1
|
Castelluccia A, Tramacere F, Colciago RR, Borgia M, Sallustio A, Proto T, Portaluri M, Arcangeli PS. 10-yr Results of Moderately Hypofractionated Postoperative Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Focused on Treatment Related Toxicity. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102102. [PMID: 38759337 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To retrospectively report long term outcomes following postoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer, emphasizing treatment related toxicity. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients for whom adjuvant or salvage RT was indicated after prostatectomy were treated with a course of moderate hypofractionation consisting in the delivery of 62.5 Gy in 25 fractions (2.5 Gy per fraction) on the prostate bed in 5 consecutive weeks (EQD21.5 = 70 Gy) by means of 3D-CRT in most of them. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was allowed at physician's discretion. Patients were evaluated for urinary and rectal complications according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4 (CTCAE v.4). Overall survival (OS), biochemical recurrence free survival (bRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS One hundred and ten patients with a median age of 67 years (range 51-78) were enrolled. The majority of them (82%) had adverse pathologic features only, while 31 (28%) had early biochemical relapse. Median PSA level before RT was 0.12 ng/mL (range 0-9 ng/mL). Median time from surgery was 4 months (range 1-136 months). Twenty-eight patients (25.4%) also received ADT. At a median follow up of 103 months (range 19-138 months), late Grade 3 and Grade 4 rectal toxicity were 0.9% (1 case of hematochezia) and 0.9% (1 case of fistula), respectively, while late Grade 3 GU side effects (urethral stenosis) occurred in 9 cases (8%). No late Grade 4 events were observed, respectively. Ten-year OS, b-RFS and MFS were 77.3% (95%CI: 82.1%-72.5%), 53.3% (95%CI: 59.9%-47.6%), and 76.7% (95%CI: 81.2%-72.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION Our study provides long term data that a shortened course of postoperative RT is as safe and effective as a long course of conventionally fractionated RT and would improve patients' convenience and significantly reduce RT department workloads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Marzia Borgia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perrino Hospital, 72100, Brindisi, Italy
| | | | - Tiziana Proto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perrino Hospital, 72100, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Maurizio Portaluri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perrino Hospital, 72100, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Prof Stefano Arcangeli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Canales JP, Barnafi E, Salazar C, Reyes P, Merino T, Calderón D, Cortés A. Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy to the prostate bed with or without pelvic lymph nodes: a prospective trial. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2024; 29:187-196. [PMID: 39143977 PMCID: PMC11321776 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.99677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Hypofractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer has been widely studied. However, in the postoperative setting it has been less explored. The objective of this prospective study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy in postoperative prostate cancer. Materials and methods A prospective study was designed to include patients with prostate cancer with an indication of postoperative radiotherapy as adjuvant or salvage. A hypofractionated radiotherapy scheme of 51 Gy in 17 fractions was performed with the possibility of treating the pelvis at a dose of 36 Gy in 12 fractions sequentially. Safety was evaluated based on acute and late toxicity [according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale and Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03], International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) over time, and quality of life. Results From August 2020 to June 2022, 31 patients completed treatment and were included in this report. 35.5% of patients received elective treatment of the pelvic nodal areas. Most patients reported minimal or low acute toxicity, with an acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) grade 3 or greater toxicity of 3.2% and 0%, respectively. The evolution in time of the IPSS remained without significant differences (p = 0.42). With the exception of a significant improvement in the domains of hormonal and sexual symptoms of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire, the rest of the domains [EPIC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core quality of life questionnaire (C-30) and Prostate Cancer module (PR-25)] were maintained without significant differences over time. With a follow-up of 15.4 months, late GI and GU grade 2 toxicity was reported greater than 0% and 9.6%, respectively. Conclusions Hypofractionated radiotherapy in postoperative prostate cancer appears to be safe with low reports of relevant acute or late toxicity. Further follow-up is required to confirm these results. Trial registration The protocol was approved by the accredited Medical Ethical Committee of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. All participants accepted and wrote informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P. Canales
- Department of Hemato-oncology, Radiotherapy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Esteban Barnafi
- Medicine School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Cristian Salazar
- Medicine School, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Paula Reyes
- Department of Hemato-oncology, Radiotherapy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Tomas Merino
- Department of Hemato-oncology, Radiotherapy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - David Calderón
- Department of Urology, Hospital del Salvador, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Analía Cortés
