Concurrent proton-pump inhibitors increase risk of death for lung cancer patients receiving 1st-line gefitinib treatment - a nationwide population-based study

Optimizing epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of gastric acid suppressants

Background

The introduction of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. However, their efficacy can be compromised by concurrent use of gastric acid suppressants (GASs), such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs). This study aimed to update the evidence on the impact of GASs on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients on EGFR-TKI treatment.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using data from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, KoreaMed, and preprint repositories. Data from 13 retrospective studies, involving 10,814 patients, were analyzed.

Results

Overall, 34.6% of the patients used GASs, with most being Asian females and non-smokers. Most patients had EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma, reflecting typical EGFR-TKI usage scenarios. Concurrent use of GASs was significantly associated with reduced OS [hazard ratio (HR) =1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.26-1.42], and PFS (HR =1.52, 95% CI: 1.25-1.86). In subgroup analysis, PPIs had a more negative impact on OS (HR =1.64, 95% CI: 1.51-1.79) than did H2RAs (HR =1.11, 95% CI: 0.95-1.31). Longer overlap times of GASs correlated with a higher trend in HRs for OS. However, the results for PFS were not significant in both subgroup analyses.

Conclusions

Concurrent use of GASs with EGFR-TKIs is linked to poorer OS and PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC. Careful consideration is advised when prescribing GASs, including adjusting administration timing, minimizing overlap duration, or opting for H2RAs over PPIs. Further research is needed to optimize treatment protocols, specifically addressing the duration of overlap time, to improve patient outcomes.

Prognostic impact of concomitant pH-regulating drugs in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project 01-S1

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the prognostic impact of concomitant pH-regulating drug use in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study and reviewed clinical data of consecutive patients with NSCLC treated with the first-line EGFR-TKIs in 46 hospitals between April 2010 and March 2020. Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the differences in overall survival (OS) between patients treated with and without concomitant pH-regulating drugs, including potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs).

RESULTS

A total of 758 patients were included in the final dataset, of which 307 (40%) were administered concomitant pH-regulating drugs while receiving frontline EGFR-TKIs. After adjusting for basic patient characteristics, patients administered gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib with concomitant pH-regulating drugs had lower OS than those without concomitant pH-regulating drugs, with hazard ratios of 1.74 (with a 95% confidence interval of 1.34-2.27), 1.33 (0.80-2.22), 1.73 (0.89-3.36), and 5.04 (1.38-18.44), respectively. The 2-year OS rates of patients receiving gefitinib with or without concomitant pH-regulating drugs were 65.4 and 77.5%, those for erlotinib were 55.8 and 66.6%, and those for afatinib were 63.2 and 76.9%, respectively. The 1-year OS rates of patients receiving osimertinib with or without concomitant pH-regulating drugs were 88.1% and 96.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the first-generation EGFR-TKIs, the second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs also resulted in OS deterioration in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC when used concurrently with pH-regulating drugs.

Deleterious association between proton pump inhibitor and protein kinase inhibitor exposure and survival for patients with lung cancer: A nationwide cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have identified an interaction between protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with lung cancer. This type of interaction may reduce the efficacy of PKIs. However, the effect of PKI-PPI interaction on patient mortality remains controversial. This study set out to determine the impact of PKI-PPI interaction on overall survival for lung cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted using data from the French National Health Care Database from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021. We identified patients with: (i) an age equal to or greater than 18 years; (ii) lung cancer; and (iii) at least one reimbursement for one of the following drugs: erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib and osimertinib. Patients were followed-up between the first date of PKI reimbursement and either December 31, 2021 or if they died, the date on which death occurred. The cumulative exposure to PPI duration during PKI treatment was calculated as the ratio between the number of concomitant exposure days to PKI and PPI and the number of exposure days to PKI. A survival analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was then performed to assess the risk of death following exposure to a PKI-PPI interaction.

RESULTS

34,048 patients received at least one reimbursement for PKIs of interest in our study: 26,133 (76.8 %) were exposed to erlotinib; 3,142 (9.2 %) to gefitinib; 1,417 (4.2 %) to afatinib; and 3,356 (9.9 %) to osimertinib. Patients with concomitant exposure to PKI-PPI interaction during 20 % or more of the PKI treatment period demonstrated an increased risk of death (HR, 1.60 [95 % CI, 1.57-1.64]) compared to other patients. When this cut-off varied from 10 % to 80 %, the estimated HR ranged from 1.46 [95 % CI, 1.43-1.50] to 2.19 [95 % CI, 2.12-2.25].

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

In our study, an elevated risk of death was observed in patients exposed to PKI-PPI interaction. Finally, we were able to identify a dose-dependent effect for this interaction. This deleterious effect of osimertinib and PPI was revealed for the first time in real life conditions.

