Emerging combination therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer - impact of trifluridine/tipiracil

Treatment Settings and Outcomes with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil at Third-Line Treatment and beyond in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with refractory mCRC rarely undergo third-line or subsequent treatment. This strategy could negatively impact their survival. In this setting, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two key new treatment options with statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control with different tolerance profiles. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents in real-world practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2012-2022, 866 patients diagnosed with mCRC who received sequential R and T (T/R, n = 146; R/T, n = 116]) or T (n = 325]) or R (n = 279) only were retrospectively recruited from 13 Italian cancer institutes.

RESULTS

The median OS is significantly longer in the R/T group (15.9 months) than in the T/R group (13.9 months) (p = 0.0194). The R/T sequence had a statistically significant advantage in the mPFS, which was 8.8 months with T/R vs. 11.2 months with R/T (p = 0.0005). We did not find significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving T or R only. A total of 582 grade 3/4 toxicities were recorded. The frequency of grade 3/4 hand-foot skin reactions was higher in the R/T sequence compared to the reverse sequence (37.3% vs. 7.4%) (p = 0.01), while grade 3/4 neutropenia was slightly lower in the R/T group than in the T/R group (66.2% vs. 78.2%) (p = 0.13). Toxicities in the non-sequential groups were similar and in line with previous studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The R/T sequence resulted in a significantly longer OS and PFS and improved disease control compared with the reverse sequence. R and T given not sequentially have similar impacts on survival. More data are needed to define the best sequence and to explore the efficacy of sequential (T/R or R/T) treatment combined with molecular-targeted drugs.

A bioequivalence study of trifluridine/tipiracil tablets in Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer patients under fed conditions

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Trifluridine (FTD) remained at higher concentrations longer when administered along with tipiracil (TPI) compared with FTD alone. Lonsurf^® is a combination formulation consisting of FTD and TPI. This study aimed to investigate the bioequivalence of FTD/TPI formulations in Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.

METHODS

In this phase I, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, four-cycle crossover study in mCRC patients, the bioequivalence of 60 mg (20 mg tablet, 3 tablets) of the test formulation and the reference formulation (Lonsurf^®) was evaluated. Due to its high variability, the method of reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) was used to investigate the bioequivalence of the test and reference formulations.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled. 78.1% of the subjects were male, and the mean (standard deviation) age was 53.9 (SD =  ± 9.0) years old. The time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T_max) was almost 2.0 h post-dose. The geometric least-squares mean ratios (GMRs) (test/reference) of C_max and AUC_0-t for FTD were 95.3% and 102.9%, respectively, with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the natural log-transformed ratios of C_max and AUC_0-t of 90.0-100.9% and 99.9-105.9%, while the GMRs of C_max and AUC_0-t for TPI were 95.7% and 100.7%, respectively, with 90% CIs of 90.5-101.2% and 97.0-104.7%. In addition, the GMRs of C_max and AUC_0-t for FTD's major metabolite, trifluorothymine (FTY), were 94.8 (90% CI 90.3-99.5%) and 99.33 (90% CI 96.9-101.9%), respectively. These were in accord with the FDA bioequivalence definition interval of 80-125%.

CONCLUSION

The test and reference FTD/TPI formulations were bioequivalent in Chinese mCRC patients under fed conditions.

Biomarkers of Trifluridine-Tipiracil Efficacy

Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is a newer generation chemotherapy that has been approved for the later-line treatment of metastatic colorectal and gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. The oral drug provides a modest benefit of prolongation of survival over placebo in pretreated patients with these cancers with acceptable toxicity. Studies have shown rare objective responses (2-4%), and the disease control rates were 44% in both colorectal and gastric cancer randomized trials. Thus, the majority of patients progress through treatment and are burdened by toxicities. To better characterize the sub-group of patients with a higher probability of benefit from trifluridine/tipiracil, predictive biomarkers have been sought using data from randomized trials as well as from non-randomized trials and real-world series. Biomarkers examined include clinical characteristics of the patients, laboratory tests, and tumor derived biomarkers. These studies show that early neutropenia on treatment, and ratios of leukocyte subsets, are potential biomarkers able to predict trifluridine/tipiracil benefit. Combinations of laboratory values and clinical characteristics and proteins involved in trifluridine transport and activation have been examined with initial positive results.

