Early efficacy of budesonide/formoterol in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD

Prenatal Origins of Obstructive Airway Disease: Starting on the Wrong Trajectory?

From the results of well-performed population health studies, we now have excellent data demonstrating that deficits in adult lung function may be present early in life, possibly as a result of developmental disorders, incurring a lifelong risk of obstructive airway diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Suboptimal fetal development results in intrauterine growth restriction and low birth weight at term (an outcome distinct from preterm complications), which are associated with subsequent obstructive disease. Numerous prenatal exposures and disorders compromise fetal development and these are summarized herein. Various physiological, structural, and mechanical abnormalities may result from prenatal disruption, including changes to airway smooth muscle structure-function, goblet cell biology, airway stiffness, geometry of the bronchial tree, lung parenchymal structure and mechanics, respiratory skeletal muscle contraction, and pulmonary inflammation. The literature therefore supports the need for early life intervention to prevent or correct growth defects, which may include simple nutritional or antioxidant therapy. © 2024 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 14:5729-5762, 2024.

Longitudinal FEV1 and Exacerbation Risk in COPD: Quantifying the Association Using Joint Modelling

BACKGROUND

Lung function, measured as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and exacerbations are two endpoints evaluated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) clinical trials. Joint analysis of these endpoints could potentially increase statistical power and enable assessment of efficacy in shorter and smaller clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate joint modelling as a tool for analyzing treatment effects in COPD clinical trials by quantifying the association between longitudinal improvements in FEV1 and exacerbation risk reduction.

METHODS

A joint model of longitudinal FEV1 and exacerbation risk was developed based on patient-level data from a Phase III clinical study in moderate-to-severe COPD (1740 patients), evaluating efficacy of fixed-dose combinations of a long-acting bronchodilator, formoterol, and an inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide. Two additional studies (1604 and 1042 patients) were used for external model validation and parameter re-estimation.

RESULTS

A significant (p<0.0001) association between FEV1 and exacerbation risk was estimated, with an approximate 10% reduction in exacerbation risk per 100 mL improvement in FEV1, consistent across trials and treatment arms. The risk reduction associated with improvements in FEV1 was relatively small compared to the overall exacerbation risk reduction for treatment arms including budesonide (10-15% per 160 µg budesonide). High baseline breathlessness score and previous history of exacerbations also influenced the risk of exacerbation.

CONCLUSION

Joint modelling can be used to co-analyze longitudinal FEV1 and exacerbation data in COPD clinical trials. The association between the endpoints was consistent and appeared unrelated to treatment mechanism, suggesting that improved lung function is indicative of an exacerbation risk reduction. The risk reduction associated with improved FEV1 was, however, generally small and no major impact on exacerbation trial design can be expected based on FEV1 alone. Further exploration with other longitudinal endpoints should be considered to further evaluate the use of joint modelling in analyzing COPD clinical trials.

Efficacy and safety of high-dose budesonide/formoterol in patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Background

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a rare, progressive and irreversible airway disease associated with significant mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). In this study, we investigated the therapeutic effect of high-dose budesonide/formoterol (320/9 µg bid) in patients with BOS after HSCT already using low-dose budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 µg bid).

Methods

After a retrospective chart review, patients who were initially treated with budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 µg bid and increased their dose to 320/9 µg bid between March 2009 and February 2019 were enrolled. Pulmonary function test (PFT) and COPD assessment test (CAT) were performed before and after changing the drug dose. Efficacy was assessed within 3 months after increasing the drug dose; the primary variable was changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and CAT score. Safety was assessed as the incidence of pneumonia within 3 months after increasing the drug dose.

Results

Seventy-seven patients were treated with budesonide 160 µg plus formoterol 4.5 µg twice a day for more than 3 months and the dose was increased to budesonide 320 µg plus 9.0 µg twice a day. After treatment with high-dose ICS/LABA (budesonide 320 µg plus formoterol 9.0 µg twice a day for 12 weeks), there were no significant differences in FEV1 (before treatment 1.59 L vs. after treatment 1.65 L, P=0.182) or FVC (before treatment 2.93 L vs. after treatment 2.96 L, P=0.519) compared to before starting the high dose treatment. There were no significant differences in the total CAT score. Of all patients, 34.2% of patients had an increase in FEV1 ≥100 mL and 35.3% of patients showed a decrease ≥2 points in CAT score. In safety assessment, there were no significant differences between the two periods.

Conclusions

Our study failed to show superior effect of high-dose budesonide/formoterol (320/9 µg) compared with low-dose. However, high-dose budesonide/formoterol was safe and there was no lung function deterioration.

Bronchodilator Efficacy of a Single-Dose 12/400-µg Formoterol/Budesonide Combination as a Dry Powder for Inhalation Delivered by Discair® in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Stable COPD: Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase IV Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A patient-friendly and easy-to-use multi-dose dry powder inhaler, Discair^®, has been recently developed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bronchodilator efficacy of a single-dose 12/400-µg formoterol plus budesonide combination as a dry powder for inhalation delivered by Discair^® in adult patients with moderate-to-severe, stable, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

