Obinutuzumab treatment in the elderly patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

A Prognostic Nomogram Combining Immune-Related Gene Signature and Clinical Factors Predicts Survival in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma

The existence of tumor heterogeneity and complex carcinogenic mechanisms in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) make the most commonly used TNM staging system unable to well-interpret the prognosis of patients. Using transcriptome profiling and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, we constructed an immune signature based on a multivariate Cox analysis (stepwise model). We estimated the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of chemotherapeutic drugs in patients according to the pRRophetic algorithm. Gene-set variation analysis (GSVA) was used to reveal pathway enrichment between groups. Moreover, immune microenvironment landscape was described by single-sample gene-set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) and CIBERSORT and systematically correlated with genomic of these patients. A prognostic nomogram combining the immune signature and TNM stage to predict the prognosis was developed by multivariate Cox regression. The novel signature with four immune-related genes (MAL, MS4A1, OAS1, and WFDC2) had good robustness, which can accurately distinguish between high- and low-risk patients. Compared with low-risk patients, high-risk patients with a worse prognosis (5-year OS: 46.5 vs. 59.4%, p = 0.002) could benefit more from immunotherapy and the application of common chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin and paclitaxel (Wilcoxon test, all p < 0.05). There were significant differences in tumor immune microenvironment and metabolic pathways between the two groups. Additionally, the constructed nomogram had reliable predictive performance with the C-index of 0.725 (95% CI = 0.668–0.781) in the development set (n = 500), 0.793 (95% CI = 0.728–0.858) in the internal validation set (n = 250) and 0.679 (95% CI = 0.644–0.714) in the external validation set (n = 442). The corresponding calibration curves also showed good consistency. To sum up, we developed an immune-related gene signature and comprehensively evaluated LUAD immune landscape and metabolic pathways. Effective differentiation of high- and low-risk patients and accurate construction of nomogram would be helpful to the development of individualized treatment strategies.

The safety profile of monoclonal antibodies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), non-chemotherapeutic agents targeting the antigens present on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) lymphocytes, are being implemented increasingly more often as treatment options. Areas covered: This article reviews the similarities and differences in the structure, mechanism of action, efficacy and safety profile of commercially-available MoAbs and prevents new agents potentially useful for CLL treatment. Publications in English before June 2016 were surveyed on the MEDLINE database for articles. Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology held during the last five years were also included. Expert opinion: MoAbs, especially those targeting CD20, are highly effective biological options for first-line and salvage treatment of CLL, particularly in chemoimmunotherapy, and possibly also as maintenance therapy. Treatment with MoAbs is associated with reduced risk of such adverse events as cytopenias, infections and secondary neoplasias and is generally well tolerated. Depending on antibody type, the most common adverse events are usually transient and limited to grade 1 and 2 infusion-related reactions. In addition to commercially available MoAbs, several other antibodies exist which are targeted against different antigens studied in the clinical trials.