The Impact of Cognition and Gender on Speeding Behaviour in Older Drivers with and without Suspected Mild Cognitive Impairment

Driving among individuals with chronic conditions: A systematic review of applied research using kinematic driving sensors

BACKGROUND

Kinematic driving data studies are a novel methodology relevant to health care, but prior studies have considerable variance in their methods, populations, and findings suggesting a need for critical analysis and appraisal for feasibility and methodological guidelines.

METHODS

We assessed kinematic driving studies of adults with chronic conditions for study feasibility, characteristics, and key findings, to generate recommendations for future study designs, and to identify promising directions for applications of kinematic driving data. PRISMA was used to guide the review and searches included PubMed, CINAHL, and Compendex. Of 379 abstract/titles screened, 49 full-text articles were reviewed, and 29 articles met inclusion criteria of analyzing trip-level kinematic driving data from adult drivers with chronic conditions.

RESULTS

The predominant chronic conditions studied were Alzheimer's disease and related Dementias, obstructive sleep apnea, and diabetes mellitus. Study objectives included feasibility testing of kinematic driving data collection in the context of chronic conditions, comparisons of simulation with real-world kinematic driving behavior, assessments of driving behavior effects associated with chronic conditions, and prognostication or disease classification drawn from kinematic driving data. Across the studies, there was no consensus on devices, measures, or sampling parameters; however, studies showed evidence that driving behavior could reliably differentiate between adults with chronic conditions and healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Vehicle sensors can provide driver-specific measures relevant to clinical assessment and interventions. Using kinematic driving data to assess and address driving measures of individuals with multiple chronic conditions is positioned to amplify a functional outcome measure that matters to patients.

Exploring the differences in rider injury severity in vehicle-two-wheelers accidents with dissimilar fault parties

Objective: The division of responsibility in vehicle-two-wheelers accidents reflects the extent to which different fault parties contributed to the occurrence of the accident, with significant differences in the injuries sustained by the riders in accidents where diverse parties were primarily responsible. We want to explore the difference in the severity of injury of riders in different fault parties of accidents so that we can make targeted protection improvements.Methods: In this study, three generalized ordered logit models were established for the total sample (n = 1204), the sample with drivers as the primary fault party (n = 607), and the sample with riders as the primary fault party (n = 597), respectively, to explore the differential impact factors on rider injury severity in vehicle-two-wheelers accidents involving different fault parties. Inter-group difference tests were conducted on the mean rider injury severity caused by differential factors in different accidents. Combining the impact effect trends and mean differences in the model, the differences in rider injury severity in accidents involving different fault parties were analyzed from the standpoints of human, vehicle, and road factors.Results: It was found that the effects of curve on injury severity was sheerly opposite in accidents with different fault parties and that factors, such as visual obstruction, road surface condition, gender, and helmet wearing differed in their effects on rider injury severity under different fault parties accidents. This reveals the driving tendencies and states of both parties in different environments.Conclusion: Based on the differential impact factor analysis and rider injury characteristics in accidents involving different fault parties, suggestions for improvement were made from the perspectives of road facilities, and safety awareness of drivers and riders, which are beneficial for improving rider safety and providing a theoretical reference for future regulations on liability allocation.

Driving Behaviour in Depression Based on Subjective Evaluation and Data from a Driving Simulator

Road traffic collisions are a major issue for public health. Depression is characterized by mental, emotional and executive dysfunction, which may have an impact on driving behaviour. Patients with depression (N = 39) and healthy controls (N = 30) were asked to complete questionnaires and to drive on a driving simulator in different scenarios. Driving simulator data included speed, safety distance from the preceding vehicle and lateral position. Demographic and medical information, insomnia (Athens Insomnia Scale, AIS), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, ESS), fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale, FSS), symptoms of sleep apnoea (StopBang Questionnaire) and driving (Driver Stress Inventory, DSI and Driver Behaviour Questionnaire, DBQ) were assessed. Gender and age influenced almost all variables. The group of patients with depression did not differ from controls regarding driving behaviour as assessed through questionnaires; on the driving simulator, patients kept a longer safety distance. Subjective fatigue was positively associated with aggression, dislike of driving, hazard monitoring and violations as assessed by questionnaires. ESS and AIS scores were positively associated with keeping a longer safety distance and with Lateral Position Standard Deviation (LPSD), denoting lower ability to keep a stable position. It seems that, although certain symptoms of depression (insomnia, fatigue and somnolence) may affect driving performance, patients drive more carefully eliminating, thus, their impact.