Comparison of three generic vancomycin products using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and an online tool

Stability of Generic Formulations of Bortezomib 1.0 and 2.5 mg/mL in Vials and Syringes Stored at 4°C and Room Temperature (23°C or 25°C)

BACKGROUND

The availability of generic versions of bortezomib raises questions about the reliability of extrapolating stability data from one brand to another.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the stability of bortezomib formulations available from Janssen, Teva Canada, Actavis Pharma, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Apotex, and MDA, reconstituted with 0.9% sodium chloride (normal saline) to produce solutions of either 1.0 or 2.5 mg/mL and stored over at least 21 days under refrigeration (4°C) or at room temperature (either 23°C or 25°C) in the manufacturer's original glass vials or in polypropylene syringes.

METHODS

On study day 0, solutions with concentration 1.0 mg/mL or 2.5 mg/mL of the Teva, Actavis, Dr. Reddy's, Apotex, and MDA generic formulations were prepared. Three units of each type of container (glass vials and syringes) were stored at 4°C and 3 units at room temperature. Concentration and physical inspection were completed on at least 8 study days (including day 0) over a 21- to 84-day study period. Bortezomib concentrations were determined by a validated stability-indicating liquid chromatographic method with ultraviolet detection. The end point of these studies was the time to reach 90% of the initial concentration (T-90) with 95% confidence, which is expressed as "T-9095%CI", where CI refers to the confidence interval. In addition to estimating the T-9095%CI, differences in stability among products from all manufacturers were compared using multiple linear regression. Previously published data for the Janssen product were included in the overall comparisons.

RESULTS

In all of the studies, the analytical method separated degradation products from bortezomib, such that the concentration of bortezomib was measured specifically, accurately (deviations < 2.5%), and reproducibly (average replicate error 2.5%). During all studies, solutions retained more than 94% of the initial concentration at 4°C. The T-9095%CI exceeded the study period for all formulations under all combinations of concentration, container, and temperature, except the 84-day study for the MDA product. Multiple linear regression showed no significant differences among manufacturers (p = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, formulations of bortezomib currently marketed in Canada (by Janssen, Teva Canada, Actavis Pharma, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Apotex, and MDA) were pharmaceutically equivalent and interchangeable. Given that there was no difference in stability related to manufacturer, nominal concentration, or container, we conclude that these formulations are physically and chemically stable for at least 35 days under refrigeration and at least 25 days at room temperature.

In vitro stability of three oral vancomycin preparations stored at 2- 5 °C and ambient room temperature for up to 60 days against 100 Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile and 51Staphylococcus aureus strains

Oral vancomycin is used to treat Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection. Several different preparations are available including reconstituted IV solutions, vancomycin capsules, and grape flavored vancomycin oral solution kit (CutisPharma). The shelf life for IV after reconstitution varies between 7 and 14 days under refrigeration, and a standard 30 days for vancomycin oral solution kit (CutisPharma). The impact of storage on the in vitro potency was determined in 3 different vancomycin preparations by measuring MICs for 100 strains of C. difficile and 25 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, at T₀, 14, 30, and 60 days, stored at ambient (RT) and refrigerated (2-5 °C) temperatures. All vancomycin preparations showed potency over a period of 60 days regardless of storage conditions. However, the capsule preparation showed mold after 60 days at room temperature, but unlike vancomycin oral solution kit, which retained a clear appearance, the IV and capsule preps showed evidence of crystallization.

Elution and Mechanical Strength of Vancomycin-Loaded Bone Cement: In Vitro Study of the Influence of Brand Combination

Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is widely used in orthopaedic surgery for both prevention and treatment of infection. Little is known about the effect of different brand combinations of antibiotic and bone cement on the elution profile and mechanical strength of ALBC. Standardized specimens that consisted of one of the 4 brands of bone cement and one of the 3 brands of vancomycin were fashioned, producing 12 combinations of ALBC. Two dosages of vancomycin in 40g bone cement were used to represent the high (4g vancomycin) and low (1g vancomycin) dose groups. Concentrations of vancomycin elution from ALBC was measured for up to 336 hours. The ultimate compression strength was tested at axial compression using a material testing machine before and after elution. In both high-dose and low-dose groups, Lyo-Vancin in PALACOS bone cement resulted in the highest cumulative elution and Vanco in Simplex P bone cement resulted in the lowest elution (458% and 65% higher in high- and low-dose groups, respectively). The mechanical strength was not significantly compromised in all groups with low dose vancomycin (range: 70.31 ± 2.74 MPa to 87.28 ± 8.26MPa after elution). However, with the addition of high dose vancomycin, there was a mixed amount of reduction in the ultimate compression strength after cement aging, ranging from 5% (Vanco in Simplex P, 81.10 ± 0.48 MPa after elution) to 38% (Sterile vancomycin in CMW, 60.94 ± 5.74 MPa after elution). We concluded that the selection of brands of vancomycin and bone cement has a great impact on the release efficacy and mechanical strength of ALBC.