- Department of Oncology, Hospital del Salvador, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Takano S, Tomita N, Takaoka T, Niwa M, Torii A, Kita N, Okazaki D, Uchiyama K, Nakanishi-Imai M, Ayakawa S, Iida M, Tsuzuki Y, Otsuka S, Manabe Y, Nomura K, Ogawa Y, Miyakawa A, Miyamoto A, Takemoto S, Yasui T, Hiwatashi A. Late genitourinary toxicity in salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: impact of daily fraction doses. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1050-1056. [PMID: 38466928 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of daily fraction doses on late genitourinary (GU) toxicity after salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS This multi-institutional retrospective study included 212 patients who underwent SRT between 2008 and 2018. All patients received image-guided intensity-modulated SRT at a median dose of 67.2 Gy in 1.8-2.3 Gy/fraction. The cumulative rates of late grade ≥2 GU and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were compared using Gray test, stratified by the ≤2.0 Gy/fraction (n = 137) and ≥2.1 Gy/fraction groups (n = 75), followed by multivariate analyses. The total dose was represented as an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) with α/β = 3 Gy. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 63 months, the cumulative rates of 5-year late grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicities were 14% and 2.5%, respectively. The cumulative rates of 5-year late grade ≥2 GU toxicity in the ≥2.1 Gy/fraction and ≤2.0 Gy/fraction groups were 22% and 10%, respectively (P = .020). In the multivariate analysis, ≥2.1 Gy/fraction was still associated with an increased risk of late grade ≥2 GU toxicity (hazard ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.99; P = .023), while the total dose was not significant. CONCLUSION The present results showed that ≥2.1 Gy/fraction resulted in a higher incidence of late grade ≥2 GU toxicity in SRT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The impact of fraction doses on late GU toxicity after SRT remains unknown. The results suggest that higher fraction doses may increase the risk of late GU toxicity in SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiya Takano
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Natsuo Tomita
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Taiki Takaoka
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Masanari Niwa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Akira Torii
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Nozomi Kita
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Dai Okazaki
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Kaoru Uchiyama
- Department of Radiology, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, Kariya, Aichi 448-8505, Japan
| | - Mikiko Nakanishi-Imai
- Department of Radiology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8650, Japan
| | - Shiho Ayakawa
- Department of Radiology, Japan Community Health care Organization Chukyo Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi 457-8510, Japan
| | - Masato Iida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Suzuka General Hospital, Suzuka, Mie 513-0818, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Shinya Otsuka
- Department of Radiology, Okazaki City Hospital, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8553, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Manabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanbu Tokushukai General Hospital, Shimajiri, Okinawa 901-0493, Japan
| | - Kento Nomura
- Department of Radiotherapy, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, Kasugai, Aichi 486-8510, Japan
| | - Akifumi Miyakawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 460-0001, Japan
| | - Akihiko Miyamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokuto Hospital, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-0833, Japan
| | - Shinya Takemoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujieda Heisei Memorial Hospital, Fujieda, Shizuoka 426-8662, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yasui
- Department of Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Akio Hiwatashi
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Padayachee J, Chaudhary S, Shim B, So J, Lim R, Raman S. Utilizing clinical, pathological and radiological information to guide postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:293-305. [PMID: 36795862 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2181795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A detectable and rising PSA following radical prostatectomy is indicative of recurrent prostate cancer. Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with/without androgen deprivation therapy represents the main treatment option for these patients and has been historically associated with a biochemical control rate of ~70%. To determine the optimal timing, diagnostic workup, radiotherapy dosefractionation, treatment volume, and use of systemic therapy, several informative studies have been conducted in the last decade. AREAS COVERED This review examines the recent evidence to guide radiotherapy decision making in the SRT setting. Key topics include adjuvant vs salvage RT, utilization of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, length of androgen deprivation therapy, inclusion of elective pelvic volume, and emerging role for hypofractionation. EXPERT OPINION Recently reported trials, conducted in an era prior to the routine use of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, have been pivotal in establishing the current standard of care for SRT in prostate cancer. However, decisions about radiation treatment and systemic therapy may be tailored based on available prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Data from contemporary clinical trials are awaited to define and establish individualized, biomarker-driven approaches for SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerusha Padayachee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Simone Chaudhary
