Effectiveness of alteplase in the very elderly after acute ischemic stroke

Comparison of pharmacokinetic properties of alteplase and tenecteplase. The future of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke

INTRODUCTION

The drug most frequently used for thrombolysis in cases of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is alteplase. However, there is moderate-to-high-quality evidence that tenecteplase has similar or higher efficacy and safety. With improved pharmacokinetic properties over alteplase, tenecteplase could be a significant advantage in treating AIS.

AREAS COVERED

After conducting an extensive search on Scopus and PubMed, this manuscript reviews and compares the pharmacokinetic properties of alteplase and tenecteplase. Additionally, it provides information on pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, tolerability, and drug-drug interactions.

EXPERT OPINION

The pharmacokinetic profile of alteplase and tenecteplase is derived from studies in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Thanks to its pharmacokinetic properties, tenecteplase is the drug closest to being the ideal fibrinolytic for AIS. Its longer half-life enables a single-bolus administration, which is particularly useful in emergencies. Tenecteplase has proven to have a good efficacy and safety profile in randomized clinical trials. Although we are awaiting the results of the ongoing phase 3 randomized clinical trials, we believe that tenecteplase has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of AIS through thrombolysis.

Predictors and long-term outcome of intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke-A prospective single-center study

Introduction

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a potentially devastating disease with high disability and mortality. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is an effective treatment with a 2-8% possible risk for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Our aim was to investigate the risk factors and long-term clinical outcomes of ICH in patients after rt-PA treatment.

Methods

Consecutive patients with AIS, thrombolysed at the Department of Neurology, University of Debrecen, between 1 January 2004 and 31 August 2016 were enrolled prospectively. Risk factors, stroke severity based on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), functional outcome using the modified Rankin scale, and mortality at 1 year were compared in patients with and without ICH following rt-PA treatment. We evaluated clinical characteristics and prognosis by hemorrhage type based on the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification. Descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney U-test, ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis test, a survival analysis, and logistic regression were performed as appropriate.

Results

Out of 1,252 patients with thrombolysis, ICH developed in 138 patients, with 37 (2.95%) being symptomatic. Mean ages in the ICH and non-ICH groups differed significantly (p = 0.041). On admission, the 24-h NIHSS after thrombolysis was higher in patients with ICH (p < 0.0001). Large vessel occlusion was more prevalent in patients with ICH (p = 0.0095). The ICH risk was lower after intravenous thrombolysis than intra-arterial or combined thrombolysis (p < 0.0001). Both at 3 months and 1 year, the outcome was worse in patients with ICH compared to patients without ICH group (p < 0.0001). Mortality and poor outcome were more prevalent in all hemorrhage types with a tendency for massive bleeding associated with unfavorable prognosis. At 3 months with the logistic regression model, the worse outcome was detected in patients with ICH after thrombolysis, at 1 year in patients with ICH after thrombolysis and smoking.

Discussion

Older age, higher NIHSS, large vessel occlusion, and intra-arterial thrombolysis may correlate with ICH. The unfavorable outcome is more common in patients with ICH. Precise scoring of post-thrombolysis bleeding might be a useful tool in the evaluation of the patient's prognosis. Our findings may help to identify predictors and estimate the prognosis of ICH in patients with AIS treated with rt-PA.

Acute stroke treatment and outcome in the oldest old (90 years and older) at a tertiary care medical centre in Germany-a retrospective study showing safety and efficacy in this particular patient population

Background

Stroke is among the most common causes of death and disability worldwide. Despite the relevance of stroke-related disease burden, which is constantly increasing due to the demographic change in industrialized countries with an ageing population and consecutively an increase in age-associated diseases, there is sparse evidence concerning acute stroke treatment and treatment-related outcome in the elderly patient group. This retrospective study aimed at analysing patient characteristics, therapy-related complications and functional outcome in stroke patients aged 90 years or older who underwent acute stroke treatment (i.e. intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or both).