Lung cancer, comorbidities, and medication: the infernal trio

Most patients with lung cancer are smokers and are of advanced age. They are therefore at high risk of having age- and lifestyle-related comorbidities. These comorbidities are subject to treatment or even polypharmacy. There is growing evidence of a link between lung cancer, comorbidities and medications. The relationships between these entities are complex. The presence of comorbidities and their treatments influence the time of cancer diagnosis, as well as the diagnostic and treatment strategy. On the other hand, cancer treatment may have an impact on the patient's comorbidities such as renal failure, pneumonitis or endocrinopathies. This review highlights how some comorbidities may have an impact on lung cancer presentation and may require treatment adjustments. Reciprocal influences between the treatment of comorbidities and anticancer therapy will also be discussed.

The Effects of Antibiotics on the Development and Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

There have been studies on antibiotic use concerning lung cancer and its potential impact on carcinogenesis and microbiome. However, subsequent research has failed to support these associations consistently. In terms of the potential carcinogenic of antibiotics on lung cancer, the available evidence has not been sufficient to draw any definitive conclusions. Maintaining immune homeostasis and preventing pathogen invasion is critically dependent on the microbiome. The subtle balance of the body microbiota, including the lungs, is susceptible to disruption by antibiotic use. There is an association between disruptions of the lung microbiome and respiratory diseases, including lung cancer, and decreased efficacy of treatments. Patients with lung cancer are often indicated for antibiotic treatment due to respiratory infections or other comorbidities. Pulmonary infections in the area of undetected lung tumors are not uncommon. They can be an early sign of malignancy, which may explain the association between antibiotic use and lung cancer diagnosis. Antibiotic use can also affect the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Studies suggest that antibiotic use can impair the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in lung cancer patients, particularly around the time when treatment is initiated. These findings require further study, understanding underlying mechanisms, and identifying microbiota signatures associated with treatment response.

PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors has emerged as a first-line therapeutic strategy for advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which can stimulate T-cell activation, thereby preventing tumor avoidance of immunologic surveillance, whereas, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can play an important role in regulating immune function. This study assessed whether the concomitantly use of PPIs affected outcomes of immunotherapy in advanced SCLC.

METHODS

Data from advanced SCLC patients who firstly treated with PD-L1 inhibitors between July 2018 and February 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. The impact of concomitant medications (especially PPIs) on objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 208 patients, 101 received immunotherapy concomitant PPIs. The median PFS of patients receiving PPIs (6.6 months) were significantly shorter than those without PPIs (10.6 months), and so was OS. There was associated with a 74.9% increased risk of progression and 58.3% increased risk of death. Both first-line and post-first-line immunotherapy, patients treated PPIs had poorer PFS.

CONCLUSION

PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors.

Despite warnings, co-medication with proton pump inhibitors and dasatinib is common in chronic myeloid leukemia, but XS004, a novel oral dasatinib formulation, provides reduced pH-dependence, minimizing undesirable drug-drug interactions

BACKGROUND

Dasatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, as a lipophilic weak base, crystalline monohydrate, dasatinib (Sprycel®) is poorly soluble, rendering a pH-dependent absorption and a highly variable bioavailability. Thus, co-medication with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) profoundly impairs dasatinib uptake and is clearly recommended against. XS004 is a novel oral immediate release and amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) formulation of dasatinib and is bioequivalent to the original crystalline dasatinib at 30% lower dosages. XS004 is designed to mitigate gastric pH dependency, thus optimizing absorption and bioavailability.

METHODS

We investigated the prevalence of dasatinib and PPI co-medication among chronic-phase CML patients in a real-world setting and assessed the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of XS004 with and without PPI co-medication (omeprazole) in healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Using the Swedish CML and Prescribed Drug Registers, we identified 676 TKI-treated CML patients; 320 (47%) had been prescribed PPI at some point after CML diagnosis. Among dasatinib-treated patients, the 2-year cumulative PPI co-medication was 24%. Interestingly, the 5-year overall survival was significantly lower for TKI-treated CML patients with versus without PPI co-medication (79% vs. 94%; hazard ratio 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-5.3; p < .0001). When assessing PK of XS004, neither Cmax nor area under the plasma concentration curve levels in plasma were significantly altered by the PPI co-medication.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, despite warnings, PPI co-medication is common among dasatinib-treated CML patients in a real-world setting. The new XS004 ASD formulation of dasatinib provided, in contrast to original crystalline dasatinib, superior pH independence with stable bioavailability, thereby minimizing drug-drug interactions. This may improve the long-term efficacy and tolerability of dasatinib in CML.

Predicting leptomeningeal disease spread after resection of brain metastases using machine learning

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) has increased as treatments for brain metastases (BMs) have improved and patients with metastatic disease are living longer. Sample sizes of individual studies investigating LMD after surgery for BMs and its risk factors have been limited, ranging from 200 to 400 patients at risk for LMD, which only allows the use of conventional biostatistics. Here, the authors used machine learning techniques to enhance LMD prediction in a cohort of surgically treated BMs.

