Lobaplatin in Prophylactic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Safety and Efficacy Profiles

Intraperitoneal Irrigation Chemotherapy with Lobaplatin in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Special Type of Abdominal Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the safety and efficiency of intraperitoneal irrigation chemotherapy with lobaplatin for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

A total of 56 locally advanced GC patients (experimental group) who received intraoperative intraperitoneal irrigation chemotherapy in addition to undergoing radical D2 surgery were matched 1:1 based on 8 covariates to 56 patients without drug treatment (control group). Clinical data were collected and analyzed.

RESULT

The two groups were well balanced in basic characteristics and had comparable clinical indices. All patients had similar time to first flatus (2.8 ± 0.3 vs. 2.9 ± 0.3 d, P = 0.076), time to first oral intake (3.5 ± 3.4 vs. 4.1 ± 4.6 d, P = 0.439), and duration of postoperative hospitalization (9.1 ± 3.2 vs. 9.6 ± 4.0 d, P = 0.446). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications including anastomotic and duodenal stump leakage, abdominal and anastomotic bleeding, seroperitoneum, and incision infection between the experimental and control groups (P > 0.05). The rates of chemotherapy-related side effects including allergic reaction, neurotoxicity, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting were also similar between the two groups, and there were no abnormalities in leukocyte and platelet levels and liver and renal function during the first 5 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Intraperitoneal irrigation chemotherapy with lobaplatin is safe for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

The safety and effectiveness of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with pathological T3-4 locally advanced colon cancer

INTRODUCTION

The safety and effectiveness of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in pathological T3-4 locally advanced (pT3N + M0 and pT4NxM0) colon cancer (CC) patients with radical resection need further study.

METHODS

Clinical and pathological information of pT3-4 locally advanced CC patients who received radical surgery in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were analyzed. The prognosis of patients was estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among 927 patients, 10.4% (96/927) received prophylactic HIPEC based on 5-FU, 4.6% (43/927) received prophylactic HIPEC based on lobaplatin, 85.0% (788/927) received conventional therapy. The incidence of metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis (mPC) was 9.4%. Complications occurred in 32 patients (4.1%) in the conventional therapy group, 6 patients (6.3%) in the prophylactic HIPEC group based on 5-FU and 3 patients (7.0%) in the prophylactic HIPEC group based on lobaplatin within 30 days after surgery (5-FU vs. conventional therapy group, p = 0.464; Lobaplatin vs. conventional therapy group, p = 0.591). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that prophylactic HIPEC based on either 5-FU or lobaplatin regimen could not effectively improve mPC-free survival (5-FU: p = 0.020, HR = 1.927, 95% CI, 1.111-3.343; Lobaplatin: p = 0.167, HR = 0.247, 95% CI, 0.034-1.796), overall survival (5-FU: p = 0.361, HR = 1.360, 95% CI, 0.703-2.634; Lobaplatin: p = 0.780, HR = 0.816, 95% CI, 0.195-3.416) and disease-free survival (5-FU: p = 0.525, HR = 1.149, 95% CI, 0.749-1.760; Lobaplatin: p = 0.117, HR = 0.488, 95% CI, 0.199-1.198).

CONCLUSION

Early prophylactic HIPEC based on 5-FU or lobaplatin subsequent to radical resection for patients with pT3-4 locally advanced CC is safe, but not effective in reducing the risk for mPC.

A Clinical Study of Intraoperative Perfusion Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is the third largest cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with major geographic disparities in incidence and outcomes. Sociodemographic indicators, food habits, and genetic predispositions all add to the load. Despite advances in systemic treatments, peritoneal metastasis remains a concern, with intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) emerging as a promising treatment option.

METHODS

A prospective cohort research was done, with 30 GC patients receiving cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by lobaplatin-based intraoperative chemotherapy. The study evaluated postoperative complications, survival rates, and disease recurrence using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY) for data analysis. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness, safety, and dependability of lobaplatin as an intraoperative chemotherapeutic agent in patients having gastric cancer surgery, with a particular emphasis on those patients who do not have distant metastases.

