Efficacy Of Apatinib In Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Refractory Intermediate And Advanced-Stage Hepatocellular carcinoma：A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Efficacy and safety of TACE combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and camrelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and camrelizumab (collectively: T-T-C) is a novel treatment strategy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of T-T-C compared with TACE combined with TKIs only (T-T) in the treatment of patients with unresectable HCC. A systematic literature search was conducted on T-T and T-T-C using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Data regarding the clinical outcome, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and adverse events (AEs), were independently extracted and analyzed by two researchers using standardized protocols. In total, 7 cohort studies, including 1,798 patients (T-T-C, 838; T-T, 960), were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the present study demonstrated that the T-T-C group had significantly prolonged OS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-0.50; I2=61.5%; P=0.016)] and PFS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.46; I2=44.5%; P=0.109), and showed significantly higher objective response rates [risk ratio (RR), 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.96; I2=25.1%; P=0.237)] and slightly higher disease control rates without a significant difference (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.03; I2=0.0%; P=0.969). In addition, grade 3/4 AEs were more common in the T-T group, including hypertension (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.85-1.56), vomiting or nausea (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.44-1.76) and pain (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.45-1.21); however, these results were not statistically significant. In conclusion, compared with T-T combination therapy, T-T-C demonstrated a notable advantage in terms of OS, PFS, ORR and DCR in patients with unresectable HCC. For manageable AEs, although the results were not statistically significant, the incidence of AEs in the T-T group was higher than that in the T-T-C group in terms of event probability.

Evaluation of models to predict prognosis in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE combined with apatinib

BACKGROUND

The HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI scores have been substantiated as reliable prognostic markers in patients presenting with intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment. Given this premise, our research aims to assess the predictive efficacy of these models in patients with intermediate and advanced HCC receiving a combination of TACE and Apatinib. Additionally, we have conducted a meticulous comparative analysis of these four scoring systems to discern their respective predictive capacities and efficacies in combined therapy.

METHODS

Performing a retrospective analysis on the clinical data from 200 patients with intermediate and advanced HCC, we studied those who received TACE combined with Apatinib at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China between June 2018 and December 2022. To identify the factors affecting survival, the study performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, with calculations of four different scores: HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI. Lastly, Harrell's C-index was employed to compare the prognostic abilities of these scores.

RESULTS

Cox proportional hazards model results revealed that the ALBI score, presence of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT, )and tumor size are independent determinants of prognostic survival. The Kaplan-Meier analyses showed significant differences in survival rates among patients classified by the HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI scoring methods. Of the evaluated systems, the HAP scoring demonstrated greater prognostic precision, with a Harrell's C-index of 0.742, surpassing the alternative models (P < 0.05). In addition, an analysis of the area under the AU-ROC curve confirms the remarkable superiority of the HAP score in predicting short-term survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the predictive value of HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI scores in intermediate to advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving combined Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Apatinib therapy. Notably, the HAP model excels in predicting outcomes for this specific HCC subgroup.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been increasingly used to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, the superiority of combination therapy to TACE monotherapy remains controversial. Therefore, here we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE plus TKIs in patients with uHCC.

METHODS

We searched four databases for eligible studies. The primary outcome was time to progression (TTP), while the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), tumor response rates, and adverse events (AEs). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were collected for TTP and OS, and the data were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis models in STATA software. OR and 95% CIs were used to estimate dichotomous variables (complete remission[CR], partial remission[PR], stable disease[SD], progressive disease[PD], objective response rate[ORR], disease control rate[DCR], and AEs) using RStudio's random-effects model. Quality assessments were performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for observational studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 30 studies (9 RCTs, 21 observational studies) with 8246 patients. We judged the risk of bias as low in 44.4% (4/9) of the RCTs and high in 55.6% (5/9) of the RCTs. All observational studies were considered of high quality, with a NOS score of at least 6. Compared with TACE alone or TACE plus placebo, TACE combined with TKIs was superior in prolonging TTP (combined HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.80), OS (combined HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.49-0.67), and objective response rate (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.23-3.67) in patients with uHCC. However, TACE plus TKIs caused a higher incidence of AEs, especially hand-foot skin reactions (OR 87.17%, 95%CI 42.88-177.23), diarrhea (OR 18.13%, 95%CI 9.32-35.27), and hypertension (OR 12.24%, 95%CI 5.89-25.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis found that TACE plus TKIs may be beneficial for patients with uHCC in terms of TTP, OS, and tumor response rates. However, combination therapy is also associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse reactions. Therefore, we must evaluate the clinical benefits and risks of combination therapy. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm our findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022298003.

Transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib with or without camrelizumab for unresected hepatocellular carcinoma: A two-center propensity score matching study

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib and camrelizumab with those of TACE as well as apatinib among patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods

The data of patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC) who received TACE-apatinib-camrelizumab combination (TACE + AC group) and TACE-apatinib combination (TACE + A group) were collected from two centers between January 2018 and January 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to diminish the bias between the two groups. The primary outcome measures of the study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcome measures were response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 102 patients were enrolled in this study after PSM, with 34 patients in the TACE + AC group and 68 patients in the TACE + A group. Compared to the TACE + A group, TACE + AC had a significantly longer median OS (25.5 months, interquartile range [IQR], 23.5–33.0) than 18.5 months (IQR, 13.0–25.0; P = 0.001). Similarly, the PFS of the TACE + AC group was significantly improved (14.0 months, IQR, 9.0–NA) compared to that of the TACE + A group (5.0 months, IQR, 2.5–9.0; P = 0.001). The ORR rates (55.9% vs. 51.5%), and DCR rates (79.4% vs. 72.1%) were comparable between groups (P &gt; 0.05). All treatment-related adverse events were tolerable and manageable, and no serious adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

TACE combined with apatinib plus camrelizumab demonstrated superior efficacy to TACE plus apatinib for patients with unresectable HCC. The two combination therapies showed similar safety profiles.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus apatinib vs. TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a common therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while TACE-induced tumor angiogenesis would increase progression and metastasis risk. Besides, apatinib possesses the capability of inhibiting tumor angiogenesis. Thus, this study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of TACE plus apatinib compared to TACE alone in HCC patients.

METHODS

Ninety-six intermediate-advanced HCC patients were retrospectively enrolled and classified into TACE plus apatinib group (N = 45) and TACE group (N = 51) based on the treatment.

RESULTS

Objective response rate (68.9% vs. 47.1%) was increased in TACE plus apatinib group than in TACE group (P = 0.031). However, no difference was found in disease-control rate between groups (95.6% vs. 86.3%) (P = 0.167). Progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS (95% confidence interval (CI)): 20.0 (13.2-26.8) vs. 14.0 (8.3-19.7) months) was enhanced in TACE plus apatinib group compared with TACE group (P = 0.030), while no difference was found in overall survival between groups (P = 0.060). Additionally, multivariate Cox's analysis presented that TACE plus apatinib (vs. TACE alone) independently associated with prolonged PFS (P = 0.043, hazard ratio = 0.617). Regarding safety profile, no difference in liver function indexes (albumin, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase) was found after treatment between two groups; meanwhile, only the incidence of hand-foot skin reaction (24.4% vs. 7.8%) was higher in TACE plus apatinib group compared to TACE group (P = 0.025), while no difference was found in other adverse events between two groups (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TACE plus apatinib illustrates a superior efficacy with tolerable safety than TACE alone in intermediate-advanced HCC patients.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Oxaliplatin Plus Raltitrexed as an Alternative Option in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Failure of, or Unsuitability for, Transarterial Chemoembolization

Background and Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed (HAICROX) as an alternative treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who are ineligible for, or failed, the transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment. Materials and Methods: From July 2020 to November 2021, a total of 35 HCC patients were enrolled and received HAIC with oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed. The overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. The tumor response was assessed by the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST), and the adverse events were investigated using the common terminology criteria for adverse events version 5.0 (CTCAE 5.0). Results: The median OS and TTP were 10 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.5-14.6) and 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.7), respectively. By means of multivariate analysis, anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) immunotherapy was found to be an independent prognostic factor for better survival. No patients experienced toxicity-related death. Thrombocytopenia, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation were the most common toxicities. No grade 3 or higher adverse events related to HAICROX were observed. Conclusion: HAICROX showed valuable efficacy and tolerable toxicity in advanced HCC patients who progressed on TACE or were ineligible for TACE. HAICROX is a promising treatment for advanced-stage HCC patients with TACE failure or ineligibility.

