The acute wheezy adult with airways disease in the emergency department: a retrospective case-note review of exacerbations of COPD

A Low Eosinophil to Platelet Ratio as a Worse Prognostic Index for Emergency Department Attendance in Acute Exacerbation of COPD

Purpose

Identifying prognosis for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is challenging. Eosinophils and platelet are involved in the development of COPD, which may predict adverse events. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the eosinophil to platelet ratio (EPR) in predicting adverse events in patients with AECOPD who visited the emergency department.

Patients and Methods

The records of patients with AECOPD treated at Dalian Municipal Friendship Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The relationship between the clinical characteristics and EPR, as cut-off value of 0.755, was evaluated.

Results

A total of 508 patients with an AECOPD (316 male, 192 female) were included. An optimal AUC cutoff of 0.755 for the EPR segregated the patients into 2 groups with significantly different mortality (25.3% vs 5.5%, P < 0.001). The same mortality risk with lower EPR was observed among the patients with emergency room attendance (35.6% vs 11.1%, P < 0.001). A model including EPR <0.755, exacerbation history, PaO2 <60mmHg, PaCO2 >50 mm Hg, hypoalbuminemia and age ≥80 was developed to predict death risk and showed good performance.

Conclusion

During severe COPD exacerbation, an EPR < 0.755 preceding therapy can predict worse outcomes in patients with an AECOPD.

Global mortality and readmission rates following COPD exacerbation-related hospitalisation: a meta-analysis of 65 945 individual patients

Background

Exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) have a major impact on patients and healthcare systems across the world. Precise estimates of the global burden of ECOPD on mortality and hospital readmission are needed to inform policy makers and aid preventive strategies to mitigate this burden. The aims of the present study were to explore global in-hospital mortality, post-discharge mortality and hospital readmission rates after ECOPD-related hospitalisation using an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) design.

Methods

A systematic review was performed identifying studies that reported in-hospital mortality, post-discharge mortality and hospital readmission rates following ECOPD-related hospitalisation. Data analyses were conducted using a one-stage random-effects meta-analysis model. This study was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-IPD statement.

Results

Data of 65 945 individual patients with COPD were analysed. The pooled in-hospital mortality rate was 6.2%, pooled 30-, 90- and 365-day post-discharge mortality rates were 1.8%, 5.5% and 10.9%, respectively, and pooled 30-, 90- and 365-day hospital readmission rates were 7.1%, 12.6% and 32.1%, respectively, with noticeable variability between studies and countries. Strongest predictors of mortality and hospital readmission included noninvasive mechanical ventilation and a history of two or more ECOPD-related hospitalisations <12 months prior to the index event.

Conclusions

This IPDMA stresses the poor outcomes and high heterogeneity of ECOPD-related hospitalisation across the world. Whilst global standardisation of the management and follow-up of ECOPD-related hospitalisation should be at the heart of future implementation research, policy makers should focus on reimbursing evidence-based therapies that decrease (recurrent) ECOPD.

Stability of blood eosinophils in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its relationship to clinical outcomes: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The clinical value of blood eosinophils and their stability in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial. There are limited studies on association between the stability of blood eosinophils in acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the stability of blood eosinophils in hospitalized AECOPD and its relationship to clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This prospective observational study recruited patients hospitalized with AECOPD from November 2016 to July 2020. The eligible patients were divided into four groups according to their blood eosinophil counts at admission and discharge: persistently < 300 cells/μl (LL), < 300 cells/μl at admission but ≥ 300 cells/µl at discharge (LH), ≥ 300 cells/μl at admission but < 300 cells/µl at discharge (HL), and persistently ≥ 300 cells/μl (HH). Cox hazard analyses were used to study the association between eosinophil changes and exacerbations or mortality.

RESULTS

In 530 patients included, 90 (17.0%) had a high blood eosinophil count (BEC) ≥ 300 cells/µl at admission but 32 (35.6%) of them showed a decreased BEC at discharge. The proportions and distribution for group LL, LH, HL, and HH were 381 (71.9%), 59 (11.1%), 32 (6.0%), and 58 (10.9%), respectively. During hospitalization, the LH group had a higher C-reactive protein level, higher rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and higher total cost. The length of hospital stay of the LH group was longer compared with group LL, HL, or HH (P = 0.002, 0.017, and 0.001, respectively). During a follow-up of 12 months, the HH group was associated with a higher risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbations compared to the LL group (hazard ratio 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.30-3.08, P = 0.002). Eosinophil changes had no significant association with mortality at 12 months. Sensitivity analyses in patients without asthma and without use of systemic corticosteroids prior to admission did not alter the results.

CONCLUSIONS

More attention should be paid to the LH group when evaluating the short-term prognosis of AECOPD. A persistently high BEC was a risk factor for long-term exacerbations. Eosinophil changes during hospitalization could help to predict outcomes.