METHODS

A conditional survival forest, a Cox proportional hazards model, an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier, an extra trees classifier, and logistic regression were trained. A synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was used to train the models and handle the inherent class imbalance. Patients were divided into an 80:20 training and test set. Fivefold cross-validation was used on the training set for hyperparameter optimization. Patients eligible for study inclusion were adults who had consecutively undergone neurosurgical BM treatment, had been admitted to Brigham and Women's Hospital from January 2007 through December 2019, and had a minimum of 1 month of follow-up after neurosurgical treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 1054 surgically treated BM patients were included in this analysis. LMD occurred in 168 patients (15.9%) at a median of 7.05 months after BM diagnosis. The discrimination of LMD occurrence was optimal using an XGboost algorithm (area under the curve = 0.83), and the time to LMD was prognosticated evenly by the random forest algorithm and the Cox proportional hazards model (C-index = 0.76). The most important feature for both LMD classification and regression was the BM proximity to the CSF space, followed by a cerebellar BM location. Lymph node metastasis of the primary tumor at BM diagnosis and a cerebellar BM location were the strongest risk factors for both LMD occurrence and time to LMD.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of LMD patients in the BM population are predictable using SMOTE and machine learning. Lymph node metastasis of the primary tumor at BM diagnosis and a cerebellar BM location were the strongest LMD risk factors.

Drug-drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors in cancer patients: an underrecognized cause of treatment failure

New concepts and drugs have revolutionized medical treatment for cancers. These drugs, which are very expensive and usually well tolerated, have dramatically improved cancer prognosis. We must use them wisely for patients to fully benefit. Gastric acid antisecretory drugs and particularly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) revolutionized the treatment of gastroduodenal ulcers and severe gastroesophageal reflux, but are frequently overused for symptomatic treatment of epigastric pain or heartburn. Long-term acid suppression may alter the efficacy of many anticancer drugs, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), by either decreasing gastric acid secretion and thus drug absorption, or by modifying the gut microbiome that modulates the response to ICIs. Oncologists thus need to pay particular attention to the concomitant use of PPIs and anticancer drugs. These interactions translate into major clinical impacts, with demonstrated loss of efficacy for some TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, pazopanib), and conflicting results with many other oral drugs, including capecitabine and CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Furthermore, the profound changes in the gut microbiome due to using PPIs have shown that the benefit of using ICIs may be suppressed in patients treated with PPIs. As the use of PPIs is not essential, we must apply the precautionary principle. The first sentence of a recent Comment in Nature was "Every day, millions of people are taking medications that will not help them". We fear that every day millions of cancer patients are taking medications that harm them. While this may well be only association and not causation, there is enough to make us pause until we reach a clear answer. All these data should encourage medical oncologists to refrain from prescribing PPIs, explaining to patients the risks of interaction in order to prevent inappropriate prescription by another physician.

Combination Use of First-Line Afatinib and Proton-Pump Inhibitors Reduces Overall Survival Among Patients with EGFFR Mutant Lung Cancer

Purpose

Previous retrospective studies reported that proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) may decrease the efficacy of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) including gefitinib and erlotinib. Afatinib had a wider soluble pH range, with possible fewer interactions with antacids. However, clinical data were limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the negative impact of PPIs on afatinib.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients who are newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from 2014 to 2019 using the Chang Gung Research Database. We identified patients who were treated with first-line afatinib and analyzed the association between the PPI and afatinib treatment outcomes.

Results

A total of 1418 patients were treated with first-line afatinib and followed up for 6 years. First-line afatinib was administered to 918 eligible patients, and 330 had afatinib with PPIs. The combination use of PPIs and afatinib significantly decreased the overall survival (OS) compared with that of patients using afatinib only (median OS: 33.2 and 25.1 months, p < 0.01) and multivariate analyses (Combination use: hazard ratio: 1.29; 1.05-1.59, p = 0.01). The percentages of patients who were able to receive 2nd line therapy also significantly decreased in afatinib with PPI cohort.

Conclusion

The concurrent use of PPIs was associated with lower OS in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer under the first-line afatinib treatment but not associated with TTF.

The status of TKI/acid-suppressant concomitant use in 44 hospitals in China: A cross-sectional descriptive study

The irrational use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has attracted increasing attention, especially because of drug-drug interactions. The objective of this study was to analyze TKI prescriptions and evaluate the rationality of concomitant use of TKIs and acid-suppressants. TKI prescriptions from 2016 to 2018 were collected from hospitals in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hangzhou, and Zhengzhou for 40 d/yr. Focusing on the data in 2018, we analyzed the pharmacoeconomic indicators of TKIs and the number and proportion of different coprescriptions. The evaluation criteria for coprescriptions were based on clinical literature and package inserts. A total of 41,738 TKI prescriptions were assessed. The total dose and sales of imatinib were the highest, the medication days and defined daily doses of gefitinib were the highest, and the highest defined daily cost was sunitinib. Meanwhile, there were 17 TKIs with drug utilization indices of ≤ 1.0. The irrational combination rate of prescriptions of non-cancer-related departments was high in 3 cities, but not Hangzhou. The irrational combination rate of prescription of inpatient prescriptions was > 23% in the 4 cities. The combined use of TKIs and acid-suppressants is common in China and may have a clear or potential impact on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and adverse drug reactions of TKIs. Therefore, it is urgent to implement necessary interventions to stop such irrational use or if the combined use is necessary, to correct adverse consequences. The aims should be to achieve safe and effective use of TKIs and reduce unnecessary costs.

