Risk of cancer after lung transplantation for COPD

Incidence of malignancies after lung transplantation and their effect on the outcome. 26 years' experience

Background

Malignancy is a significant, life-limiting complication after lung transplantation (LuTx) and the second common long-term cause of death. We aimed to investigate its incidence and effect on the outcome.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study. Between 1996 and 2022, n = 627 lung transplantations (LuTx) were performed in our department. We used our institutional database to identify recipients with malignancies after LuTx and examined the malignancies' incidence and mortality.

Results

N = 59 malignancies occurred in n = 55 (8.8%) LuTx recipients. The post-LTx malignancies incidence was 9.4% (59/627). We report the following rates based on their location: n = 17/55 (28,8% of all recipients diagnosed with malignancies) skin, n = 10/55 (16,95%) gastrointestinal, n = 9/55 (15,3%) respiratory, n = 5/55 (8,48%) lymphatic, n = 13/55 (23,6%) other, n = 5 (8,48%) multiple synchronous.During this study period, a total of n = 328 deaths after LuTx was determined. N = 29 (8,84% of all deaths) were malignancy induced, corresponding to a total malignancy-induced mortality of 4.6% (n = 29/627). The majority of deaths were attributed to GI adenocarcinoma and PTLD. Malignancies' origin, primary COPD diagnosis, type, and specific age group were significantly survival-related (p-values <0.05). The most affected organ was skin and showed the best prognosis. PTLD had the fastest and pancreatic the latest onset.

Conclusions

This is the first report of its kind in a large cohort of german LuTx recipients. The prevalence ranking of the three commonest malignancy were skin > colorectal > PTLD. Post-LTx malignancy was the second commonest cause of death. Further studies are needed, while post-LuTx malignomas remain a serious impairment of long-term LuTx survival.

Lung Cancer in Lung Transplant Recipients: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Characteristics and Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate clinical and radiologic characteristics of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients and evaluate the treatment course and prognosis.

METHODS

The study included 448 patients who underwent lung transplant between 2005 and 2021. All patients had pretransplant chest computed tomography (CT), 429 patients had posttransplant CT, whereas 19 had no posttransplant CT (median number of posttransplant CT, 6; range, 0-24). Medical records of these patients were reviewed to identify patients who developed lung cancer after lung transplant. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography/CT at the time of lung cancer diagnoses were reviewed to obtain imaging features. Demographics, tumor histology, stages, and survival were compared using Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

Among 448 lung transplant recipients with a median follow-up of 71.3 months after lung transplant, 15 patients (3.3%) developed posttransplant lung cancer (13 unilateral, 2 bilateral; 10 men, 5 women; median age, 63.1 years; median time from transplantation to cancer diagnosis, 3.1 years). Twelve cancers were in native lung, and 3 were in transplanted lung. The incidence of lung cancer was higher in single lung transplant recipients than in bilateral lung transplant recipients (10.3% vs 0.6%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Imaging manifestations varied according to tumor stages. Among 12 patients treated for lung cancer, 2 patients developed posttreatment acute respiratory distress syndrome. The median survival from cancer diagnosis of cancer was 6.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant lung cancer was noted in 3% of lung transplant recipients and was more common in unilateral transplant recipients. The prognosis upon diagnosis was poor with rapid clinical deterioration and serious posttreatment complications.

Lung cancer in recipients after lung transplant: single-centre experience and literature review

Introduction

Lung cancer is a major challenge facing modern medicine. It is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. Little is known of the incidence, prevalence and disease characteristics in lung transplant recipients, a population unique in its vulnerability and exposure to carcinogenic risk factors. We aimed to elaborate these characteristics of lung cancer in our population through a retrospective cohort study.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed our institution’s 8-year experience with lung transplantation and searched for patients with a post-transplant diagnosis of lung cancer, neoplasia or mass. We focused on patient demographics, indication for transplant, smoking history, stage at diagnosis, location of the tumour, length of time between transplant and diagnosis, the treatment offered and length of time from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis standard Kaplan-Meier method was conducted from the date of cancer diagnosis to death from all-cause mortality or last follow-up as of August 2021.

Results

We identified 24 patients with de novo lung cancer postlung transplant in 905 recipients. More patients with an underlying diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis developed lung cancer. Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and three had small cell lung cancer. The remaining native lung was involved most in single lung recipients with 17 patients. Patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer had a mean survival of 17.6 months after diagnosis.

Discussion

The incidence rate of lung cancer in our cohort was higher than reported for smokers from the general population in previous studies. In this study, we compare our findings with available literature. We also explore screening strategies, treatment modalities, survival and postulated mechanisms for the development of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients.

