Predictive significance of preoperative CT findings for suboptimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

Initial Experience with the Radiotracer 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Early and accurate staging of ovarian cancer is paramount to disease survival. Conventional imaging including FDG PET/CT are limited in the evaluation of small metastatic lesions. 18F-Fluciclovine has minimal urine and bowel excretion allowing optimal visualization of the abdomen and pelvis. This study examines 18F-fluciclovine uptake in known primary and recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Seven patients with a confirmed diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer underwent 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT imaging. Forty-one (41) lesions were identified with 18F-fluciclovine and confirmed to be true positive (n = 41). We aim to explore if 18F-fluciclovine uptake in ovarian lesions were greater than background uptake of bone marrow, blood pool, and bladder. Quantification analysis was performed to determine max and mean standard uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) of known and suspected lesions compared to SUVmean uptake of background structures.

RESULTS

18F-Fluciclovine demonstrated 100% sensitivity (41/41) for uptake in known ovarian lesions. The average SUVmax (±SD) uptake of known ovarian lesions was 5.9 (±2.6) and 5.1 (±2.0) on early and delayed images, respectively. The average tumor SUVmax to SUVmean of background (±SD) (T:B) ratios on early and delay were 1.9 (±0.8), 2.1 (±0.9) for marrow; 3.8 (±1.8), 3.4 (±1.5) for aorta; and 8.4 (±4.3), 1.5 (±1.7) for bladder, respectively.

CONCLUSION

18F-Fluciclovine uptake in malignant ovarian lesions was above background levels suggesting its feasibility in the imaging of ovarian cancer. Due to increasing tracer washout via the urinary bladder over time, early imaging at 4 min post injection is favorable.

Ultrasound for assessing tumor spread in ovarian cancer. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

In this review, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasound for assessing the tumor spread in the abdomen in women with ovarian cancer. A search for studies evaluating the role of ultrasound for assessing intrabdominal tumor spread in women with ovarian cancer compared to surgery from January 2011 to March 2023 was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 evaluated the quality of the studies (QUADAS-2). All analyses were performed using MIDAS and METANDI commands in STATA 12.0 software. We identified 1552 citations. After exclusions, five studies comprising 822 women were included. Quality of studies were considered as good, except for patient selection as all studies were considered as having high risk of bias. The pooled sensitivity and specificity could be calculated for three anatomical areas (recto-sigma, major omentum and root of mesentery) and the presence of ascites. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting disease in the recto-sigma, major omentum and root of mesentery were 0.83 and 0.95, 0.87 and 0.87, and 0.29 and 0.99, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting ascites was 0.95 and 0.91, respectively. There is evidence that ultrasound offers good diagnostic performance for evaluating the intra-abdominal extent of disease in women with suspected ovarian cancer.

Minilaparotomy, Cyfra21-1, and Other Predicting Factors for Suboptimal Cytoreductive Surgery in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no reliable method to predict the result of the primary cytoreduction to decide whether to go on primary cytoreductive surgery or receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to identify candidate predicting factors from clinical data, serum biomarkers, CT/MRI imaging, and minilaparotomy for suboptimal cytoreduction in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Women who were clinically suspicious of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery were recruited. Clinical data, abdominopelvic CT/MRI, and serum biomarkers, including CA125, HE4, and Cyfra21-1, were collected preoperatively. At the start of the surgery, a minilaparotomy incision was made, the peritoneal cavity was assessed, and the operating surgeons gave the impression of whether the optimal cytoreductive surgery would be attainable. Subsequently, the incision was extended as necessary, and the standard cytoreductive surgery was attempted. After the procedure completion, the surgical outcome (optimal vs. suboptimal cytoreduction) and other operative outcomes were recorded. The association between the potential predicting factors and the surgical outcome was examined.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were included in this pilot study. Twelve patients were diagnosed with primary ovarian or fallopian tube cancer, while two had ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer. The optimal cytoreduction was achieved in eight women. After minilaparotomy, the surgeons could predict suboptimal surgery correctly in five out of six cases (OR: 24.12, 95%CI: 2.34-Inf., p<0.01). Moreover, no patient with the finding of rectosigmoid invasion from CT had optimal surgery (OR: 12.96, 95%CI: 1.26-Inf., p=0.03). Lastly, increased serum cyfra21-1(>8 ng/mL) and HE4 (>83 pmol/L) were significantly associated with suboptimal cytoreduction, with OR: 35.00, 95%CI: 1.74-702.99, p=0.02 and OR: 15.00, 95%CI: 1.03-218.30, p=0.05, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The finding of rectosigmoid invasion from abdominal CT, increased serum cyfra21-1 and HE4, and the initial minilaparotomy impression were potentially associated with suboptimal cytoreduction.

The BUMPy road of peritoneal metastases in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most common cause of death due to gynecologic malignancies, with more than 70% of patients presenting with advanced stage disease at the time of diagnosis. The extent and distribution of tumor guide primary treatment selection and clinical management. While primary cytoreductive surgery with complete tumor resection improves survival, patients with extensive peritoneal disease may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy first to reduce tumor burden followed by interval cytoreductive surgery. Imaging plays an essential role in triaging patients including selecting patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery. Interestingly, there are no universally established criteria to predict resectability and local practices depend on local guidelines and surgeon preferences. Nevertheless, certain anatomical tumor locations are known to be difficult to resect and are associated with suboptimal cytoreduction or require special surgical considerations. This review discusses the recent advances in the initial management of patients with ovarian cancer, a practical approach to the assessment and communication of peritoneal metastases locations on CT and MRI. It also explores recent advances in genomics profiling and radiomics that may influence the initial management of these patients.

Clinical Utility of Preoperative Assessment in Ovarian Cancer Cytoreduction

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic cancer, in part due to late presentation. Many women have vague early symptoms and present with disseminated disease. Cytoreductive surgery can be extensive, involving multiple organ systems. Novel therapies and recent clinical trials have provided evidence that, compared to primary cytoreduction, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has equivalent survival outcomes with less morbidity. There is increasing need for validated tools and mechanisms for clinicians to determine the optimal management of ovarian cancer patients.

An update on preoperative assessment of the resectability of advanced ovarian cancer

The best prognosis for advanced ovarian cancer is provided by no residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery. It is thus important to be able to predict resectability that will result in complete cytoreduction, while avoiding unnecessary surgery that may leave residual disease. No single procedure appears to be sufficiently accurate and reliable to predict resectability. The process should include a preoperative workup based on clinical examination, biomarkers, especially tumor markers, and imaging, for which computed tomography, as well as sonography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography, can be used. This workup should provide sufficient information to determine whether complete cytoreduction is possible or if not, to propose neoadjuvant chemotherapy which is preferable in this case. For the remaining patients, laparoscopy is broadly recommended as an ultimate triage step. However, its modalities are still debated, and several scores have been proposed for standardization and improving accuracy. The risk of false negatives requires a final assessment of resectability as the first stage of cytoreductive surgery by laparotomy. Composite models, consisting of several criteria of workup and, sometimes, laparoscopy have been proposed to improve the accuracy of the predictive process. Regardless of the modality, the process appears to be accurate and reliable for predicting residual disease but less so for predicting complete cytoreduction and thus avoiding unnecessary surgery and an inappropriate treatment strategy. Overall, the proposed procedures are heterogeneous, sometimes unvalidated, or do not consider advances in surgery. Future techniques and/or models are still needed to improve the prediction of complete resectability.