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian Shim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan So
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Remy Lim
- Mercy PET/CT Epsom, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fathy MM, Hassan BZ, El-Gebaly RH, Mokhtar MH. Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2023; 62:97-106. [PMID: 36576578 PMCID: PMC9950215 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-022-01011-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The hypofractionated radiotherapy modality was established to reduce treatment durations and enhance therapeutic efficiency, as compared to conventional fractionation treatment. However, this modality is challenging because of rigid dosimetric constraints. This study aimed to assess the impact of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) widths (10 mm and 5 mm) on plan quality during the treatment of prostate cancer. Additionally, this study aimed to investigate the impact of the MLC mode of energy on the Agility flattening filter (FF), MLC Agility-free flattening filter (FFF), and MLCi2 for patients receiving hypofractionated radiotherapy. Two radiotherapy techniques; Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy (VMAT), were used in this research. In the present study, computed tomography simulations of ten patients (six plans per patient) with localized prostate adenocarcinoma were analyzed. Various dosimetric parameters were assessed, including monitor units, treatment delivery times, conformity, and homogeneity indices. To evaluate the plan quality, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were estimated for each technique. The results demonstrated that the determined dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV)p (such as D mean, conformity, and homogeneity index) showed greater improvement with MLC Agility FF and MLC Agility FFF than with MLCi2. Additionally, the treatment delivery time was reduced in the MLC Agility FF (by 31%) and MLC Agility FFF (by 10.8%) groups compared to the MLCi2 group. It is concluded that for both the VMAT and IMRT techniques, the smaller width (5 mm) MLCs revealed better planning target volume coverage, improved the dosimetric parameters for PTV, reduced the treatment time, and met the constraints for OARs. It is therefore recommended to use 5 mm MLCs for hypofractionated prostate cancer treatment due to better target coverage and better protection of OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed M Fathy
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
| | - Belal Z Hassan
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
- Department of Radiotherapy, Al-Ziraeyeen Hospital, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Reem H El-Gebaly
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Maha H Mokhtar
- Department of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Physics Unit, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nicosia L, Vitale C, Cuccia F, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Mazzola R, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Ruggieri R, Cavalleri S, Alongi F. Hypofractionated Postoperative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer with Ialuril Soft Gels ®: Toxicity and Efficacy Analysis on a Retrospective Series of 305 Patients. Cancer Manag Res 2022; 14:2839-2846. [PMID: 36164468 PMCID: PMC9508891 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s357814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the impact of Ialuril soft Gels® (HA) in reducing acute genito-urinary (GU) toxicity in patients treated with adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy for a prostate cancer relapse. Material and Methods The data of 305 patients were retrospectively collected. One hundred and five patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT), while 200 a salvage treatment (sRT). GU toxicity was evaluated according to CTCAE v5.0. Every patient received RT combined with HA. Results Grade 1-2 GU toxicity during RT was represented by: urgency (36%), dysuria (23%), increased urinary frequency (12.1%), and urinary retention (11.8%). Nevertheless, the majority of symptoms were present at the baseline. Grade 3 severe toxicity was represented by 10 (3.2%) cases of incontinence and 3 (1%) cases of urgency. The incidence of any-grade RT-related GU toxicity was significantly higher in the aRT group than the salvage group (esRT + sRT) (83.8% versus 64.5%). When comparing the incidence of any-grade RT-related GU toxicity in the aRT, esRT, and sRT groups we observed a significant correlation favoring sRT, over esRT, and aRT. Conclusion Postoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy is safe and not correlated with increase of unexpected toxicity when administered with oral hyaluronic acid. A prospective study is necessary to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Claudio Vitale
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Ruggero Ruggieri
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Stefano Cavalleri
- Urology Division, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Verona, Negrar, Italy.,University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moll M, D'Andrea D, Zaharie A, Grubmüller B, Paschen C, Zehetmayer S, Shariat SF, Widder J, Goldner G. Comparative effectiveness of moderate hypofractionation with volumetric modulated arc therapy versus conventional 3D-radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:719-726. [PMID: 35284951 PMCID: PMC9300528 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01909-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer is well established for definitive treatment, but not well defined in the postoperative setting. The purpose of this analysis was to assess oncologic outcomes and toxicity in a large cohort of patients treated with conventionally fractionated three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy (CF) and hypofractionated volumetric modulated arc therapy (HF) after radical prostatectomy. METHODS Between 1994 and 2019, a total of 855 patients with prostate carcinoma were treated by postoperative radiotherapy using CF (total dose 65-72 Gy, single fraction 