The Diagnostic Value Of Using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography To Differentiate Between Low- And High-Grade Meningioma

Differentiating primary from secondary lung cancer with FDG PET/CT and extra-pulmonary tumor grade

OBJECTIVE

Assess feasibility of differentiating primary from secondary lung cancer in patients with a solid solitary malignant pulmonary lesion (SMPL) and a previously resected extrapulmonary tumor.

METHODS

Patients with pathology proven primary or secondary lung cancer from a solitary pulmonary lesion and known histopathology of extrapulmonary tumor were included. Patients with a small pulmonary lesion size, multiple malignant pulmonary nodules or an active infectious/inflammatory process were excluded. Extrapulmonary tumor grade was categorized as low, intermediate and high and was matched to FDG uptake intensity of SMPL, with FDG uptake range (SMPL/Liver SUVmax) of <0.9 for low, 0.91-1.99 for intermediate and >2.0 for high extrapulmonary tumor grade.

RESULTS

Of 274 patients, 62 met the study criteria. 46 are primary and 16 are secondary lung cancer. There are 19 low, 27 intermediate and 16 high grade extrapulmonary tumors. Mean SMPL SUVmax is 8.2 ± 4.5 and SMPL/liver SUVmax is 2.4 ± 1.4. There are 37 cases (60%) with mismatched results (e.g., low FDG SMPL with intermediate or high grade extrapulmonary tumor or vice versa) and 25 matched cases (40%) that are inconclusive (e.g., low FDG with low tumor grade or high FDG with high tumor grade). Of the mismatched cases, we correctly predicted 30 cases (81%) as primary lung cancers.

CONCLUSION

A mismatch between the SMPL SUVmax and the extrapulmonary tumor grade could be used to differentiate a primary lung cancer from a metastasis with reasonable accuracy. Our preliminary results support the hypothesis that FDG uptake intensity of a metastatic pulmonary lesion mirrors the tumor aggressiveness of its extrapulmonary neoplasm of origin.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-V. Head and Neck and Neuro Oncology

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT) has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With PET-CT, a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan, performed at the same time, provides information to facilitate attenuation correction, so that radioactivity from deep or dense structures can be better visualized, but with head and neck malignancies it is critical to provide correlating detailed anatomic imaging. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging, and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging and interpretive strategies of PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The fifth report in this series provides a review of PET-CT imaging in head and neck and neuro oncology.

Abstract

PET-CT is an advanced imaging modality with many oncologic applications, including staging, assessment of response to therapy, restaging, and longitudinal surveillance for recurrence. The goal of this series of six review articles is to provide practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for specific oncologic indications, and the potential pitfalls and nuances that characterize these applications. In addition, key tumor-specific clinical information and representative PET-CT images are provided to outline the role that PET-CT plays in the management of oncology patients. Hundreds of different types of tumors exist, both pediatric and adult. A discussion of the role of FDG PET for all of these is beyond the scope of this review. Rather, this series of articles focuses on the most common adult malignancies that may be encountered in clinical practice. It also focuses on FDA-approved and clinically available radiopharmaceuticals, rather than research tracers or those requiring a local cyclotron. The fifth review article in this series focuses on PET-CT imaging in head and neck tumors, as well as brain tumors. Common normal variants, key anatomic features, and benign mimics of these tumors are reviewed. The goal of this review article is to provide the imaging professional with guidance in the interpretation of PET-CT for the more common head and neck malignancies and neuro oncology, and to inform the referring providers so that they can have realistic expectations of the value and limitations of PET-CT for the specific type of tumor being addressed.

FDG PET/CT of Benign Psammomatous Meningioma Effacing the Medulla

ABSTRACT

A 62-year-old woman had progressively developing throbbing right neck pain for 1 year. The pain radiated to the right suboccipital area, sometimes accompanied by breathlessness. To rule out cancer, patient received FDG PET/CT, which showed an intraspinal cord intense FDG-avid calcified mass at the level of the first cervical spine, mimicking malignancy. MRI showed it effacing the medulla; surgery is probably a challenge. She received laminectomy with tumor removal; pathology showed psammomatous meningioma, World Health Organization grade I. This case suggests that benign spinal cord psammomatous meningioma with calcification may show high FDG uptake, mimicking malignancy.

The value of multiparameter 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in differentiating retroperitoneal paragangliomas from unicentric Castleman disease

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of multiple parameters retrieved from the FDG PET/CT studies, including SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV, TLG, tumour size in differentiating retroperitoneal paragangliomas from UCD. 28 patients with solitary retroperitoneal masses who had undergone preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively evaluated. Histopathology by surgical resection confirmed 17 paragangliomas and 11 UCDs. SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV, TLG, and tumour size of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were measured for each patient. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to assess differences in multiple parameters between paragangliomas and UCDs. The ROC curve analysis was performed to determine the differential diagnostic value of these parameters. Paragangliomas presented significantly higher SUVmax (P < 0.001), SUVmean (P = 0.001), SUVpeak (P < 0.001), and TLG (P = 0.024) than UCDs, whereas no significant difference was observed in MTV. The AUCs for differentiating paragangliomas and UCDs were 0.920, 0.888, 0.909, and 0.765 for SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, and TLG, respectively. The SUVmax cut-off of 7.75 yielded 82.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity for predicting paragangliomas. This study indicated that ¹⁸F FDG PET/CT-derived multiple metabolic parameters are useful in distinguishing between paragangliomas and UCDs. SUVmax showed the best result for the differential diagnosis of these two diseases among multiple metabolic parameters.