Predicting Lung Cancer Risk of Incidental Solid and Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules in Different Sizes

The differential computed tomography features between small benign and malignant solid solitary pulmonary nodules with different sizes

Background

Computed tomography (CT) has been widely known to be the first choice for the diagnosis of solid solitary pulmonary nodules (SSPNs). However, the smaller the SSPN is, the less the differential CT signs between benign and malignant SSPNs there are, which brings great challenges to their diagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the differential CT features between small (≤15 mm) benign and malignant SSPNs with different sizes.

Methods

From May 2018 to November 2021, CT data of 794 patients with small SSPNs (≤15 mm) were retrospectively analyzed. SSPNs were divided into benign and malignant groups, and each group was further classified into three cohorts: cohort I (diameter ≤6 mm), cohort II (6 mm < diameter ≤8 mm), and cohort III (8 mm < diameter ≤15 mm). The differential CT features of benign and malignant SSPNs in three cohorts were identified. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent factors of benign SSPNs.

Results

In cohort I, polygonal shape and upper-lobe distribution differed significantly between groups (all P<0.05) and multiparametric analysis showed polygonal shape [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 12.165; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.512-97.872; P=0.019] was the most effective variation for predicting benign SSPNs, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.640-0.855; P=0.001). In cohort II, polygonal shape, lobulation, pleural retraction, and air bronchogram differed significantly between groups (all P<0.05), and polygonal shape (OR: 8.870; 95% CI: 1.096-71.772; P=0.041) and the absence of pleural retraction (OR: 0.306; 95% CI: 0.106-0.883; P=0.028) were independent predictors of benign SSPNs, with an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.694-0.863; P<0.001). In cohort III, 12 CT features showed significant differences between groups (all P<0.05) and polygonal shape (OR: 3.953; 95% CI: 1.508-10.361; P=0.005); calcification (OR: 3.710; 95% CI: 1.305-10.551; P=0.014); halo sign (OR: 6.237; 95% CI: 2.838-13.710; P<0.001); satellite lesions (OR: 6.554; 95% CI: 3.225-13.318; P<0.001); and the absence of lobulation (OR: 0.066; 95% CI: 0.026-0.167; P<0.001), air space (OR: 0.405; 95% CI: 0.215-0.764; P=0.005), pleural retraction (OR: 0.297; 95% CI: 0.179-0.493; P<0.001), bronchial truncation (OR: 0.165; 95% CI: 0.090-0.303; P<0.001), and air bronchogram (OR: 0.363; 95% CI: 0.208-0.633; P<0.001) were independent predictors of benign SSPNs, with an AUC of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.840-0.897; P<0.001).

Conclusions

CT features vary between SSPNs with different sizes. Clarifying the differential CT features based on different diameter ranges may help to minimize ambiguities and discriminate the benign SSPNs from malignant ones.

Radiomics-based decision support tool assists radiologists in small lung nodule classification and improves lung cancer early diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Methods to improve stratification of small (≤15 mm) lung nodules are needed. We aimed to develop a radiomics model to assist lung cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

Patients were retrospectively identified using health records from January 2007 to December 2018. The external test set was obtained from the national LIBRA study and a prospective Lung Cancer Screening programme. Radiomics features were extracted from multi-region CT segmentations using TexLab2.0. LASSO regression generated the 5-feature small nodule radiomics-predictive-vector (SN-RPV). K-means clustering was used to split patients into risk groups according to SN-RPV. Model performance was compared to 6 thoracic radiologists. SN-RPV and radiologist risk groups were combined to generate "Safety-Net" and "Early Diagnosis" decision-support tools.

RESULTS

In total, 810 patients with 990 nodules were included. The AUC for malignancy prediction was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.87), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.85) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.59-0.92) for the training, test and external test datasets, respectively. The test set accuracy was 73% (95% CI: 65-81%) and resulted in 66.67% improvements in potentially missed [8/12] or delayed [6/9] cancers, compared to the radiologist with performance closest to the mean of six readers.

CONCLUSIONS

SN-RPV may provide net-benefit in terms of earlier cancer diagnosis.

Lung nodule pre-diagnosis and insertion path planning for chest CT images

Medical image processing has proven to be effective and feasible for assisting oncologists in diagnosing lung, thyroid, and other cancers, especially at early stage. However, there is no reliable method for the recognition, screening, classification, and detection of nodules, and even deep learning-based methods have limitations. In this study, we mainly explored the automatic pre-diagnosis of lung nodules with the aim of accurately identifying nodules in chest CT images, regardless of the benign and malignant nodules, and the insertion path planning of suspected malignant nodules, used for further diagnosis by robotic-based biopsy puncture. The overall process included lung parenchyma segmentation, classification and pre-diagnosis, 3-D reconstruction and path planning, and experimental verification. First, accurate lung parenchyma segmentation in chest CT images was achieved using digital image processing technologies, such as adaptive gray threshold, connected area labeling, and mathematical morphological boundary repair. Multi-feature weight assignment was then adopted to establish a multi-level classification criterion to complete the classification and pre-diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Next, 3-D reconstruction of lung regions was performed using voxelization, and on its basis, a feasible local optimal insertion path with an insertion point could be found by avoiding sternums and/or key tissues in terms of the needle-inserting path. Finally, CT images of 900 patients from Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative were chosen to verify the validity of pulmonary nodule diagnosis. Our previously designed surgical robotic system and a custom thoracic model were used to validate the effectiveness of the insertion path. This work can not only assist doctors in completing the pre-diagnosis of pulmonary nodules but also provide a reference for clinical biopsy puncture of suspected malignant nodules considered by doctors.

