Update on the use of topical calcineurin inhibitors in cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Comparison of effectiveness of topical tacrolimus 0.1% vs topical halobetasol propionate 0.05% as an add-on to oral hydroxychloroquine in discoid lupus erythematosus

In recent years, calcineurin inhibitors have been used as the first line alternative to topical corticosteroids in the treatment of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical tacrolimus 0.1% vs topical halobetasol propionate 0.05% in patients with DLE. This comparative study was carried out in the Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital (CMCH), Bangladesh between the period of July 2018 and June 2019. The change of DLE activity assessed with the cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index was used as a primary outcome measure. The effective sample was 40 patients in each group. Both groups were similar in terms of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. After 8 weeks of treatment, the mean total erythema score decreased significantly in both groups (in tacrolimus treated group [TTG] from 12.53 ± 8.05 to 8.03 ± 5.69, [P < .001] and in halobetasol propionate treated group [HTG] from 11.83 ± 7.17 to 7.30 ± 4.56 [P < .001]), as well as the mean total scale/hypertrophy score (in TTG from 8.08 ± 5.30 to 4.33 ± 3.21; [P < .001] and in HTG from 7.40 ± 4.73 to 3.68 ± 2.01, [P < .001]. The magnitude of reduction was significantly better in HTG [P = .032]). The mean total activity score decreased significantly in both groups (in TTG from 22.95 ± 13.40 to 14.33 ± 8.89, [P < .001] and in HTG from 22.15 ± 11.95 to 13.7 ± 7.22, [P < .001]). The present study demonstrated that tacrolimus 0.1% ointment and halobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment had a comparable efficacy in DLE patients; however, halobetasol showed significantly better improvement regarding scaly, hypertrophic lesions.

Therapeutic options for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: recent advances and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Treatment and prevention are of critical importance in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), as the disease can have a devastating effect on patient well-being and quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a selective search of the PubMed database for articles published between December 2010 and November 2015. This review encompasses both non-pharmaceutical (photoprotection, smoking cessation, drug withdrawal, and vitamin D replacement) and pharmaceutical (topicals, antimalarials, immunosuppressives, biologics, etc.) interventions used in the treatment of CLE. Expert Commentary: Recent work has expanded our understanding of established therapies as well as introduced new treatments for consideration, though existing medications still prove inadequate for a subset of patients. Changes in trial design may help to alleviate this issue.

Lupus erythematosus: considerations about clinical, cutaneous and therapeutic aspects

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is a chronic inflammatory disease with multifactorial etiology. Although clinical manifestations are varied, the skin is an important target-organ, which contributes to the inclusion of skin lesions in 4 out of the 17 new criteria for the diagnosis of the disease, according to the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics. The cutaneous manifestations of lupus are pleomorphic. Depending on their clinical characteristics, they can be classified into Acute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus, Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus, Chronic Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus and Intermittent Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus. Treatment is based on preventive measures, reversal of inflammation, prevention of damage to target organs and relief of adverse events due to pharmacological therapy. The most commonly used treatment options are topical, systemic and surgical treatment, as well as phototherapy. The correct handling of the cases depends on a careful evaluation of the morphology of the lesions and the patient's general status, always taking into consideration not only the benefits but also the side effects of each therapeutic proposal.

Treatment of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Review and Assessment of Treatment Benefits Based on Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Criteria

The treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus is centered upon formulating a regimen of topical and systemic therapies designed to reduce disease activity and minimize cosmetic damage. Sun avoidance and sunscreen are important preventative measures proven to minimize cutaneous lupus erythematosus exacerbations. Limited disease is typically managed with topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. Antimalarial therapy is the gold standard of systemic therapy. Many other treatments have been studied in patients with recalcitrant cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and their use must be evaluated based on individual risk-benefit concerns. R-salbutamol and pulsed dye laser therapy have proven to be effective topical alternatives. Additional systemic agents include retinoids, immunosuppressants, immunomodulators, biologics, and other experimental therapies with novel modes of action. According to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine criteria for evaluating the strength of evidence supporting an individual treatment measure, no therapy for cutaneous lupus erythematosus has achieved Level 1 status. This demonstrates the need for randomized, controlled trials and systematic reviews of all cutaneous lupus erythematosus interventions in order to meet increasing standards and demand for evidence-based practice.