1.8-2 Gy) in 572 patients and HF (total dose 62.5-63.75 Gy, single fraction 2.5-2.55 Gy) in 283 patients. The association of treatment modality with biochemical control, overall survival (OS), and gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was assessed using logistic and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS There was no difference between the two modalities regarding biochemical control rates (77% versus 81%, respectively, for HF and CF at 24 months and 58% and 64% at 60 months; p = 0.20). OS estimates after 5 years: 95% versus 93% (p = 0.72). Patients undergoing HF had less frequent grade 2 or higher acute GI or GU side effects (p = 0.03 and p = 0.005, respectively). There were no differences in late GI side effects between modalities (hazard ratio 0.99). Median follow-up was 23 months for HF and 72 months for CF (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION For radiation therapy of resected prostate cancer, our analysis of this largest single-centre cohort (n = 283) treated with hypofractionation with advanced treatment techniques compared with conventional fractionation did not yield different outcomes in terms of biochemical control and toxicities. Prospective investigating of HF is merited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Moll
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandru Zaharie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bernhard Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christopher Paschen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sonja Zehetmayer
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Section for Medical Statistics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregor Goldner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nicosia L, Mazzola R, Vitale C, Cuccia F, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Ruggeri R, Cavalleri S, Alongi F. Postoperative moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a mono-institutional propensity-score-matching analysis between adjuvant and early-salvage radiotherapy. Radiol Med 2022; 127:560-570. [PMID: 35347581 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01479-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the impact of moderately hypofractionated postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS The data of 304 surgically resected PCa patients were analyzed. One hundred and five patients underwent adjuvant RT (aRT), 77 early-savage RT (esRT), and 123 salvage RT (sRT). Biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for potential confounders between aRT and esRT groups. RESULTS The median follow-up was 33 months. Three-year BRFS and PFS were 82 and 85.2%, respectively, in the overall population. At the multivariate analysis, Gleason score and hormone therapy were factors independently correlated with BRFS and PFS. After PSM, there was no difference in BRFS and PFS between aRT and esRT patients. Severe toxicity was represented by grade 3 urinary incontinence (3.5%) and urgency (1%), and aRT correlated with increased any-grade acute toxicity. Severe grade 3 gastrointestinal late toxicity occurred in 1.3% of cases. CONCLUSION Postoperative moderately hypofractionated RT achieved acceptable disease control rate and demonstrated no increased or unexpected toxicity. Future prospective studies should evaluate the role of postoperative RT in patients with unfavorable disease characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Vitale
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Ruggiero Ruggeri
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Cavalleri
- Urology Division, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Park G, Kim YJ, Ahn H, Park W, Lee JS, Kim YS. Salvage hypofractionated accelerated versus standard radiotherapy for the treatment of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (SHARE): the protocol of a prospective, randomized, open-label, superiority, multi-institutional trial. Trials 2021; 22:728. [PMID: 34674739 PMCID: PMC8532339 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05708-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While several phase III trials have investigated the role of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer, prospective data reporting the outcomes of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment setting are sparse. Therefore, this study is designed to assess the efficacy and treatment-related toxicity of hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of biochemical recurrence in men who underwent radical prostatectomy. The primary objective of this trial is to investigate whether hypofractionated radiotherapy improves biochemical control compared with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. In addition, treatment-related toxicity, quality of life, and survival will be evaluated as secondary endpoints. METHODS In this prospective, randomized, multi-institutional trial (the SHARE study), patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer will be randomized to receive either hypofractionated radiotherapy (65 Gy in 2.5-Gy fractions) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (66 Gy in 2-Gy fractions). Prostate bed irradiation or elective pelvic nodal irradiation including the prostate bed will be performed using intensity-modulated radiotherapy and daily image guidance. Treatment efficacy will be assessed using the serum tumor marker prostate-specific antigen, and toxicity will be evaluated through both physician- and patient-reported outcomes. Quality of life will also be investigated. DISCUSSION This study is designed to demonstrate whether hypofractionated radiotherapy is beneficial in terms of biochemical control and toxicity compared with standard salvage radiotherapy. If hypofractionated radiotherapy is shown to be superior to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, it will mean that improved biochemical control can be achieved, accompanied by greater patient convenience and more efficient use of medical resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03920033. Registered on 18 April 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geumju Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Joo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Hanjong Ahn