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Convolutional Neural Network Assessment of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Compared With PET With CT Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging

BACKGROUND

Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) measuring 8 to 30 mm in diameter require further workup to determine the likelihood of malignancy.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the diagnostic performance of a lung cancer prediction convolutional neural network (LCP-CNN) in SPNs using unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT imaging compared with the current clinical workup?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the Single Pulmonary Nodule Investigation: Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography in the Characterisation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules trial, a prospective multicenter study comparing the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT imaging with PET imaging in SPNs. The LCP-CNN was designed and validated in an external cohort. LCP-CNN-generated risk scores were created from the noncontrast and contrast-enhanced CT scan images from the DCE CT imaging. The gold standard was histologic analysis or 2 years of follow-up. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were calculated using LCP-CNN score, maximum standardized uptake value, and DCE CT scan maximum enhancement and were compared using the DeLong test.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy participants (mean ± SD age, 68.3 ± 8.8 years; 49% women) underwent PET with CT scan imaging and DCE CT imaging with CT scan data available centrally for LCP-CNN analysis. The accuracy of the LCP-CNN on the noncontrast images (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88) was superior to that of DCE CT imaging (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82; P = .03) and equal to that of PET with CT scan imaging (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.90; P = .35). The presence of contrast resulted in a small reduction in diagnostic accuracy, with the AUC falling from 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88) on the noncontrast images to 0.80 to 0.83 after contrast (P < .05 for 240 s after contrast only).

INTERPRETATION

An LCP-CNN algorithm provides an AUC equivalent to PET with CT scan imaging in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier; No.: NCT02013063.

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Core Needle Biopsy for Pulmonary Nodules in Patients with Impaired Lung Function: Is It Feasible and Safe?

Background

The number of patients with incidentally identified pulmonary nodules is increasing. This study attempted to confirm the usefulness and safety of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) core needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules.

Methods

Data from 18 patients diagnosed with pulmonary nodules who underwent VATS core need biopsy were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Of the 18 patients, 15 had malignancies (primary lung cancer, n=14; metastatic lung cancer, n=1), and 3 had benign nodules. Mortality and pleural metastasis did not occur during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

In patients with solitary pulmonary nodules that require tissue confirmation, computed tomography-guided percutaneous cutting needle biopsy or diagnostic pulmonary resection sometimes may not be feasible choices due to the location of the solitary pulmonary nodule or the patient's impaired pulmonary function, VATS core needle biopsy may be performed in these patients as an alternative method.

A radiomics-based decision support tool improves lung cancer diagnosis in combination with the Herder score in large lung nodules

BACKGROUND

Large lung nodules (≥15 mm) have the highest risk of malignancy, and may exhibit important differences in phenotypic or clinical characteristics to their smaller counterparts. Existing risk models do not stratify large nodules well. We aimed to develop and validate an integrated segmentation and classification pipeline, incorporating deep-learning and traditional radiomics, to classify large lung nodules according to cancer risk.

METHODS

502 patients from five U.K. centres were recruited to the large-nodule arm of the retrospective LIBRA study between July 2020 and April 2022. 838 CT scans were used for model development, split into training and test sets (70% and 30% respectively). An nnUNet model was trained to automate lung nodule segmentation. A radiomics signature was developed to classify nodules according to malignancy risk. Performance of the radiomics model, termed the large-nodule radiomics predictive vector (LN-RPV), was compared to three radiologists and the Brock and Herder scores.

FINDINGS

499 patients had technically evaluable scans (mean age 69 ± 11, 257 men, 242 women). In the test set of 252 scans, the nnUNet achieved a DICE score of 0.86, and the LN-RPV achieved an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.88) for malignancy classification. Performance was higher than the median radiologist (AUC 0.75 [95% CI 0.70-0.81], DeLong p = 0.03). LN-RPV was robust to auto-segmentation (ICC 0.94). For baseline solid nodules in the test set (117 patients), LN-RPV had an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.80-0.93) compared to 0.67 (95% CI 0.55-0.76, DeLong p = 0.002) for the Brock score and 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.90, DeLong p = 0.4) for the Herder score. In the international external test set (n = 151), LN-RPV maintained an AUC of 0.75 (95% CI 0.63-0.85). 18 out of 22 (82%) malignant nodules in the Herder 10-70% category in the test set were identified as high risk by the decision-support tool, and may have been referred for earlier intervention.

INTERPRETATION

The model accurately segments and classifies large lung nodules, and may improve upon existing clinical models.

