Treatment Options for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After First-Line Chemotherapy

Side effects of drug-antibody conjugates enfortumab-vedotin and sacituzumab-govitecan in targeted therapy in cancer

OBJECTIVE

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), enfortumab-vedotin (EV) and sacituzumab-govitecan are new drugs in the treatment of urologic tumors, whose safety profile has not been fully investigated. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate adverse events related to both agents reported to VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance database.

METHODS

We employed Bayesian disproportionality analysis based on the information component (IC) to explore the safety profile associated with both therapies. Additionally, we used the proportional reporting ratio approach to examine the safety profile further.

RESULTS

We identified 41,752 reports connected to ADC therapy (EV: n=5359; SG: n=36,393). In the EV subgroup, most reports were associated with dermatologic (38.6%), neurologic adverse events (16.5%), or adverse laboratory assessments (19.4%). In contrast, reports in the SG subgroup were mainly associated with gastrointestinal adverse events (24.2%) and adverse laboratory assessments (39.0%). Adverse laboratory assessments in both cohorts were often based on haematotoxic adverse events.

CONCLUSION

We could provide a comprehensive real-world safety profile of EV and SG using a global pharmacovigilance database. Based on the safety signals explored in this study, further research regarding the impact of these side effects on patient outcomes is justified.

Occult urothelial carcinoma with mediastinal metastasis: A case report

Occult urothelial carcinoma (UC), particularly with mediastinal metastases, is an uncommon clinical occurrence. The present study describes the unusual case of a 70-year-old male patient who developed mediastinal metastases from an occult UC. Histological evaluations and immunohistochemical features of the mediastinal tumor were indicative of UC; however, extensive imaging failed to identify the primary urological lesion. The findings suggest that mediastinal metastases from UCs, despite their rarity, should be considered in cases where patients with mediastinal tumors exhibit chest-related symptoms. Prompt pathological examinations are crucial for ascertaining the nature and origin of the tumor. Moreover, individualized treatment should be performed in strict accordance with the established oncology guidelines.

Emerging strategy for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma: Advances in antibody-drug conjugates combination therapy

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a prevalent malignant tumor involving the urinary system. Although there are various treatment modalities, including surgery, chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, some patients experience disease recurrence and metastasis with poor prognosis and dismal long-term survival. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which combine the targeting ability of antibody drugs with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs, have recently emerged as a prominent research focus in the development of individualized precision cancer therapy. Although ADCs have improved the overall response rate in patients with UC, their effectiveness remains limited. Currently, ADC-based combination therapies, particularly ADC combined with ICIs, have demonstrated promising efficacy. This combination approach has advanced the treatment of UC, exhibiting the potential to become the standard first-line therapy for advanced UC in the future. This article reviewed clinical trials involving ADC-based combination therapy for UC and discussed the possible challenges and future perspectives to provide guidance for the clinical treatment of UC.

TERT promoter mutations and the outcome of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated by platinum-based chemotherapy or pembrolizumab

BACKGROUND

TERT promoter mutation is one of the most common genomic alterations in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Its prognostic role on patients' outcomes is still not clear.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective analysis on patients with advanced UC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy or immunotherapy to assess the presence of somatic TERT-124[C>T] and TERT-146[C>T] mutations and their association with clinicopathologic factors and survival outcomes. Patients were assessed for Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), and Overall Response Rate (ORR).

RESULTS

We analyzed 45 UC tumors; 38 of them received first-line chemotherapy and 21 second-line pembrolizumab; 6 patients (13%) harbored -146 C > T TERTp mutation and 25 patients (56%)-124 C > T. The presence of TERT promoter mutations was associated with a higher rate of lower tract UC and a lower rate of synchronous or lymph node metastases. TERT wild-type patients showed higher 12- and 24-months OS-rates in the chemotherapy subgroup and 6-, 12- and 24-months OS rates in the pembrolizumab subgroup. The presence of TERT promoter mutations was also associated with a lower 6 months-PFS rate in patients receiving chemotherapy and in all the three time points in those treated by pembrolizumab. The ORRs of pembrolizumab were 21% and 71% in patients with or without TERT promoter mutations, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that the presence of TERT promoter mutations could negatively affect the outcome of UC patients treated by chemotherapy or pembrolizumab. This hypothesis should be further evaluated in wider cohorts.

How Do Molecular Classifications Affect the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma?

Despite the significant improvements in the field of oncological treatments in recent decades, and the advent of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, urothelial carcinoma of the bladder remains a highly heterogeneous and difficult-to-treat neoplasm with a poor prognosis. In this context, owing to the new methods of genomic sequencing, numerous studies have analyzed the genetic features of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, providing a consensus set of molecular classes, to identify malignancies that may respond better to specific treatments (standard chemotherapy, immunotherapy, target therapy, local-regional treatment, or combinations) and improve the survival. The aim of the current review is to provide an overview of the current status of the molecular landscape of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, focusing our attention on therapeutic and prognostic implications in order to select the most effective and tailored therapeutic regimen for the individual patient.

Case Report: PD-L1-negative advanced bladder cancer effectively treated with anlotinib and tislelizumab: A report of two cases

Second-line treatment for metastatic or locally advanced urothelial cancer (UC) is limited. Immunotherapy is approved as a second-line treatment for metastatic UC. Its use as a first-line agent is limited to patients who are ineligible for cisplatin-based treatments. The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, erdafitinib, can be applied as a third-line approach after the failure of these prior treatments in eligible patients. Therefore, it is especially important to combine limited drugs for second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic UC. Anlotinib is a multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor agent with both anti-angiogenic and FGFR inhibitory effects. For two patients with advanced and metastatic UC, we combined anlotinib and tislelizumab therapy even though there is no indication of its use. We describe two patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-negative advanced bladder cancer, one with FGFR3 mutation and another with FGFR3 wild type. Both patients had progressed after first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. We selected anlotinib in combination with tislelizumab, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor, for second-line treatment. Responses were evaluated as partial remission in both cases, who achieved up to 12 months of progression-free survival with no significant adverse events. Two patients with PD-L1-negative UC underwent second-line therapy using tislelizumab in combination with anlotinib, and the efficacy was better than that of tislelizumab alone. These results suggest that anlotinib may act synergistically with tislelizumab in the treatment of UC.