1
|
Pericay C, Fernández Montes A, Alonso Orduña V, Macias Declara I, Asensio Martínez E, Rodríguez Salas N, Torres E, Cacho Lavín D, Rodríguez Alonso RM, Falcó E, Oliva JC, Cirera L. Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Spain: The RWD-ACROSS Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4603. [PMID: 37760572 PMCID: PMC10526223 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The retrospective, observational RWD-ACROSS study analyzed disease characteristics, systemic treatment, and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Spain. In total, 2002 patients were enrolled (mean age 65.3 years; 62.7% male). Overall median overall survival (OS) was 26.72 months, and was longer in patients with left-sided tumors (28.85 vs. 21.04 months (right-sided tumors); p < 0.0001) and in patients receiving first-line anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment (31.21 vs. 26.75 (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment) and 24.45 months (chemotherapy); p = 0.002). Overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.72 months and was longer in patients with left-sided tumors (11.24 vs. 9.31 months (right-sided tumors); p < 0.0001), and in patients receiving either first-line anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF (12.13 and 12.00 vs. 8.98 months (chemotherapy); p < 0.001). PFS was longer with anti-VEGF treatment in patients with right-sided tumors and wild-type RAS (11.24 vs. 8.78 (anti-EGFR) and 7.83 months (chemotherapy); p = 0.025). Both anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF produced longer PFS in patients with left-sided tumors and wild-type RAS than chemotherapy alone (12.39 and 13.14 vs. 9.83 months; p = 0.011). In patients with left-sided tumors and mutant RAS, anti-VEGF produced a longer PFS than chemotherapy alone (12.36 vs. 9.34 months; p = 0.001). In Spain, wild-type RAS or left-sided mCRC tumors are predictive of longer survival times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carles Pericay
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Mútua Terrassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5., 08221 Terrassa, Spain;
| | - Ana Fernández Montes
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Calle Ramón Puga Noguerol, 54., 32005 Ourense, Spain;
| | - Vicente Alonso Orduña
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Aragon, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3., 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - Ismael Macias Declara
- Institut d’Investigació I Innovació I3PT, Fundació Parc Taulí, Plaça Taulí, 1., 08208 Sabadell, Spain; (I.M.D.); (J.C.O.)
| | - Elena Asensio Martínez
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Carrer Almazara, 11., 03203 Elche, Spain;
| | - Nuria Rodríguez Salas
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana, 261., 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Esperanza Torres
- UGC Intercentros de Oncología Médica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria and Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Campus de Teatinos, S/N, 29010 Málaga, Spain;
| | - Diego Cacho Lavín
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain;
| | - Rosa María Rodríguez Alonso
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía-Córdoba, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n., 14004 Córdoba, Spain;
| | - Esther Falcó
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital de Son Llàtzer, Carretera de Manacor, 07198 Palma de-Mallorca, Spain;
| | - Joan Carles Oliva
- Institut d’Investigació I Innovació I3PT, Fundació Parc Taulí, Plaça Taulí, 1., 08208 Sabadell, Spain; (I.M.D.); (J.C.O.)
| | - Lluis Cirera
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Mútua Terrassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5., 08221 Terrassa, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martins D, Rodrigues J, Redondo P, Julião I, Faustino C. Evaluating the Optimal Sequence of Treatment With EGFR Inhibitors and Bevacizumab in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cureus 2022; 14:e23543. [PMID: 35494924 PMCID: PMC9042308 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
3
|
Optimal Sequence and Second-Line Systemic Treatment of Patients with RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10215166. [PMID: 34768686 PMCID: PMC8584361 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Although several sequential therapy options are available for treating patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the optimal sequence of these therapies is not well established. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies were performed, resulting from a search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases. Overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly in patients with RAS-WT failure who were administered a second-line regimen of changed chemotherapy (CT) plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) versus only changed CT, changed CT plus bevacizumab versus changed CT plus anti-EGFR, or changed CT versus maintaining CT plus anti-EGFR after first-line therapy with CT, plus bevacizumab. However, OS was significantly different with a second-line regimen that included changed CT plus bevacizumab, versus only changing CT. Analysis of first-line therapy with CT plus anti-EGFR for treatment of RAS-WT mCRC indicated that second-line therapy of changed CT plus an anti-EGFR agent resulted in better outcomes than changing CT without targeted agents. The pooled data study demonstrated that the optimal choice of second-line treatment for improved OS was an altered CT regimen with retention of bevacizumab after first-line bevacizumab failure. The best sequence for first-to-second-line therapy of patients with RAS-WT mCRC was cetuximab-based therapy, followed by a bevacizumab-based regimen.
