Volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination's success

Dual Coaching of Medical Clerkship Students' History Taking Skills by Volunteer Inpatients at the Bedside and Faculty Physicians on Zoom During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Purpose

Coaching is a well-described means of providing real-time, actionable feedback to learners. We aimed to determine whether dual coaching from faculty physicians and real inpatients led to an improvement in history-taking skills of clerkship medical students.

Patients and Methods

Expert faculty physicians (on Zoom) directly observed 13 clerkship medical students as they obtained a history from 26 real, hospitalized inpatients (in person), after which students received immediate feedback from both the physician and the patient. De-identified audio-video recordings of all interviews were scored by independent judges using a previously validated clinical rating tool to assess for improvement in history-taking skills between the two interviews. Finally, all participants completed a survey with Likert scale questions and free-text prompts.

Results

Students' history-taking skills - specifically in the domains of communication, medical knowledge and professional conduct - on the validated rating tool, as evaluated by the independent judges, did not significantly improve between their first and second patient interviews. However, students rated the dual coaching as overwhelmingly positive (average score of 1.43, with 1 being Excellent and 5 being Poor), with many appreciating the specificity and timeliness of the feedback. Patients also rated the experience very highly (average score of 1.23, with 1 being Excellent and 5 being Poor), noting that they gained new insights into medical training.

Conclusion

Students value receiving immediate and specific feedback and real patients enjoy participating in the feedback process. Dual physician-patient coaching is a unique way to incorporate more direct observation into undergraduate medical education curricula.

Internal medicine intern performance on the gastrointestinal physical exam

OBJECTIVES

The gastrointestinal (GI) physical exam provides critical information about underlying disease states. However, since assessment of physical examination skills is rarely conducted as part of internal medicine residency training, little is known about resident performance on the GI physical exam.

METHODS

During a clinical skills assessment that took place between November 2019 and February 2020, internal medicine interns examined the same patient with chronic liver disease while being observed by faculty preceptors. We compared the exam maneuvers performed with those expected by the faculty evaluators. We noted which maneuvers were performed incorrectly, whether physical exam technique correlated with identification of physical exam findings, and if performance on the physical exam was associated with building an appropriate differential diagnosis. This four-hour assessment was required for internal medicine interns within two different residency programs in the Baltimore area.

RESULTS

More than half of the 29 participating interns (n=17, 58.6 %) received a "needs improvement" score on their physical exam technique. Technique was highly correlated with identifying the correct physical signs (r=0.88, p<0.0001). The most commonly excluded maneuvers were assessing for splenomegaly and hepatomegaly. The most commonly missed findings were splenomegaly and hepatomegaly. Most interns included chronic liver disease as part of their differential diagnosis even if they received "needs improvement" scores on physical exam technique or identifying physical signs.

CONCLUSIONS

Internal medicine interns would benefit from learning an organized approach to the gastrointestinal exam. This would likely lead to increased identification of important gastrointestinal findings.

Relationship of Physical Examination Technique to Associated Clinical Skills: Results from a Direct Observation Assessment

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this research was to use direct observation of the physical examination to elucidate the role physical examination technique plays in diagnostic accuracy. Physical examination is important for quality clinical care and requires multiple interrelated skills. The relationship of physical examination technique to related skills is poorly understood. Current methods of teaching and assessing physical examination skills provide few opportunities to evaluate physical examination technique and accuracy.

METHODS

The authors developed a clinical examination assessment using volunteer patients and direct observation. Trained faculty preceptors rated resident performance in 7 domains: 1) physical examination technique, 2) identification of physical signs, 3) clinical communication, 4) differential diagnosis, 5) clinical judgment, 6) managing patient concerns, and 7) maintaining patient welfare. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine relationships between performance in each of these domains. Data on residents' self-assessed competency in the physical examination and perceptions of feedback received during the assessment were collected.

RESULTS

From December 2018 to February 2020, 113 interns from 2 internal medicine residency programs participated in the assessment. Physical examination technique was significantly correlated with accurate identification of physical signs, differential diagnosis and clinical judgment. Time spent in graduate medical education was negatively correlated with performance. Interns more highly rated the feedback received from this assessment than traditional clinical skills feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings emphasize the necessity of multi-dimensional physical examination assessment. Observed deterioration of physical examination skill during internship may reflect contemporary practice patterns, which deprioritize the physical examination. Future research on physical examination education should focus on the interface between physical examination technique and related clinical skills.