FUNDING

This project represents independent research funded by: 1) Royal Marsden Partners Cancer Alliance, 2) the Royal Marsden Cancer Charity, 3) the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, 4) the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Imperial College London, 5) Cancer Research UK (C309/A31316).

Factors associated with concurrent malignancy risk among patients with incidental solitary pulmonary nodule: A systematic review taskforce for developing rapid recommendations

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between prespecified factors and the malignancy risk of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) to support the development of rapid recommendations for daily use in the Chinese setting.

METHODS

The expert panel for the rapid recommendations voted for 12 candidate factors based on published guidelines, selected publications, and clinical experiences. We then searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science up to October 17, 2021, for studies investigating the association between these factors and the diagnosis of malignant SPNs in patients with CT-identified SPNs through multivariable regression analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Checklist. We pooled adjusted odds ratios (aOR) between candidate factors and the diagnosis of the malignant SPNs.

RESULTS

A total of 32 cross-sectional studies were included. Nine factors were statistically associated with malignant SPNs: age (aOR 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.07), smoking history (2.83, 1.84-4.36), history of extrathoracic malignancy (5.66, 2.80-11.46), history of malignancy (4.64, 3.37-6.39), family history of malignancy (3.11, 1.66-5.83), nodule diameter (1.23, 1.17-1.31), spiculation (3.41, 2.64-4.41), lobulation (3.85, 2.47-6.01), and mixed ground-glass opacity (mGGO) density of the nodule (5.56, 2.47-12.52). No statistical association was found between family history of lung cancer, emphysema, nodule border, and malignant SPNs.

CONCLUSION

Nine prespecified factors were associated with the concurrent malignancy risk among patients with SPNs. Risk stratification for SPNs is warranted in clinical practice.

Developing of risk models for small solid and subsolid pulmonary nodules based on clinical and quantitative radiomics features

Background

Accurate evaluation of pulmonary nodule malignancy is important for lung cancer management. This current study aimed to develop risk models for small solid and subsolid pulmonary nodules based on clinical and quantitative radiomics features.

Methods

This study enrolled 5–20 mm pulmonary nodules detected on thoracic high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), which were all confirmed pathologically. There were 548 solid nodules (242 malignant vs. 306 benign) and 623 subsolid nodules (SSNs 519 malignant vs. 104 benign). Relevant clinical characteristics were recorded. The CT image prior to the initial treatment was chosen for manual segmentation of the targeted nodule using the ITK-SNAP software. Subsequently, the marked image was processed to quantitatively extract 1218 radiomics features using PyRadiomics. We performed five-fold cross-validation to select potential predictors from clinical and radiomics features using the LASSO method and to evaluate the performance of the established models. In total, four types of models were tried: random forest, XGBOOST, SVM, and logistic models. The established models were compared with the Mayo model.

Results

Lung cancer risk models were developed among four nodule groups: all nodules (410 benign vs. 761 malignant; 1:1.86), nodules ≤10 mm (185 benign vs. 224 malignant; 1:1.21), solid nodules (306 benign vs. 242 malignant; 1.26:1), and SSNs (104 benign vs. 104 malignant; 1:1 matched). Significant clinical and radiomics predictors were selected for each group. The accuracy, area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity of the best model on validation dataset was 0.86, 0.91, 0.93, 0.73 for all nodules (XGBOOST), 0.82, 0.90, 0.86, 0.76 for nodules ≤10 mm (XGBOOST), 0.80, 0.89, 0.78, 0.82 for solid nodules (XGBOOST) and 0.70, 0.73, 0.73, 0.67 for SSNs (Random Forest). Except for the SSN models, the established clinical-radiomics models were superior to the Mayo model.

Conclusions

Predictive models based on both clinical and radiomics features can be used to assess the malignancy of small solid and subsolid pulmonary nodules, even for nodules that are 10 mm or smaller.

Cross-Scale Integration of Nano-Sized Extracellular Vesicle-Based Biomarker and Radiomics Features for Predicting Suspected Sub-Solid Pulmonary Nodules

Sub-solid nodules (SSN) are common radiographic findings. Due to possibility of malignancy, further evaluation is urgentlyneeded for prevention and management of lung cancer (LC). This current study enrolled patients with SSN, including LC, benign nodules (BN), and healthy individuals as a control, to discover small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) as biomarker by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and validation by RT-qPCR. Through cross-scale integration of validated small-molecule and macro-imaging, the prediction model was developed by logistic algorithms and further interpreted into an easy-to-use Nomogram by Cox-proportional hazards modeling. Present study has discovered various sEVs DEMs and sEVs-miR-424-5p that were selected and validated as novel potential biomarkers for cancerous nodule, namely LC. Furthermore, the 10 radiomics signs and 4 clinical features of SSN were merged with sEVs-miR-424-5p and proceeded in multivariate logistic regression analysis to develop the cross-scale integrated modeling, which yielded a significantly higher area under the curve (AUC). Finally, visualization of an easy-to-use nomogram was invented to potentially predict suspected SSN. sEVs-miR-424-5p could be a novel biomarker for distinguishing SSN from LC and BN populations. Its association with cross-scale fusion of radiomics-clinical features will provide great potential to be an errorless prediction of malignant SSN.