Decision of Adjuvant Systemic Treatment in HR+ HER2- Early Invasive Breast Cancer: Which Biomarkers Could Help?

Neoadjuvant nivolumab + palbociclib + anastrozole for oestrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative primary breast cancer: Results from CheckMate 7A8

BACKGROUND

Preclinical data suggest synergistic activity with the combination of programmed death-1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 blockade in oestrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer. The noncomparative phase 1b/2 CheckMate 7A8 study (NCT04075604) evaluated neoadjuvant treatment with nivolumab, palbociclib, and anastrozole in patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Here, we report outcomes from the safety run-in phase.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed, untreated ER+/HER2- breast cancer, primary tumour ≥2 cm, ECOG performance status ≤1, and eligible for post-treatment surgery received nivolumab 480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks, palbociclib 125 mg or 100 mg orally once daily for 3 weeks per cycle, and anastrozole 1 mg orally once daily for five 4-week cycles, or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) within 4 weeks of treatment initiation.

RESULTS

At safety data review, 21 patients were treated (palbociclib 125-mg group: n = 9; palbociclib 100-mg group: n = 12). DLTs were reported in 2 (22.2%) and 0 patients in the palbociclib 125-mg and 100-mg groups, respectively. Across both groups, 9 patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity (grade 3/4 hepatic adverse events [n = 6], grade 3 febrile neutropaenia [n = 1], grade 1 pneumonitis [n = 1], and grade 3 rash and grade 2 immune-mediated pneumonitis [n = 1]). Consequently, the study was closed early.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant treatment with nivolumab, palbociclib, and anastrozole showed a high incidence of grade 3/4 hepatotoxicity and treatment discontinuation, indicating that this combination should not be further pursued for treatment of primary ER+/HER2- breast cancer.

A real-world retrospective study of the use of Ki-67 testing and treatment patterns in patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer in the United States

Background

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer be considered for adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) after primary treatment like surgical excision. Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) use primarily depends on risk of recurrence. Biomarkers such as Ki-67 potentially have most value in patients with intermediate risk factors, such as involvement of 1–3 positive nodes. This study evaluated the use of Ki-67 testing and treatment patterns in patients with HR+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer.

Methods

This was an observational retrospective cohort study of patients with electronic medical records from January 2010 to August 2018 treated for HR+, HER2− early breast cancer at Sarah Cannon sites in the United States (US). Overall, 567 patients were randomly selected after using the eligibility criteria: female or male ≥18 years, without distant metastases, and with available physician and pathology reports. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate factors predicting Ki-67 testing and test results. Descriptive analyses were applied to treatment patterns.

Results

Multivariable logistic regression analyses found no clinical or pathological factors that predicted whether Ki-67 testing had been ordered by physicians. Of all tested patients (N = 130), having Grade-2 tumors (OR, 7.95 [95% CI: 2.05, 30.9]; p = 0.0027) or Grade-3 tumors (OR, 95.3 [95% CI, 11.9, 760.7]; p < 0.001) at initial diagnosis was a predictor of high Ki-67 expression (≥20%). Ki-67 expression was tested in 23.6% (61/258) of patients with 1–3 positive nodes; 54.1% of them (33/61) had high Ki-67 expression (≥20%). While having a higher grade tumor predicted high Ki-67 (≥20%), 28.6% of patients with Grade-1 tumors also had high Ki-67 expression. Neo-adjuvant therapy was received by 16.0% of patients (91/567), most of whom (66/91; 72.5%) received CT alone. Adjuvant therapy, either endocrine and/or chemotherapy, was received by 92.6% (525/567) of patients and by 67.0% (61/91) of those who received neo-adjuvant therapy. Most (428/525, 81.5%) received ET in the adjuvant treatment setting.

Conclusions

High grade tumors predicted high Ki-67 (≥20%) expression, but Ki-67 testing was not widely used in these US patients. Most HR+, HER2− early breast cancers were treated with adjuvant ET, with or without CT.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09557-6.

Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in premenopausal women

In the past 20 years, clinicians have shifted away from relying solely on clinicopathologic indicators toward increasing use of multigene expression assays in guiding treatment decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) is one of the most widely used multigene assays when considering indications for adjuvant chemotherapy, and guidelines have recently incorporated its use in women with early HR-positive HER2-negative breast cancer and up to three positive lymph nodes. While multiple retrospective and prospective clinical studies have demonstrated that most women with a low- to mid-range RS (0-25) can safely forgo chemotherapy, premenopausal women remain an important subgroup for which recommendations based on RS are ill-defined. The majority of patients included in clinical trials and retrospective analyses validating the use of RS have been postmenopausal women. In the subgroup of premenopausal women with HR-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, studies indicate that traditional clinicopathologic methods for assessing risk continue to be powerful tools when combined with RS to predict benefit from chemotherapy. This suggests that there is an element of uncaptured risk inherent to the premenopausal state that evades characterization by RS alone. This review describes the evidence that has supported the recommendation of RS in clinical guidelines, specifically focusing on data for its current use in premenopausal women. We review available data regarding the impact of the menstrual cycle on hormonally regulated gene expression, which may drive variations in the RS. Further research on the reliability and interpretation of the RS in the premenopausal subgroup is necessary and represents a gap in knowledge of how the RS should be applied in premenopausal women.