Methods

We identified files of all inpatient stays at the Department of Neurology at Saarland University Medical Center (tertiary care level with a comprehensive stroke unit) between June 2011 and December 2018 and filtered for subjects aged 90 years or older at the time of admission. We reviewed patient files for demographic data, symptoms upon admission, (main) diagnoses, comorbidities, and administered therapies. For patients admitted due to acute stroke we reviewed files for therapy-related complications and functional outcome. We compared the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores upon admission and at discharge for these patients.

Results

We identified 566 inpatient stays of subjects aged 90 years or older. Three hundred sixty-seven of the 566 patients (64.8%) were admitted and discharged due to symptoms indicative of stroke. Two hundred eleven patients received a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke. These 211 patients were analysed subsequently. Sixty-four patients qualified for acute stroke treatment (intravenous thrombolysis n = 22, mechanical thrombectomy n = 26, intravenous thrombolysis followed by mechanical thrombectomy n = 16) and showed a significant improvement in their functional status as measured by change in mRS score (admission vs. discharge, p 0.001) with 7 (10.9%) observed potentially therapy-related complications (relevant drop in haemoglobin n = 2, subarachnoidal haemorrhage n = 1, cerebral haemorrhage n = 3, extracranial bleeding n = 1). One intravenous thrombolysis was stopped because of an uncontrollable hypertensive crisis. Patients who did not qualify for these treatments (including those declining acute treatment) did not show a change of their functional status between admission and discharge (p 0.064).

Conclusion

Our data indicate that acute stroke treatment is effective and safe in the oldest old. Age alone is no criterion to withhold an acute intervention even in oldest old stroke patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02566-3.

Experiences With Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke by Elderly Patients-A "Real World Scenario"

Objectives: This retrospective single-center study aimed to investigate the risk factors, outcomes and complication rates in patients older vs. younger than 80 years treated with intravenous alteplase.

Methods: Data of 1,253 thrombolysed patients were analyzed between January 1, 2004 and August 31, 2016. Vascular risk factors, stroke severity based on the NIHSS score, functional outcome using modified Rankin Scale (mRS), mortality and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) were compared between two subgroups (<80 and ≥80 years).

Results: 1,125 patients were included, 199 (17.6%) among them were aged over 80 years, majority (63.3%) were female (p < 0.00001). Mean age was 68.2 ± 12.4 years, i.e., 64.7 ± 10.8 years and 84.3 ± 3.4 years in the younger and the older groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation and pre-stroke anticoagulation among patients over 80 years was more likely (p < 0.0005 and p = 0.02, respectively). NIHSS scores on admission and at 24 h were higher in elderly patients (p < 0.0001). ASPECT score at 24 h was less favorable in elderly patients (p = 0.007) and was associated with worse outcome. At 3 months, 59.8% of the patients from the older group had an unfavorable outcome (p < 0.0001), however 34.7% had independent outcome. The one-year- survival was significantly worse in the older group (p < 0.0001). The incidence of SICH was lower among older patients. In a logistic regression model, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, diabetes mellitus and smoking were proven as a significant independent risk factors for worse outcome.

Conclusion: Although, the outcomes were less favorable in patients over 80 years of age, our results support the feasibility of using intravenous thrombolysis among patients over 80 years of age.

Pharmacological management of cerebral ischemia in the elderly

Introduction: For elderly adults in the United States, stroke is the fifth leading cause of death of which ischemic strokes comprise a vast majority. Optimal pharmacological management of elderly ischemic stroke patients involves both reperfusion and supportive care. Recent research into pharmacological management has focused on vascular, immunomodulatory, cytoprotective, and alternative agents, some of which have shown limited success in clinical trials. However, no treatments have been established as a reliable mode for management of cerebral ischemia for elderly adults beyond acute thrombolysis.Areas covered: The authors conducted a literature search for ischemic stroke management in the elderly and a search for human drug studies for managing ischemic stroke on clinicaltrials.gov. Here, they describe recent progress in the pharmacological management of cerebral ischemia in the elderly.Expert opinion: Many drug classes (antihypertensive, cytoprotective and immunomodulatory, and alternative agents) have been explored with limited success in managing ischemic stroke, though some have shown preventative benefits. We generally observed a broad gap in evidence on elderly patients from studies across all drug classes, necessitating further studies to gain an understanding of effective management of ischemic stroke in this large demographic of patients.