Apatinib: A Novel Antiangiogenic Drug in Monotherapy or Combination Immunotherapy for Digestive System Malignancies

Digestive system malignancies are one of the primary causes of cancer-related death. Meanwhile, angiogenesis has been proved to play an important role in the process of cancer neovascularization. Apatinib, a novel targeted antiangiogenic molecule, could generate highly selective competition in the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, involved in tumor progression and metastasis. It has been implied as a promising cancer treatment agent that can prevent tumor cell proliferation meanwhile inhibit tumor angiogenesis. Furthermore, completed clinical trials demonstrated that apatinib could prolong the progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced gastric cancer and primary liver cancer. Recent studies revealed that apatinib had a synergistic effect with immunotherapy as a second-line and third-line treatment regimen for some other cancers. In this review, we summarize the pharmacological properties of apatinib and the latest clinical application in chemotherapy-refractory patients with advanced digestive system cancer. Based on the comparable survival results, the molecular mechanisms of apatinib are prospective to include the antiangiogenic, apoptosis-inducing, and autophagy-inducing properties in the corresponding signaling pathway. Treatment of apatinib monotherapy or combination immunotherapy remains the optimal option for patients with digestive system malignancies in the future.

What Is the Most Suitable Agent Combined With Apatinib for Transarterial Chemoembolization Treatment in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Purpose

Combined therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and apatinib is superior in therapeutic effect compared with TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To determine the most suitable agent combined with apatinib for TACE treatment, we did a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Methods

Four electronic databases were searched from inception until November 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies that combined therapy of TACE and apatinib (TACE+A) compared with TACE alone were included. We performed random-effect pairwise and network meta-analyses to summarize the outcomes about efficacy and safety.

Results

Forty-five original studies including 3,876 patients were included. In terms of efficacy, we evaluated treatment response, 6 months overall survival (OS), 1 year OS, 6 months progression-free survival (PFS), 1 year PFS, alphafetoprotein (AFP), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Significant differences always appear in TACE agent subgroups of adriamycin, platinum, and fluorouracil from both pairwise and network meta-analysis, while significant differences could also be found in apatinib dosage of 500 and >500 mg/day subgroups and in both RCT and retrospective study subgroups. From second time network analysis, compared with TACE alone, subgroups with TACE agents of oxaliplatin, cisplatin, pirarubicin, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil ranked front. In addition, the safety of adriamycin, platinum, and fluorouracil subgroups is acceptable.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the most suitable agents in TACE combined with apatinib were adriamycin+platinum ± fluorouracil combination therapy.

Systematic Review Registration

The study was registered with https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=311650, PROSPERO, CRD4202022311650

Tumor feeding artery contraction and metastasis inhibition after transarterial chemoembolization combined with apatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study

AIM

To investigate the change of tumor feeding artery diameter and the efficacy of metastasis inhibition after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib or TACE monotherapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who without metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 616 consecutive patients who received the treatment of TACE-apatinib or TACE in our center was enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce bias. The overall survival (OS), OS-after-metastasis (OSM), time to progression (TTP), time to metastasis (TTM), time to vessel or organ metastasis (TVOM), time to lymph node metastasis, and tumor feeding artery diameter between the two treatment groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 113 pairs of patients were eligible after the PSM. Time to lymph node metastasis between the two groups was not significantly different (P > 0.05). The tumor feeding artery diameter was significantly smaller after TACE-apatinib management (P < 0.001). Median OS (P < 0.001) and OSM (P < 0.001) were significantly longer in the TACE-apatinib group compared with the TACE group. Median TTP (P < 0.001), TTM (P < 0.001), and TVOM (P < 0.001) were significantly prolonged in TACE-apatinib group.

CONCLUSION

TACE-apatinib treatment could improve the prognosis compared with TACE alone, and inhibit metastasis after TACE procedure with contracted tumor feeding artery for advanced HCCs without metastasis.