Collapse
|
4
|
Oppelt KA, Kuiper JG, Ingrasciotta Y, Ientile V, Herings RMC, Tari M, Trifirò G, Haug U. Characteristics and Absolute Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Biologics: A Real-World Data Analysis From Three European Countries. Front Oncol 2021; 11:630456. [PMID: 33747950 PMCID: PMC7973261 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.630456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Biologics were approved for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) based on favorable benefit-risk-assessments from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but evidence on their use in the real-world setting is scarce. Based on descriptive analyses we therefore aimed to assess characteristics and survival of CRC patients treated with biologics using large healthcare databases from three European countries (Netherlands, Italy, Germany). Methods: We included CRC patients treated with a biologic in 2010 or 2014 and characterized them regarding age, sex, comorbidities, and absolute survival. Results: Among 4,758 patients, the mean age ranged from 64.8 to 66.8 years, the majority was male, and comorbidities used as exclusion criteria in RCTs were coded in up to 30% of these patients. The proportion of bevacizumab users decreased between 2010 (72–93%) and 2014 (63–85%). In 2014, the absolute 12-month survival in new users was 64% (95% CI 51–77%), 56% (30–80%), and 61% (58–63%) in the Dutch, Italian, and German database, respectively, varying by age and comorbidity. Conclusions: Our study suggests that in the real-world setting, CRC patients treated with biologics are older and less selected regarding comorbidities compared to patients in RCTs, potentially explaining the relatively low 12-month survival we found. Treatment decisions in the real-world setting may require careful evaluation given that the risk-benefit ratio may vary depending on age and co-existing conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja A Oppelt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - Ylenia Ingrasciotta
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Valentina Ientile
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ron M C Herings
- PHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Gianluca Trifirò
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ulrike Haug
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.,Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sequential Treatment with Bevacizumab and Aflibercept for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real-World Clinical Practice. Target Oncol 2020; 15:193-201. [PMID: 32052341 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-020-00705-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bevacizumab and aflibercept are currently the mainstay of antiangiogenic therapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). They are often used in sequence with first- and second-line chemotherapy, especially in patients with RAS-mutated tumours. OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to investigate the outcomes of patients with mCRC treated with the bevacizumab-aflibercept sequence in real-world clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from a national clinical registry of targeted therapies for mCRC were analysed retrospectively. Overall, there were 366 patients with valid data who received first-line treatment with bevacizumab and chemotherapy followed by aflibercept with chemotherapy. The majority of the patients (n = 296, 80.8%) had RAS mutated tumours. RESULTS Median cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of the bevacizumab-containing regimen to progression on aflibercept was 18.2 months (95% CI 16.8-19.5). Median PFS for bevacizumab and aflibercept was 10.6 months (95% CI 9.5-11.7) and 5.6 months (95% CI 5.1-6.1), respectively. Longer PFS on aflibercept was associated with metachronous metastatic disease and longer PFS on bevacizumab. Median overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line bevacizumab was 32.0 months (95% CI 26.6-37.5). The presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis was associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with aflibercept in real-world clinical practice achieved similar survival outcomes as those treated within randomised trials. Cumulative survival data provide a benchmark for future studies and enable indirect comparisons with other treatment sequences used in mCRC.