The association between proton pump inhibitor use and systemic anti-tumour therapy on survival outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed to prevent or treat gastrointestinal disease. Whether the combination of systemic anti-tumour therapy and PPIs leads to poor outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. This systematic review explored the relationship between PPIs and survival outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC who are receiving systemic anti-tumour therapy.

METHODS

We searched studies reporting the overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced NSCLC patients who are receiving systemic anti-tumour therapy with or without PPIs on PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for literature published prior to 31 August 2021. The meta-analysis used a random effects model to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I2 to assess statistical heterogeneity. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Fourteen retrospective studies comprising 13 709 advanced NSCLC patients were identified. Subgroup analyses showed that the use of PPI was correlated with the OS or PFS of patients receiving chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy (PPI users' group vs non-users' group: HR for OS = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.21-1.51, P < .00001; HR for PFS = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.25-1.80, P < .0001). Publication bias and sensitivity analyses confirmed that the results were robust.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis demonstrated that PPI use in advanced NSCLC patients who were undergoing systemic anti-tumour therapy was correlated with increased mortality risk. Until results are further confirmed, caution should be applied when administering PPIs and systemic anti-tumour therapy to advanced NSCLC patients.

Impact of the Gastric Acid Suppressant Use on the Safety and Effectiveness of EGFR-TKIs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The use of gastric acid suppressants (GASs) has an influence on the exposure of some epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and therefore may affect the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKIs. The impact of GASs, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H₂RAs), on the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKIs remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the impact of GASs on the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKIs in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Method We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases thoroughly from inception to 2nd February 2021, including the studies for NSCLC patients who used GASs, offering the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of effectiveness outcomes such as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) or adjusted odds ratio (OR) of the adverse drug reaction (ADRs), and the results were calculated with a random effect. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the quality. Stata 15.0 was used for meta-analysis.

Result Twelve studies were finally included. Nine of them were cohort studies, and three of them were case–control studies. For effectiveness outcomes, the use of GASs was associated with shorter PFS (HR 1.66 [1.40, 1.98]) and OS (HR 1.50 [1.31, 1.72]), and the use of PPIs was associated with shorter OS (HR 1.56 [1.21, 2.02]), regardless of the overlap time and type of EGFR-TKIs. For safety outcomes, the use of GASs (OR 1.98 [1.19, 3.31]) or PPIs (OR 1.91 [1.17, 3.12]) were both associated with an increased risk of hepatotoxicity.

Conclusion The concomitant use of GASs is associated with shorter PFS and OS for NSCLC patients taking EGFR-TKIs and is also associated with a higher risk of hepatotoxicity. The co-administration of GASs should be avoided; if they cannot be avoided, H₂RAs is a better choice.

Systematic Review Registration: (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021235018), identifier (PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021235018)

Proton pump inhibitors may reduce the efficacy of ribociclib and palbociclib in metastatic breast cancer patients based on an observational study

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 20-33% of all cancer patients are treated with acid-reducing agents (ARAs), most commonly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), to reduce gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Palbociclib and ribociclib are weak bases so their solubility depends on different pH. The solubility of palbociclib dramatically decreases to < 0.5 mg/ml when pH is above 4,5 but ribociclibs' solubility decreases when pH increases above 6,5. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the effects of concurrent PPIs on palbociclib and ribociclib efficacy in terms of progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative mBC patients treated with endocrine treatment (letrozole or fulvestrant) combined palbociclib or ribociclib alone or with PPI accompanying our observational study. During palbociclib/ribociclib therapy, patients should be treated with "concurrent PPIs" defined as all or more than half of treatment with palbociclib/ribociclib, If no PPI was applied, it was defined as 'no concurrent PPI', those who used PPI but less than half were excluded from the study. All data was collected from real-life retrospectively.

RESULTS

Our study included 217 patients, 105 of whom received palbociclib and 112 received ribociclib treatment. In the study population CDK inhibitor treatment was added to fulvestrant 102 patients ( 47%), to letrozole 115 patients (53%). In the Palbociclib arm fulvestrant/letrozole ratio was 53.3/46.7%, in the ribociclib arm it was 41.07/58.93%. Of 105 patients who received palbociclib, 65 were on concomitant PPI therapy, 40 were not. Of the 112 patients who received ribociclib, 61 were on concomitant PPI therapy, 51 were not. In the palbociclib group, the PFS of the patients using PPIs was shorter than the PFS of the patients not using (13.04 months vs. unreachable, p < 0.001). It was determined that taking PPIs was an independent predictor of shortening PFS (p < 0.001) in the multivariate analysis, In the ribociclib group, the PFS of the patients using PPIs was shorter than the PFS of the patients not using (12.64 months vs. unreachable, p = 0.003). It was determined that taking PPIs was single statistically independent predictor of shortening PFS (p = 0.003, univariate analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that concomitant usage of PPIs was associated with shorter PFS in mBC treated with both ribociclib and especially palbociclib. If it needs to be used, PPI selection should be made carefully and low-strength PPI or other ARAs (eg H2 antagonists, antacids) should be preferred.