METHODS

A total of 33 male patients with moderate-to-severe, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were included in this single-arm, open-label, phase IV trial. The primary efficacy parameters were the average maximum change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁, in L) and time to maximum FEV₁ response. Absolute and percent change from baseline in FEV₁ and forced vital capacity, maximum change and time to peak forced vital capacity response were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean post-bronchodilator FEV₁ maximum value was significantly higher than the pre-bronchodilator baseline FEV₁ value [1.66 (standard deviation 0.43) vs. 1.32 (standard deviation 0.35), p < 0.001], with an absolute change of 0.34 (standard deviation 0.18) and a percent change of 26.0 (standard deviation 0.14) from baseline to maximum response. The average time to peak FEV₁ response was 3.94 h (standard deviation 2.75), while the standardized area under the response-time curve from 0 to 12 h for FEV₁ was 2.72 (standard deviation 1.84). The FEV₁ and forced vital capacity values recorded at each time point during the 12-h post-bronchodilator period were also significantly higher than the baseline values (p < 0.001 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed significant changes from baseline in post-bronchodilator peak and average FEV₁ and forced vital capacity responses, indicating bronchodilator efficacy of a single-dose 12/400 µg formoterol plus budesonide dry powder formulation delivered by Discair^® in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03028701.

Comparative Efficacy of Budesonide/Formoterol with Budesonide, Formoterol or Placebo for Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND The 2018 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease publication suggested that the combination of bronchodilator therapy of inhaled glucocorticoid/long-acting β₂ adrenoceptor agonist is more effective in improving pulmonary function and health status in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations than the individual components; however, it is not known whether this also the case for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol in the maintenance and relief therapy of patients with stable COPD. MATERIAL AND METHODS An electronic search of the literature in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was undertaken to identify published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ≥12 weeks duration comparing the budesonide/formoterol, with budesonide, formoterol, or placebo in the treatment of patients with stable COPD. The identified RCTs were reviewed. The mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to pool the results. RESULTS Seven high quality studies with RCTs met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Compared with budesonide alone, the combination therapy of budesonide/formoterol showed significant improvement in the following spirometric indices: pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) (SMD: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.34; P=0.000). In addition, versus formoterol alone, budesonide/formoterol was associated with a significant increase in pre-dose FEV₁ (SMD: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.17; P=0.000). A similar pattern was also evident in the comparison to placebo, where budesonide/formoterol yielded greater increase in pre-dose FEV₁ (SMD: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.30; P=0.000). Moreover, compared with other controls, the combination of budesonide-formoterol significantly improved morning peak expiratory flow and evening peak expiratory flow, significantly reduced the total score of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS For stable COPD patients, compared with controls (monocomponents or placebo), budesonide/formoterol improved pulmonary function and health status. Future larger long-term RCTs are warranted to assess the beneficial clinical efficacy of budesonide/formoterol in COPD patients.

An evaluation of roflumilast and PDE4 inhibitors with a focus on the treatment of asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a common chronic airway inflammatory disease characterized by diverse inflammatory events leading to airway hyperresponsiveness and reversible airflow obstruction. Corticosteroids have been the mainstay for asthma treatment due to their broad anti-inflammatory actions; however, other medications such as phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors also demonstrate anti-inflammatory activity in the airways.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes tissue expression of phosphodiesterase 4 in the airways, the different phosphodiesterase 4 isoenzymes identified, and the anti-inflammatory activities of phosphodiesterase 4 inhibition in asthma and related findings in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The authors further review clinical trials demonstrating that drugs such as roflumilast have an excellent safety profile and efficacy in patients with asthma and COPD.

EXPERT OPINION

Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors suppress the activity of immune cells, an effect similar to corticosteroids although by acting through different anti-inflammatory pathways and uniquely blocking neutrophilic inflammation. Roflumilast and other phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors have been shown to provide additive protection in asthma when added to corticosteroid and anti-leukotriene treatment. Developmental drugs with dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibition are thought to be able to provide bronchodilation and anti-inflammatory activities and will consequently be pushed forward in their clinical development for the treatment of asthma and COPD.

Inhaled corticosteroids for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: what is their role in therapy?

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are a mainstay of COPD treatment for patients with a history of exacerbations. Initial studies evaluating their use as monotherapy failed to show an effect on rate of pulmonary function decline in COPD, despite improvements in symptoms and reductions in exacerbations. Subsequently, ICS use in combination with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) was shown to provide improved reductions in exacerbations, lung function, and health status. ICS-LABA combination therapy is currently recommended for patients with a history of exacerbations despite treatment with long-acting bronchodilators alone. The presence of eosinophilic bronchial inflammation, detected by high blood eosinophil levels or a history of asthma or asthma-COPD overlap, may define a population of patients in whom ICSs may be of particular benefit. Prospective clinical studies to determine an appropriate threshold of eosinophil levels for predicting the beneficial effects of ICSs are needed. Further study is also required in COPD patients who continue to smoke to assess the impact of cell- and tissue-specific changes on ICS responsiveness. The safety profile of ICSs in COPD patients is confounded by comorbidities, age, and prior use of systemic corticosteroids. The risk of pneumonia in patients with COPD is increased, particularly with more advanced age and worse disease severity. ICS-containing therapy also has been shown to increase pneumonia risk; however, differences in study design and the definition of pneumonia events have led to substantial variability in risk estimates, and some data indicate that pneumonia risk may differ by the specific ICS used. In summary, treatment with ICSs has a role in dual and triple therapy for COPD to reduce exacerbations and improve symptoms. Careful assessment of COPD phenotypes related to risk factors, triggers, and comorbidities may assist in individualizing treatment while maximizing the benefit-to-risk ratio of ICS-containing COPD treatment.