Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

Anlotinib hydrochloride consolidation after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a truncated, randomized, multicenter, clinical study (ALTER-L029)

Anlotinib is an antiangiogenic drug that shows good efficacy and safety in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for consolidation therapy in patients with stage III locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). This was a randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial of patients with unresectable/nonoperated NSCLC treated with cCRT. The participants were randomized 2:1 to the anlotinib or control group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival. This study was terminated early due to poor recruitment. Nine and two participants were randomly assigned to the anlotinib and control groups, respectively. One participant in the control group was excluded due to taking prohibited medications before the first efficacy evaluation. In the anlotinib group, the median age was 63 (range, 37-74) years. Two participants achieved partial response, six stable disease, and one progressive disease as best response. The DCR was 88.9%. The median PFS was 11.5 months, and the 12-month PFS rate was 33.9%. All related adverse events were grade 1 or 2. Two participants had a dose adjustment during the study. The evaluable data suggest that anlotinib alone was effective and tolerable in consolidation therapy after cCRT in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC. The results need to be confirmed by a large-sample trial. This clinical trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03743129). Registration date: 6 September 2018.

Efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with anlotinib for advanced cholangiocarcinoma after first-line chemotherapy and the variations in efficacy based on different neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of anlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma following first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 154 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer admitted to the hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. All patients received first-line intravenous chemotherapy with gemcitabine combined with cisplatin, oxaliplatin, or tegafur. Among the 106 patients who achieved disease control, 47 received oral anlotinib hydrochloride (12 mg daily, 2 weeks on/1 week off) as maintenance therapy. Clinical efficacy, including ORR, DCR, DOR, PFS, and OS, was compared between the anlotinib maintenance and non-maintenance groups. Subgroup analysis based on NLR levels was also performed.

RESULTS

Among the 47 anlotinib maintenance patients, the ORR was 21.28% and the DCR was 51.06%. The median DOR was 36 weeks, and the median PFS was 43 weeks in the anlotinib group, versus 28 weeks and 38 weeks in the non-maintenance group, respectively. The median OS was not reached in the anlotinib group but was 48 weeks in the non-maintenance group. Patients receiving anlotinib maintenance had significantly longer DOR, PFS, and OS (all p < 0.05). Patients with low NLR levels had better survival benefits from anlotinib.

CONCLUSION

Maintenance therapy with anlotinib demonstrates potential efficacy and a reliable safety profile in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma following first-line treatment. The efficacy of anlotinib therapy appears to be influenced by NLR levels. Further validation with larger sample sizes is warranted to strengthen the robustness and reliability of the results.

Anlotinib plus docetaxel vs. docetaxel alone for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients who failed first-line treatment: A multicenter, randomized phase II trial

OBJECTIVES

Given the modest efficacy of docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this study assesses the therapeutic potential and safety profile of anlotinib in combination with docetaxel compared to docetaxel monotherapy as a second-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this phase II study, patients with advanced NSCLC experiencing failure with first-line platinum-based regimens were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either anlotinib plus docetaxel or docetaxel alone. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were randomized. The combination of anlotinib and docetaxel significantly extended median PFS to 4.4 months compared to 1.6 months for docetaxel alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.63, P = 0.0002), and also demonstrated superior ORR (32.5 % vs. 9.3 %, P = 0.0089) and DCR (87.5 % vs. 53.5 %, P = 0.0007). Median OS was observed at 12.0 months in the combination group vs. 10.9 months in the monotherapy group (HR = 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.47-1.43, P = 0.4803). For patients previously treated with immunotherapy, the median PFS was notably longer at 7.8 vs. 1.7 months (HR = 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.09-0.51, P = 0.0290). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events, predominantly leukopenia (15.0 % vs. 7.0 %) and neutropenia (10.0 % vs. 5.0 %), was manageable across both groups.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib plus docetaxel offers a viable therapeutic alternative for patients with advanced NSCLC who failed first-line platinum-based treatments.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in EGFR-Positive Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Compared with Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

There are no standard third-line or beyond treatments for patients with driver mutation-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Anlotinib was approved as a third-line multitarget drug in China in 2018. Limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with chemotherapy. To investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with traditional chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive advanced LUAD. We conducted a retrospective study of 83 EGFR mutation-positive patients with advanced LUAD between 2011 and 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints, whereas the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were the secondary endpoints. Anlotinib-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded to evaluate the safety of anlotinib. 39 patients with LUAD received anlotinib and 44 patients with LUAD received chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. Patients treated with anlotinib exhibited longer PFS (11.2 vs 4.5 months, P < .01) and OS (18.8 vs 15.8 months, P < .05) than patients treated with chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in ORR (7.9% vs 20.5%, P = .129) or DCR (100% vs 93.2%, P = .120) between the two groups. Anlotinib-related AEs grading 3-4 level were observed in 2 (5.1%) patients, no anlotinib-related death was recorded. Cox regression analyses of PFS and OS showed that brain metastases and age < 30 years at diagnosis had negative effects on clinical outcomes. Anlotinib is effective and safe in patients with EGFR-positive advanced LUAD. Patients without brain metastases had better clinical outcomes.

