Association Between Changes in Frailty Index and Clinical Outcomes: An Observational Cohort Study

Sex-specific effects of frailty on cardiac structure and function: insights from preclinical models

Advanced age is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in both sexes. This is thought to be due, in part, to age-dependent cellular, structural, and functional changes in the heart, a process known as cardiac aging. An emerging view is that cardiac aging leads to the accumulation of cellular and subcellular deficits that increase susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases. Still, people age at different rates, with those aging rapidly considered frail. Evidence suggests that frailty, rather than simply age, is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and predicts adverse outcomes in those affected. Recent studies in mouse models of frailty show that many adverse changes associated with cardiac aging are more prominent in mice with a high degree of frailty. This suggests that frailty sets the stage for late life cardiovascular diseases to flourish and raises the possibility that treating frailty may treat cardiovascular diseases. These studies show that ventricular dysfunction increases with frailty in males only, whereas atrial dysfunction increases with frailty in both sexes. These results may shed light on the reasons that men and women can be susceptible to different cardiovascular diseases as they age, and why frail individuals are especially vulnerable to these disorders.

Efficacy of empagliflozin in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction according to frailty status in EMPEROR-Preserved

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a severe, common co-morbidity associated with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The impact of frailty on HFpEF outcomes may affect treatment choices in HFpEF. The impact of frailty on HFpEF patients and any impact on the clinical benefits of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition in HFpEF have been described in only a limited number of trials. Whether the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin would improve or worsen frailty status when given to HFpEF patients is also not known. The aims of this study were, therefore, to evaluate, in HFpEF patients enrolled in the EMPEROR-Preserved trial (Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction), the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes, and on the effects of empagliflozin, as well as the effect of empagliflozin on frailty status during treatment period.

METHODS

We calculated a cumulative deficit-derived frailty index (FI) using 44 variables including clinical, laboratory and quality of life parameters recorded in EMPEROR-Preserved. Patients were classified into four groups: non-frail (FI < 0.21), mild frailty (0.21 to <0.30), moderate frailty (0.30 to <0.40) and severe frailty (≥0.40). Clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life were evaluated according to baseline FI along with the effect of empagliflozin on chronological changes in FI (at 12, 32 and 52 weeks).

RESULTS

The patient distribution was 1514 (25.3%), 2100 (35.1%), 1501 (25.1%) and 873 (14.6%) in non-frail, mild frailty, moderate frailty and severe frailty, respectively. Severe frailty patients tended to be female and have low Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, more co-morbidities and more polypharmacy. Incidence rates of the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization increased as frailty worsened (hazard ratio [HR] of each FI category compared with the non-frail group: 1.10 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.89-1.35], 2.00 [1.63-2.47] and 2.61 [2.08-3.27] in the mild frailty, moderate frailty and severe frailty groups, respectively; P trend < 0.001). Compared with placebo, empagliflozin reduced the risk for the primary outcome across the four FI categories, HR: 0.59 [95% CI 0.42-0.83], 0.79 [0.61-1.01], 0.77 [0.61-0.96] and 0.90 [0.69-1.16] in non-frail to severe frailty categories, respectively (P value for trend = 0.097). Empagliflozin also improved other clinical outcomes and KCCQ score across frailty categories. Compared with placebo, empagliflozin-treated patients had a higher likelihood of being in a lower FI category at Weeks 12, 32 and 52 (P < 0.05), odds ratio: 1.12 [95% CI 1.01-1.24] at Week 12, 1.21 [1.09-1.34] at Week 32 and 1.20 [1.09-1.33] at Week 52.

CONCLUSIONS

Empagliflozin improved key efficacy outcomes with a possible diminution of effect in very frail patients. Empagliflozin also improved frailty status during follow-up.

The Longitudinal Relationship between Frailty, Loneliness and Cardiovascular Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies had reported that frailty and loneliness were associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of present study was to evaluate the combined effect of frailty and loneliness on the risk of CVD.

METHODS

A total of 9,674 participants from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study were included. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to explore the associations between frailty, loneliness and new-onset CVD, stroke and cardiac events.

RESULTS

During the 7-year follow-up, a total of 1,758 respondents experienced CVD (including 584 stroke and 1,324 cardiac events). Compared to those without loneliness or frailty, individuals with loneliness alone, or with frailty alone, or with both loneliness and frailty were significantly associated with increased risk of CVD, with corresponding HRs (95%CIs) were 1.21(1.07-1.37), 1.57(1.32-1.86) and 1.78(1.52-2.10), respectively. Similarly, participants with loneliness alone, or with frailty alone, or with both loneliness and frailty were associated with higher risk of cardiac events. The significant associations were consistent in age subgroups (participants aged less or more than 60 years).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated that there was a combined effect of effect of frailty and loneliness on the risk of CVD, stroke and cardiac events. These findings highlighted the importance of identifying loneliness and frailty, and intervening much earlier both in older and younger population.

Height loss as an indicator of ageing through its association with frailty and sarcopenia: An observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Height loss is associated with various health-related variables such as cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, cognitive function, and mortality. We hypothesized that height loss can be used as an indicator of aging, and we assessed whether the degree of height loss for 2 years was associated with frailty and sarcopenia.

METHODS

This study was based on a longitudinal cohort, the Pyeongchang Rural Area cohort. The cohort included people aged 65 years or older, ambulatory, and living at home. We divided individuals according to the ratio of height change (height change for 2 years divided by height at 2 years from baseline): HL2 (<-2%), HL1 (-2%--1%), and REF (-1%≤). We compared the frailty index, diagnosis of sarcopenia after 2 years from baseline, and the incidence of a composite outcome (mortality and institutionalization).

RESULTS

In total, 59 (6.9%), 116 (13.5%), and 686 (79.7%) were included in the HL2, HL1, and REF groups, respectively. Compared with the REF group, groups HL2 and HL1 had a higher frailty index, and higher risks of sarcopenia and composite outcome. When groups HL2 and HL1 were merged, the merged group had higher frailty index (standardized B, 0.06; p = 0.049), a higher risk of sarcopenia (OR, 2.30; p = 0.006), and a higher risk of composite outcome (HR, 1.78; p = 0.017) after adjusting for age and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with greater height loss were frailer, more likely to be diagnosed with sarcopenia and had worse outcomes regardless of age and sex.