Managing Atopic Dermatitis with Lebrikizumab - The Evidence to Date

Emerging drugs for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a focus on phase 2 and phase 3 trials

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin condition that affects millions of pediatric and adult patients with well-studied impact on morbidity and quality of life. Management occurs in a stepwise fashion beginning with preventative measures before immunomodulators are introduced. However, challenges remain in treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis that is refractory to first- and second-line treatments and there are only few topical anti-inflammatory options, especially for pediatric patients.

AREAS COVERED

New medications are required to address these gaps as lesions may persist despite treatment or patients may discontinue treatment due to actual or anticipated adverse effects of mainstay medications. Emerging research into the pathophysiology of AD and the immune system at large has provided opportunities for novel interventions aimed at stopping AD mechanisms at new checkpoints. Clinical trials for 36 agents currently in phase 2 or phase 3 are evaluated with particular focus on the studies for, B244, CBP-201, tapinarof, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, amlitelimab, and rocatinlimab as they explore novel pathways and have some of the most promising results.

EXPERT OPINION

These clinical trials contribute to the evolution of AD treatment toward greater precision based on salient pathways with a particular focus on moderate-to-severe AD to enhance efficacy and minimize adverse effects.

Engineered polyspecific antibodies: A new frontier in the field of immunotherapeutics

The 21st-century beginning remarked with the huge success of monospecific MAbs, however, in the last couple of years, polyspecific MAbs (PsAbs) have been an interesting topic and show promise of being biobetter than monospecific MAbs. Polyspecificity, in which a single antibody serves multiple specific target binding, has been hypothesized to contribute to the development of a highly effective antibody repertoire for immune defence. This polyspecific MAb trend represents an explosion that is gripping the whole pharmaceutical industry. This review is concerned with the current development and quality enforcement of PsAbs. All provided literature on monospecific MAbs and polyspecific MAbs (PsAbs) were searched using various electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Elsevier, Springer, ACS, Google Patent and books via the keywords Antibody engineering, Polyspecific antibody, Conventional antibody, non-conventional antibody, and Single domain antibody. In the literature, there are more than 100 different formats to construct PsAb by quadroma technology, chemical conjugation and genetic engineering. Till March 2023, nine PsAb have been approved around the world, and around 330 are in advanced developmental stages, showing the dominancy of PsAb in the growing health sector. Recent advancements in protein engineering techniques and the fusion of non-conventional antibodies have made it possible to create complex PsAbs that demonstrate higher stability and enhanced potency. This marks the most significant achievement for cancer immunotherapy, in which PsAbs have immense promise. It is worth mentioning that seven out of the nine PsAbs have been approved as anti-cancer therapy. As PsAbs continue to acquire prominence, they could pave the way for the development of novel immunotherapies for multiple diseases.

Novel Immunopharmacological Drugs for the Treatment of Allergic Diseases

The exponential rise in the prevalence of allergic diseases since the mid-twentieth century has led to a genuine public health emergency and has also fostered major progress in research on the underlying mechanisms and potential treatments. The management of allergic diseases benefits from the biological revolution, with an array of novel immunomodulatory therapeutic and investigational tools targeting players of allergic inflammation at distinct pathophysiological steps. Prominent examples include therapeutic monoclonal antibodies against cytokines, alarmins, and their receptors, as well as small-molecule modifiers of signal transduction mainly mediated by Janus kinases and Bruton's tyrosine kinases. However, the first-line therapeutic options have yet to switch from symptomatic to disease-modifying interventions. Here we present an overview of available drugs in the context of our current understanding of allergy pathophysiology, identify potential therapeutic targets, and conclude by providing a selection of candidate immunopharmacological molecules under investigation for potential future use in allergic diseases.

Clinical trials of antibody drugs in the treatments of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common, relapsing, chronic inflammatory skin disease, being regarded as a global health issue. Recent studies have shown that Th2 cell-mediated type 2 immunity plays a central role in AD. The type 2 inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-13, IL-22, IL-31, IL-17 and IL-5 mediate the pathogenesis of AD. A variety of antibody drugs targeting these cytokines have been developed to treat AD in clinics. Notably, several antibody drugs have exhibited high efficacy in treating atopic dermatitis in previous studies, demonstrating that they could be therapeutic methods for AD patients. Herein, we reviewed the clinical trials of antibody drugs in the treatment of AD, which provides a useful guideline for clinicians to treat patients with AD in clinics.