Efflux pump inhibitors as a promising adjunct therapy against drug resistant tuberculosis: a new strategy to revisit mycobacterial targets and repurpose old drugs

INTRODUCTION

In 2018, an estimated 377,000 people developed multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), urging for new effective treatments. In the last years, it has been accepted that efflux pumps play an important role in the evolution of drug resistance. Strategies are required to mitigate the consequences of the activity of efflux pumps.

AREAS COVERED

Based upon the literature available in PubMed, up to February 2020, on the diversity of efflux pumps in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their association with drug resistance, studies that identified efflux inhibitors and their effect on restoring the activity of antimicrobials subjected to efflux are reviewed. These support a new strategy for the development of anti-TB drugs, including efflux inhibitors, using in silico drug repurposing.

EXPERT OPINION

The current literature highlights the contribution of efflux pumps in drug resistance in M. tuberculosis and that efflux inhibitors may help to ensure the effectiveness of anti-TB drugs. However, despite the usefulness of efflux inhibitors in in vitro studies, in most cases their application in vivo is restricted due to toxicity. In a time when new drugs are needed to fight MDR-TB and extensively drug-resistant TB, cost-effective strategies to identify safer efflux inhibitors should be implemented in drug discovery programs.

Value of tumor size as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer patients after chemotherapy: a population-based study

Aim: To evaluate the relationship between tumor size and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who received chemotherapy. Materials & methods: SEER database was accessed for eligible patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to compare the effect of tumor size on overall survival (OS) and CRC-specific survival (CCSS). Results: Tumor size ≥5 cm was an independent risk factor for OS and CCSS in mCRC patients treated with chemotherapy. Tumor size <5 cm did not show a survival advantage in patients whose primary tumor site was rectosigmoid junction, while tumor size ≥5 cm was associated with poor OS and CCSS in left-and right-sided colorectal cancer. Conclusion: Tumor size ≥5 cm was associated with poor prognosis after receiving chemotherapy treatment and a risk factor for survival of mCRC.

Retrospective study of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil efficacy as a third-line or later chemotherapy regimen for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) are novel antitumor agents for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. However, it is unclear which patients may derive a survival benefit from these drugs in real-life clinical practice. We evaluated retrospectively the efficacy and safety of regorafenib and TAS-102 at a single institution between June 2013 and November 2015. Cox regression analysis was carried out to obtain predictive scores (the nearest integers of hazard ratio) for survival benefit. Forty-four patients treated with regorafenib or TAS-102 were included in the analysis; among them, 17 received crossover treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.1 months for regorafenib and 9.3 months for TAS-102, and the corresponding values after crossover were 7.1 and 5.3 months, respectively. OS was not correlated to relative dose intensity, but was proportional to the total administered dose of each drug. Adverse events were tolerable even after crossover. We identified three variables as significant for prediction of OS with good discrimination (C-statistic=0.70): Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, time since diagnosis of metastatic disease ≤18 months, and previous chemotherapy continued ≥2 months beyond progression were all predictors of poor OS. Regorafenib and TAS-102 can be recommended for patients with better performance status and slow progression of metastatic disease. Optimal survival benefit was provided by prompt administration of either drug after failure of previous chemotherapy, with flexible titration to the optimal dose for each individual patient.

Pharmacokinetic Enhancers (Boosters)-Escort for Drugs against Degrading Enzymes and Beyond

Pharmacokinetic enhancers (boosters) are compounds used in combination with a primary therapeutic agent (drug) and are not used for their direct effects on the disease but because they enhance or restore the activity of the primary agent. Hence, in certain cases, they represent an indispensable escort for enzyme-labile drugs. Pharmacokinetic enhancers can exert their activity on different ways. In the most common case, they inhibit enzymes such as human cytochrome P450 enzymes in the liver or other organs and, thereby, block or reduce undesired metabolism and inactivation of the primary drug. In this review, an overview will be given on the therapeutically most important classes of pharmacokinetic enhancers like β-lactamase inhibitors, inhibitors of CYP (cytochrome P450) enzymes in HIV therapy and hepatitis C, boosters for fluoropyrimidine-type anticancer agents, compounds utilized for enabling therapy of Parkinson's disease with levodopa, and others. Inhibitors of efflux pumps in both pathogenic bacteria and tumor cells will be addresses shortly.