Collapse
|
6
|
Novakova-Jiresova A, Kopeckova K, Boublikova L, Chloupkova R, Melichar B, Petruzelka L, Finek J, Fiala O, Grell P, Batko S, Linke Z, Kiss I, Prausova J, Buchler T. Regorafenib for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Analysis of a Registry-Based Cohort of 555 Patients. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:5365-5372. [PMID: 32753954 PMCID: PMC7342462 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s255332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor approved for the therapy of previously treated metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). The aim of the present study was to analyze the outcomes of treatment with regorafenib in real-world clinical practice based on data from a national registry. Methods The CORECT registry, the Czech non-interventional database of patients with mCRC treated with targeted agents, searched for patients with metastatic CRC treated with regorafenib. In total, 555 evaluable patients were identified. Results The median age at diagnosis was 61.7 years. All patients had disease progression on or after previous systemic treatment. Most patients were treated with an initial dose of 160 mg daily (n = 463; 83.6%). The median duration of treatment was 2.7 months (range 0.0-23.4 months). By the data cut-off date, 472 patients (85%) had completed treatment with regorafenib and were evaluable for treatment response evaluation. Partial response was reported in 13 patients (2.8%) and disease stabilization in 130 patients (27.5%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-3.7 months) and 9.3 months (95% CI 8.3-10.3 months), respectively. The 6-month OS rate was 67.7% (95% CI 63.4-72.1%). Multivariable analysis showed that female gender, longer interval from diagnosis of metastatic disease, M0 stage at diagnosis, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 were associated with longer PFS, while higher body-mass index (BMI), longer interval from diagnosis of metastatic disease, and ECOG PS of 0 were associated with longer OS. Conclusion OS of patients treated with regorafenib in the real-world clinical practice in this cohort exceeded that reported in randomized trials. Regorafenib is a safe and active treatment option for a subgroup of patients with mCRC who are progressing after other systemic therapies and maintain good performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alena Novakova-Jiresova
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Katerina Kopeckova
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital in Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ludmila Boublikova
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Renata Chloupkova
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analysis, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Bohuslav Melichar
- Department of Oncology, Palacky University Medical and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Lubos Petruzelka
- Department of Oncology, General Faculty Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jindrich Finek
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical School and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrej Fiala
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical School and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.,Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Peter Grell
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Stanislav Batko
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital in Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Zdenek Linke
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital in Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Igor Kiss
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Prausova
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital in Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Buchler
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cervena K, Siskova A, Buchler T, Vodicka P, Vymetalkova V. Methylation-Based Therapies for Colorectal Cancer. Cells 2020; 9:E1540. [PMID: 32599894 PMCID: PMC7349319 DOI: 10.3390/cells9061540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal carcinogenesis (CRC) is caused by the gradual long-term accumulation of both genetic and epigenetic changes. Recently, epigenetic alterations have been included in the classification of the CRC molecular subtype, and this points out their prognostic impact. As epigenetic modifications are reversible, they may represent relevant therapeutic targets. DNA methylation, catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), regulates gene expression. For many years, the deregulation of DNA methylation has been considered to play a substantial part in CRC etiology and evolution. Despite considerable advances in CRC treatment, patient therapy response persists as limited, and their profit from systemic therapies are often hampered by the introduction of chemoresistance. In addition, inter-individual changes in therapy response in CRC patients can arise from their specific (epi)genetic compositions. In this review article, we summarize the options of CRC treatment based on DNA methylation status for their predictive value. This review also includes the therapy outcomes based on the patient's methylation status in CRC patients. In addition, the current challenge of research is to develop therapeutic inhibitors of DNMT. Based on the essential role of DNA methylation in CRC development, the application of DNMT inhibitors was recently proposed for the treatment of CRC patients, especially in patients with DNA hypermethylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klara Cervena
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Siskova
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Buchler
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Videnska 800, 140 59 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Pavel Vodicka
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Veronika Vymetalkova
- Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1083, 14 200 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.C.); (A.S.); (P.V.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Albertov 4, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|