The role of lebrikizumab in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in the adult population

Although there are many atopic dermatitis (AD) treatments, finding a long-term medication with minimal side effects can be difficult. This review characterizes lebrikizumab as AD treatment in adults. A literature search was conducted to examine lebrikizumab's role in treating moderate to severe AD. In a phase III trial, 74% of adults with AD treated with lebrikizumab 250 mg every 4 weeks achieved an Investigator Global Assessment of 0/1, 79% achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 and 79% experienced improvements in pruritus numeric rating scale scores relative to placebo. Common adverse effects in the ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 trials were conjunctivitis (7 and 8%, respectively), nasopharyngitis (4 and 5%, respectively) and headache (3 and 5%, respectively). Results from clinical trials suggest that lebrikizumab may be a viable alternative for AD management.

Pruritogenic Mediators and New Antipruritic Drugs in Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common highly pruritic chronic inflammatory skin disorder affecting 5-20% of children worldwide, while the prevalence in adults varies from 7 to 10%. Patients with AD experience intense pruritus that could lead to sleep disturbance and impaired quality of life. Here, we analyze the pathophysiology of itchiness in AD. We extensively review the histamine-dependent and histamine-independent pruritogens. Several receptors, substance P, secreted molecules, chemokines, and cytokines are involved as mediators in chronic itch. We also, summarize the new emerging antipruritic drugs in atopic dermatitis.

Treatment options for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis

Background: The treatment of chronic refractory moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has traditionally relied on broad-spectrum systemic anti-inflammatory agents. With the introduction of biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors (Jakinib), the step management of moderate-to-severe AD is rapidly changing; however, guidelines have yet to provide formal recommendations for how to best incorporate these agents into the treatment plan. Objective: To summarize the updated evidence-based medical treatment for AD, including a proposed position for biologics and Jakinibs in the treatment algorithm. Methods: A literature search of several medical literature data bases for guidelines, position papers, systematic reviews, and clinical trials from 2012 to 2022 on the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD was conducted to prepare this narrative review. Results: Emollients and topical corticosteroids are the mainstay for treating acute flares and for maintaining chronic control. Second-line topical agents include calcineurin inhibitors, e.g., tacrolimus and pimecrolimus; crisaborole; and ruxolitinib. For acute flares, cyclosporine is preferred over systemic corticosteroids. For chronic treatment, phototherapy should be considered before systemic anti-inflammatory agents. Of the traditional anti-inflammatory agents, cyclosporine is the first-line choice, with methotrexate and azathioprine equal secondary choices. Although abrocitinib may have better efficacy then dupilumab based on indirect comparisons, abrocitinib requires closer monitoring for adverse events. Based on package labeling, Jakinibs, e.g., abrocitinib and upadacitinib, should be used only after failure with other systemic agents, including biologics (e.g., dupilumab and tralokinumab). Biologics and Jakinibs should be considered before the traditional systemic anti-inflammatory agents. Conclusion: Clinicians should consider a modified step management for AD as they await the development of national and international guideline recommendations for how best to position the biologics and Jakinibs into the AD treatment algorithm.

The IL-4/-13 Axis and Its Blocking in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease with a complex pathophysiology, intertwining immune dysregulation, epidermal barrier dysfunction, IgE sensitization, environmental factors and genetic predisposition. It has been recently identified that interleukins -4 and -13 play crucial roles in the type-2-driven inflammation that characterizes AD, contributing to its symptomatology. Novel therapeutic approaches that target Th2 cytokines and their respective pathways have been developed, aiming to optimize the treatment of AD.

Biologics and Small Molecule Inhibitors: an Update in Therapies for Allergic and Immunologic Skin Diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Biologics and small molecule inhibitors (SMIs) are a rapidly growing class of highly efficacious therapies in the treatment of chronic immunologic and allergic conditions. With precision targeting of inflammatory signaling molecules, these new agents selectively modulate the immune system to treat a variety of conditions. Dermatologic diseases, including atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, are of particular interest due to the growing number of new biologics and SMIs in recent years. This review serves to summarize and evaluate the recent literature regarding biologics and SMIs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Currently approved biologics for AD achieve clear or almost clear skin in less than 40% of patients treated. Several biologics that are still under investigation for AD have shown better efficacy in phase III trials with similar safety profiles. Recently approved SMIs for AD also demonstrate a high degree of efficacy, but safety profiles may limit their use. Psoriasis has several highly efficacious biologics on the market; however, only one SMI is currently available. Additional SMIs for psoriasis have completed phase III trials and demonstrated high efficacy. This article evaluates recent literature on biologics and small molecule inhibitors for AD and psoriasis.