Effectiveness and Feasibility of Complementary Lung-RADS Version 1.1 in Risk Stratification for pGGN in LDCT Lung Cancer Screening in a Chinese Population

Proposal of Modified Lung-RADS in Assessing Pulmonary Nodules of Patients with Previous Malignancies: A Primary Study

BACKGROUND

In addition to the diameters of pulmonary nodules, the number and morphology of blood vessels in pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) were closely related to the occurrence of lung cancer. Moreover, the benign and malignant signs of nodules were also valuable for the identification of nodules. Based on these two points, we tried to revise Lung-RADS 2022 and proposed our Modified Lung-RADS. The aim of the study was to verify the diagnostic performance of Modified Lung-RADS for pulmonary solid nodules (SNs) and pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) in patients with previous malignancies.

METHODS

The chest CT and clinical data of patients with prior cancer who underwent pulmonary nodulectomies from 1 January 2018 to 30 November 2021 were enrolled according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 240 patients with 293 pulmonary nodules were included in this study. In contrast with the original version, the risk classification of pGGNs based on the GGN-vascular relationships (GVRs), and the SNs without burrs and with benign signs, could be downgraded to category 2. The sensitivity, specificity, and agreement rate of the original Lung-RADS 2022 and Modified Lung-RADS for pGGNs and SNs were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Compared with the original version, the sensitivity and agreement rate of the Modified version for pGGNs increased from 0 and 23.33% to 97.10% and 92.22%, respectively, while the specificity decreased from 100% to 76.19%. As regards SNs, the specificity and agreement rate of the Modified version increased from 44.44% to 75.00% (p < 0.05) and 88.67% to 94.09% (p = 0.052), respectively, while the sensitivity was unchanged (98.20%).

CONCLUSIONS

In general, the diagnostic efficiency of Modified Lung-RADS was superior to that of the original version, and Modified Lung-RADS could be a preliminary attempt to improve Lung-RADS 2022.

A Nomogram Incorporating Tumor-Related Vessels for Differentiating Adenocarcinoma In Situ from Minimally Invasive and Invasive Adenocarcinoma Appearing as Subsolid Nodules

OBJECTIVES

To develop a nomogram incorporating the quantity of tumor-related vessels (TRVs) and conventional CT features (CCTFs) for the preoperative differentiation of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) from minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) appearing as subsolid nodules.

METHODS

High-resolution CT target scans of 274 subsolid nodules from 268 patients were included in this study and randomly assigned to the training and validation groups at a ratio of 7:3. A nomogram incorporating CCTFs with the category of TRVs (CTRVs, using TRVs as categorical variables) and a final nomogram combining the number of TRVs (QTRVs) and CCTFs were constructed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The performance levels of the two nomograms were evaluated and validated on the training and validation datasets and then compared.

RESULTS

The CCTF-QTRV nomogram incorporating abnormal air bronchogram, density, number of dilated and distorted vessels and number of adherent vessels showed more favorable predictive efficacy than the CCTF-CTRV nomogram (training cohort: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.893 vs. 0.844, validation cohort: AUC = 0.871 vs. 0.807). The net reclassification index (training cohort: 0.188, validation cohort: 0.326) and the integrated discrimination improvement values (training cohort: 0.091, validation cohort: 0.125) indicated that the CCTF-QTRV nomogram performed significantly better discriminative ability than the CCTF-CTRV nomogram (all p-value < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram incorporating the QTRVs and CCTFs showed favorable predictive efficacy for differentiating AIS from MIA-IAC appearing as subsolid nodules and may serve as a potential tool to provide individual care for these patients.

Development and Validation of a Risk Stratification Model of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules Based on Complementary Lung-RADS 1.1 and Deep Learning Scores

Purpose

To assess the value of novel deep learning (DL) scores combined with complementary lung imaging reporting and data system 1.1 (cLung-RADS 1.1) in managing the risk stratification of ground-glass nodules (GGNs) and therefore improving the efficiency of lung cancer (LC) screening in China.

Materials and Methods

Overall, 506 patients with 561 GGNs on routine computed tomography images, obtained between January 2017 and March 2021, were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective Chinese study. Moreover, the cLung-RADS 1.1 was previously validated, and the DL algorithms were based on a multi-stage, three-dimensional DL-based convolutional neural network. Therefore, the DL-based cLung-RADS 1.1 model was created using a combination of the risk scores of DL and category of cLung-RADS 1.1. The recall rate, precision, accuracy, per-class F1 score, weighted average F1 score (F1_weighted), Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of DL-based cLung-RADS 1.1.

Results

The percentage of neoplastic lesions appeared as GGNs in our study was 95.72% (537/561) after long-period follow-up.Compared to cLung-RADS 1.1 model or DL model, The DL-based cLung-RADS 1.1 model achieved the excellent performance with F1 scores of 95.96% and 95.58%, F1_weighted values of 97.49 and 96.62%, accuracies of 92.38 and 91.77%, and MCCs of 32.43 and 37.15% in the training and validation tests, respectively. The combined model achieved the best AUCs of 0.753 (0.526–0.980) and 0.734 (0.585–0.884) for the training and validation tests, respectively.

Conclusion

The DL-based cLung-RADS 1.1 model shows the best performance in risk stratification management of GGNs, which demonstrates substantial promise for developing a more effective personalized lung neoplasm management paradigm for LC screening in China.

Impact of lung-RADS classification system on the accurate diagnosis of pulmonary nodular lesions in oncology patients

Background

Lung assessment is highly recommended in the management of oncology patients as it is the commonest affected site in metastatic dissemination. The low-dose CT with nodule reporting system based on Lung Reporting and Data System (lung-RADS) is a promising non-invasive tool for the characterization of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules. The authors aimed to assess the accuracy of the “lung-RADS” classification system as a non-invasive tool for the characterization of any newly developed pulmonary nodules among oncology patients. Ethics committee approval and informed written consent were obtained from the studied patients. A non-contrast LDCT study was performed on all patients with a nodule reporting system based on the lung-RADS classification system applied for evaluation of each detected pulmonary nodule. Diagnoses were established using the help of either histopathology or follow-up clinical results as a gold standard.

Results

In this prospective study, we enrolled 187 known malignancy patients with 200 suspicious newly developed pulmonary nodules. Their mean patient age was 48.4 ± 9.7 years. The studied 200 pulmonary nodular lesions were categorized using a nodule reporting system based on the lung-RADS into 6 sub-groups with 122 lesions found to be malignant and 78 lesions were of benign etiology, which showed a high sensitivity of 92.08%, specificity of 78.79%, and accuracy of 85.50% with 81.58% positive predictive value and 90.70% negative predictive value in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules in cancer patients.

Conclusion

Low-density CT with a nodule reporting system based on the lung-RADS classification system was found to be an accurate non-invasive tool to characterize and to risk stratify pulmonary nodules in oncology patients.