1
|
Bonnesen B, Eklöf J, Biering-Sørensen T, Modin D, Miravitlles M, Mathioudakis AG, Sivapalan P, Jensen JUS. Effect of low climate impact vs. high climate impact inhalers for patients with asthma and COPD-a nationwide cohort analysis. Respir Res 2024; 25:339. [PMID: 39267035 PMCID: PMC11395588 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-02942-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma can be treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) delivered by low climate impact inhalers (dry powder inhalers) or high climate impact inhalers (pressurized metered-dose inhalers containing potent greenhouse gasses). ICS delivered with greenhouse gasses is prescribed ubiquitously and frequent despite limited evidence of superior effect. Our aim was to examine the beneficial and harmful events of ICS delivered by low and high climate impact inhalers in patients with asthma and COPD. METHODS Nationwide retrospective cohort study of Danish outpatients with asthma and COPD treated with ICS delivered by low and high climate impact inhalers. Patients were propensity score matched by the following variables; age, gender, tobacco exposure, exacerbations, dyspnoea, body mass index, pulmonary function, ICS dose and entry year. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalisation with exacerbations and all-cause mortality analysed by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Of the 10,947 patients with asthma and COPD who collected ICS by low or high climate impact inhalers, 2,535 + 2,535 patients were propensity score matched to form the population for the primary analysis. We found no association between high climate impact inhalers and risk of exacerbations requiring hospitalization and all-cause mortality (HR 1.02, CI 0.92-1.12, p = 0.77), nor on pneumonia, exacerbations requiring hospitalization, all-cause mortality, or all-cause admissions. Delivery with high climate impact inhalers was associated with a slightly increased risk of exacerbations not requiring hospitalization (HR 1.10, CI 1.01-1.21, p = 0.03). Even with low lung function there was no sign of a superior effect of high climate impact inhalers. CONCLUSION Low climate impact inhalers were not inferior to high climate impact inhalers for any risk analysed in patients with asthma and COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Bonnesen
- Section of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Josefin Eklöf
- Section of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Tor Biering-Sørensen
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Modin
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marc Miravitlles
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d́Hebrond, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexander G Mathioudakis
- North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Pradeesh Sivapalan
- Section of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Jens-Ulrik Staehr Jensen
- Section of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Campos LS, Rosa P, Carreiro Martins P, Xavier B, Leuschner P, M Marques MI, Albino J, Robalo Cordeiro C. [Recommendations for Reducing the Environmental Impact of Inhalers in Portugal: Consensus Document]. ACTA MEDICA PORT 2024; 37:654-661. [PMID: 39226554 DOI: 10.20344/amp.22062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
This consensus document addresses the reduction of the environmental impact of inhalers in Portugal. It was prepared by the Portuguese Council for Health and the Environment and the societies representing the specialties that account for these drugs' largest volume of prescriptions, namely the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology, the Portuguese Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, the Portuguese Society of Pediatrics, the Portuguese Society of Internal Medicine, the Portuguese Association of General and Family Medicine and also a patient association, the Respira Association. The document acknowledges the significant impact of pressurized metered-dose inhalers on greenhouse gas emissions and highlights the need to transition to more sustainable alternatives. The carbon footprint of pressurized metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers in Portugal was calculated, and the level of awareness among prescribing physicians on this topic was also estimated. Finally, recommendations were developed to accelerate the reduction of the ecological footprint of inhalers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luí S Campos
- Hospital CUF Tejo. Lisboa; Conselho Português para a Saúde e Ambiente. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Paula Rosa
- Serviço de Pneumologia. Hospital de Vila Franca de Xira Unidade Local de Saúde Estuário do Tejo. Vila Franca de Xira; Hospital CUF Descobertas. Lisboa; Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Pedro Carreiro Martins
- Serviço de Imunoalergologia. Hospital Dona Estefânia. Unidade Local de Saúde São José. Lisboa; NOVA Medical School. Universidade NOVA de Lisboa. Lisboa; Sociedade Portuguesa de Alergologia e Imunologia Clínica. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Bilhota Xavier
- Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria. Lisboa; Secção Pediátrica da Qualidade e Segurança. Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Pedro Leuschner
- Serviço de Medicina Interna. Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António. Porto; Instituto de Ciência Biomédicas Abel Salazar. Porto; Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna. Lisboa. Portugal
| | - Maria Inês M Marques
- Unidade de Saúde Familiar Reynaldo dos Santos. Unidade Local de Saúde Estuário do Tejo. Vila Franca de Xira; Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar. Lisboa. Portugal
| | | | - Carlos Robalo Cordeiro
- Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Lisboa; Serviço de Pneumologia. Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra. Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra. Coimbra; Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade de Coimbra. Coimbra. Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sridharan K, Sivaramakrishnan G. Intraclass comparison of inhaled corticosteroids for the risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary airway disorder: a network meta-analysis and meta-regression. Int J Clin Pharm 2024; 46:831-842. [PMID: 38664319 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01736-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inhalational corticosteroids (ICS) were observed to increase the pneumonia risk in chronic obstructive pulmonary airway disorder (COPD). However, it is unknown whether any differences exist between the drugs within the ICS class. AIM This study aimed to evaluate the risk of pneumonia associated with different ICS and identify factors that predict pneumonia in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD using a network meta-analysis. METHOD Electronic databases (Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar) were searched for trials comparing ICS in COPD patients. The outcomes were pneumonia and serious pneumonia. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated. Meta-regression was used to identify the predictors. The strength of evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. RESULTS Sixty-six studies (103,347 participants) were included. Fluticasone (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.26, 1.7), mometasone (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.05, 4.6), and beclometasone (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.6) were observed with an increased pneumonia risk compared to placebo. Fluticasone (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3, 1.7) was observed with an increased risk of serious pneumonia. High doses (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.4), BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.2), and history of exacerbations in the preceding year predicted the pneumonia risk. Evidence strength was moderate. CONCLUSION ICS class differences in pneumonia risk were observed in terms of pooled effect estimates but it is unlikely that any clinically relevant differences exist. Risk-benefit analysis supports ICS use in moderate-severe COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kannan Sridharan
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain.