Apatinib Plus Camrelizumab With/Without Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Experience of a Single Center

Objective

This study was conducted in order to compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus apatinib plus camrelizumab (TACE+AC) and apatinib plus camrelizumab (AC) in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a real-world setting.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, the data of patients with unresectable HCC who had received TACE+AC or AC treatment during March 2017 to May 2021 were assessed. Patients in the AC group received intravenous administration of camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg/day treatment. Patients in the TACE+AC group received the same dose of camrelizumab and apatinib 1 week after TACE. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) as the secondary endpoints.

Results

A total of 108 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 52 patients in the AC group and 56 patients in TACE+AC group. Median OS was significantly longer in the TACE+AC group than in the AC group (24.8 vs. 13.1 months; P = 0.005). Patients in the TACE+AC group achieved a higher ORR [24 (42.9%) vs. 9 (17.3%), P = 0.004] than those in the AC group. Patients in the TACE+AC group also achieved a higher disease control rate (DCR) [48 (85.7%) vs. 30 (57.7%), P = 0.001] than patients in the AC group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs related to apatinib and camrelizumab between the two groups, except for gastrointestinal reaction (P > 0.05, all; P < 0.05, gastrointestinal reaction).

Conclusion

TACE plus apatinib plus camrelizumab significantly improved OS, ORR, and DCR over apatinib plus camrelizumab in patients with unresectable HCC. AEs were tolerable and manageable.

Subsequent Treatment after Transarterial Chemoembolization Failure/Refractoriness: A Review Based on Published Evidence

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is widely applied for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Repeat TACE is often required in clinical practice because a satisfactory tumor response may not be achieved with a single session. However, repeated TACE procedures can impair liver function and increase treatment-related adverse events, all of which prompted the introduction of the concept of “TACE failure/refractoriness”. Mainly based on evidence from two retrospective studies conducted in Japan, sorafenib is recommended as the first choice for subsequent treatment after TACE failure/refractoriness. Several studies have investigated the outcomes of other subsequent treatments, including locoregional, other molecular targeted, anti-programmed death-1/anti-programed death ligand-1 therapies, and combination therapies after TACE failure/refractoriness. In this review, we summarize the up-to-date information about the outcomes of several subsequent treatment modalities after TACE failure/refractoriness.

The Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of the Combination of TACE and Apatinib for the Treatment of BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective: Apatinib is a inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. To explore the efficacy and prognostic factors of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib in the treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (BCLC C) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: Clinical data of 146 HCC patients with BCLC stage C admitted to our hospital were collected and analyzed retrospectively, of which 76 cases were treated with TACE combined with apatinib (TACE-apatinib) and 70 with TACE alone. The tumor response, survival time, and adverse events were compared between the two groups, and the factors affecting the prognosis were analyzed.

Results: The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in the TACE-apatinib group were higher than in the TACE-alone group (ORR: 42.10 vs. 25.71%, P = 0.03; DCR: 84.21 vs. 55.71%, P = 0.001). The median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in the TACE-apatinib group were longer than in the TACE-alone group (TTP: 5.5 vs. 3.7 months, P = 0.02; OS: 10.0 vs. 6.2 months, P = 0.01). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that tumor size, Child-Pugh class, and the presence of the portal vein tumor thrombus affect the prognosis of patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that TACE-apatinib therapy resulted in a higher OS in patients with tumor size <10 cm, without portal vein tumor thrombus, and with Child-Pugh class A (P < 0.05). The likelihood of adverse events (hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, oral ulcer) was significantly higher in the increased in the TACE-apatinib group than in the TACE alone group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: TACE-apatinib is an effective and safe method for the treatment of BCLC stage C HCC. Tumor size, Child-Pugh class, and portal vein tumor thrombus affect survival time in HCC patients with BCLC stage C.

Predicting Outcome in Combination Treatment of TACE and Camrelizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma: Tumor Hypervascularity and Reactive Cutaneous Capillary Endothelial Proliferation

Objective

To validate the robust predictive values of tumor vascularity and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) in combination treatment of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and camrelizumab for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and then select the potential candidates who would survive best from such treatment.

Methods

The clinical data of 113 patients with advanced HCC treated with TACE and camrelizumab from January 2019 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Mann Whitney U-test was used to evaluate the correlation between vascular distribution and RCCEP and tumor response; Kaplan Meier technique was used to evaluate time to progress (TTP) and overall survival (OS), and log rank test was used for comparison; multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the related influencing factors.