Eosinophilic phenotype was associated with better early clinical remission in elderly patients but not middle-aged patients with acute exacerbations of COPD

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence of the relationship between peripheral blood eosinophils and clinical remission of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) at different ages, especially in elderly patients, which was the objective of the present study.

METHODS

This retrospective study stratified patients by age (elderly patients >65 years old or middle-aged patients between 45 and 65 years old) and analysed the relationship between blood eosinophils (≥2% or <2%) and AECOPD clinical remission at observing time points of 7, 14, 21 and 28 days of hospitalisation. Student's t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were conditionally used to compare difference between groups. The unadjusted or adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse the association between blood eosinophilic levels and cumulative clinical remission.

RESULTS

Of 703 AECOPD cases analysed, 616 were elderly people (>65 years), 312 of whom had eosinophilic exacerbations. There were statistically significant differences in leucocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (hs-CRP), and hospital costs between groups (P < .05, respectively). According to the chi-square analysis, eosinophilic exacerbation had a higher clinical remission rate at 7, 14 and 21 days (all P < .05), but not 28 days (P > .05). Among analysis through adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, eosinophilic exacerbation was significantly associated with a higher cumulative remission rate in elderly patients at 7, 14, 21 days (all P < .05), but not 28 days (P > .05). No significant association was observed in meddle-aged patients at any time points (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Eosinophilic exacerbation was associated with better early clinical remission of AECOPD patients during hospitalisation. As stratified by ages, similar results were observed in elderly patients but not middle-aged patients. Blood eosinophils at different ages may be valuable in personalised management for AECOPD.

Blood Eosinophils and Clinical Outcome of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have shown the association between eosinophilia and clinical outcomes of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). But the evidences are lack of consensus.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to conduct a pooled analysis of outcome comparing eosinophilic (EOS) AECOPD and non-EOS AECOPD patients.

METHODS

We included PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to 2020 to retrieve articles. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies about patients with and without EOS AECOPD in terms of in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, comorbidities, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), gender, and BMI were included preclinical studies, review articles, editorials, commentaries, conference abstracts, and book chapters were excluded. The methodologic assessment of studies was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochran scale. Comprehensive Rev Man 5 was used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies with 18,041 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were used in this meta-analysis. Comparing to the non-EOS group, those with EOS AECOPD patients had a lower risk for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.95, p = 0.03), shorter length of hospital stay (OR = -0.72, 95% CI -1.44 to -0.00, p = 0.05), better FEV1 (mean difference = 0.14, 95% CI 0.08-0.20, p < 0.00001), and a lower risk of arrhythmias (OR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.01-2.21, p = 0.04). In addition, the non-EOS group had a higher percentage of male (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.15-1.56, p = 0.0002) than EOS group. The rate of steroid use (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.47-1.42, p = 0.48) and BMI (mean difference = 0.43, 95% CI -0.18 to 1.05, p = 0.17] had no difference between 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of our meta-analysis suggest that EOS AECOPD patients have a better clinical outcome than non-EOS AECOPD patients in terms of length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, FEV1, and risk of arrhythmias. In addition, the non-EOS AECOPD patients have higher percentage of male than EOS AECOPD patients.

Clinical characteristics of neutrophilic, eosinophilic and mixed-type exacerbation phenotypes of COPD

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) comprises a significant number of emergency department (ED) presentations, and hematological phenotypes may have prognostic significance. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of hematological phenotypes on serious outcomes in COPD exacerbations.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was carried out in patients with COPD exacerbation presenting to the ED. The patients were classified into three groups, including neutrophilic, eosinophilic, and mixed-type (including neutrophilic and eosinophilic features) COPD exacerbation. Outcome measures were defined as mortality, hospitalization, and need for intensive care unit (ICU) care within three months, and these outcomes were compared among groups.

RESULTS

A total of 173 COPD patients were assessed for eligibility, and 147 of them were included in the final analysis. The study population consisted of 90 patients with neutrophilic exacerbation (61.2%), 26 patients with eosinophilic exacerbation (17.7%), and 31 patients with mixed-type exacerbation (21.1%). The neutrophilic exacerbation group was older, was more often tachycardic and desaturated, and had more sputum production compared with the eosinophilic exacerbation group. Mortality was seen in 35 patients in the neutrophilic exacerbation group (38.9%), whereas 5 patients in the eosinophilic group (19.2%) and 6 patients in the mixed-type group (19.4%) died (p = .044). No difference was observed among groups in terms of hospital and ICU admission.

CONCLUSION

COPD exacerbations with neutrophilic phenotypes presented to the ED with more serious clinical findings compared with eosinophilic exacerbations. This may also have a possible effect on mortality.