Identifying Risk Factors for Regional Recurrence in Early-Stage Breast Cancer with pT1-2 and Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Axillary surgery after neoadjuvant therapy in initially node-positive breast cancer: international EUBREAST survey

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on axillary management after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer. To investigate current clinical practice, an international survey was conducted among breast surgeons and radiation oncologists. The aim of the first part of the survey was to provide a snapshot of international discrepancies regarding axillary surgery in this context.

METHODS

The European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists (EUBREAST) developed a web-based survey containing 39 questions describing clinical scenarios in the setting of axillary management in patients with cN1 disease converting to ycN0 after NAT. The survey was then distributed to breast surgeons and radiation oncologists via 14 breast cancer societies between April and October 2021.

RESULTS

Responses from 349 physicians in 45 countries were recorded. The most common post-NAT axillary surgery in patients with cN1 disease converting to ycN0 was targeted axillary dissection (54.2 per cent), followed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone (20.9 per cent), level 1-2 axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (18.4 per cent), level 1-3 ALND (4 per cent), and targeted lymph node biopsy (2.5 per cent). For SLNB alone, dual tracers were most commonly used (62.3 per cent). Management varied widely in patients with ambiguous axillary status before initiation of treatment or a residual metastatic burden in the axilla after NAT. In patients with ycN+ tumours, ALND was the preferred surgical approach for 66.8 per cent of respondents.

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the wide heterogeneity in surgical approaches to the axilla after NAT. To standardize the guidelines, further data from clinical research are urgently needed, which underlines the importance of the ongoing AXSANA (EUBREAST-3) study.

Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and whole-breast irradiation (WBI) are both effective radiotherapeutic interventions for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery; however, an issue on whether which one can entail the better prognosis is still controversial. Our study aimed to investigate the 5-year oncological efficacy of the IORT cohort and the WBI cohort, respectively, and compare the oncological efficacy between the cohorts.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a computerized retrieval to identify English published articles between 2000 and 2021 in the PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and APA PsycInfo databases. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed in duplicate.

Results

A total of 38 studies were eligible, with 30,225 analyzed participants. A non-comparative binary meta-analysis was performed to calculate the weighted average 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) in the two cohorts, respectively. The LRFS, DMFS, and OS (without restriction on the 5-year outcomes) between the two cohorts were further investigated by a comparative binary meta-analysis. The weighted average 5-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS in the IORT cohort were 96.3, 96.6, and 94.1%, respectively, and in the WBI cohort were 98.0, 94.9, and 94.9%, respectively. Our pooled results indicated that the LRFS in the IORT cohort was significantly lower than that in the WBI cohort (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 2.36; 95% confidential interval [CI], 1.66–3.36). Nevertheless, the comparisons of DMFS (pooled OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76–1.31), and OS (pooled OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79–1.14) between the IORT cohort with the WBI cohort were both not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Despite the drastically high 5-year oncological efficacy in both cohorts, the LRFS in the IORT cohort is significantly poorer than that in the WBI cohort, and DMFS and OS do not differ between cohorts.

What Is High-risk Breast Cancer With Pathologically Negative Lymph Nodes for Regional Recurrence?

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify high-risk factors for regional recurrence in patients with breast cancer with pathologically negative lymph nodes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed 3800 patients with stage pT1-pT3 breast cancer and pathologically negative lymph nodes between 2004 and 2012. All patients underwent upfront surgery with curative intent. Adjuvant systemic treatments were administered to most patients (96.7%) based on contemporary guidelines.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 83 months (range, 7-175 months), the estimated 10-year cumulative incidence rate of regional recurrence was 2.0%. Multivariate competing risk analysis revealed that high histologic grade, positive lymphovascular invasion, and stage pT2-3 were significant risk factors for any regional recurrence. Patients with ≥2 risk factors showed a significantly higher 10-year cumulative incidence rate of any regional recurrence than those with 1 or no risk factors (5.5% vs 1.2%; P < .001). When the number of retrieved lymph nodes was less than 10, the difference in the incidence rate of regional recurrence between patients with ≥2 risk factors and those with 1 or no risk factors was greater (6.6% vs 1.3%, respectively; P < .001). The 10-year disease-free survival was worse in patients with ≥2 risk factors than in those with 1 or no risk factors (84.7% vs 90.0%, respectively; P < .001). Patients with ≥2 risk factors also showed worse 10-year overall survival than did those with 1 or no risk factors (91.3% vs 97.0%, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the cumulative incidence rate of any regional recurrence was low at 10 years. However, patients with ≥2 risk factors showed an increased risk of any regional recurrence and worse disease-free survival, particularly when the number of retrieved lymph nodes was less than 10.