Short-Term Quality of Life, Functional Status, and Their Predictors in Tongue Cancer Patients After Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap Reconstruction: A Single-Center, Prospective, Comparative Study

Quality of life and functional outcomes in tongue cancer patients: a long-term, prospective, comparative study

BACKGROUND

The tongue has an indispensable role in communication, swallowing and breathing. Tongue cancer treatment involves direct resection of the tumor and surrounding tissue, which can limit many essential functions of the tongue. There are few patient-reported quality of life studies involving tongue cancer exclusively. There is also a lack of data on the outcomes of quality of life regarding different reconstructive methods, adjuvant non-surgical therapies and other predicting factors. Our objective is to assess the quality of life, functional status, and predicting factors in patients with tongue cancer up to one year after surgical resection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with tongue cancer were prospectively identified between October of 2017 and January 2021. Patients were examined before and one, three, six and twelve months after surgical resection with the validated University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire (UW-QOL). Data collection included patient age, sex, TNM staging, size of resection, neck dissection, tracheostomy, reconstructive method and adjuvant therapies. Outcome scores were compared using the Friedman test. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of quality of life and functional status.

RESULTS

The use of UWQOL scores as dependent variables revealed the following predicting factors: age, tobacco use, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, reconstruction method and neck dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

The most relevant findings in our study are that flap reconstruction becomes increasingly necessary when a glossectomy resection is over 45 mm, in order to maintain tongue function. We established that the reconstructive flap type does not influence quality of life in the long term. Also, we have found that cervical sentinel node biopsy provides better quality of life over neck dissection in the first 3 months after surgery.

Quality of life and swallowing outcomes following major glossectomy: A prospective single-center experience

BACKGROUND

There exists a lacuna in the structured reporting of swallowing dysfunction and quality of life (QoL) outcome following major glossectomy.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study to assess the swallowing dysfunction and QoL following STG (subtotal glossectomy) or NTG (near total glossectomy) over a 6-month period using FEES and PAS scale, MDADI, and FACT-HN.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were available for analysis. The pre- and post-adjuvant evaluation revealed a statistically significant improvement in the composite MDADI and FACT-HN scores. Subscale analysis of FACT-HN scores revealed maximum deficit in the head and neck cancer-specific score domain followed by functional domain and social well-being domain, with serial improvement noted in the post-adjuvant setting.

CONCLUSION

This study showed serial improvement in terms of swallowing dysfunction although social and functional well-being domains related to QoL continued to reveal major deficits. Better outcomes were seen with preservation of bilateral base of tongue and mandible.

Screening oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with head and neck cancer in a radiation oncology department

Background

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) occurs in up to 40% of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients before treatment and remains a common symptom (23-60%) after oncological treatments, leading to several consequences. Early detection is essential for effective swallowing-rehabilitation and nutritional-support. The increased radiosensitivity of tumors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) and advances in imaging techniques have stimulated research into deintensified strategies to minimize radiotherapy (RT) side effects. The purposes of the study are to establish the percentage of patients with HNC who are candidates to RT who are at risk of dysphagia [Eating Assessment Tool (EAT) score ≥ 3], determine if tumor location and previous surgery were related to a higher risk of dysphagia and if patients suffering severe toxicity during cancer therapy are at greater risk of posttreatment-dysphagia.

Materials and methods

Patients diagnosed of HNC who were referred to RT treatment at our Radiation Oncology Department were prospectively included. Questionnaire EAT-10 was filled in the first assessment used as a screening tool and repeated one month after treatment. Treatment toxicity was established according to common toxicity criteria adverse effects (CTCAE4.03).

Results

From November 2019 to January 2021, 72 patients were included. All completed pretreatment EAT-10 questionnaire. The mean (SD) score of the pretreatment EAT-10 was 7.26 ± 11.19 and 43.1% were at dysphagia risk. Patients with tumors located in the oral cavity, oropharynx and those that had received surgery prior to RT had higher risk than the rest of locations or those who had not previous surgery (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). After oncological treatment 95.83% completed EAT-10 post-treatment and 45,6% showed positive EAT-10 score.

