Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Dacomitinib versus Gefitinib in the First-Line Treatment of EGFR-Positive Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Critical Examination of Modeling Approaches Used in Economic Evaluations of First-Line Treatments for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, with up to 32% of patients with NSCLC harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. NSCLC harboring an EGFR mutation has a dedicated treatment pathway, with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy often being the therapy of choice.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systemically review and summarize economic models of first-line treatments used for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, as well as to identify areas for improvement for future models.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted via Ovid in PubMed, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews: Health Technology Assessment, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews: National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, and EconLit. An initial search was conducted on 19 December 2022 and updated on 11 April 2023. Studies were selected according to predefined criteria using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study design (PICOS) framework.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven articles were included in the review, representing 59 unique studies. The majority of included models were cost-utility analyses (n = 52), with the remaining studies being cost-effectiveness analyses (n = 4) and a cost-minimization analysis (n = 1). Two studies incorporated both a cost-utility and cost-minimization analysis. Although the model structure across studies was consistently reported, justification for this choice was often lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the reporting of economic models in NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations is generally good, many of these studies lacked sufficient reporting of justification for structural choices, performing extensive sensitivity analyses and validation in economic evaluations. In resolving such gaps, the validity of future models can be increased to guide healthcare decision making in rare indications.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of dinutuximab β for the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma in China

BACKGROUND

Dinutuximab β can be used to treat children with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB). Due to its high price, whether dinutuximab β is cost-effective for the treatment of high-risk NB remains uncertain. Therefore, assessing the cost-effectiveness of dinutuximab β in children with high-risk NB is of high importance.

METHODS

The health utilities and economic outcomes in children with high-risk NB were projected using a partitioned survival model. The individual patient data (IPD) of add-on treatment with dinutuximab β (GD2 group) were derived from the literature, while the IPD of traditional therapy (TT group) were obtained from retrospective data of Shanghai Children's Medical Center. Treatment costs included drugs, adverse event-related expenses, and medical resource use. Utility values were obtained from the literature. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were measured over a 10-year time horizon. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were also conducted.

RESULTS

Compared with the TT group, QALY increased in the GD2 group by 0.72 with an increased cost of $171,269.70, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 236,462.75$/QALY. DSA showed that the price of dinutuximab β was the main factor on the results than other parameters. Compared with the TT group, the GD2 group could not be cost-effective in the PSA at the $37,920/QALY threshold.

CONCLUSION

Results found that dinutuximab β is not a cost-effective treatment option for children with high-risk NB unless its price is significantly reduced.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Sugemalimab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Squamous and Non-squamous NSCLC in China

INTRODUCTION

Sugemalimab is the first China-developed programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor that has proved to be effective as a first-line treatment for both metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when used in combination with chemotherapy. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab plus chemotherapy (sugema + chemo) with placebo plus chemotherapy (placebo + chemo) among metastatic squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC, respectively.

METHODS

Separate Markov models were constructed to generate the cumulative healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with two treatment strategies over a 20-year time horizon. Transition probabilities were estimated using survival data reported in the GEMSTONE-302 trial. Health state utilities and costs were derived from published literature, national databases, and local general hospitals. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of our conclusions.

RESULTS

Compared with first-line placebo + chem, sugema + chemo achieved an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $57,842/QALY for patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC and achieved an ICER of $78,249/QALY for patients with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. In our sensitivity analyses of a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $35,663 per QALY, the first-line sugema + chemo was only cost-effective for patient groups when the price of sugemalimab decreased.

CONCLUSION

Sugema + chemo was not cost-effective as a first-line treatment for either metastatic squamous or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC in Chinese patients compared with placebo + chemo. However, we found that sugema + chemo would be cost-effective in patients with metastatic squamous and non-squamous NSCLC when sugemalimab's price was decreased by > 39.0% and 64.8%, respectively.

A systematic review of economic evaluations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

INTRODUCTION

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved the efficacy of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the accessibility of TKIs is limited due to high costs. Despite the critical role of the cost-effectiveness of TKIs on decision-making, no systematic reviews have compared the cost-effectiveness of comparable TKIs. Therefore, we systemically reviewed the economic evaluation studies on various TKIs for NSCLC.

AREAS COVERED

We searched PubMed and the Cochran Library to identify the published economic evaluation studies of TKIs in NSCLC patients that were published by January 2022. All of the included studies (n = 38) evaluated the cost-effectiveness of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs (n = 29) or anaplastic lymphocyte kinase (ALK)-TKIs (n = 9). The cost-effectiveness results were reported as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life-year, except for three studies.

EXPERT OPINION

We found that the economic evaluation studies of the first and second generation of EGFR-TKIs and ALK-TKIs varied by the country and study settings, such as comparator and input parameters. In 12 studies, osimertinib (EGFR-TKI) was not cost-effective compared to other first/second EGFR-TKIs, regardless of the study settings. More evidence can be provided about cost-effectiveness of the third-generation TKIs in future research.

PEGylated SLN as a Promising Approach for Lymphatic Delivery of Gefitinib to Lung Cancer

Purpose

The present study aimed to develop gefitinib-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (GEF-SLN), and GEF-loaded PEGylated SLN (GEF-P-SLN) for targeting metastatic lung cancer through the lymphatic system.

Methods

The prepared SLNs were characterized in terms of physicochemical properties, entrapment efficiency, and in-vitro release. Furthermore, ex-vivo permeability was investigated using the rabbit intestine. Cytotoxicity and apoptotic effects were studied against A549 cell lines as a model for lung cancer.

Results

The present results revealed that the particle size and polydispersity index of the prepared formulations range from 114 to 310 nm and 0.066 to 0.350, respectively, with negative zeta-potential (−14 to −27.6). Additionally, SLN and P-SLN showed remarkable entrapment efficiency above 89% and exhibited sustained-release profiles. The permeability study showed that GEF-SLN and GEF-P-SLN enhanced the permeability of GEF by 1.71 and 2.64-fold, respectively, compared with GEF suspension. Cytotoxicity showed that IC₅₀ of pure GEF was 3.5 μg/mL, which decreased to 1.95 and 1.8 μg/mL for GEF-SLN and GEF-P-SLN, respectively. Finally, the apoptotic study revealed that GEF-P-SLN decreased the number of living cells from 49.47 to 3.43 when compared with pure GEF.

Conclusion

These results concluded that GEF-P-SLN is a promising approach to improving the therapeutic outcomes of GEF in the treatment of metastatic lung cancer.