A Versatile and Ubiquitous IoT-Based Smart Metabolic and Immune Monitoring System

In the present medical age, the focus on prevention and prediction is achieved using the medical internet of things. With a broad and complete framework, effective behavioral, environmental, and physiological criteria are necessary to govern the major healthcare sectors. Wearables play an essential role in personal health monitoring data measurement and processing. We wish to design a variable and flexible frame for broad parameter monitoring in accordance with the convenient mode of wearability. In this study, an innovative prototype with a handle and a modular IoT portal is designed for environmental surveillance. The prototype examines the most significant parameters of the surroundings. This strategy allows a bidirectional link between end users and medicine via the IoT gateway as an intermediate portal for users with IoT servers in real time. In addition, the doctor may configure the necessary parameters of measurements via the IoT portal and switch the sensors on the wearables as a real-time observer for the patient. Thus, based on goal analysis, patient situation, specifications, and requests, medications may define setup criteria for calculation. With regard to privacy, power use, and computation delays, we established this system's performance link for three common IoT healthcare circumstances. The simulation results show that this technique may minimize processing time by 25.34%, save energy level up to 72.25%, and boost the privacy level of the IoT medical device to 17.25% compared to the benchmark system.

Complications of Lung Transplantation: Update on Imaging Manifestations and Management

As lung transplantation has become the most effective definitive treatment option for end-stage chronic respiratory diseases, yearly rates of this surgery have been steadily increasing. Despite improvement in surgical techniques and medical management of transplant recipients, complications from lung transplantation are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Some of these complications can be classified on the basis of the time they typically occur after lung transplantation, while others may occur at any time. Imaging studies, in conjunction with clinical and laboratory evaluation, are key components in diagnosing and monitoring these conditions. Therefore, radiologists play a critical role in recognizing and communicating findings suggestive of lung transplantation complications. A description of imaging features of the most common lung transplantation complications, including surgical, medical, immunologic, and infectious complications, as well as an update on their management, will be reviewed here. Keywords: Pulmonary, Thorax, Surgery, Transplantation Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Cancer Risks in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Results from a Comprehensive Analysis of 72 Cohort Studies

Understanding the cancer risks in different transplant recipients helps early detection, evaluation, and treatment of post-transplant malignancies. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the cancer risks at multiple sites for solid organ transplant recipients and their associations with tumor mutation burden (TMB), which reflects the immunogenicity. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library was conducted. Random effects models were used to calculate the standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) versus the general population and determine the risks of different cancers. Linear regression (LR) was used to analyze the association between the SIRs and TMBs. Finally, seventy-two articles met our criteria, involving 2,105,122 solid organ transplant recipients. Compared with the general population, solid organ transplant recipients displayed a 2.68-fold cancer risk (SIR 2.68; 2.48–2.89; P <.001), renal transplant recipients displayed a 2.56-fold cancer risk (SIR 2.56; 2.31–2.84; P <.001), liver transplant recipients displayed a 2.45-fold cancer risk (SIR 2.45; 2.22–2.70; P <.001), heart and/or lung transplant recipients displayed a 3.72-fold cancer risk (SIR 3.72; 3.04–4.54; P <.001). The correlation coefficients between SIRs and TMBs were 0.68, 0.64, 0.59, 0.79 in solid organ recipients, renal recipients, liver recipients, heart and/or lung recipients, respectively. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that solid organ transplant recipients displayed a higher risk of some site-specific cancers, providing individualized guidance for clinicians to early detect, evaluate, and treat cancer among solid organ transplantation recipients. In addition, the increased cancer risk of solid organ transplant recipients is associated with TMB, suggesting that iatrogenic immunosuppression may contribute to the increased cancer risk in transplant recipients. (PROSPERO ID CRD42020160409).

Cancer risk in heart or lung transplant recipients: A comprehensive analysis of 21 prospective cohorts

We performed a meta-analysis to determine cancer risks at multiple sites and their associations with tumor mutation burden (TMB), an index for immunogenicity, in heart or lung transplant recipients. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Medline was conducted. Random effects models were used to calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) versus the general population and to determine the risks of different cancers. Weighted linear regression (WLR) was used to analyze the associations between the SIRs and TMBs. (PROSPERO CRD42020159599). Data from 21 studies including 116,438 transplant recipients (51,173 heart transplant recipients and 65,265 lung transplant recipients) with a total follow-up of 601,330.7 person-years were analyzed. Compared with the general population, heart transplant recipients displayed a 3.13-fold higher cancer risk [SIR: 3.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.38-4.13; p < 0.001]; lung transplant recipients displayed a 4.28-fold higher cancer risk [SIR: 4.28; 95% CI: 3.18-5.77; p < 0.001]. The correlation coefficients were 0.54 (p = 0.049) and 0.79 (p < 0.001) in heart and lung transplant recipients, respectively, indicating that 29% and 63% of the differences in the SIRs for cancer types might be explained by the TMBs. Our study demonstrated that both heart and lung transplant recipients displayed a higher risk of certain site-specific cancers. These findings can provide individualized guidance for clinicians for detection of cancer among heart or lung transplantation recipients. In addition, we provided evidence that increased risks of post-transplant cancers can be attributed to immunosuppression.