1
|
Oțelea MR, Fell AKM, Handra CM, Holm M, Filon FL, Mijakovski D, Minov J, Mutu A, Stephanou E, Stokholm ZA, Stoleski S, Schlünssen V. The value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in occupational diseases - a systematic review. J Occup Med Toxicol 2022; 17:14. [PMID: 35879723 PMCID: PMC9317127 DOI: 10.1186/s12995-022-00355-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a non-invasive biomarker of respiratory tract inflammation, originally designated to identify eosinophilic airway inflammation and to predict steroid response. The main field of application of this biomarker is asthma, but FeNO has also been used for other allergic and non-allergic pulmonary disorders such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypersensitivity pneumonitis and interstitial lung disease. A substantial part of respiratory diseases are related to work, and FeNO, a safe and easy measure to conduct, is a potential valid examination in an occupational setting. This systematic review assesses the value of measuring FeNO related to three types of airborne exposures: allergens, irritants, and respiratory particles inhaled during occupational activities. The review covers results from longitudinal and observational clinical studies, and highlights the added value of this biomarker in monitoring effects of exposure and in the diagnostic criteria of occupational diseases. This review also covers the possible significance of FeNO as an indicator of the efficacy of interventions to prevent work-related respiratory diseases. Initially, 246 articles were identified in PUBMED and SCOPUS. Duplicates and articles which covered results from the general population, symptoms (not disease) related to work, non-occupational diseases, and case reports were excluded. Finally, 39 articles contributed to this review, which led to the following conclusions: a) For occupational asthma there is no consensus on the significant value of FeNO for diagnosis, or on the magnitude of change needed after specific inhalation test or occupational exposure at the workplace. There is some consensus for the optimal time to measure FeNO after exposure, mainly after 24 h, and FeNO proved to be more sensitive than spirometry in measuring the result of an intervention. b) For other occupational obstructive respiratory diseases, current data suggests performing the measurement after the work shift. c) For interstitial lung disease, the evaluation of the alveolar component of NO is probably the most suitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne Kristin M Fell
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway.,Department of Global Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Health and Community, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Claudia Mariana Handra
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.,Colentina Clinical Hospital, Clinic for Occupational Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mathias Holm
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Francesca Larese Filon
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Dragan Mijakovski
- Institute of Occupational Health of RN Macedonia, Skopje, North Macedonia.,Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius, University in Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Jordan Minov
- Institute of Occupational Health of RN Macedonia, Skopje, North Macedonia.,Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius, University in Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Andreea Mutu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.,Central Military University Emergency Hospital "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Zara Ann Stokholm
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sasho Stoleski
- Institute of Occupational Health of RN Macedonia, Skopje, North Macedonia.,Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius, University in Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Vivi Schlünssen
- Department of Public Health, Environment, Occupation and Health, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Challenges in Diagnosing Occupational Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA 2021; 57:medicina57090911. [PMID: 34577834 PMCID: PMC8469547 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57090911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Occupational chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (oCOPD) represents 15–20% of the global burden of this disease. Even if industrial bronchitis has long been known, new occupational hazards continue to emerge and enlarge the number of people exposed to risk. This review discusses the challenges related to the early detection of oCOPD, in the context of new exposures and of limited usage of methods for an efficient disease occupational screening. It underlines that a better translation into clinical practice of the new methods for lung function impairment measurements, imaging techniques, or the use of serum or exhaled breath inflammation biomarkers could add significant value in the early detection of oCOPD. Such an approach would increase the chance to stop exposure at an earlier moment and to prevent or at least slow down the further deterioration of the lung function as a result of exposure to occupational (inhaled) hazards.
Collapse
|