Proton pump inhibitors reduce the survival of advanced lung cancer patients with therapy of gefitinib or erlotinib

Gefitinib and erlotinib are the first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, co-administration of either drug with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) may reduce TKI's bioavailability. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of these drug-drug interactions. We surveyed nationwide population-based databases between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 30, 2018. Newly diagnosed patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who received first-line gefitinib or erlotinib were identified. Effects on overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) association between PPIs or H2RAs and co-administrated gefitinib or erlotinib were evaluated. PPIs or H2RAs users were defined if the period overlapped with TKIs by ≥ 20%. A total of 4340 gefitinib and 1635 erlotinib users were included. PPI group had the shortest median OS and TTNT compared to the H2RA and non-user groups (in gefitinib cohort: OS: 14.35 vs. 17.67 vs. 21.87 months; P < 0.0001, TTNT: 8.47 vs. 10.78 vs. 10.33 months; P < 0.0001); (in erlotinib cohort: OS: 16.97 vs. 20.07 vs. 23.92 months; P < 0.0001, TTNT: 9.06 vs. 11.85 vs. 10.90 months; P = 0.0808). Compared with the non-user group, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of the PPI group in the gefitinib was 1.58 on OS (95% CI 1.42-1.76), 1.37 on TTNT (95% CI 1.24-1.52); in the erlotinib was 1.54 on OS (95% CI 1.30-1.82) and 1.19 on TTNT (95% CI 1.01-1.39). Concurrent use of PPIs with first-line gefitinib or erlotinib therapy was associated with a worse OS and TTNT in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cancer: Current State of Play

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most widely used drugs worldwide and are overprescribed in patients with cancer; there is increasing evidence of their effects on cancer development and survival. The objective of this narrative review is to comprehensively identify cancer medications that have clinically meaningful drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with PPIs, including loss of efficacy or adverse effects, and to explore the association between PPIs and cancer.

Methods: A PubMed search of English language studies published from 1 January 2016, to 1 June 2021 was conducted. The search terms included “proton pump inhibitors,” “cancer,” “chemotherapy,” “immunotherapy,” “hormonotherapies,” “targeted therapies,” “tyrosine kinase inhibitors,” and “gut microbiome”. Recent and relevant clinical trials, meta-analyses, and reviews were included.

Results: PPIs may have pro-tumor activity by increasing plasma gastrin levels or anti-tumor activity by inhibiting V-ATPases. However, their impact on cancer survival remains unclear. PPIs may decrease the efficacy of some antineoplastic agents through direct DDIs (e.g., some tyrosine kinase inhibitors, capecitabine, irinotecan, methotrexate). More complex DDIs seem to exist for immunotherapies with indirect interactions through the microbiome. PPIs worsen hypomagnesemia, bone loss, iron, and vitamin B12 deficiencies but may have a protective effect on the renal system.

Discussion/Conclusions: PPIs may interact with the cancer microbiome and the efficacy of various antineoplastic agents, although only a few DDIs involving PPIs are clinically significant. Further pharmaco-epidemiological studies are warranted, but physicians should be aware of the potential consequences of PPI use, which should be dose appropriate and prescribed according to guidelines.

Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Cancer Patients: An Opinion Paper

Simple Summary

Proton pump inhibitors are frequently used in cancer patients to alleviate some symptoms, epigastric pain or heartburn. However, acid suppression decreases the absorption of some oral-targeted anticancer treatments (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, CDK4/6 inhibitors) and induces changes in the gut microbiome. Recent data are showing that these interactions have important clinical impacts and medical oncologists and patients must be aware of these possible interactions.

Abstract

Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), and particularly tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), are currently some of the major breakthroughs in cancer treatment. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) revolutionised the treatment of acid-related diseases, but are frequently overused for epigastric pain or heartburn. However, long-term acid suppression from using PPIs may lead to safety concerns, and could have a greater impact in cancer patients undergoing therapy, like bone fractures, renal toxicities, enteric infections, and micronutrient deficiencies (iron and magnesium). Moreover, acid suppression may also affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs (at least during acid suppression) and decrease the absorption of many molecularly-targeted anticancer therapies, which are mostly weak bases with pH-dependent absorption. This type of drug-drug interaction may have detrimental effects on efficacy, with major clinical impacts described for some orally administrated targeted therapies (erlotinib, gefitinib, pazopanib, palbociclib), and conflicting results with many others, including capecitabine. Furthermore, the long-term use of PPIs results in severe alterations to the gut microbiome and recent retrospective analyses have shown that the benefit of using CPIs was suppressed in patients treated with PPIs. These very expensive drugs are of great importance because of their efficacy. As the use of PPIs is not essential, we must apply the precautionary principle. All these data should encourage medical oncologists to refrain from prescribing PPIs, explaining to patients the risks of interaction in order to prevent inappropriate prescription by another physician.