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Sung Lee
- Clinical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Seok Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferrera G, D'Alessandro S, Cuccia F, Serretta V, Trapani G, Savoca G, Mortellaro G, Lo Casto A. Post-operative hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a mono-institutional analysis of toxicity and clinical outcomes. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 148:89-95. [PMID: 34595542 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03816-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the use of hypofractionation has spread in the setting of curative prostate radiotherapy, few data are available in the post-operative scenario. This study reports a mono-institutional experience of moderate post-operative hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS In February 2021, we retrospectively assessed the outcomes of 129 patients who received between April 2013 and May 2020 hypofractionated post-operative radiotherapy using Helical Tomotherapy. Toxicity was assessed using CTCAE criteria v4.0. Survival endpoints were calculated with Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Median age and follow-up were, respectively, 67 years and 43 months. Adjuvant and salvage treatment were delivered to 63.5% and 36.4% of patients to a median total dose of 63.8 Gy (61.6-65.25 Gy) in 29 fractions (2.12-2.25 Gy/fraction). Pelvic lymph-nodes irradiation was performed in 67.4% of cases. ADT was added in 50%. Acute toxicity was: G1 and G2 GU events in 36% and 9.3% of cases; G1 and G2 GI events in 29.4% and 13.9%. Late GU toxicity occurred in 12.4% of cases: 3.1% G1, 7.7% G2 and 1.5% G3 events; GI toxicity consisted of 1.5% G1 and 7.7% G2 events. Biochemical relapse occurred in 26.3% of cases, recording no significant differences between adjuvant and salvage (p = 0.67), with 4- and 5-years bRFS rates of 78.7% and 75.6%. Two patients died of progressive disease and eight for non-oncological causes resulting in 3-years overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates of 98% and 98.4%. CONCLUSIONS Our experience supports the use of moderate hypofractionation for prostate bed radiotherapy, with minimal toxicity and promising results in terms of clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Salvatore D'Alessandro
- Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy.,Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
| | | | - Giovanna Trapani
- Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy.,Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio Lo Casto
- Radiation Oncology School, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.,Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic Department Bi.N.D., Institute of Radiology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Murgic J, Jaksic B, Prpic M, Kust D, Bahl A, Budanec M, Prgomet Secan A, Franco P, Kruljac I, Spajic B, Babic N, Kruslin B, Zovak M, Zubizarreta E, Rosenblatt E, Fröbe A. Comparison of hypofractionation and standard fractionation for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistent PSA: single institution experience. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:88. [PMID: 33980277 PMCID: PMC8115388 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01808-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypofractionated post-prostatectomy radiotherapy is emerging practice, however with no randomized evidence so far to support it's use. Additionally, patients with persistent PSA after prostatectomy may have aggressive disease and respond less well on standard salvage treatment. Herein we report outcomes for conventionally fractionated (CFR) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFR) in patients with persistent postprostatectomy PSA who received salvage radiotherapy to prostate bed. METHODS Single institution retrospective chart review was performed after Institutional Review Board approval. Between May 2012 and December 2016, 147 patients received salvage postprostatectomy radiotherapy. PSA failure-free and metastasis-free survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to test association of fractionation regimen and other clinical factors with treatment outcomes. Early and late toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients who had persistent PSA (≥ 0.1 ng/mL) after prostatectomy were identified. Median follow-up was 67 months (95% CI 58-106 months, range, 8-106 months). Thirty-six patients (52.2%) received CFR, 66 Gy in 33 fractions, 2 Gy per fraction, and 33 patients (47.8%) received HFR, 52.5 Gy in 20 fractions, 2.63 Gy per fraction. Forty-seven (68%) patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). 5-year PSA failure- and metastasis-free survival rate was 56.9% and 76.9%, respectively. Thirty patients (43%) experienced biochemical failure after salvage radiotherapy and 16 patients (23%) experienced metastatic relapse. Nine patients (13%) developed metastatic castration-resistant disease and died of advanced prostate cancer. Median PSA failure-free survival was 72 months (95% CI; 41-72 months), while median metastasis-free survival was not reached. Patients in HFR group were more likely to experience shorter PSA failure-free survival when compared to CFR group (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.0-4.6, p = 0.04). On univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with PSA failure-free survival were radiotherapy schedule (CFR vs HFR, HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.6, p = 0.04), first postoperative PSA (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.0-1.04, p = 0.03), and concomitant ADT (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2-8.6, p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with PSA failure-free survival were radiotherapy schedule (HR 3.04, 95% CI 1.37-6.74, p = 0.006) and concomitant ADT (HR 4.41, 95% CI 1.6-12.12, p = 0.004). On univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with