Demonstration of Therapeutic Equivalence of Fluconazole Generic Products in the Neutropenic Mouse Model of Disseminated Candidiasis

Some generics of antibacterials fail therapeutic equivalence despite being pharmaceutical equivalents of their innovators, but data are scarce with antifungals. We used the neutropenic mice model of disseminated candidiasis to challenge the therapeutic equivalence of three generic products of fluconazole compared with the innovator in terms of concentration of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, analytical chemistry (liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry), in vitro susceptibility testing, single-dose serum pharmacokinetics in infected mice, and in vivo pharmacodynamics. Neutropenic, five week-old, murine pathogen free male mice of the strain Udea:ICR(CD-2) were injected in the tail vein with Candida albicans GRP-0144 (MIC = 0.25 mg/L) or Candida albicans CIB-19177 (MIC = 4 mg/L). Subcutaneous therapy with fluconazole (generics or innovator) and sterile saline (untreated controls) started 2 h after infection and ended 24 h later, with doses ranging from no effect to maximal effect (1 to 128 mg/kg per day) divided every 3 or 6 hours. The Hill’s model was fitted to the data by nonlinear regression, and results from each group compared by curve fitting analysis. All products were identical in terms of concentration, chromatographic and spectrographic profiles, MICs, mouse pharmacokinetics, and in vivo pharmacodynamic parameters. In conclusion, the generic products studied were pharmaceutically and therapeutically equivalent to the innovator of fluconazole.

Nephrotoxicity comparison of two commercially available generic vancomycin products

To date, no comparative clinical studies have investigated the effects of different vancomycin products on nephrotoxicity. The objective of this single-center, retrospective, matched-cohort study was to investigate the impact of two different vancomycin products on the development of nephrotoxicity. The study population included adults receiving a single vancomycin product, from either Pfizer or Hospira, for their entire course of therapy. Patients were matched based on underlying nephrotoxicity risk factors. Secondary outcomes included the need for renal replacement therapy, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. One-hundred forty-six matched pairs (n = 292) were included, and they had no significant differences in demographics, comorbid conditions, severity of illness, or vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity risk factors. The frequency of nephrotoxicity was 8.9% in the Pfizer group and 11.0% in the Hospira group as defined by the 2009 consensus vancomycin guidelines (P = 0.56), 17.1% in the Pfizer group and 13.0% in the Hospira group as defined by the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) (P = 0.33), and 10.3% in the Pfizer group and 11.6% in the Hospira group as defined by RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage renal disease) criteria (P = 0.71). There were no differences between groups in regard to nephrotoxicity by any definition or in secondary outcomes. In multivariate analysis of overall nephrotoxicity risk factors, the type of vancomycin product was not independently associated with increased odds of developing nephrotoxicity according to the RIFLE criteria. Based on our results, there are no discernible differences between Pfizer and Hospira vancomycin products in the frequency of nephrotoxicity. Confirmation of these results with other types of vancomycin and different patient populations is warranted.

Vancomycin-associated renal dysfunction: where are we now?

Vancomycin has been in clinical use for over 60 years, during which time renal toxicity has been well documented. Multiple risk factors and outcomes are associated with vancomycin-related nephrotoxicity. Risk factors include vancomycin exposure (trough levels 15 mg/L or higher, larger area under the curve, duration of therapy), host susceptibility to vancomycin (increased body weight, preexisting renal dysfunction, critical illness), and concurrent nephrotoxin therapy. Nephrotoxicity is associated with prolonged hospital stays, mortality, and the need for renal replacement therapy. To what degree vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity exacerbates these adverse clinical outcomes remains unclear. This article reviews the current evidence on vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity and explores future research directions with potential implications for improved patient safety.