Concomitant Gastric Acid Suppressants on the Survival of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The influence of concomitant use of gastric acid suppressants (AS) on survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is inconsistent according to previous studies. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of additional AS in patients with NSCLC taking TKIs.

METHODS

Relevant observational studies were identified by a search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Only studies with multivariate analyses were included. A random-effect model was used to combine the results.

RESULTS

Thirteen retrospective studies with 12259 patients were included. Pooled results showed that concomitant use of AS was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31 to 1.89, P < 0.001; I ² = 65%) and overall survival (OS, adjusted HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.61, P < 0.001; I ² = 70%) in NSCLC patients taking TKIs. Sensitivity analysis limited to studies including NSCLC with EGFR mutation showed consistent results (HR for PFS: 1.53, P=0.003; HR for OS: 1.43, P=0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that the association between concomitant use of AS and poor survival was not significantly affected by the category of AS used (proton pump inhibitors or histamine type-2 receptor antagonists) or the country of the study (Asian or non-Asian, P for subgroup analysis all >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of AS in patients with NSCLC taking TKIs may be associated with poor survival outcomes.

Interactions between epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and proton-pump inhibitors/histamine type-2 receptor antagonists in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are increasingly used for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as first-line therapy. The bioavailability and efficacy of oral EGFR-TKIs could be affected by acid suppression (AS) therapy such as PPIs and H2RAs which are reported to be over-prescribed. Hence, there is a need to investigate the effect of AS on the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse effect profile in patients treated with EGFR TKIs.

Methods

An electronic database search of Medline and Embase was performed following PRISMA guidelines on 17 January 2021. Studies analyzing interactions between EGFR TKIs and PPIs/H2RAs in NSCLC patients were included. Abstracts, non-English or non-Japanese studies or studies using non-EGFR TKIs were excluded. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using generic inverse variance random effects model. Effect sizes for dichotomous variables were pooled using Mantel-Haenszel random effects model. Significance was considered at P≤0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran Q-test and I2 test. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots. The assessment of quality and risk of bias of randomized and non-randomized studies were undertaken with RoB 2 and the ROBINS-I tool respectively.

Results

Out of 1,173 potentially relevant articles, 14 articles were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of AS in patients taking EGFR TKI was 30.71% in 4,010 individuals. Patients who were treated only with EGFR TKI had significantly better OS (HR =1.46, 95% CI: 1.27–1.72; P<0.00001) and PFS (HR =1.63, 95% CI: 1.35–1.98; P<0.00001). The OS for EGFR mutation positive patients only was as similarly significant as the OS in all patients taking EGFR TKI, while the PFS in mutation positive patients was significantly worsened with AS. PPIs resulted in a significantly worsened OS and PFS but H2RAs did not produce significantly different OS and PFS between AS and non-AS users. There were no significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR =0.81, 95% CI: 0.50–1.32; P=0.40), diarrhoea (OR =1.03, 95% CI: 0.63–1.67; P=0.91) or other adverse effects.

Conclusions

Co-administration of AS medications with first-generation EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC worsens survival outcomes. Physicians should only prescribe AS medications when absolutely clinically indicated.

Drug-drug interactions between palbociclib and proton pump inhibitors may significantly affect clinical outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients

Background

Proton-pump-inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently prescribed for the management of anticancer drug-related gastrointestinal symptoms. Palbociclib is a weak base with pH-dependent solubility and potential drug-drug interaction at the absorption level may affect clinical pharmacokinetics. The current study was aimed at investigating the effect of co-administration of PPIs and palbociclib on progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients.

Patients and methods

Patients affected by estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative mBC, who were candidates for first-line treatment with palbociclib, were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Patients were defined as ‘no concomitant PPIs’ if no PPIs were administered during palbociclib treatment, and as ‘concomitant PPIs’ if the administration of PPIs covered the entire or not less than two-thirds of treatment with palbociclib. All clinical interventions were made according to clinical practice.

Results

A total of 112 patients were enrolled in the study; 56 belonged to the ‘no concomitant PPIs’ group and 56 to the ‘concomitant PPIs’ group. Seventy-one patients were endocrine-sensitive and received palbociclib and letrozole, and 43 were endocrine-resistant and were treated with palbociclib and fulvestrant. The most prescribed PPI was lansoprazole. Patients taking PPIs had a shorter PFS than those taking palbociclib and endocrine therapy alone (14.0 versus 37.9 months, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed concomitant PPIs as the only independent predictive factor for shorter PFS (P = 0.0002). PFS was significantly longer in estrogen-sensitive mBC with no concomitant PPIs compared with patients taking PPIs or estrogen-resistant patients, with and without PPIs (P < 0.0001). No correlation with adverse events was found when considering grade >2 hematological toxicities [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale].

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that concomitant use of PPIs in mBC patients treated with palbociclib has a detrimental effect on PFS. Therefore, it is recommended to prescribe PPIs with caution in these patients, strictly adhering to the indications in the summary of product characteristics (RCP).

•

PPIs are widely used in cancer patients to manage chemotherapy-related gastrointestinal adverse events.