Results

The TTP and OS of TACE combined with carrelizumab in patients with advanced HCC were 7.1 and 14.3 months. Hypervascularity and development of RCCEP were good predictors of TTP (HR 2.561, P < 0.001; HR 1.486, P = 0.032) and OS (HR 2.854, P < 0.001; HR 1.634, P = 0.011). The median TTP and OS of patients with hypervascularity and RCCEP were 10.6 and 19.3 months, which were better than those with only hypervascularity (6.8 months, P = 0.016; 11.6 months, P = 0.003) and only RCCEP (6.2 months, P = 0.039; 13.5 months, P = 0.042), as well as those with neither (3.8 months, P < 0.001; 7.4 months, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Tumor hypervascularity and development of RCCEP were favorable predictive factors for the combination treatment of TACE and carrelizumab, with both of which the patients survived longest and might be the potential candidates.

The Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization plus Apatinib or Sorafenib in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib (TACE-S) or apatinib (TACE-A) is used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, to date, no study has compared the efficacy and safety of both treatments. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of patients with advanced HCC who received either TACE-S or TACE-A.

Methods

193 patients with advanced HCC were included in the study between June 2015 and December 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used in the study to reduce selection bias.

Results

Before PSM, the median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) of patients treated with TACE-S were not significantly longer than in patients treated with TACE-A (P=0.703, P=0.514). TACE-A did not increase the mortality risk compared with TACE-S in the first 12 months (HR: 1.255, 95%CI: 0.796–1.978, P=0.329) or after the 12-month mark (HR: 0.832, 95%CI: 0.482–1.436, p=0.508). Similarly, TACE-A did not increase the tumor recurrence risk relative to TACE-S in the first 12 months (HR: 1.054, 95%CI: 0.744–1.493, P=0.767) or after the 12-month mark (HR: 1.730, 95%CI: 0.592–5.049, P=0.316). The subgroups analysis showed that TACE-A did not increase mortality risk or tumor recurrence risk relative to TACE-S. After PSM, similar results were presented. The III and IV stage adverse events in the TACE-A group were similar to those in the TACE-S group before PSM.

Conclusions

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma could get similar survival benefits from treatment with either transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib or transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib.

S-1 Combined With Apatinib and Trans-arterial Chemotherapy and Embolization for Conversion Therapy of Unresectable Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Conversion therapy is a promising option for unresectable locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of conversion therapy based on S-1, apatinib combined with transarterial chemotherapy and embolization (TACE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty eligible unresectable locally advanced GC patients were enrolled in this single-arm, single-center, prospective clinical trial. Apatinib was administered orally at 0.5 g once daily and continuously for 58 d, while S-1 twice daily on d 1-14 was given at a dose calculated according to the body surface area and repeated every 3 wk for three cycles. TACE (oxaliplatin 80 mg/m² and etoposide 80 mg/m²) was performed on d 1 and was repeated on d 31.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients completed conversion therapy and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The objective response rate (ORR) was 94.7% (18/19) and noncurative factors had resolved in 13 patients (68.4%) based on imaging estimation. 18 patients received laparoscopic examination and 12 cases underwent definitive surgery. Based on the intraoperative and postoperative pathological examination, 10 patients received radical resection (R0 + D2/D2+). The patients who underwent the conversion surgery had a superior median overall survival (OS) compared with those who did not (P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 combined with apatinib and TACE regimen is feasible for preoperative treating initial unresectable locally advanced GC patients with high rates of objective response and radical resection which may provide a survival benefit.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib versus TACE combined with sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

The combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with sorafenib has demonstrated superior efficacy over sorafenib and TACE monotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Apatinib, a new targeted agent, has been recently reported to prolong the survival of HCC patients, either alone or in combination with TACE. However, the superior regimen between TACE-apatinib and TACE-sorafenib in HCC patients has not been determined. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of TACE-apatinib versus TACE-sorafenib in advanced stage HCC patients.

Methods

The data of 201 HCC patients who had received TACE-sorafenib or TACE-apatinib between January 2016 and June 2018 in three hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse effects (AEs) between the two treatment groups were compared. A subgroup analysis based on the doses of targeted agents was also performed.