metastasis-free survival were the first postoperative PSA (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.12, p = 0.002), seminal vesicle involvement (HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.26-9.6,p = 0.02), extracapsular extension (HR 7.02, 95% CI 1.96-25.07, p = 0.003), and surgical margin status (HR 2.86, 95% CI 1.03-7.97, p = 0.04). The first postoperative PSA (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08, p = 0.02) and extracapsular extension (HR 4.24, 95% CI 1.08-16.55, p = 0.04) remained significantly associated with metastasis-free survival on multivariate analysis. Three patients in CFR arm (8%) experienced late genitourinary grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, commonly used hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen was associated with lower biochemical control compared to standard fractionation in patients with persistent PSA receiving salvage radiotherapy. Reason for this might be lower biological dose in HFR compared to CFR group. However, this observation is limited due to baseline imbalances in ADT use, ADT duration and Grade Group distribution between two radiotherapy cohorts. In patients with persistent PSA post-prostatectomy, the first postoperative PSA is an independent risk factor for treatment failure. Additional studies are needed to corroborate our observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jure Murgic
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Vinogradska 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Blanka Jaksic
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Vinogradska 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marin Prpic
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Vinogradska 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
- School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Gunduliceva 5, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Davor Kust
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Vinogradska 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Amit Bahl
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS13NU, UK
| | - Mirjana Budanec
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Vinogradska 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Angela Prgomet Secan
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Vinogradska 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100, Novara, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Maggiore della Carità' University Hospital, 28100, Novara, Italy
| | - Ivan Kruljac
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases "Mladen Sekso", University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Vinogradska 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Borislav Spajic
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Nenad Babic
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Vinogradska 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Bozo Kruslin
- Ljudevit Jurak Department of Pathology and Cytology, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Vinogradska 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Mario Zovak
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Vinogradska 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Eduardo Zubizarreta
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Wagramer Str. 5, 1220, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eduardo Rosenblatt
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Wagramer Str. 5, 1220, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ana Fröbe
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Vinogradska 29, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
- School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Gunduliceva 5, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wages NA, Sanders JC, Smith A, Wood S, Anscher MS, Varhegyi N, Krupski TL, Harris TJ, Showalter TN. Hypofractionated Postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer to Reduce Toxicity and Improve Patient Convenience: A Phase 1/2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:1254-1262. [PMID: 33227441 PMCID: PMC7965239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The phase 1 portion of this multicenter, phase 1/2 study of hypofractionated (HypoFx) prostate bed radiation therapy (RT) as salvage or adjuvant therapy aimed to identify the shortest dose-fractionation schedule with acceptable toxicity. The phase 2 portion aimed to assess the health-related quality of life (QoL) of using this HypoFx regimen. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligibility included standard adjuvant or salvage prostate bed RT indications. Patients were assigned to receive 1 of 3 daily RT schedules: 56.6 Gy in 20 Fx, 50.4 Gy in 15 Fx, or 42.6 Gy in 10 Fx. Regional nodal irradiation and androgen deprivation therapy were not allowed. Participants were followed for 2 years after treatment with outcome measures based on prostate-specific antigen levels, toxicity assessments (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v4.0), QoL measures (the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC] and EuroQol EQ-5D instruments), and out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS There were 32 evaluable participants, and median follow-up was 3.53 years. The shortest dose-fractionation schedule with acceptable toxicity was determined to be 42.6 Gy in 10 Fx, with most patients (23) treated with this schedule. Grade 3 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities occurred in 3 patients and 1 patient, respectively. There was 1 grade 4 sepsis event. Higher dose to the hottest 25% of the rectum was associated with increased risk of grade 2+ GI toxicity; no dosimetric factors were found to predict for GU toxicity. There was a significant decrease in the mean bowel, but not bladder, QoL score at 1 year compared with baseline. Prostate-specific antigen failure occurred in 34.3% of participants, using a definition of nadir plus 2 ng/mL. Metastases were more likely to occur in regional lymph nodes (5 of 7) than in bones (2 of 7). The mean out-of-pocket cost for patients during treatment was $223.90. CONCLUSIONS We identified 42.6 Gy in 10 fractions as the shortest dose-fractionation schedule with acceptable toxicity in this phase 1/2 study. There was a higher than expected rate of grade 2 to 3 GU and GI toxicity and a decreased EPIC bowel QoL domain with this regimen. Future studies are needed to explore alternative adjuvant/salvage HypoFx RT schedules after radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nolan A Wages
- Division of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| | - Jason C Sanders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Amy Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Songserea Wood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Mitchell S Anscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Nikole Varhegyi
- Division of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Tracey L Krupski
- Department of Urology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Timothy J Harris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li R, Liu X, Yang B, Qiu J. External beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: What are the current research trends and hotspots? Cancer Med 2021; 10:772-782. [PMID: 33480190 PMCID: PMC7877352 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) applied for prostate cancer (PCa) has been one of the most important and hottest research fields over recent decades. This study aimed to explore the research hotspots of EBRT in PCa and help the researchers have a clear and intuitive reference basis for later researches. Methods The literature scientometric analysis related to “EBRT applied for PCa” was conducted via the Web of Science Core Collection from 2010 to 2019. The Microsoft Office Excel 2019 and CiteSpace V. 5.7.R1 software were introduced for visualizing and analyzing the data. Results A total of 7860 relevant papers were extracted and downloaded. A total of 7828 papers were extracted and analyzed after data cleansing by CiteSpace. The tendency of published papers was comprehensively increasing from 2010 to 2019. Among all 73 countries/regions, USA published the most papers, accounting for 39%, which was the most active contributor with most publications. Australia (Centrality: 0.18), England (Centrality: 0.12) were cooperating most cohesively with other countries. Univ Toronto was the most productive institute (229), while Harvard Univ (Centrality: 0.67) had extensive collaborations with other institutes. The International journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics had the largest number of publications and the highest number of co‐citations. Briganti A had the largest volume of publications. D'Amico AV had the highest number of co‐citations. Four latest and largest clusters were identified as oligometastases, salvage therapy (SRT), prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and hypofractionation. Thirteen references became strongest burst citations lasting until 2019. The studies of “oligometastases,” “SRT,” “PSMA,” “hypofractionation,” “postoperative radiotherapy,” and “dose and fraction regimen changes” were prevailing in the recent years. Conclusion The “oligometastases,” “SRT,” “PSMA,” “hypofractionation,” “postoperative radiotherapy,” and “dose and fraction regimen changes” may be the state‐of‐art research frontiers, and related studies will advance in this field over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xia Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Valero J, Montero A, Hernando O, Izquierdo M, Sánchez E, García-Aranda M, López M, Ciérvide R, Martí J, Álvarez B, Alonso R, Chen-Zhao X, Fernández-Letón P, Rubio C. Moderate hypofractionated post-prostatectomy radiation therapy is feasible and well tolerated: experience from a single tertiary cancer centre. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:1452-1462. [PMID: 33433839 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02543-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Conventional post-prostatectomy radiation therapy comprises 6.5-8 weeks of treatment, therefore, hypofractionated and shortened schemes arouse increasing interest. We describe our experience regarding feasibility and clinical outcome of a post-prostatectomy moderate hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy schedule MATERIALS AND METHODS: From Oct 2015-Mar 2020, 113 patients, median age of 62 years-old (range 45-76) and prostate adenocarcinoma of low risk (30%), intermediate risk (49%) and high risk (21%) were included for adjuvant (34%) or salvage radiation therapy (66%) after radical prostatectomy (RP). All patients underwent radiotherapy with image-guided IMRT/VMAT to a total dose of 62.5 Gy in 2.5 Gy/fraction in 25 fractions. Sixteen patients (14%) received concomitant androgen deprivation therapy. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 29 months (range 3-60 months) all patients but three are alive. Eleven patients (10%) developed exclusive biochemical relapse while 19 patients (17%) presented macroscopically visible relapse: prostatectomy bed in two patients (2%), pelvic lymph nodes in 13 patients (11.5%) and distant metastases in four patients (4%). The 3 years actuarial rates for OS, bFRS, and DMFS were 99.1, 91.1 and 91.2%, respectively. Acute and late tolerance was satisfactory. Maximal acute genitourinary (AGU) toxicity was G2 in 8% of patients; maximal acute gastrointestinal (AGI) toxicity was G2 in 3.5% of patients; maximal late genitourinary (LGU) toxicity was G3 in 1% of patients and maximal late gastrointestinal (LGI) toxicity was G2 in 2% of patients. There were no cases of severe acute or late toxicity. No relationship was found between acute or late GI/GU adverse effects and dosimetric parameters, age, presence of comorbidities or concomitant treatments. CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated radiotherapy (62.5 Gy in 25 2.5 Gy fractions) is feasible and well tolerated with low complication rates allowing for a moderate dose-escalation that offers encouraging clinical results for biochemical control and survival in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Valero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain.