•

Palbociclib is a weak base with a pH-dependent solubility.

•

Breast cancer patients treated with palbociclib and PPIs have significantly shorter PFS.

•

Drug-drug interactions should be clearly evaluated in patients taking PPIs.

Crosstalk of physiological pH and chemical pKa under the umbrella of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity

Introduction: Physiological pH and chemical pKa are two sides of the same coin in defining the ionization of a drug in the human body. The Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and pH-partition hypothesis form the theoretical base to define the impact of pH-pKa crosstalk on drug ionization and thence its absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET).Areas covered: Human physiological pH is not constant, but a diverse, dynamic state regulated by various biological mechanisms, while the chemical pKa is generally a constant defining the acidic dissociation of the drug at various environmental pH. Works on pH-pKa crosstalk are scattered in the literature, despite its significant contributions to drug pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and toxicity. In particular, its impacts on drug ADMET have not been effectively linked to the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation, a powerful tool increasingly used in model-informed drug development (MIDD).Expert opinion: Lacking a full consideration of the interactions of physiological pH and chemical pKa in a PBPK model limits scientists' capability in mechanistically describing the drug ADMET. This mini-review compiled literature knowledge on pH-pKa crosstalk and its impacts on drug ADMET, from the viewpoint of PBPK modeling, to pave the way to a systematic incorporation of pH-pKa crosstalk into PBPK modeling and simulation.

Controversial link between proton pump inhibitors and anticancer agents: review of the literature

Drug-drug interactions represent a topic of great interest, not only due to the risk of unexpected adverse events but also due to the possibility of altering the effectiveness of a specific treatment. Inappropriate or concomitant use of drugs can often lead to changes in the bioavailability of various compounds, resulting in pharmacokinetic alterations. A recent example is the concomitant administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and anticancer agents. PPIs are overused beyond their classic indications, resulting in a high risk of interactions with other drugs, such as anticancer agents, both PO and intravenous. However, the real clinical impact of concomitant acid suppression therapy and anticancer therapies remains controversial and is not yet fully understood. Certainly, the gut microbiota plays a key role in regulating the response of the immune system, and PPIs can significantly alter the gut microbiome, resulting in gut dysbiosis. Indeed, while the link sometimes appears to lead to negative outcomes, as in the case of immunotherapy, oral capecitabine, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in other cases, it seems to enhance the effectiveness of intravenous chemotherapy. In this review, I analyse the possible drug interactions between PPIs and the main classes of anticancer drugs.

Real-life drug-drug and herb-drug interactions in outpatients taking oral anticancer drugs: comparison with databases

PURPOSE

Due to polypharmacy and the rising popularity of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM), oncology patients are particularly at risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI) or herb-drug interactions (HDI). The aims of this study were to assess DDI and HDI in outpatients taking oral anticancer drug.

METHOD

All prescribed and non-prescribed medications, including CAM, were prospectively collected by hospital pharmacists during a structured interview with the patient. DDI and HDI were analyzed using four interaction software programs: Thériaque^®, Drugs.com^®, Hédrine, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) database. All detected interactions were characterized by severity, risk and action mechanism. The need for pharmaceutical intervention to modify drug use was determined on a case-by-case basis.

RESULTS

294 patients were included, with a mean age of 67 years [55-79]. The median number of chronic drugs per patient was 8 [1-29] and 55% of patients used at least one CAM. At least 1 interaction was found for 267 patients (90.8%): 263 (89.4%) with DDI, 68 (23.1%) with HDI, and 64 (21.7%) with both DDI and HDI. Only 13% of the DDI were found in Thériaque^® and Drugs.com^® databases, and 125 (2.5%) were reported with similar level of risk on both databases. 104 HDI were identified with only 9.5% of the interactions found in both databases. 103 pharmaceutical interventions were performed, involving 61 patients (20.7%).

CONCLUSION

Potentially clinically relevant drug interaction were frequently identified in this study, showing that several databases and structured screening are required to detect more interactions and optimize medication safety.

The effect of proton pump inhibitors on survival outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib

PURPOSE

Sorafenib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and first-line treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Preliminary evidence indicates proton pump inhibitors (PPI) may affect the absorption of TKIs through decreased gut dissolution. This study aims to evaluate the impact of PPI use on the survival outcomes of advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib.

METHODS

The study was a secondary analysis of individual-participant data from the phase III clinical trial NCT00699374. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to evaluate the association between baseline PPI use and survival outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome with progression-free survival (PFS) secondary.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 542 advanced HCC patients initiating sorafenib treatment, 122 were concomitantly using a PPI at baseline. No significant associations between baseline PPI use and OS were identified on univariable (HR [95% CI]; 1.01 [0.80-1.28], P = 0.93) and adjusted (1.10 [0.82-1.41], P = 0.62) analysis. Furthermore, no significant associations between baseline PPI use and PFS were identified on univariable (0.96 [0.76-1.21], P = 0.73) and adjusted (1.11 [0.86-1.44], P = 0.41) analysis.

CONCLUSION

In a large high-quality dataset, PPI use was not observed to compromise the survival outcomes of advanced HCC patients initiated on sorafenib.