Measuring the Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter with Ultrasound in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Patients

BACKGROUND

Measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) with ultrasound enables non-invasive and indirect assessment of increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Although most of the studies were employed with traumatic brain injury patients, it's increasingly popular in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) studies.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating whether using ONSD as a follow-up measurement would help monitor the thrombolytic therapy (TT) effectiveness and determine the high-risk patients for malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) syndrome.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted between August 1, 2019, and February 1, 2020, in a tertiary hospital. Forty-four patients were eligible. We determined the TT moment as the time when the first ocular ultrasound measurement would be made (time 0). Also, we decided on the 24^th h after the treatment as the time to perform the second ocular ultrasound measurement (time 24). The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography (ASPECT) scores were evaluated blindly at the time-0 and the time-24. The cut-off value of ONSD was 0.55 mm.

RESULTS

There was no difference in ONSD results before and after the TT (p = 0.414). But, patients with an equal or higher value than cut-off had an increased risk for complications such as malignant-MCA, bleeding, seizure, etc. (p = 0.05). Malignant-MCA was observed in four patients with higher ONSD values. At the time-24, NIHSS decreased, GCS and ASPECT scores increased. Finally, ONSD was positively correlated with the NIHSS and negatively correlated with the GCS at the time-24.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring ONSD values in both the emergency department and the intensive care unit may be useful in the early diagnosis of MCA stroke complications and the follow-up of TT's effectiveness.

The telestroke and thrombolysis therapy in diabetic stroke patients

OBJECTIVE

Several controversial findings have been reported on treatment outcomes for diabetic stroke patients that received thrombolysis therapy in the hospital. We determined whether the association between telestroke technology, thrombolysis therapy and clinical risk factors in diabetic acute ischemic stroke may result in the inclusion or exclusion or more diabetic ischemic stroke patients for thrombolysis therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective data that comprises of a total of 3202 acute ischemic stroke patients from a regional stroke registry that contained telestroke and non telestroke patients with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke of which 312 were identified as diabetic stroke patients were used in this study. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the associated pre-clinical risk factors, and demographics associated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) therapy in a subset of diabetic acute ischemic stroke patients in the telestroke and non-telestroke settings.

RESULTS

In the telestroke, only higher International Normalized Ratio (INR) [odds ratio, OR = 0.063 (0.003-1.347, 95% confidence interval (CI)] was associated with exclusion from thrombolysis. Direct admission [OR, 3.141 (1-9.867), 95% CI] and telestroke [OR, 4.87 (1.834-12.928), 95% CI] were independent predictors in the inclusion for thrombolysis therapy. In the non telestroke, older age (> 80 years) [(OR), 0.955 (0.922-0.989), 95% CI], higher blood glucose level [OR, 0.994 (0.99-0.999); 95% CI], higher INR [OR, 0.113 (0.014-0.944); 95% CI], and renal insufficiency [OR, 0.163 (0.033-0.791); 95% CI] were associated with exclusion while higher NIH stroke scale [OR, 1.068 (1.009-1.13); 95% CI] was associated with inclusion for thrombolysis in the non telestroke.

CONCLUSION

The non-telestroke setting admitted more diabetic stroke patients to the hospital, but more were excluded from thrombolysis therapy when compared with the telestroke setting. Measures to improve clinical risk factors that excluded more diabetic ischemic stroke patients in the non telestroke will improve the use of thrombolysis in the treatment of diabetic acute ischemic stroke patients.

Stroke. Support for IV tPA in ischaemic stroke in elderly people

In Europe, use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in patients older than 80 years is discouraged because these patients have been excluded from certain past clinical trials. A new retrospective, observational study shows that tPA can substantially improve functional outcome after ischaemic stroke in patients aged 80–89 years.