Does the radiologist need to rescan the breast lesion to validate the final BI-RADS US assessment made on the static images in the diagnostic setting?

A New Practical Decision Rule to Better Differentiate BI-RADS 3 or 4 Breast Masses on Breast Ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

The BI-RADS classification provides a standardized way to describe ultrasound findings in breast cancer diagnostics. However, there is little information regarding which BI-RADS descriptors are most strongly associated with malignancy, to better distinguish BI-RADS 3 (follow-up imaging) and 4 (diagnostic biopsy) breast masses.

METHODS

Patients were recruited as part of an international, multicenter trial (NCT02638935). The trial enrolled 1294 women (6 excluded) categorized as BI-RADS 3 or 4 upon routine B-mode ultrasound examination. Ultrasound images were evaluated by three expert physicians according to BI-RADS. All patients underwent histopathological confirmation (reference standard). We performed univariate and multivariate analyses (chi-square test, logistic regression, and Krippendorff's alpha).

RESULTS

Histopathologic evaluation showed malignancy in 368 of 1288 masses (28.6%). Upon performing multivariate analysis, the following descriptors were significantly associated with malignancy (P < .05): age ≥50 years (OR 8.99), non-circumscribed indistinct (OR 4.05) and microlobulated margin (OR 2.95), nonparallel orientation (OR 2.69), and calcification (OR 2.64). A clinical decision rule informed by these results demonstrated a 97% sensitivity and missed fewer cancers compared to three physician experts (range of sensitivity 79-95%) and a previous decision rule (sensitivity 59%). Specificity was 44% versus 22-83%, respectively. The inter-reader reliability of the BI-RADS descriptors and of the final BI-RADS score was fair-moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

A patient should undergo a diagnostic biopsy (BI-RADS 4) instead of follow-up imaging (BI-RADS 3) if the patient is 50 years or older or exhibits at least one of the following features: calcification, nonparallel orientation of mass, non-circumscribed margin, or posterior shadowing.

Automated breast ultrasound: Supplemental screening for average-risk women with dense breasts

OBJECTIVE

We review ultrasound (US) options for supplemental breast cancer screening of average risk women with dense breasts.

CONCLUSION

Performance data of physician-performed handheld US (HHUS), technologist-performed HHUS, and automated breast ultrasound (AUS) indicate that all are appropriate for adjunctive screening. Volumetric 3D acquisitions, reduced operator dependence, protocol standardization, reliable comparison with previous studies, independence of performance and interpretation, and whole breast depiction on coronal view may favor selection of AUS. Important considerations are workflow adjustments for physicians and staff.