Results

No significant differences in baseline clinicopathological features were found between the two groups except for dose reduction. The TACE-apatinib group had higher incidences of hypertension, oral or anal ulcer and proteinuria, while the TACE-sorafenib group had higher incidences of diarrhea and alopecia. Grade 3/4 AEs occurred more frequently in the TACE-apatinib group than in the TACE-sorafenib group (52.3% vs. 22.6%, P<0.001). The TACE-sorafenib group had better PFS than the TACE-apatinib group (median PFS: 5.0 vs. 6.0 months, P=0.002) while the two groups showed no difference in OS (median OS: 13.0 vs. 13.0 months, P=0.448). The TACE-apatinib group had a higher rate of targeted agent dose reduction than the TACE-sorafenib group (53.5% vs. 17.4%, P<0.001). When the patients were stratified into normal and reduced-dose subgroups, those who received TACE-sorafenib exhibited improved PFS but similar OS compared with the patients who received TACE-apatinib in the reduced-dose subgroup (median OS: 12.0 vs. 13.3 months, P=0.614; median PFS: 3.0 vs. 7.0 months, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis validated that treatments and dose reduction were independent prognostic factors for PFS among all patients.

Conclusions

Compared with TACE-sorafenib, the strategy of TACE-apatinib yielded shorter PFS in advanced HCC patients while no difference in OS was observed. A high rate of AE-related dose reduction of apatinib could account for the observed differences.

Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Hepatic Arterioportal Shunts: Combination Treatment of Transarterial Chemoembolization With Apatinib

Object: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combining with apatinib (TACE-apatinib) and TACE-alone for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with hepatic arterioportal shunts (APS). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the medical records of patients with advanced HCC with APS who underwent TACE-apatinib or TACE-alone from June 2015 to January 2019. The occlusion of the shunt was performed during the TACE procedure. The time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of study patients were evaluated. The modified Response Evaluation Criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) was used to evaluate the treatment response. The apatinib-related adverse events were recorded. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in this study. Twenty-seven patients underwent the treatment of TACE-apatinib, and 31 received TACE-alone treatment. The median overall survival (OS) and median time of tumor progression (TTP) in the TACE-apatinib group were significantly longer than those of the TACE-alone group (OS: 12.0 vs. 9.0 months, P = 0.000; TTP: 9.0 vs. 5.0 months, P = 0.041). Multivariate analysis revealed that TACE-apatinib was a protective factor for OS, and there was no independent risk factor for TTP. In the TACE-apatinib group, the grade 3 apatinib-related adverse events occurred in four patients. Conclusion: TACE-apatinib was an efficacious and safe treatment for patients with advanced HCC with APS, and apatinib improved the efficacy of TACE in the treatment of these patients.

Microwave ablation versus sorafenib for intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular carcinoma with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractoriness: a propensity score matching analysis

Purpose: To compared the benefits of sorafenib with microwave ablation (MWA) in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with tumor size ≤7 cm and tumor number ≤5 after Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) failure.Methods: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted using a one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and involved 52 intermediate-stage HCC patients with absence of evidence of intrahepatic vascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis after TACE failure and underwent treatment with MWA or sorafenib between 2007 and 2019. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The factors with OS and PFS were determined by Cox regression.Results: Of the 52 patients included in our study, 30 (57.7%) underwent MWA and 22 (42.3%) received sorafenib. After PSM, 22 pairs were enrolled into different groups for further analysis. Patients in the MWA-group had a significantly longer median PFS than patients in the sorafenib-group on both before (median, 9.3 vs. 2.8 months, p = .001) and after PSM (median, 9.0 vs. 2.8 months, p = .006). They also had a significantly longer median OS than patients in the sorafenib-group on before (median, 48.8 vs. 16.6 months, p = .001) and after PSM (median, Not reached vs. 16.6 months, p = .001). Besides, Cox regression analysis showed that the treatment and age were the independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS (p＜0.05).Conclusions: MWA was superior to sorafenib in improving survival for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with tumor size ≤7 cm and tumor number ≤5 after TACE failure.Key PointsCompared with sorafenib, microwave ablation may be a more reasonable alternative treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with tumor size ≤7 cm and tumor number ≤5 after TACE refractoriness.The treatment (MWA vs sorafenib) and the age of patients were the independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS.