Risk Factors for Postoperative Infectious Complications in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer

Effect of preoperative oral nutritional supplements on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefit of preoperative oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of preoperative ONS on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for randomized controlled trials evaluating preoperative ONS in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer from inception until April 2024. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of the included literature and performed statistical analyses using Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 12 eligible studies with 1201 patients (600 ONS group and 601 control group) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with a normal diet, preoperative ONS effectively reduced infectious complications (odds ratio = 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.98; P = .04), white blood cell count (mean difference [MD] = -0.66; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.28; P = .0007), C-reactive protein (MD = -0.26; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.19; P < .00001), and markedly improved albumin levels (MD = 1.71; 95% CI, 0.97-2.46; P < .00001), prealbumin (MD = 24.80; 95% CI, 1.72-47.88; P = .04), immunoglobulin G (MD = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.44-1.28; P < .00001), CD4 T lymphocyte cells (MD = 3.06; 95% CI, 2.21-3.92; P < .00001), and CD4 T lymphocyte cells/CD8 T lymphocyte cells (MD = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.10-0.56; P = .004). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of noninfectious complications (odds ratio = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.39-1.53; P = .46), immunoglobulin A (MD = -0.21; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.02; P = .08) or length of hospital stay (MD = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.71 to 0.64; P = .92).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative ONS may effectively reduce postoperative infectious complications, improve postoperative nutritional status and immune function, and relieve the inflammatory response in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Therefore, we recommend that preoperative nutrition could be optimized with ONS in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

Risk factors for infectious complications after gastrectomy in older patients

The present study aimed to identify preoperative and perioperative risk factors for postoperative infectious complications in older patients with gastric cancer. The present retrospective study included 504 patients with gastric cancer aged >65 years who underwent radical gastrectomy. After determining the cutoff values for various perioperative factors in the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, preoperative and perioperative risk factors for the development of infectious complications after gastrectomy were examined using logistic regression analysis. Of the 504 patients who underwent gastrectomy, 95 (18.8%) developed infectious complications of grade II-V based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. In an analysis restricted to preoperative factors, male sex, low prognostic nutritional index, high visceral fat area and total gastrectomy were independent risk factors for infectious complications after gastrectomy. Among all perioperative factors, a low prognostic nutritional index and long operative duration were identified as independent risk factors for infectious complications after gastrectomy. The patients were divided into five groups according to the number of positive preoperative risk factors for infectious complications, and the incidence of infectious complications differed among the five groups (0 factors, 6.7%; 1 factor, 10.4%; 2 factors, 18.9%; 3 factors, 27.8%; and 4 factors, 47.6%; P<0.001). Older patients with gastric cancer who have a number of preoperative risk factors require careful consideration of the indication for gastrectomy and a shorter operative time to reduce infectious complications.

Comorbidity assessment methods and their significance in predicting the results of treatment of older patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries for cancer - A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

The scoping review was performed to identify methods of comorbidity assessment and to evaluate their significance in predicting the results of treatment of older patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries for cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and European Trials Register were searched for eligible studies investigating the impact of comorbidity on various postoperative outcomes of patients aged ≥65. Findings were narratively reported.

RESULTS

The review identified 40 studies with a total population of 59,612 patients, using eight different methods of comorbidity assessment. The most used was Charlson Comorbidity Index (60 % of studies) and presence of specific comorbid conditions (38 %). No study provided rationale for the choice of specific comorbidity measure. Most of the included studies reported short-term results (75 %), such as postoperative complications (43 %) and mortality (18 %) as main clinical endpoint. The results were inconsistent across the studies.

DISCUSSION

There is still no consensus regarding the choice of comorbidity measures and their role in postoperative outcome prediction. Further efforts are needed to develop new, well-designed, more effective comorbidity assessments tools.

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Scarce research has reported the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in elderly patients. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in elderly patients.

METHODS

A total of 303 elderly patients who underwent distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer from June 2017 to June 2021 were enrolled. Variables used to calculate propensity score matching included sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists, history of diabetes, and history of hypertension. The statistical significance of continuous variables was tested using an independent sample t test. chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were used for the evaluation of 3-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

After performing 1:1 propensity score matching, 248 patients were included for analysis (laparoscopic = 124, open = 124). Compared with the open group, the laparoscopic group showed significant advantages in estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), pain scale on the first postoperative day (P = 0.002), time to first flatus (P = 0.004), time to first liquid diet (P = 0.005), hospital stays (P < 0.001), and total complications (P = 0.011), but devoted much more operation time (P < 0.001). No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in 3-year recurrence-free survival (P = 0.315) or overall survival (P = 0.159).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis demonstrated that laparoscopic surgery had the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, fewer postoperative complications, and faster postoperative recovery in distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric, indicating that laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is safe and effective for treating elderly patients with distal gastric cancer.

Influences of comorbidities on perioperative rehabilitation in patients with gastrointestinal cancers: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Older patients are more likely to have comorbidities than younger patients, and multiple comorbidities are associated with mortality in patients with cancer. Therefore, we hypothesized that a functional comorbidity index could predict the therapeutic effects of rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we investigate whether the comorbidities influenced the execution and therapeutic effects of rehabilitation.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of 48 patients with gastrointestinal cancer who underwent surgery between January 1 and November 30, 2020, was analyzed. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were calculated based on data derived from medical records. The primary outcomes were ambulation status, duration (days) from the start of postoperative rehabilitation, and length of hospital stay. We investigated the relationship between CCI scores and primary outcomes.

RESULTS

The CCI did not correlate with the duration of rehabilitation or the length of hospital stay. Subsequently, patients with functional recovery problems were evaluated, and we identified the conditions that were not included in the list using CCI scores. Most conditions are associated with surgical complications. Furthermore, using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC), we assessed the clinical features of the severity of complications. We found that the length of stay and the duration to start rehabilitation were significantly longer in the patients with higher severity of surgical complications (CDC≧III) than in those with lower severity (CDC≦II).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment-related conditions may significantly impact the perioperative period more than the original comorbidities. In addition to original comorbidities, events related to surgical complications should be assessed to determine the therapeutic effects of rehabilitation in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Skeletal Muscle Loss During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Predicts the Incidence of Postoperative Infectious Complications in Esophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND/AIM

Malnutrition, immune deficiency, and skeletal muscle loss are associated with a risk of postoperative complications in patients with various types of cancer. This study evaluated whether malnutrition, immunological deficiencies, and skeletal muscle loss during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) predict postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 123 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with NAC and esophagectomy at our hospital between 2014 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of postoperative infectious complications, such as pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, surgical site infections, pyothorax, acalculous cholecystitis, and peripheral phlebitis. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and Onodera prognostic nutritional index were used as indicators of systemic inflammation and nutritional status. Skeletal muscle mass was evaluated using the skeletal muscle index (SMI), calculated by evaluating the total cross-sectional area of muscle tissue at the third lumbar level in computed tomography imaging. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of postoperative infectious complications.

RESULTS

Postoperative infectious complications occurred in 41 patients (33.3%). A reduction in SMI was observed in 105 patients (87.8%) during NAC. Univariable and multivariable analyses indicated that the reduction in SMI during NAC was an independent predictor of postoperative complications (odds ratio=0.89; 95% confidence interval=0.79-0.99; p=0.048).

CONCLUSION

Skeletal muscle loss during NAC is a useful predictor of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy.

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy (LDG) has been more frequently performed for locally advanced distal gastric cancer (AGC) than open distal gastrectomy (ODG). However, the benefits of LDG for elderly AGC patients (AGC-lap) remain unclear.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 70 years who underwent D2 distal gastrectomy from July 2014 to July 2021 were enrolled consecutively. Perioperative parameters, pathological features, and oncological outcomes of AGC-lap patients (n = 39) were compared with those of elderly AGC patients receiving ODG (AGC-open; n = 37) and elderly early gastric cancer patients receiving LDG (EGC-lap; n = 41) respectively.

RESULTS

The median age of all AGC patients was 77 years, and 28% of them had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥ 2. Most of the perioperative and pathological features (including the number of lymph nodes harvested) were similar between the AGC-lap and AGC-open groups. AGC-lap patients had longer median operative times (215 min versus 192 min) but significantly less surgical complications (10.3% versus 37.8%) and shorter median hospital stays (11 days versus 13 days) than did AGC-open patients (all p < 0.05). The 3-year recurrence-free and overall survival was 66.2% and 88.8% in the AGC-lap group and 51% and 66.3% in the AGC-open group (both p = 0.1). The perioperative features, including operative time, number of lymph nodes harvested, hospital stay, and complication rates, were similar between the AGC- and EGC-lap groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LDG was safely and effectively performed in elderly AGC patients, resulting in faster recovery and a lower complication rate than ODG, without compromising oncological outcomes.

Prognosis after curative resection for stage IA gastric cancer in elderly patients: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery

PURPOSE

To establish whether gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (EGC) in elderly patients is related to poor survival.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were patients aged ≥ 75 years with primary stage IA EGC, who underwent curative resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or surgery.

RESULTS

We analyzed data on 365 patients who underwent ESD and 170 patients who underwent surgery. Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different for the ESD group vs. the surgery group (5-year cumulative rates, 81.5% vs. 79.7%; log-rank test, P = 0.506). Multivariate analysis revealed that treatments; namely, ESD or surgery, were not associated with OS (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.51). Similar results were observed even in the subgroups with worse conditions, such as age > 80 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2-3, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 2, and prognostic nutritional index ≤ 46.7. Using propensity score matching, we selected 88 pairs of patients who underwent ESD or surgery with baseline characteristics matched and found that OS was not different between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.829).

CONCLUSION

OS was comparable for elderly patients who underwent ESD and those who underwent surgery for EGC. Surgical invasiveness did not worsen the prognosis, even for elderly patients.

Risk factors for cancer-specific survival in elderly gastric cancer patients after curative gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate cancer-specific survival (CSS) and associated risk factors in elderly gastric cancer (EGC) patients.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

EGC patients (≥ 70 yrs) who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2013 and December 2017 at our hospital were included. Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival data were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to extract the best cutoff point for body mass index (BMI). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the risk factors for CSS.

RESULTS

In total, 290 EGC patients were included, with a median age of 74.7 yrs. The median follow-up time was 31 (1–77) mon. The postoperative 1-yr, 3-yr and 5-yr CSS rates were 93.7%, 75.9% and 65.1%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed risk factors for CSS, including age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.15), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (HR = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.08–2.79), nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002) score ≥ 5 (HR = 2.33; 95% CI, 1.49–3.75), and preoperative prognostic nutrition index score < 45 (HR = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.27–3.33). The ROC curve showed that the best BMI cutoff value was 20.6 kg/m². Multivariate analysis indicated that a BMI ≤ 20.6 kg/m² (HR = 2.30; 95% CI, 1.36–3.87), ICU admission (HR = 1.97; 95% CI, 1.17–3.30) and TNM stage (stage II: HR = 5.56; 95% CI, 1.59–19.43; stage III: HR = 16.20; 95% CI, 4.99–52.59) were significantly associated with CSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Low BMI (≤ 20.6 kg/m²), ICU admission and advanced pathological TNM stages (II and III) are independent risk factors for CSS in EGC patients after curative gastrectomy. Nutrition support, better perioperative management and early diagnosis would be helpful for better survival.