Benefits of Endovascular Treatment in Late Window for Acute Ischemic Stroke Selected without CT Perfusion: A Real-World Study

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Reperfusion and Non-Reperfusion Therapy in Elderly Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Purpose

To investigate the benefit (90-day mRS score) and rate of major complications (early symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage-SICH) after reperfusion therapy (RT) (including intravenous thrombolysis -IVT and mechanical thrombectomy -MT) in patients over 80 years with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Patients and Methods

AIS patients aged over 80 admitted to Huizhou Central People's Hospital from September 2018 to 2023 were included in this study. Data on SICH, NIHSS, and mRS were analyzed. A good prognosis was defined as a mRS ≤ 2 or recovery to pre-stroke status at 90 days.

Results

Of 209 patients, 80 received non-RT, 100 received IVT and 29 underwent MT. The non-RT group had the lowest baseline NIHSS while the MT group had the highest (non-RT 6.0 vs IVT 12.0 vs MT 18.0, P <0.001). Higher NIHSS was associated with increased SICH risk (OR 1.083, P=0.032), while RT was not (OR 5.194, P=0.129). The overall SICH rate in the RT group was higher but not significantly different after stratification by stroke severity. Poor prognosis was associated with higher admission NIHSS, stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) combined with cardioembolism (CE), and stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) (OR 0.902, P<0.001; OR 0.297, P=0.029; OR 0.103, P<0.001, respectively). The RT group showed a greater reduction in NIHSS (delta NIHSS) than the non-RT group (non-RT 2.0 vs IVT 4.0 vs MT 6.0, P<0.005). For severe AIS, the IVT group had a better prognosis at 90 days (non-RT 0% vs IVT 38.2%, P=0.039). No 90-day mortality difference was found between groups after stratification.

Conclusion

Stroke severity, rather than RT, is an independent risk factor for SICH in AIS patients over 80. RT in severe stroke patients improves NIHSS at 90 days, suggesting RT is safe and effective in this demographic. Further studies with larger samples are required to confirm these findings.

Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the USA before and after time window expansion

BACKGROUND

In 2018, the time window for mechanical thrombectomy eligibility in patients with acute ischemic stroke increased from within 6 hours to within 24 hours of symptom onset. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of window expansion on procedural and hospital volumes and patient outcomes at a national level.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy using data from the National Inpatient Sample. We compared the numbers of mechanical thrombectomy procedures and performing hospitals between 2017 and 2019 in the USA, and the proportion of patients discharged home/self-care, those with in-hospital mortality and post-procedural intracranial hemorrhage (2019 vs 2017) after adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The number of patients with ischemic stroke who underwent mechanical thrombectomy increased from 16 960 in 2017 to 28 120 in 2019. There was an increase in the number of hospitals performing mechanical thrombectomy (501 in 2017, 585 in 2019) and those performing ≥50 procedures/year (97 in 2017, 199 in 2019; P<0.001). The odds of in-hospital mortality decreased (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.94, P=0.008) and the odds of intracranial hemorrhage increased (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.31, P=0.003) in 2019 compared with 2017, with no change in odds of discharge to home.

CONCLUSIONS

The window expansion for mechanical thrombectomy for patients with acute ischemic stroke was associated with an increase in the numbers of mechanical thrombectomy procedures and performing hospitals with a reduction of in-hospital mortality in the USA.