| | - O Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Izquierdo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - M García-Aranda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - M López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Ciérvide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Martí
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Álvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - X Chen-Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - C Rubio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, c/Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Nicosia L, Giaj-Levra N, Figlia V, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Vitale C, Corradini S, Alongi F. Prostate re-irradiation: current concerns and future perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 20:947-956. [PMID: 32909471 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1822742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To date, the optimal management of locally relapsed prostate cancer patients after an initial course of radiotherapy remains a matter of debate. In recent years, local approaches have been proposed as a therapeutic option, which may potentially delay the initiation of hormone therapy. In the case of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), re-irradiation has been supported by growing evidence in the literature, mostly represented by extreme hypofractionated schedules delivered with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). AREAS COVERED We performed a systematic review of the literature using the PICO methodology to explore the available evidence regarding the use of EBRT in the setting of locally relapsed prostate cancer, both in terms of safety, tolerability and preliminary clinical outcomes. EXPERT OPINION Current literature data report the use of EBRT and particularly of SBRT for the safe and feasible re-treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer after an initial treatment course of radiotherapy. When extreme hypofractionation is adopted, only occasional grade ≥3 late adverse events are reported. Despite the current lack of high-level evidence and the short follow-up, preliminary clinical outcomes are promising and allow clinicians to hypothesize further prospective studies to evaluate SBRT as an alternative to the early initiation of androgen-deprivation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Vitale
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, University of Munich , Munich, Germany
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy.,University of Brescia , Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chin S, Fatimilehin A, Walshaw R, Argarwal A, Mistry H, Elliott T, Logue J, Wylie J, Choudhury A. Ten-Year Outcomes of Moderately Hypofractionated Salvage Postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy and External Validation of a Contemporary Multivariable Nomogram for Biochemical Failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:288-296. [PMID: 31987961 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although high-level evidence supports moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy for definitive prostate treatment, there is less evidence for its use in the postprostatectomy setting. We externally validated a contemporary nomogram predicting biochemical failure (BF) after salvage radiation therapy (SRT) and report long-term disease control outcomes for hypofractionated SRT to the prostate bed. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective review was performed for 112 patients treated with hypofractionated SRT (52.5 Gy in 20 fractions using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy) for pT2-4R0-1N0/XM0 prostate adenocarcinoma, with postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 0.1 ng/mL or rising. Freedom from BF (FFBF), distant metastasis, cancer-specific mortality, and overall survival were analyzed from commencement of radiation therapy. Cox regression was performed on FFBF to account for covariates. BF was defined as a PSA ≥0.4 ng/mL and rising after SRT. Early SRT was defined as SRT commencing at a pre-SRT PSA of ≤0.2 ng/mL. RESULTS Median follow-up was 10.0 years (interquartile range, 9.3-10.7 years), median pre-SRT PSA was 0.4 ng/mL, and androgen deprivation therapy was used in 14% of patients. The 5/10-year FFBF, distant metastasis, cancer-specific mortality, and overall survival were 68%/51%, 7%/16%, 5%/11%, and 90%/75%, respectively. FFBF for early SRT compared with late SRT was 81% versus 66% at 5 years and 68% versus 49% at 10 years. On multivariable analysis, pre-SRT PSA, International Society of Urologic Pathology grade group, seminal vesicle invasion, and androgen deprivation therapy use were associated with FFBF. The nomogram c-index was 0.67, and it overestimated FFBF by 10% and 15% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, with confidence intervals overlapping the line of unity. CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionated SRT provides long-term disease control outcomes comparable to conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Early SRT provides improved disease control, with two-thirds of patients with pre-SRT PSA of ≤0.2 ng/mL free of BF at 10 years. We performed the first external validation of the Tendulkar salvage nomogram, which showed a robust model performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Chin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Rural Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Abiola Fatimilehin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Walshaw
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Arjun Argarwal
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Hitesh Mistry
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Pharmacy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Tony Elliott
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - John Logue
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - James Wylie
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Koerber SA, Katayama S, Sander A, Jaekel C, Haefner MF, Debus J, Herfarth K. Prostate bed irradiation with alternative radio-oncological approaches (PAROS) - a prospective, multicenter and randomized phase III trial. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:122. [PMID: 31291969 PMCID: PMC6617634 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1325-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background For patients with treatment-naïve carcinoma of the prostate, hypofractionated irradiation becomes more and more popular. Due to the low α/β value of prostate cancer, increased single dose leading to a shortened treatment period seems to be safe and feasible. However, reliable data is lacking for post-prostatectomy patients so far. Further, the role of proton therapy is still under debate. Two prospective phase II trials with both, hypofractionated photon and proton therapy, provided promising results. Methods/ design The PAROS trial is a prospective, multicenter and randomized phase III trial for men with localized prostate carcinoma after surgery. Post-prostatectomy patients will be randomized to either normofractionated radiotherapy (nRT) with photons (70.0/ 2.0 Gy), or hypofractionated radiotherapy (hRT) with photons (57.0/ 3.0 Gy) or hRT with protons (57.0/ 3.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE]). Block randomization is stratified by Gleason Score (≤ 7 vs. > 7) and treatment indication (adjuvant vs. salvage). The trial is planned to enroll 897 patients. The primary objective is to show an improvement in the bowel-score according to EORTC QLQ-PR25 after proton therapy compared to photon irradiation (week 12 vs. baseline). Secondary aims are non-inferiority of hRT compared to nRT with regard to biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life and toxicity. Discussion The present study aims to evaluate the role of hypofractionated radiotherapy to the prostate bed with photons and protons leading to significant impact on future management of operated men with prostate cancer. Trial registration Deutsches Register klinischer Studien: DRKS00015231; registered 27 September 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Sander
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Jaekel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|