RESULTS

The study population had a balanced gender distribution, with an average age of 44.83 years. Most patients had advanced-stage cancer (T3 and T4), and lobaplatin treatment resulted in a low frequency of serious postoperative sequelae. Preliminary studies suggest that lobaplatin is a safe and potentially effective IPC drug for GC, with few side effects and adequate survival rates.

CONCLUSION

Lobaplatin shows promise as an intraoperative chemotherapeutic treatment for gastric cancer, necessitating more research in bigger, randomized controlled studies to determine its efficacy and safety profile. The study emphasizes the need for novel treatment strategies to enhance the prognosis of GC patients, particularly those with peritoneal involvement.

Effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on survival and recurrence rates in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Around 5-20% of patients who undergo surgery for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), which invades into the muscularis propria or beyond, have peritoneal carcinomatosis. The peritoneal recurrence rate is 10-54%, which is associated with a poor prognosis. The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in AGC with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis is not clearly defined.

METHODS

The authors conducted a meta-analysis, in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, of the clinical trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies evaluating the role of HIPEC in AGC over the last 10 years. The studies were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases between January 2011 to December 2021. Clinical data including overall survival, recurrence free survival, overall recurrence rate, peritoneal recurrence rate, and complications analyzed using RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials and 10 nonrandomized studies, comprising a total of 1700 patients were included. HIPEC was associated with significantly improved OS at 3 [odd ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% CI: 1.17-3.05] and 5 years (OR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.29-2.71). HIPEC was associated with reduced overall recurrence (OR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31-0.80) and peritoneal recurrence (OR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11-0.47). HIPEC was not associated with increased complications. The occurrence of postoperative renal dysfunction was significantly higher in the HIPEC group (OR 3.94, 95% CI: 1.85-8.38).

CONCLUSION

The role of HIPEC in AGC has evolved over the past decade. HIPEC may improve survival rates and reduce recurrence rates in patients with AGC, without significant increase in complications and with a favorable impact on 3 and 5-year survival.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy May Damage Renal Function and Cause Serum Electrolyte Disturbance: A Retrospective Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on bone marrow hematopoiesis, liver and kidney function, and serum electrolytes for patients who underwent open radical gastrectomy, and investigate the variation tendency of above indicators.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical data of 153 patients who underwent open radical gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed and were divided into HIPEC group (n=83) and control group (n=70). Repeated analysis of variance was used to analyze the variation tendency of bone marrow hematopoiesis, liver and kidney function, and serum electrolytes in the HIPEC and control group, respectively, and then made a comparison between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were statistical differences in alanine aminotransferase ( P =0.034), phosphorus ( P+ ) ( P <0.05), potassium (K + ) ( P =0.023), sodium (Na + ) ( P <0.001), and chloride (Cl - ) ( P =0.008) between HIPEC and control group. All outcome indicators changed significantly over time ( P <0.05). No significant difference was found in hemoglobin, white blood cell, platelet, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, or uric acid between the 2 treatment groups at each time point. On the next day after HIPEC treatment, the levels of blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and P+ were higher in the HIPEC group, whereas the calcium (Ca + ), magnesium (Mg + ), and K + levels of HIPEC group tended to be lower. However, the effects of HIPEC on alanine aminotransferase, Na + , and Cl - levels needed to be further explored.

CONCLUSIONS

HIPEC treatment after open radical gastrectomy has no significant effect on hematopoietic bone marrow and liver function but may damage renal function; reduce Ca + , Mg + , K + levels; and increase P+ level.

Single versus multiple hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy applications for T4 gastric cancer patients: Efficacy and safety profiles

Objective

To explore the clinical safety and efficacy of single and multiple applications of lobaplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with T4 gastric cancer and to evaluate the impact of HIPEC on peritoneal metastasis.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from T4 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastric resection plus HIPEC between March 2018 and August 2020 from the National Cancer Center and Huangxing Cancer Hospital. Patients who underwent radical surgery and HIPEC were divided into two groups: the single-HIPEC group (radical resection + a single application of intraoperative HIPEC with lobaplatin 50 mg/m2 at 43.0 ± 0.5°C for 60 min), and a multi-HIPEC group (two more HIPEC applications were performed after radical surgery).

