A medicoeconomic review of early intervention with biologic agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases

Direct transition from rapid-infusion originator to rapid-infusion biosimilar tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in children with inflammatory bowel disease: A case series

PURPOSE

Biosimilar tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (b-TNFi) reduce healthcare costs and maintain equal efficacy when compared to their originator counterparts (o-TNFi). Current practice is to start patients on a slower standard infusion rate during the initial transition from an o-TNFi to a b-TNFi. There is a knowledge gap around switching from rapid originator infusion to rapid biosimilar infusion in the pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population.

SUMMARY

We present a case series of 8 pediatric patients with IBD who were switched from a rapid-infusion o-TNFi to a rapid-infusion b-TNFi from 2016 through 2022. Our primary interest was safety, which we evaluated based on the occurrence of infusion reactions or need for new premedications within the first 6 months of starting a b-TNFi. We also examined effectiveness through the incidence of IBD-related hospitalizations, TNFi failure, and need for co-medication or dose escalation over the same period. In our cohort, 4 patients had Crohn's disease and 4 had ulcerative colitis. All patients were switched to a biosimilar for nonmedical reasons. During the follow-up period, no patients had infusion reactions necessitating new premedications, serious adverse events, or medication nonresponse.

CONCLUSION

Patients who directly transitioned from a rapid-infusion o-TNFi to a rapid-infusion b-TNFi did not experience serious adverse events. Given the fiscal and patient experience advantages of rapid-rate infusions, larger studies are needed to consider a change in practice.

Health-care costs of inflammatory bowel disease in a pan-European, community-based, inception cohort during 5 years of follow-up: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) places a significant burden on health-care systems because of its chronicity and need for expensive therapies and surgery. With increasing use of biological therapies, contemporary data on IBD health-care costs are important for those responsible for allocating resources in Europe. To our knowledge, no prospective long-term analysis of the health-care costs of patients with IBD in the era of biologicals has been done in Europe. We aimed to investigate cost profiles of a pan-European, community-based inception cohort during 5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

The Epi-IBD cohort is a community-based, prospective inception cohort of unselected patients with IBD diagnosed in 2010 at centres in 20 European countries plus Israel. Incident patients who were diagnosed with IBD according to the Copenhagen Diagnostic Criteria between Jan 1, and Dec 31, 2010, and were aged 15 years or older the time of diagnosis were prospectively included. Data on clinical characteristics and direct costs (investigations and outpatient visits, blood tests, treatments, hospitalisations, and surgeries) were collected prospectively using electronic case-report forms. Patient-level costs incorporated procedures leading to the initial diagnosis of IBD and costs of IBD management during the 5-year follow-up period. Costs incurred by comorbidities and unrelated to IBD were excluded. We grouped direct costs into the following five categories: investigations (including outpatient visits and blood tests), conventional medical treatment, biological therapy, hospitalisation, and surgery.

FINDINGS

The study population consisted of 1289 patients with IBD, with 1073 (83%) patients from western Europe and 216 (17%) from eastern Europe. 488 (38%) patients had Crohn's disease, 717 (56%) had ulcerative colitis, and 84 (6%) had IBD unclassified. The mean cost per patient-year during follow-up for patients with IBD was €2609 (SD 7389; median €446 [IQR 164-1849]). The mean cost per patient-year during follow-up was €3542 (8058; median €717 [214-3512]) for patients with Crohn's disease, €2088 (7058; median €408 [133-1161]) for patients with ulcerative colitis, and €1609 (5010; median €415 [92-1228]) for patients with IBD unclassified (p<0·0001). Costs were highest in the first year and then decreased significantly during follow-up. Hospitalisations and diagnostic procedures accounted for more than 50% of costs during the first year. However, in subsequent years there was a steady increase in expenditure on biologicals, which accounted for 73% of costs in Crohn's disease and 48% in ulcerative colitis, in year 5. The mean annual cost per patient-year for biologicals was €866 (SD 3056). The mean yearly costs of biological therapy were higher in patients with Crohn's disease (€1782 [SD 4370]) than in patients with ulcerative colitis (€286 [1427]) or IBD unclassified (€521 [2807]; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

Overall direct expenditure on health care decreased over a 5-year follow-up period. This period was characterised by increasing expenditure on biologicals and decreasing expenditure on conventional medical treatments, hospitalisations, and surgeries. In light of the expenditures associated with biological therapy, cost-effective treatment strategies are needed to reduce the economic burden of inflammatory bowel disease.

FUNDING

Kirsten og Freddy Johansens Fond and Nordsjællands Hospital Forskningsråd.

Estimation the direct cost of inflammatory bowel disease in Iranian patients; the one- year follow-up

AIM

We conducted this study to estimate the direct medical cost of Iranian IBD patients.

BACKGROUND

In the economic evaluation setting, descriptive epidemiological studies can provide substantial information for health system policymakers in taking accountable decisions for diseases such as Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).

METHODS

To do so, we used a self-designed checklist to collect demographic and medical cost information for IBD patients. We also tried to have a national estimation of IBD costs.

RESULTS

The mean annual medical cost of IBD was 18354.52 PPP$. Crohn's disease (CD) vs. ulcerative colitis (UC) and UC township patients vs. Tehran resident patients had higher medical costs (31160.79 PPP$; P<0.001) and (20840.23 PPP$, P<0.025). The largest medical cost spent in both IBD subtypes (CD/UC) was attributed to biological agents, especially in UC patients. We estimated that the mean annual cost of IBD in Iran for 2017 was 746315864 (95% CI: 602964172, 964685749) PPP$ (constant incidence) and 862776811 (95% CI: 697055402, 1115222835) PPP$ (increment incidence) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that for management of IBD patients, policymakers should address shifting the medical costs to biological agents, the higher cost of CD, and the impact of underlying factors on the distribution of these medical costs.

Infusion administration billing for vedolizumab and infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease

AIMS

Increasing use of biologics has led to interest in treatment components with potential for cost savings. This study was aimed at comparing administration times and associated costs of infliximab and vedolizumab infusions for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used claims data from the Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse to identify IBD patients using infliximab or vedolizumab between 20 May 2014 and 29 February 2016. Use of Current Procedural Terminology administration codes was evaluated and costs calculated using the 2016 Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule. Assessments included infusion times, associated costs, productivity loss using average wage estimates from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, and home infusion adoption.

RESULTS

A total of 10,051 infliximab and 3114 vedolizumab patients with first-hour claims were identified; 52.0% were female and 64.5% had Crohn's disease. There were 48,377 infliximab first-hour claims (mean 4.8 infusions per patient); 46,462 (96.0%) had a second-hour claim. In comparison, there were 14,717 vedolizumab claims (mean 4.7 infusions per patient), with only 411 (2.8%) second-hour claims, resulting in vedolizumab cost savings of approximately $1.27 million. The difference in second-hour infusions resulted in 46,051 additional hours of productivity loss with infliximab, and lost wages averaging $1.18 million (range $0.68-$1.77 million).

LIMITATIONS

Administration costs were inferred as charge costs and not directly assessed. Productivity loss assessed time spent on infusion only, and included a small proportion of patients beyond working age.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-hour infusion billing was significantly lower with vedolizumab than with infliximab, corresponding to cost savings and reduced productivity loss.

Protective mechanisms of 6-gingerol in dextran sulfate sodium-induced chronic ulcerative colitis in mice

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a relapsing and remitting inflammatory disease of the colon, with an increasing incidence worldwide. 6-Gingerol (6G) is a bioactive constituent of Zingiber officinale, which has been reported to possess various biological activities. This study was designed to evaluate the role of 6G in chronic UC. Chronic UC was induced in mice by three cycles of 2.5% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in drinking water. Each cycle consisted of 7 days of 2.5% DSS followed by 14 days of normal drinking water. 6G (100 mg/kg) and a reference anti-colitis drug sulfasalazine (SZ) (100 mg/kg) were orally administered daily to the mice throughout exposure to three cycles of 2.5% DSS. Administration of 6G and SZ significantly prevented disease activity index and aberrant crypt foci formation in DSS-treated mice. Furthermore, 6G and SZ suppresses immunoexpression of tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1β, inducible nitric oxide synthase, Regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), and Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in the DSS-treated mice. 6G effectively protected against colonic oxidative damage by augmenting the antioxidant status with marked decrease in lipid peroxidation levels in DSS-treated mice. Moreover, 6G significantly inhibited nuclear factor kappa B (P65), p38, cyclooxygenase-2, and β-catenin whereas it enhanced IL-10 and adenomatous polyposis coli expression in DSS-treated mice. In conclusion, 6G prevented DSS-induced chronic UC via anti-inflammatory and antioxidative mechanisms and preservation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

A systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies comparing conventional, biological and surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease placing a large health and economic burden on health systems worldwide. The treatment landscape is complex with multiple strategies to induce and maintain remission while avoiding long-term complications. The extent to which rising treatment costs, due to expensive biologic agents, are offset by improved outcomes and fewer hospitalisations and surgeries needs to be evaluated. This systematic review aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for IBD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in March 2017 to identify economic evaluations of pharmacological and surgical interventions, for adults diagnosed with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). Costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were adjusted to reflect 2015 purchasing power parity (PPP). Risk of bias assessments and a narrative synthesis of individual study findings are presented.

RESULTS

Forty-nine articles were included; 24 on CD and 25 on UC. Infliximab and adalimumab induction and maintenance treatments were cost-effective compared to standard care in patients with moderate or severe CD; however, in patients with conventional-drug refractory CD, fistulising CD and for maintenance of surgically-induced remission ICERs were above acceptable cost-effectiveness thresholds. In mild UC, induction of remission using high dose mesalazine was dominant compared to standard dose. In UC refractory to conventional treatments, infliximab and adalimumab induction and maintenance treatment were not cost-effective compared to standard care; however, ICERs for treatment with vedolizumab and surgery were favourable.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that, in general, while biologic agents helped improve outcomes, they incurred high costs and therefore were not cost-effective, particularly for use as maintenance therapy. The cost-effectiveness of biologic agents may improve as market prices fall and with the introduction of biosimilars. Future research should identify optimal treatment strategies reflecting routine clinical practice, incorporate indirect costs and evaluate lifetime costs and benefits.

Cost-effectiveness of biological treatment of ulcerative colitis - a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to collect and summarise all current data on the cost-effectiveness of biological treatment in ulcerative colitis. A literature search was conducted using the Medline, Embase, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases and included all cost-effectiveness analyses comparing biological treatment with any comparator. We identified 277 records of which 10 were included in this review. Eighty percent of identified analyses used quality-adjusted life years (QALY) as a measure of outcome. The most commonly assessed biological agent was infliximab. Half of the eight economic analyses, with QALY as an outcome, showed the cost-effectiveness of biological treatment against the comparator. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) ranged from 15,748 euro to 450,791 euro. The highest ICER values were observed when biologicals were compared with standard care alone. This systematic review revealed that in some cases the biological treatment, despite its clinical effectiveness, is too expensive and exceeds the national threshold value.

Health-Related Utility Weights in a Cohort of Real-World Crohn's Disease Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Estimating health-related utility weights in Crohn's Disease [CD] patients is crucial for assessing the cost-effectiveness of new pharmaceutical interventions. Values used in most analyses are based on secondary data and vary substantially among studies. We estimated utility weights in a consecutive sample of real-world CD patients.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in an ongoing socioeconomic study of CD in the Israeli adult patient population completed a self-administered Short Form 36 health survey [SF-36] and Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease [SIBDQ] questionnaires and were assessed for their current clinical status, including the Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] of disease severity. For each patient enrolled we calculated a utility weight using the SF-6D scoring system.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 425 patients [40% male] with mean age of 39.1 [± 14.0] years. The average HBI was 6.1 [± 5.4]; 198 [47%] patients were in remission state [HBI < 5], 99 [23%] had mild disease [HBI 5-7], 102 [25%] moderate [HBI 8-16], and 26 [6%] severe disease [HBI > 16]. Mean utility weights were: 0.667 in all patients, 0.744 in patients with disease remission, 0.638 in mild disease, 0.587 in moderate disease, and 0.505 in severe disease. The significant predictors of utility weights in a multivariable regression analysis were the HBI [β = -0.494; p < 0.001], economic status [β = 0.198; p < 0.001], time since diagnosis [β = 0.106; p < 0.001], male [compared with female] gender [β = 0.099; p = 0.009], hospital admission in the past year for any cause [β = -0.086; p = 0.027], and treatment with steroids [β = -0.100; p = 0.012] where β denotes the standardised regression coefficients; model adjusted R(2) = 0.428.

CONCLUSIONS

Utility weights for patients in the remission and mild disease states were generally lower as compared with values used in published cost-effectiveness analyses. These values should be considered when assessing the value for money of future interventions for CD.