[uPA/PAI-1 and EPClin®: Comparison of their impact on the management of intermediate-prognosis breast cancers]

OBJECTIVE

The uPA/PAI-1 assay and the EPClin® test are useful tools that add to clinico-anatomical characteristics to determine the indication of adjuvant chemotherapy in case of intermediate-prognosis invasive breast cancer. The principal purpose of our study was to analyze the concordance of uPA/PAI-1 and EPClin® in classification of patients into two groups: low and high risk of relapse.

METHODS

We prospectively included 63 patients treated for intermediate-prognosis invasive breast cancer. All of these patients received a uPA/PAI-1 assay and an EPClin® test.

RESULTS

The uPA/PAI-1 assay and EPClin® test were consistent for 56.2% and inconsistent for 43.8%. In the event of a discrepancy, the treatment decision was based in 95.2% of patients on the EPClin® test result. In total, 38 patients were selected for adjuvant chemotherapy after achievement of the two tests. The mean time to report results after surgery was 9 days for the uPA/PAI-1 assay and 35 days for the EPClin® test. No cases of recurrence or death were found, with an average follow-up of 32 months.

CONCLUSION

The EPClin® test resulted in more chemotherapy prescriptions than indicated by uPA/PAI-1. However, we can't conclude to the superiority of one of these two tests, survival data and the effectiveness of our study being insufficient. In general, studies comparing different signatures useful to the therapeutic decision of intermediate prognosis breast cancers should be encouraged.

Omission of Chemotherapy in HR+/HER2- Early Invasive Breast Cancer Based on Combined 6-IHC Score?

PURPOSE

Current methods of judging whether HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) require adjuvant therapy, such as Ki67 and multigene prognostic tests, cannot balance accuracy with the price most patients can afford.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 330 HR+/HER2- BC patients was conducted. Six BC-related genes (Cathepsin L2, MMP11, CyclinB1, Aurora A, Survivin, and Ki67) were screened using univariate and multivariate COX regression, and correlate clinical follow-up with immunohistochemical expression (designated as 6-IHC). All the included patients were divided randomly at a 7:3 ratio into training and testing cohorts. The cutoff prognosis index (PI) of 6-IHC was determined by multivariate Cox risk regression analysis after calculating the PI of each patient in training cohort and confirmed in testing cohort. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to analyze Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Six-IHC score and other factors associated with survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy were compared with Ki67 index.

RESULTS

The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the patients can be divided into 6-IHC score "High" and "Low" risk groups. The 8-year DFS and OS of the KM curves showed that chemotherapy did not significantly improve the DFS in the 6-IHC score "Low" risk group (P= 0.830), but significantly improved the DFS in the 6-IHC score "High" risk group (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined 6-IHC score could be a reliable tool in predicting cancer-specific recurrences and survival in HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients, with additional advantages over using immunohistochemical expression of Ki67.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator and inhibitors in resectable lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system is closely related to the occurrence and progression of cancer in many aspects. Previous studies demonstrated that the conclusions about the prognosis value of uPA, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 (PAI-2) in lung cancer are controversial, so this study was performed for the exploration of the predictive effect of uPA, PAI-1 and PAI-2 on the overall survival (OS) of resectable pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients.

METHODS

UPA, PAI-1 and PAI-2 expression levels were assayed by immunohistochemical staining based on tissue microarray (TMA) that is composed of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens from 84 resectable lung adenocarcinoma patients from July 2004 to June 2009. The relationship of IHC, mRNA expression levels of three molecules were investigated respectively. The three molecules' relationship with clinicopathologic parameters and OS was explored by Chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was used to analyze differential gene expressions of RNA-sequencing data of pulmonary adenocarcinoma and normal tissues, and Kaplan-Meier methods were adopted to confirm the prognostic value of uPA, PAI-1 and PAI-2 in resectable lung adenocarcinoma in TCGA database and the R package MethylMix was used to conduct an analysis integrating methylation data and gene expression of RNA-sequencing data based on TCGA.

RESULTS

UPA, PAI-1 and PAI-2 had much higher IHC expression levels in tumor than those in the normal tissues (uPA, Z = -10.511; PAI-1, Z = -4.836; PAI-2, Z = -6.794; all P < 0.0001). High DNA methylation level of gene uPA resulted in the decrease of its expression. In addition, expression level of PAI-2 was positively associated with tumor size (χ² = 8.372, P =  0.004). Multivariate analyses showed TNM stage III was an independent adverse prognostic factor (hazard ratio = 3.736, 95 % confidence interval = 1.097-12.72, P =  0.035). Kaplan-Meier method revealed that uPA, PAI-1 and PAI-2 expression levels were not related to the OS for 84 resectable lung adenocarcinoma patients. According to TCGA data, PAI-1 expression level was identified as a potential adverse predictor for prognosis of resectable lung adenocarcinoma (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that, the expression levels of uPA, PAI-1 and PAI-2 are significantly up-regulated in resectable lung adenocarcinoma. Besides, this study highlights PAI-1 as a latent adverse prognostic factor in resectable adenocarcinoma of lung.