Results

A total of 78 patients were enrolled in this two-center study; among them, 40 patients were in the single-HIPEC group, and 38 patients were in the multi-HIPEC group. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the postoperative complication rates between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). Mild renal dysfunction, mild liver dysfunction, low platelet levels and low white blood cell levels were recorded in both groups, without significant differences between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). After a mean follow-up of 36.8 months, 3 (7.5%) patients in the single-HIPEC group and 2 (5.2%) patients in the multi-HIPEC group experienced peritoneal recurrence (P &gt; 0.05). Both groups had comparable 3-year overall survival (OS) (51.3% vs. 54.5%, P = 0.558) and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates (44.1% vs. 45.7%, P = 0.975). Multivariate analysis showed that an age &gt; 60 years and low preoperative albumin levels were independent risk factors for postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Single and multiple applications of HIPEC in patients with T4 gastric cancer were safe and feasible. Both groups had similar postoperative complication rates, 3-year OS rates and 3-year DFS rates. Special attention should be given to HIPEC for patients aged &gt; 60 years and patients with low preoperative albumin levels.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer based on laboratory tests is safe: a single Chinese center analysis

Purpose

About 15%—40% of gastric cancer patients have peritoneal metastasis, which leads to poor prognosis. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is considered to be an effective treatment for these patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of HIPEC in patients with gastric cancer diagnosed from laboratory tests.

Methods

The clinical and pathological data of 63 patients with gastric cancer who underwent HIPEC in 2017–2021 were prospectively recorded. Fifty-five patients underwent cytoreductive surgery + HIPEC, and eight patients received HIPEC alone. The factors associated with HIPEC safety and efficacy were analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

Results

The average patient age was 54.84 years and 68.3% of patients were male. Moreover, 79.4% of patients had a peritoneal carcinoma index (PCI) score of ≤ 7 and 61.9% had a completeness of cytoreduction score of 0. Because of peritoneal metastasis, 29 patients (46.03%) were classified as stage IV. Laboratory tests showed no differences in pre-HIPEC blood test results compared to post-HIPEC results after removing the effects of surgery. HIPEC treatment did not cause obvious liver or kidney damage. Serum calcium levels decreased significantly after HIPEC (P = 0.0018). The Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score correlated with the patient’s physical function and improved after HIPEC (P = 0.0045). In coagulation tests, FDP (P < 0.0001) and D-dimer (P < 0.0001) levels increased significantly and CA242 (P = 0.0159), CA724 (P < 0.0001), and CEA (P < 0.0014) levels decreased significantly after HIPEC. Completeness of cytoreduction score was an independent prognostic factor. HIPEC did not show a survival benefit in patients with gastric cancer (P = 0.5505).

Conclusion

HIPEC is a safe treatment for patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis based on the laboratory tests. However, the efficacy of this treatment on gastric-derived peritoneal metastases requires further confirmation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01795-6.

Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Radical Surgery With or Without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of preventive hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for gastric cancer (GC) remain controversial. This study aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of radical surgery (RS) with or without HIPEC for patients with locally advanced GC (LAGC).

METHODS

The study identified 394 patients with LAGC who underwent RS with or without HIPEC in China.

