1
|
van der Merwe NC, Buccimazza I, Rossouw B, Araujo M, Ntaita KS, Schoeman M, Vorster K, Napo K, Kotze MJ, Oosthuizen J. Clinical relevance of double heterozygosity revealed by next-generation sequencing of homologous recombination repair pathway genes in South African breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 207:331-342. [PMID: 38814507 PMCID: PMC11297091 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07362-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetically predisposed breast cancer (BC) patients represent a minor but clinically meaningful subgroup of the disease, with 25% of all cases associated with actionable variants in BRCA1/2. Diagnostic implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) resulted in the rare identification of BC patients with double heterozygosity for deleterious variants in genes partaking in homologous recombination repair of DNA. As clinical heterogeneity poses challenges for genetic counseling, this study focused on the occurrence and clinical relevance of double heterozygous BC in South Africa. METHODS DNA samples were diagnostically screened using the NGS-based Oncomine™ BRCA Expanded Research Assay. Data was generated on the Ion GeneStudio S5 system and analyzed using the Torrent Suite™ and reporter software. The clinical significance of the variants detected was determined using international variant classification guidelines and treatment implications. RESULTS Six of 1600 BC patients (0.375%) tested were identified as being bi-allelic for two germline likely pathogenic or pathogenic variants. Most of the variants were present in BRCA1/2, including two founder-related small deletions in three cases, with family-specific variants detected in ATM, BARD1, FANCD2, NBN, and TP53. The scientific interpretation and clinical relevance were based on the clinical and tumor characteristics of each case. CONCLUSION This study increased current knowledge of the risk implications associated with the co-occurrence of more than one pathogenic variant in the BC susceptibility genes, confirmed to be a rare condition in South Africa. Further molecular pathology-based studies are warranted to determine whether clinical decision-making is affected by the detection of a second pathogenic variant in BRCA1/2 and TP53 carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nerina C van der Merwe
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
| | - Ines Buccimazza
- Genetics Unit, Inkosi Albert Luthuli General Hospital, Durban, South Africa
- Department of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, Inkosi Albert Luthuli General Hospital, Durban, South Africa
| | - Bianca Rossouw
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Monica Araujo
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Kholiwe S Ntaita
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Mardelle Schoeman
- Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Karin Vorster
- Department of Oncology, Free State Department of Health, Universitas Annex Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Kgabo Napo
- Department of Oncology, Free State Department of Health, Universitas Annex Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Maritha J Kotze
- Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, National Health Laboratory Service, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jaco Oosthuizen
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chua GWY, Li L. Treatment Options for Early Stage Inoperable Breast Cancer: Cryoablation or Radiotherapy? Breast Care (Basel) 2024; 19:106-115. [PMID: 38645759 PMCID: PMC11026071 DOI: 10.1159/000536413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical removal of the tumour is the gold standard treatment for early stage invasive breast cancer. However, with a global ageing population, a larger number of diagnoses are occurring in women with comorbidities that render them unsuitable for surgery. Hence, it is of interest to explore alternative treatment strategies for this group of women. Summary Our narrative review aims to explore two such techniques, cryoablation and external beam radiotherapy, providing a brief summary of the evidence behind each technique. Following this, we discuss which groups of patients would gain the most benefit from each technique. Factors favouring the use of radiotherapy include patients with larger tumours, more superficial tumours, and those with less well-demarcated tumours where there is uncertainty regarding tumour extent. Meanwhile, patients who may benefit more from cryoablation include those who desire a smaller number of treatment sessions, have concerns regarding cosmesis and skin pigmentation, or who have relative contraindications to radiotherapy such as scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus, reduced lung function, or cardiac comorbidities. Key Messages Continued advancements in both cryoablation and radiotherapy technologies are taking place, in tandem with imaging technologies enabling greater certainty in tumour detection and delineation. These factors will help increase local control rates in this group of non-operable early stage breast cancer patients. Through this review, we hope to aid in the clinical decision-making process regarding the selection and referral of patients for each treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail Wan Ying Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lucia Li
- Medical Sciences Division, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Porras LM, Padilla N, Moles-Fernández A, Feliubadaló L, Santamariña-Pena M, Sánchez AT, López-Novo A, Blanco A, de la Hoya M, Molina IJ, Osorio A, Pineda M, Rueda D, Ruiz-Ponte C, Vega A, Lázaro C, Díez O, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, de la Cruz X. A New Set of in Silico Tools to Support the Interpretation of ATM Missense Variants Using Graphical Analysis. J Mol Diagn 2024; 26:17-28. [PMID: 37865290 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Establishing the pathogenic nature of variants in ATM, a gene associated with breast cancer and other hereditary cancers, is crucial for providing patients with adequate care. Unfortunately, achieving good variant classification is still difficult. To address this challenge, we extended the range of in silico tools with a series of graphical tools devised for the analysis of computational evidence by health care professionals. We propose a family of fast and easy-to-use graphical representations in which the impact of a variant is considered relative to other pathogenic and benign variants. To illustrate their value, the representations are applied to three problems in variant interpretation. The assessment of computational pathogenicity predictions showed that the graphics provide an intuitive view of prediction reliability, complementing and extending conventional numerical reliability indexes. When applied to variant of unknown significance populations, the representations shed light on the nature of these variants and can be used to prioritize variants of unknown significance for further studies. In a third application, the graphics were used to compare the two versions of the ATM-adapted American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines, obtaining valuable information on their relative virtues and weaknesses. Finally, a server [ATMision (ATM missense in silico interpretation online)] was generated for users to apply these representations in their variant interpretation problems, to check the ATM-adapted guidelines' criteria for computational evidence on their variant(s) and access different sources of information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luz-Marina Porras
- Research Unit in Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natàlia Padilla
- Research Unit in Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alejandro Moles-Fernández
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lidia Feliubadaló
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Program in Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Santamariña-Pena
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alysson T Sánchez
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Oncobell Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anael López-Novo
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Ana Blanco
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio J Molina
- Instituto de Biopatología y Medicina Regenerativa, Universidad de Granada and Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
| | - Ana Osorio
- Familial Cancer Clinical Unit, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre, Madrid, Spain; Spanish Network on Rare Diseases, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Pineda
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Program in Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Rueda
- Hereditary Cancer Laboratory, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, i+12 Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Clara Ruiz-Ponte
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Program in Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain
| | - Orland Díez
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain; Area of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Xavier de la Cruz
- Research Unit in Clinical and Translational Bioinformatics, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Allali S, Kirova Y. Radiodermatitis and Fibrosis in the Context of Breast Radiation Therapy: A Critical Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235928. [PMID: 34885037 PMCID: PMC8656525 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Skin toxicity is the main complication during irradiation in the management of early-stage breast cancer. In some cases, it may cause treatment to stop. These toxicities may be acute (mainly radiodermatitis) and/or late (mainly fibrosis). Their understandings, their mechanisms of occurrence, as well as their management is indispensable in order to improve the management of these patients. Through this study we propose to provide a clear picture of these toxicities in relation to the modalities of radiotherapy, advances in their quantification, and management to help practitioners improve their knowledge and clinical practices on this topic. Abstract Background: Radiation therapy has been progressively improved in order to maintain a satisfactory tumour response, while reducing toxicity. We will review the incidence of radiodermatitis and fibrosis according to the various radiation and fractionation techniques. We will then focus on the various methods used to manage, prevent, and quantify this toxicity. Method: More than 1753 articles were identified using the various search terms. We selected 53 articles to answer the questions addressed in this study according to criteria set in advance. Result: The literature reports lower acute toxicity with IMRT compared to 3DCRT, but no significant differences in terms of late toxicities. Partial breast irradiation appears to be less effective in terms of local control with a higher rate of late toxicity. Intra operative radiation therapy appears to provide good results in terms of both local control and late toxicity. The hypofractionation has equivalent efficacy and safety to the normofractionated regimen, but with lower rates of radiodermatitis and fibrosis. The adddition of a boost, particularly a sequential boost, increases the risk of fibrosis and radiodermatitis during treatment. Conclusion: The development of IMRT has significantly reduced acute toxicity and has improved tolerability during treatment. Modified fractionation has reduced treatment time, as well as adverse effects.
Collapse
|