The Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study

The Efficiency and Toxicity Of Anlotinib in Combination With Docetaxel Followed by Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Regimen as Neoadjuvant Treatment in IIB to IIIA Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Single-Arm, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Study

BACKGROUND

The combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-angiogenesis therapy for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains inadequately supported by evidence. We conducted a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of anlotinib plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in patients with IIB to IIIA stage TNBC.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed patients received epirubicin at 90 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide at 600 mg/m2 followed by docetaxel at 100 mg/m2 (21 days per cycle; total of 4 cycles), along with oral anlotinib (12 mg qd, d1-14; 21 days per cycle; total of 4 cycles). Subsequently, patients underwent surgery. The primary endpoint of this study was pathologic complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

Among the 34 included patients, the median age was 46.5 years (range: 27-72); all were female. Pathological assessment revealed that 17 patients achieved RCB 0 response, which is currently defined as pathologic complete response; 3 patients achieved RCB 1; 12 patients achieved RCB 2; and 1 patient achieved RCB 3. The probability of a grade 3 adverse reaction was 17.6%, and no grade 4 adverse reactions occurred. The most common hematological adverse reaction was leukopenia (13/34, 38.2%), of which 5.9% (2/34) were grade 3. The most common non-hematological adverse reactions were oral mucositis (16/34, 58.8%), fatigue (50.0%), hand-foot syndrome (50.0%), hypertension (44.1%), bleeding (44.1%), and alopecia (32.4%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of anlotinib and EC-T chemotherapy demonstrated tolerable side effects in the neoadjuvant treatment of early TNBC. pCR was higher than what has been reported in previous clinical studies of chemotherapy alone. This study provides additional rationale for using anlotinib plus docetaxel-epirubicin-based chemotherapy regimen in patients with early-stage TNBCs.

Myeloprotection with trilaciclib in Chinese patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study (TRACES)

INTRODUCTION

Trilaciclib is a transient cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor that decreases the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). TRACES study was designed to assess the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK) of trilaciclib before chemotherapy in Chinese patients with ES-SCLC.

METHODS

The study included an open-label safety run-in part (Part 1) and double-blinded, placebo-controlled part (Part 2) where patients received trilaciclib or placebo before chemotherapy. Treatment-naïve or previously treated ES-SCLC patients received intravenous trilaciclib (240 mg/m2) or placebo before etoposide/carboplatin or topotecan, respectively. Primary endpoints were PK, safety and duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1 in Part 1 and Part 2. Exploratory endpoints included the effect of trilaciclib on other myeloprotection endpoints, safety and antitumor efficacy.

RESULTS

Overall, 95 Chinese patients were enrolled, of which 12 and 83 patients were in Part 1 and Part 2, respectively. In Part 1, trilaciclib was well tolerated. Non-compartmental analysis results revealed no substantial differences in the main exposure parameters. In Part 2, 41 patients received trilaciclib, and 42 received placebo. Patients in trilaciclib arm vs placebo arm had a clinically and statistically significant decrease in DSN (mean [SD]) in Cycle 1 (0 [1.7] vs 2 [3.0] days; P = 0.0003), with improvements in additional neutrophil, red blood cell, and platelet measures. After a median follow-up of 14.1 months, the median overall survival was 12.0 months in trilaciclib arm and 8.8 months in placebo arm (HR, 0.69; 95 % CI: 0.40-1.22). Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months and 4.3 months, respectively (HR, 0.86; 95 % CI: 0.53-1.39). Trilaciclib had a well-tolerated safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Trilaciclib in the Chinese population demonstrated a similar PK and safety profile as seen in other global trials. There was significant reduction of DSN in Cycle 1, thereby substantiating the myeloprotective effects of trilaciclib in Chinese ES-SCLC patients.

Safety and efficacy of anlotinib hydrochloride capsules in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter, real-world study

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib hydrochloride capsules in stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: NSCLC patients received anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy. The primary end point was adverse reactions during anlotinib treatment and the secondary end point was progression-free survival. Results: During anlotinib treatement, 41.85% (167/399) of patients experienced adverse reactions, and the monotherapy group had a lower incidence than the combination group (36.89 vs 49.68%; p = 0.012). The median progression-free survival of patients in the monotherapy group was significantly lower than that in the combination group (5 vs 6 months; p = 0.0119). Conclusion: Compared with anlotinib monotherapy, combination therapy resulted in longer PFS and a higher incidence of adverse reactions in patients with NSCLC.

The efficacy of adebrelimab compared with durvalumab and atezolizumab in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a survival analysis of reconstructed patient-level data

Background

Adebrelimab showed excellent efficacy in the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, whether adebrelimab is superior to durvalumab and atezolizumab remains unclear. Therefore, we, in this study, aimed to compare the survival data of adebrelimab (CAPSTONE-1 trial) with durvalumab (CASPIAN trial) and atezolizumab (IMpower133 trial) in the first-line setting of ES-SCLC patients.

Methods

Online databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL, were systematically searched on December 2, 2022. The metaSurvival and IPDfromKM methods were used to analyze the summary survival curves and the reconstructed patient-level data. The main endpoints were median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

In this analysis, survival data in the CASPIAN, IMpower133, and CAPSTONE-1 trials were collected from five published studies. The pooled median OS and PFS were 14.0 months (95% CI 11.2-16.6) and 5.6 months (95% CI 4.7-6.7) when ES-SCLC patients received chemotherapy (etoposide and cisplatin/carboplatin) and anti-PD-L1 therapy. Based on the reconstructed patient-level data, adebrelimab significantly prolonged survival outcomes against atezolizumab (OS: Hazard ratio [HR]0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.95; PFS: HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.83) and durvalumab (OS: HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.92).

Conclusion

For previously untreated ES-SCLC patients, longer survival time might be benefited from adding adebrelimab to etoposide-platinum chemotherapy. In future studies, further real-world evidence or head-to-head clinical trials are warranted to confirm the differences between the PD-L1 inhibitors.