RESULTS

Of the 394 patients, 146 received RS+HIPEC, and 248 received RS alone. The RS-HIPEC procedure improved the relapse-free survival (RFS) of the GC patients (2-year RFS, 62.9 % vs 37.8 %; χ² = 4.468; P = 0.035) compared with those who received RS alone. The incidence of postoperative myelosuppression (Z = 4.077; P = 0.043) was higher in the RS+HIPEC group, whereas the incidence of wound complications was lower (Z = 4.077; P = 0.043). In the subgroup analysis, HIPEC improved the OS (2-year OS, 69.9 % vs 40.8 %; χ² = 5.537; P =0.019) and RFS (2-year RFS, 65.6 % vs 33.3 %; χ² = 7.380, P = 0.007) of the patients with nerve invasion and the RFS of the patients with vascular invasion (2-year RFS, 60.7 % vs 31.6 %; χ² = 3.891; P = 0.049). In addition, the prognosis of the patients who underwent HIPEC was better when the tumor diameter was smaller than 5 cm (2-year RFS, 68.6 % vs 37.9 %; χ² = 3.957; P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

The RS + HIPEC procedure improved the RFS of the patients with LAGC compared with RS alone, especially the patients with nerve or vascular invasion and the patients with tumor smaller than 5 cm. Moreover, it reduced the incidence of wound complications and did not induce more perioperative complications in addition to myelosuppression.

Albumin Paclitaxel Compared with 5-Penfluorouracil, Lobaplatin, and Albumin Paclitaxel Combined with 5-Penfluorouracil in the Treatment of Human Gastric Cancer Cell AGS Line Autophagy and Apoptosis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world. Albumin paclitaxel (Nab-PTX) is a novel microtubule inhibitor with albumin as the carrier. Several clinical trials are underway in gastric cancer, but the autophagy mechanism of Nab-PTX on gastric cancer is still unclear. The autophagy and apoptosis effects of Nab-PTX compared with 5-pentafluorouracil (5-Fu) and lobaplatin (LBP) in gastric cancer are also unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This article will compare the effects of Nab-PTX, 5-Fu, LBP, and albumin paclitaxel + 5-pentafluorouracil (Nab-PTX + 5-Fu) on AGS cells from the perspective of autophagy and apoptosis, which is to provide new ideas and experimental evidence for gastric cancer.

METHOD

(1) Experimental groups were control (Ctrl), Nab-PTX, 5-Fu, LBP, and Nab-PTX + 5-Fu. (2) CCK-8 assay was used to reflect cell viability and proliferation. (3) The flow cytometry was used to perform the 24-hour apoptosis and cell cycle of each group. (4) Western blot assay was used to investigate autophagy signal proteins LC3I/LC3II, LC3II/LC3I, SQSTM1/p62, Beclin-1, Atg12, Atg5, p-mULK1, p-AMPK, p-mTOR, and apoptosis signal proteins Bax and Bcl-2.

RESULTS

Nab-PTX, 5-Fu, LBP, and Nab-PTX + 5-Fu inhibited AGS cells' proliferation and arrested the cell cycle. At the same time, each group increased the apoptosis of AGS cells to various degrees (Nab-PTX + 5-Fu > Nab-PTX > 5-Fu > LBP, respectively). The experimental results showed that Nab-PTX and Nab-PTX + 5-Fu promoted autophagy and apoptosis of AGS cells. The comparison of Nab-PTX, 5-Fu, and LBP between groups revealed that 5-Fu inhibited autophagy and the expression of apoptosis protein Bax. In LBP, abnormal activation of autophagy downstream, blocking of autophagy flow, abnormal increase of ATG12, and increased expression of apoptosis protein Bax occurred. Further study found that the autophagy upstream mechanism is different.

CONCLUSION

Nab-PTX, 5-Fu, LBP, and Nab-PTX + 5-Fu can inhibit cell proliferation, promote cell apoptosis, and induce the difference in autophagy expression. The autophagy difference of this antitumor drug may be related to its inducing apoptosis. Meanwhile, Nab-PTX has a better antitumor effect than 5-Fu and LBP in gastric cancer, and the combination of Nab-PTX + 5-Fu has more antitumor advantages.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Combined with Surgery: A 12-Year Meta-Analysis of this Promising Treatment Strategy for Advanced Gastric Cancer at Different Stages

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was designed to systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with surgery for different stages of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) during the last 12 years.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched online, and papers were retrieved from other sources. Next, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and high-quality nonrandomized controlled trials (NRCTs) were selected for this analysis. The meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan5.4 software.