18 F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of metastases in nonsmall cell lung cancer on the efficacy of immunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) metabolic parameters and clinical benefit and prognosis in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

In total, 34 advanced NSCLC patients who received 18 F-FDG PET/CT before immunotherapy were retrospectively included in this study. All patients were divided into two groups, the clinical benefit (CB) group and the no-clinical benefit (no-CB) group, based on the efficacy of evaluation after 6 months of treatment. Also clinical information, characteristics of metastases, survival, PD-L1 expression level and glucose metabolic parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

Finally, 24 patients were in the CB group, and 10 patients were in the no-CB group. There was a significant difference between the CB group and the no-CB group in TNM stages ( P  = 0.005), visceral and bone metastasis ( P  = 0.031), metabolic tumor volume of primary lesion (MTV-P; P  = 0.003), the metabolic tumor volume of whole-body (MTVwb; P  = 0.005) and total lesion glycolysis of whole-body (TLGwb, P  = 0.015). However, for patient outcomes, the independent prognostic factors associated with progression free survival were TNM stage (HR = 0.113; 95% CI, 0.029-0.439; P  = 0.002), TLG-P (HR = 0.085; 95% CI, 0.018-0.402; P  = 0.002) and TLG-LN (HR = 0.068; 95% CI, 0.015-0.308; P  = 0.000), and the TLG-LN (HR = 0.242; 95% CI, 0.066-0.879; P  = 0.002) was the independent prognostic factor associated with overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastatic lesion burden evaluated by 18 F-FDG PET/ CT can predict response to immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients, in which lymph node metastasis lesion metabolic burden is a meaningful predictor, but a large multicenter trial is still needed to validate this conclusion.

MNK/eIF4E inhibition overcomes anlotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Anlotinib is approved for refractory cases in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, but patients inevitably face prospects of drug resistance during the treatment process. Using anlotinib-resistant NSCLC models, this work investigated the underlying molecular mechanism and systematically addressed the issue of anlotinib resistance. We demonstrated that expression and activity of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) were upregulated in NSCLC cells due to prolonged exposure to anlotinib. eIF4E depletion resulted in significant effects to anlotinib-resistant cells, showing proliferation inhibition and apoptosis inducement. We further showed that MAP kinase interacting serine/threonine kinase (MNK)-dependent eIF4E inhibition by cercosporamide was active against anlotinib-resistant cells and significantly augmented anlotinib's efficacy in parental NSCLC cells. Importantly, observations from in-vitro experiments are consistent in in vivo anlotinib-resistant and anlotinib-sensitive NSCLC cancer xenograft mouse models. Our work is the first to reveal that eIF4E is involved intimately in anlotinib resistance development in NSCLC, and this eIF4E activation can be reversed by cercosporamide or other MNK inhibitors.

The real-world clinical outcomes and treatment patterns of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma treated with anlotinib in the post-ALTER0203 trial era

Background

The ALTER0203 clinical trial showed that anlotinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, had antitumor effects on advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after the failure of standard chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the real‐world efficacy and explore prognostic factors and treatment patterns of anlotinib in patients with advanced STS.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic STS who received at least one dose of anlotinib from June 2018 to March 2021. The survival data were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log‐rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was performed for multivariate analysis.

Results

A total of 209 patients were included. The median age was 48 (range 11–85) years. The median follow‐up, progression‐free survival, and overall survival were 18.7 months, 6.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.9–7.2], and 16.4 months (95% CI: 13.6–19.1), respectively. The objective response rate was 13.4%. Nutritional status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and anlotinib treatment patterns (combination therapy or switch maintenance therapy vs. monotherapy) were significantly associated with progression‐free survival. Besides, pathological grade, nutritional status, ECOG performance status, and anlotinib treatment patterns were predictive of overall survival. Due to anlotinib‐related toxicity, 31 (14.8%) patients, and 25 (12.0%) patients experienced dose reduction and treatment discontinuation, respectively.

