1
|
Azzeri A, Dahlui M, Mohamed R, McDonald SA, Jaafar H, Shabaruddin FH. Budget impact analysis of two treatment approaches for hepatitis C in Malaysia through the use of voluntary and compulsory licensing options. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1114560. [PMID: 36935675 PMCID: PMC10015636 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1114560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction A scaled-up treatment cascade with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy is necessary to achieve global WHO targets for hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination in Malaysia. Recently, limited access to sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (SOF/DAC) is available through compulsory licensing, with access to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) expected through voluntary licensing due to recent agreements. SOF/VEL has superior clinical outcomes but has higher drug acquisition costs compared to SOF/DAC. A stratified treatment cascade might be the most cost-efficient approach for Malaysia whereby all HCV patients are treated with SOF/DAC except for patients with cirrhosis who are treated with SOF/VEL. Methods This study aimed to conduct a 5-year budget impact analysis of the proposed stratified treatment cascade for HCV treatment in Malaysia. A disease progression model that was developed based on model-predicted HCV epidemiology data was used for the analysis, where all HCV patients in scenario A were treated with SOF/DAC for all disease stages while in scenario B, SOF/DAC was used only for non-cirrhotic patients and SOF/VEL was used for the cirrhotic patients. Healthcare costs associated with DAA therapy and disease stage monitoring were included to estimate the downstream cost implications. Results The stratified treatment cascade with 109 in Scenario B was found to be cost-saving compared to Scenario A. The cumulative savings for the stratified treatment cascade was USD 1.4 million over 5 years. Discussion A stratified treatment cascade with SOF/VEL was expected to be cost-saving and can result in a budget impact reduction in overall healthcare expenditure in Malaysia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amirah Azzeri
- Public Health Unit, Department of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
- Department of Research, Development and Innovation, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Maznah Dahlui
- Department of Research, Development and Innovation, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Centre of Population Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Rosmawati Mohamed
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Scott Alexander McDonald
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Hafiz Jaafar
- Public Health Unit, Department of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
| | - Fatiha Hana Shabaruddin
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- *Correspondence: Fatiha Hana Shabaruddin
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marquez LK, Chaillon A, Soe KP, Johnson DC, Zosso JM, Incerti A, Loarec A, Nguyen A, Walker JG, Mafirakureva N, Lo Re Iii V, Wynn A, McIntosh C, Kiene SM, Brodine S, Garfein RS, Vickerman P, Martin NK. Cost and cost-effectiveness of a real-world HCV treatment program among HIV-infected individuals in Myanmar. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2020-004181. [PMID: 33627360 PMCID: PMC7908309 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Over half of those hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV coinfected live in low-income and middle-income countries, and many remain undiagnosed or untreated. In 2016, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) established a direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment programme for people HCV/HIV coinfected in Myanmar. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the real-world cost and cost-effectiveness of this programme, and potential cost-effectiveness if implemented by the Ministry of Health (MoH). Methods Costs (patient-level microcosting) and treatment outcomes were collected from the MSF prospective cohort study in Dawei, Myanmar. A Markov model was used to assess cost-effectiveness of the programme compared with no HCV treatment from a health provider perspective. Estimated lifetime and healthcare costs (in 2017 US$) and health outcomes (in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs)) were simulated to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), compared with a willingness-to-pay threshold of per capita Gross Domestic Product in Myanmar ($1250). We evaluated cost-effectiveness with updated quality-assured generic DAA prices and potential cost-effectiveness of a proposed simplified treatment protocol with updated DAA prices if implemented by the MoH. Results From November 2016 to October 2017, 122 with HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were treated with DAAs (46% with cirrhosis), 96% (n=117) achieved sustained virological response. Mean treatment costs were $1229 (without cirrhosis) and $1971 (with cirrhosis), with DAA drugs being the largest contributor to cost. Compared with no treatment, the program was cost-effective (ICER $634/DALY averted); more so with updated prices for quality-assured generic DAAs (ICER $488/DALY averted). A simplified treatment protocol delivered by the MoH could be cost-effective if associated with similar outcomes (ICER $316/DALY averted). Conclusions Using MSF programme data, the DAA treatment programme for HCV among HIV-coinfected individuals is cost-effective in Myanmar, and even more so with updated DAA prices. A simplified treatment protocol could enhance cost-effectiveness if further rollout demonstrates it is not associated with worse treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara K Marquez
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA .,School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Antoine Chaillon
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Kyi Pyar Soe
- Medical Department, Dawei Project, Doctors Without Borders, Dawei, Myanmar
| | - Derek C Johnson
- Medical Department, Myanmar Project, Doctors Without Borders, Yangon, Myanmar
| | - Jean-Marc Zosso
- Finance Department, Myanmar Project, Doctors Without Borders, Yangon, Myanmar
| | - Andrea Incerti
- Medical Department, Doctors Without Borders, Geneva Operational Center, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anne Loarec
- Epidemiology, Epicentre, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Aude Nguyen
- Medical Department, Doctors Without Borders, Geneva Operational Center, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Vincent Lo Re Iii
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adriane Wynn
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Craig McIntosh
- School of Global Policy and Strategy, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Susan M Kiene
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Stephanie Brodine
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Richard S Garfein
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Peter Vickerman
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Natasha K Martin
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|