Subsequent Development of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer After Ovarian Surgery for Benign Ovarian Tumor: A Population-Based Cohort Study

miRNA Expression Profiles in Ovarian Endometriosis and Two Types of Ovarian Cancer-Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer and High-Grade Ovarian Cancer

Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EOC) consisting of endometrioid cancer and clear-cell ovarian cancer could be promoted by many factors. miRNAs, which are small, non-coding molecules of RNA, are among them. The aim of this study was to detect miRNAs connected with the malignant transformation of endometriosis. FFPE (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) samples of 135 patients operated on for endometriosis and different types of ovarian cancer (EOC and HGSOC-high-grade serous ovarian cancer) were studied. Healthy ovarian tissue was used as a control group. From the expression panel of 754 miRNAs, 7 were chosen for further tests according to their ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves: miR-1-3p, miR-125b-1-3p, miR-31-3p, miR-200b-3p, miR-502-5p, miR-503-5p and miR-548d-5p. Furthermore, other potentially important clinical data were analysed, which included age, BMI, Ca-125 concentration, miscarriages and deliveries and concomitant diseases such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes and smoking. Among the miRNAs, miR200b-3p had the lowest expression in neoplastic tissues. miR31-3p had the highest expression in women without any lesions in the ovaries. miR-502-5p and miR-548-5p did not differ between the studied groups. The examined miRNA panel generally distinguished significantly normal ovarian tissue and endometriosis, normal ovarian tissue and cancer, and endometriosis and cancer. The malignant transformation of endometriosis is dependent on different factors. miRNA changes are among them. The studied miRNA panel described well the differences between endometriosis and EOC but had no potential to differentiate types of ovarian cancer according to their origin. Therefore, examination of a broader miRNA panel is needed and might prove itself advantageous in clinical practice.

To do one and to get more: Part I. Diabetes and bone

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is a chronic metabolic disease, characterized by the presence of hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. The key treatment strategies for T2DM include modification of lifestyle, medications, and continuous glucose monitoring. DM patients often have DM-associated morbidities and comorbidities; however, disorders of musculoskeletal system are often neglected, compared to other major systems in DM patients. Based on sharing similar pathophysiology of DM and osteoporosis, it is supposed that the use of antidiabetic agents (ADAs) may not only provide the lowering glucose level effect and the maintenance of the sugar homeostasis to directly delay the tissue damage secondary to hyperglycemia but also offer the benefits, such as the prevention of developing osteoporosis and fractures. Based on the current review, evidence shows the positive correlation between DM and osteoporosis or fracture, but the effectiveness of using ADA in the prevention of osteoporosis and subsequent reduction of fracture seems to be inconclusive. Although the benefits of ADA on bone health are uncertain, the potential value of "To do one and to get more" therapeutic strategy should be always persuaded. At least, one of the key treatment strategies as an establishment of healthy lifestyle may work, because it improves the status of insulin resistance and subsequently helps DM control, prevents the DM-related micro- and macrovascular injury, and possibly strengthens the general performance of musculoskeletal system. With stronger musculoskeletal system support, the risk of "fall" may be decreased, because it is associated with fracture. Although the ADA available in the market does not satisfy the policy of "To do one and to get more" yet, we are looking forward to seeing the continuously advanced technology of drug development on diabetic control, and hope to see their extra-sugar-lowering effects.

Endometriosis-associated epithelial ovarian cancer is a more complicated disease than we suspected before

OBJECTIVE

Endometriosis-associated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) often includes clear cell carcinoma and endometrioid-type carcinoma. Due to the low incidence of primary mucinous EOC and absence of association between endometriosis and primary mucinous EOC, we present an unusual endometriosis-associated mixed mucinous and endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from the same ovary.

CASE REPORT

A 54-year-old woman had an abdominal palpable mass for months. Medical and surgical history, as well as preoperative surveys was unremarkable, except of presence of a pelvic mass. She underwent an exploration laparotomy, and a 22-cm right ovarian tumor was found. Grossly, right ovarian tumor containing brownish cloudy cystic fluid 2450 ml and an apparent 4 × 4 × 2 cm-sized papillary growth. Microscopically, a confluent glandular and infiltrative pattern presented endometrioid adenocarcinoma, and cells with intracytoplasmic mucin and stratified elongated epithelial cells presented mucinous adenocarcinoma. Surgico-pathological stage was FIGO IIIA due to tumor invading to the peritoneum above the pelvis. Postoperatively, the dose-dense chemotherapy was applied with uneventful outcome.

CONCLUSION

This is a rare case, composed with mixed mucinous and endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the same ovary, suggesting that careful pathological diagnosis of endometriosis-associated EOC is needed.

The impact of COVID-19 in pregnancy: Part I. Clinical presentations and untoward outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) is a pandemic disease with rapidly and widely disseminating to the world. Based on experiences about the H1N1, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) coronavirus pandemics, pregnant women who are infected are disproportionately more likely to develop severe illness and need more hospitalizations, intensive care, and finally die of diseases compared with those nonpregnant counterparts or those pregnant women without infection. Although more than one half of pregnant women with COVID-19 are asymptomatic, and as well as their symptoms are frequently mild, this observation presents a further challenge regarding service provision, prevention, and management, in which this may result in overlooking the risk of COVID-19 during pregnancy. As predictable, despite much advance in critical care in recent decades, during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant women with COVID-19 are really at higher risk to progress to severe illness; require hospitalization; need intensive care, such as the use of mechanical ventilation as well as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and of most important, die than their nonpregnant counterparts and pregnant women without COVID-19. The magnitude of the risk to pregnant women further extend to their newborn from COVID-19 with resultant significantly increasing perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates. The heightened risk of untoward outcomes in pregnant women emphasizes an urgent need of national or international recommendations and guidelines to optimize prevention and management strategies for COVID-19 in pregnancy. Active and passive prevention of COVID-19 is approved as effective strategies for women who attempt to be pregnant or during pregnancy. Understanding that pregnant women who are a vulnerable population is essential to improve the care in the novel and urgent COVID-19 pandemic. The current review is a part I to summarize the up-to-date information about the impact of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnant women and focus on clinical presentations and untoward pregnancy outcomes of these pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2.