Nucleus-located PDK1 regulates growth, invasion and migration of breast cancer cells

AIMS

It is well known that pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1) is highly expressed in breast cancer (BC) tissues and promotes tumor growth, but the underlying mechanisms of this process are unclear. Here, we investigated the effects of nuclear PDK1 on growth, migration and invasion in human BC cells.

MAIN METHODS

The sub-cellular localization of PDK1 in BC cells was performed with subcellular fractionation followed by Western blot and immunofluorescence. The localization of PDK1 in breast normal tissue and breast duct carcinoma was detected by Immunohistochemistry. Then the protein-protein interaction between PDK1 and Importin β was verified by co-immunoprecipitation assay. Finally, the effects of nuclear PDK1 on cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion of BC cells were assessed.

KEY FINDINGS

In addition to its well-known sub-cellular localization, PDK1 was present in the nucleus of BC cells, and EGF treatment increased nucleus distribution of PDK1. Moreover, the level of nuclear PDK1 accumulation facilitated the growth of BC cells. We also found that the entry of PDK1 into nucleus mainly relied on the nuclear localization signal (NLS), and NLS mutation inhibited the entry of PDK1 into nucleus; as a result, the migration and invasion abilities of BC cells were impaired, and the number of apoptotic cells was significantly increased.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings provided a new supplement to the sub-cellular localization of PDK1 in BC cells and uncovered the function of nuclear PDK1 in facilitating BC cells growth, migration and invasion.

Impact of Use of Gastric-Acid Suppressants and Oral Anti-Cancer Agents on Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of gastric acid suppressant use on outcomes of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and oral chemotherapy. We identified all research evaluating the effect of GAS (gastric acid suppressants) use on patients receiving oral chemotherapy or TKIs for solid tumors. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with a fixed-effects or a random effects model. The study population included n = 16 retrospective studies and 372,418 patients. The series concerned gastrointestinal tract tumors (n = 5 studies), renal cell carcinomas (RCC, n = 3 studies), non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC, n = 5 studies), and soft tissue sarcomas or mixed histologies solid tumors in n = 3 studies. The pooled HRs for OS and PFS were 1.31 (95%CI: 1.20-1.43; p < 0.01) and 1.3 (95%CI 1.07-1.57; p < 0.01) for GAS and no GAS users, respectively. Only studies of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutated NSCLC patients receiving TKIs and those with colorectal cancer receiving oral chemotherapy showed a significant correlation between GAS and poor survival. Our study supports the evidence of a possible negative impact of concomitant GAS therapy on survival outcomes of patients receiving oral anti-cancer drugs.

Exposure to proton pump inhibitors and risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis

Objectives: To estimate the pancreatic cancer risk among subjects exposed versus not exposed to proton pump inhibitors.Methods: The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov to identify relevant studies. The authors quantified pancreatic cancer risk among subjects exposed versus not exposed to PPIs, expressed as the pooled (adjusted) odds ratio (OR/aOR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) in overall and sensitivity analyses.Results: One randomized trial, two cohort, four case-control, and five nested case-control studies with 700,178 subjects (73,985 cases; 626,193 controls) were retained. PPI exposure was associated with pancreatic cancer risk (OR = 1.75, 95%CI = 1.12-2.72, I2 = 99%); confirmed in sensitivity analyses for high-quality studies, observational studies, case-control studies, studies with pancreatic cancer as the primary outcome, and in sensitivity analyses for diabetes and obesity but not for pancreatitis and smoking. This association was independent of the duration and Defined Daily Dose of PPI exposure. Rabeprazole had a singular significant association with pancreatic cancer (OR = 5.40, 95%CI = 1.98-14.703, I2 = 87.9%).Conclusion: The class of PPIs is associated with a 1.75-fold increase in pancreatic cancer risk, confirmed in sensitivity analyses.

Drug repurposing for anticancer therapies. A lesson from proton pump inhibitors

Introduction: Worldwide, the annual expenditure on anticancer drugs is grossly calculated to be in the order of US$100 billion, and is expected to escalate up to $150 billion by 2020. It is evident that the vast majority of the most recently devised anticancer drugs are unaffordable in economically developing nations, frequently resulting in subpar therapies. In this complex medical and economic scenario, the repurposing of older drugs for anticancer therapies becomes a necessity. The repurposing of antiacid drugs such as the proton pump inhibitors as antitumoral agents and chemosensitizers is probably one of the most recent and promising phenomenon in oncology.Areas covered: Important research articles and patents focusing on proton pump inhibitors as a potential class of therapeutics, published between the period of 2006-2019, have been covered. This review mainly focuses on the therapeutic applications, as direct anticancer agents as well as modifiers of the tumor microenvironment and modulator of chemoresistance.Expert opinion: PPIs have significant anticancer applications and are proving to be safe, effective and inexpensive. Here the authors review the current knowledge regarding the influence of PPIs on the efficacy and safety of cancer chemotherapeutics through the regulation of targets other than the H⁺/K⁺-ATPase.