Conclusion

These findings confirmed the efficacy of anlotinib in patients with advanced STS in a real‐world setting. The patterns of anlotinib treatment deserve further exploration.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization Plus Anlotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization plus anlotinib oral administration in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Consecutive data from 51 patients with advanced NSCLC were retrospectively collected from February 2018 to August 2019. All patients underwent drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) followed by anlotinib treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated and analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, and factors associated with OS and PFS were assessed by a Cox proportional hazards test. Treatment response at 30 days was assessed by enhanced computed tomography (CT), and then the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also evaluated.

Results: The median OS was 18.4 months (95% CI, 16.6–20.2 months), and the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 6.2–10.6 months). The ORR and DCR for the whole cohort were 21.6 and 100%, respectively, at 30 days after the first cycle of treatment. Most of the treatment-related adverse reactions were mild and moderate and included anorexia, hypertension, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome. Only eight (15.7%) patients developed grade 3 TRAEs. No deaths or other serious adverse reactions occurred. Both TNM stage and brain metastasis were independent risk factors for OS and PFS.

Conclusion: DEB-BACE concomitant with anlotinib has promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Monotherapy as Third-Line Therapy for Elderly Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Exploratory Study

Purpose

The present study was to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy as third-line therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 83 elderly patients (>65 years) with NSCLC who were progressed at least two lines of previous systemic therapy were recruited retrospectively. Patients were treated with anlotinib monotherapy (12 mg or 10 mg). Efficacy of anlotinib was assessed and all the patients were followed up regularly. Adverse reactions were collected during anlotinib administration. Univariate analysis was performed using Log rank test and multivariate analysis was adjusted by Cox regression analysis. Additionally, prognostic analysis according to common adverse reactions was implemented to identify the potential clinical significance.

Results

The best overall response of the 83 elderly patients during anlotinib monotherapy indicated that partial response (PR) was observed in six patients, stable disease (SD) was noted in 59 patients, and progressive disease (PD) was reported in 18 patients. Consequently, the objective response rate (ORR) was 7.2% (95% CI=2.7–15.1%) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 78.3% (95% CI=67.9–86.6%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 83 elderly patients with NSCLC was 4.2 months (95% CI=3.51–4.89). Furthermore, the median overall survival (OS) of the 83 patients was 9.6 months (95% CI=6.65–12.55). The safety profile suggested that the relatively common adverse reactions of the elderly patients with ES-SCLC receiving anlotinib therapy were hypertension (49.4%), fatigue (45.8%), and hand–foot syndrome (39.8%). Interestingly, association analysis exhibited that the median PFS of patients with hypertension and non-hypertension was 4.5 and 3.0 months, respectively (χ²=6.306, P=0.012).

Conclusion

Anlotinib monotherapy demonstrated a satisfactory efficacy and tolerable safety profile in third-line settings for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients who experienced a hypertension adverse reaction induced by anlotinib therapy might confer superior PFS. The conclusion should be validated in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

Effect of prior thoracic radiotherapy on prognosis in relapsed small cell lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib: a subgroup analysis of the ALTER 1202 trial

Background

In ALTER 1202, anlotinib prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The aim of this study was to explore the effect of front-line thoracic radiotherapy (RT) on the benefits of anlotinib as a third-line-or-beyond treatment.

Methods

This was a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial (ALTER 1202). The participants were divided into RT (previous thoracic RT) and non-RT subgroups. The outcomes included PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

Results

In the ALTER 1202 trial, 68 participants (anlotinib, n=46; placebo, n=22) received RT and 51 participants (anlotinib, n=35; placebo, n=16) did not. PFS was longer for anlotinib versus placebo in both the RT (5.49 vs. 0.69 months; P<0.001) and non-RT (2.83 vs. 0.76 months; P<0.001) subgroups. In the RT subgroup, the OS was longer for anlotinib vs. placebo (9.49 vs. 4.90 months; P=0.039). No differences were found in the ORR, but the DCR was higher in the anlotinib arm of the RT subgroup compared with the placebo arm (73.9% vs. 9.1%, P<0.001) and the non-RT subgroup (68.6% vs. 18.8%; P=0.002).

Conclusions

In relapsed SCLC patients with previous thoracic RT, anlotinib might have DCR, PFS, and OS benefits compared with placebo. In those without previous thoracic RT patients, anlotinib might have DCR and PFS benefits compared with placebo. The safety was similar between anlotinib and placebo groups.