Conclusions

Patients with tumors in the oral cavity or oropharynx, presenting in advanced stage, and who previously received surgery are at higher risk of developing dysphagia. The EAT-10 is a simple tool that can help us identify those patients and refer them for an intensive evaluation to reduce dysphagia-consequences.

Quality of Life After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery and Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Different factors can affect the quality of life of patients treated for head and neck cancer undergoing major surgical intervention. However, it remains unclear which specific factors and what possible interventions could have the greatest influence on quality of life postoperatively for patients undergoing surgical resection with free flap reconstruction. The objective of our systematic review was to identify which factors, at the time of surgical treatment, are associated with a worse postoperative quality of life for patients undergoing surgical resection with free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), from their inception through November 2021. We included peer reviewed studies that evaluated the impact of specific factors on quality of life for adult patients who underwent surgery with free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Two reviewers independently screened citations for eligibility and extracted data. Risk of bias of each study was evaluated using the New-Castle Ottawa Scale. Vote counting and qualitative review were used to synthesize results. All relevant findings were reported.

RESULTS

We initially identified 1971 articles. We included 22 articles in our systematic review, totaling 1398 patients. There was a high level of variability for factors evaluated throughout studies and many studies presented small sample sizes. However, some factors were associated with worse long-term quality of life, including older age, radiotherapy, higher tumor stage, dysphagia, anxiety as well as depressive symptoms. Very few articles analyzed their data for specific tumor subsites and the impact of psychosocial factors was rarely evaluated throughout studies.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with head and neck cancer requiring free flap reconstruction, some specific factors may correlate with changes in quality of life. However, these findings are based on very few and mostly underpowered studies. A better understanding of factors affecting quality of life could allow a more personalized and overall better quality of care for patients.

Perioperative Symptom Burden and Its Influencing Factors in Patients with Oral Cancer: A Longitudinal Study

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify the symptom burden of perioperative oral cancer patients, its trajectory, and the factors influencing it.

Methods

A longitudinal, repeated measures design with consecutively identified sampling was used to recruit oral cancer patients scheduled for surgical treatment. Data collected included sociodemographic and clinical information, nutritional risk by the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, and symptom burden by M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck Module (MDASI-HN) at preoperation, 7 days postsurgery, and 1 month postsurgery.

Results

Perioperative patients with oral cancer had multiple symptoms. Pain, difficulty swallowing/chewing, and mouth/throat sores (61.9%–76.1%) were the most prevalent symptoms before surgery. The symptom burden was the highest at 7 days after surgery, with the most prevalent symptoms, including difficulty swallowing/chewing, difficulty with voice/speech, and problems with mucus (87.8%–95.4%). At 1 month postsurgery, the 3 main symptoms were numbness or tingling, difficulty swallowing/chewing, and difficulty with voice/speech (all 87.8%). Treatment stage, job, comorbidity, cancer stage, adjuvant therapy, and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 score were correlated with symptom burdens.

Conclusions

Our study illustrates that perioperative oral cancer patients have multiple symptoms and high symptom burdens, especially at 7 days postsurgery, with prominent symptoms and symptom burdens varying with the treatment stage.

Modified Reconstruction of Brown II Defects With Anterolateral Thigh Flaps Following Tumor Resection

OBJECTIVE

Maxillary defects reconstructed with flaps usually cause nasalomaxillary fistula, discomfort oral lining, and poor function of denture. To resolve these problems, this study introduces a modified method of anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) with skin and myofascial paddles to reconstruct nasal and oral lining of maxillary defects.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 66 consecutive patients of Brown II maxillary defects following tumor resection reconstructed with ALTFs of modified or conventional methods. In modified group, oral lining was reconstructed with myofascial paddle and nasal lining was reconstructed with skin paddle. The functional and aesthetic outcomes, and the scores based on the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire were assessed.

RESULTS

All flaps were successful in reconstruction of Brown II maxillary defects. No nasalomaxillary fistula and obstruction of the nasal cavity were found in modified ALTFs group. The functions of removable denture were better in modified ALTFs group. There was no significant difference about tumor recurrence, range of mouth opening, and aesthetic outcomes between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified method of ALTF with skin and myofascial piddle to reconstruct Brown IIa and IIb defects following tumor resection is simple and reliable, which improves the oral comfortability and function of denture, and avoids obstruction of the nasal cavity.