RESULT

The 10 RCTs and 13 NRCTs selected for the study included 1892 patients. The overall survival rates were higher in the HIPEC group at 1 year (risk ratio [RR], 0.52; P = 0.004) and 3 years (RR, 0.63; P < 0.00001) than in the control group for the patients without peritoneal cancer, and the HIPEC group had a significant reduction in the recurrence rate (RR, 0.60; p < 0.00001). Among the patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), the HIPEC group had significantly higher overall survival rates at 1 year (RR, 0.62; P = 0.00001), 2 years (RR, 0.85; P = 0.002), and 3 years (RR, 0.87; P = 0.0001), with an increase in the overall median survival time of 4.67 months. The two groups showed no statistically significant difference in terms of complications for patients with PC (RR, 1.03; P = 0.93) or without PC (RR, 1.15; P = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

For local AGC without PC, standard surgery combined with prophylactic HIPEC could prolong survival and reduce the recurrence rate without more complications. The prognosis of this treatment strategy for patients with PC is closely related to patient selection. Complete cytoreduction combined with therapeutic HIPEC could prolong survival.

Prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may benefit the long-term survival of patients after radical gastric cancer surgery

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been proven to improve the survival rate of gastric cancer and reduce peritoneal recurrence. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic HIPEC after radical gastric cancer surgery in this study. Researchers searched for studies published in PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Scopus, Cochrane, Clinical key databases and Microsoft Academic databases to identify studies that examine the impact of prophylactic HIPEC on the survival, recurrence and adverse events of patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery. RevMan 5.3 was used to analyze the results and risk of bias. The PROSERO registration number is CRD42021262016. This meta-analysis included 22 studies with a total of 2097 patients, 12 of which are RCTs. The results showed that the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rate was significantly favorable to HIPEC (OR 5.10, 2.07, 1.96 respectively). Compared with the control group, the overall recurrence rate and peritoneal recurrence rate of the HIPEC group were significantly lower (OR 0.41, 0.24 respectively). Significantly favorable to the control group in terms of renal dysfunction and pulmonary dysfunction complications (OR 2.44, 6.03 respectively). Regarding the causes of death due to postoperative recurrence: liver recurrence, lymph node and local recurrence and peritoneal recurrence, the overall effect is not significantly different (OR 0.81, 1.19, 0.37 respectively). 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival follow-up may be incremented by the prophylactic HIPEC, and which reduce the overall recurrence rate and peritoneal recurrence rate. HIPEC may have high-risk of pulmonary dysfunction and renal dysfunction complications. No difference has been found in the deaths due to recurrence after surgery.

Lobaplatin-Based Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis from Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancer: Safety and Efficacy Profiles

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lobaplatin in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) arising from colorectal or appendiceal cancer.

Materials and Methods

Patients with synchronous or metachronous PM who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with HIPEC were systematically reviewed at the China National Cancer Center and Huanxing Cancer Hospital from June 2017 to June 2019. All enrolled patients were grouped into either lobaplatin or nonlobaplatin groups depending on the different chemotherapeutic agents used during HIPEC. Clinical characteristics, pathological features, perioperative parameters, and prognostic data were collected and analyzed.

Results

A total of 100 patients were enrolled, with 48 patients in the lobaplatin group and 52 in the nonlobaplatin group. The two groups were well balanced in terms of clinicopathological characteristics. The two groups had comparable perioperative outcomes. However, more patients in the lobaplatin group than in the nonlobaplatin group developed abnormal platelet levels on postoperative day (POD)3 and abnormal ALT levels on POD5. Moreover, the average platelet count in the lobaplatin group was significantly lower than that in the nonlobaplatin group on POD5. There were no significant differences in the 3-year overall survival (OS) rates (48.4% vs 35.1%, P=0.298) and the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates (34.9% vs 21.0%, P=0.470) of the two groups.

Conclusion

Lobaplatin-based HIPEC is safe and feasible for the treatment of patients with PM arising from colorectal or appendiceal cancer with comparable low mortality and acceptable morbidity.