| | - Gowri Sivaramakrishnan
- Department of Dental Postgraduate Training, Ministry of Health, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Richeldi L, Schino P, Bargagli E, Ricci A, Rocca A, Marchesani F, Pennisi A, Camiciottoli G, D’Amato M, Macagno F, Scaffidi Argentina U, Ingrassia E, Piraino A. TRITRIAL: The Impact of Fixed Triple Therapy with Beclometasone/Formoterol/Glycopyrronium on Health Status and Adherence in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in an Italian Context of Real Life. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2024; 19:475-487. [PMID: 38435125 PMCID: PMC10907130 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s445858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The TRITRIAL study assessed the effects of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium (BDP/FF/G) fixed combination in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a real-world setting, focusing on patient's experience and perspective through the use of patients reported outcomes. Patients and Methods TRITRIAL was a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted on patients with moderate-severe COPD treated with BDP/FF/G fixed therapy for 12 months. The main objective was to evaluate the impact of BDP/FF/G on health status through the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score. Additional assessments included adherence and satisfaction, measured by the TAI-10/12 questionnaire and a specifically designed eight-item questionnaire, quality of life through the EQ-5D-5L test, sleep quality through the COPD and Asthma Sleep Impact Scale (CASIS), as well as safety and disease-related outcomes. Results Data from 655 patients were analyzed in the study. The mean total CAT score significantly improved (from 22.8 at baseline to 18.1 at 6 months and 16.5 at 12 months; p < 0.0001), as well as all the eight CAT sub-items, which decreased on average by 0.5-0.9 points during the study. Adherence and usability of the inhaler also improved during the study, with a decrease in poor compliance (from 30.1% to 18.3%) and an increase in good compliance (from 51.8% to 58.3%) according to the TAI score. Patients also benefited from significantly improved quality of life (EQ Index from 0.70 to 0.80; EQ-5D VAS score from 55.1 to 63.1) and sleep quality (CASIS score from 41.1 to 31.8). Finally, patients reported a significant reduction in exacerbation during the study. Conclusion TRITRIAL showed that the BDP/FF/G fixed combination is effective and safe in patients with moderate-severe COPD and poorly controlled disease, improving patients' HRQoL, sleep quality, adherence and inhaler usability and reducing COPD symptoms and the risk of exacerbation in a real-life setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Richeldi
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Elena Bargagli
- Respiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Neuro Sciences, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy
| | - Alberto Ricci
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Via di Grottarossa 1035, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Rocca
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Alfio Pennisi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Clinic “Casa di Cura Riabilitativa Calaciura”, Catania, Italy
| | - Gianna Camiciottoli
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Cardiothoracovascular, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Maria D’Amato
- UOSD Malattie Respiratorie ”Federico II”, Ospedale Monaldi, Napoli, 80131, Italy
| | - Francesco Macagno
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Geffen WH, Tan DJ, Walters JA, Walters EH. Inhaled corticosteroids with combination inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 12:CD011600. [PMID: 38054551 PMCID: PMC10698842 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011600.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) commonly involves a combination of long-acting bronchodilators including beta2-agonists (LABA) and muscarinic antagonists (LAMA). LABA and LAMA bronchodilators are now available in single-combination inhalers. In individuals with persistent symptoms or frequent exacerbations, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are also used with combination LABA and LAMA inhalers. However, the benefits and risks of adding ICS to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers as a triple therapy remain unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of adding an ICS to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers for the treatment of stable COPD. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register of Trials, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase up to 30 November 2022. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP up to 30 November 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included parallel-group randomised controlled trials of three weeks' duration or longer that compared the treatment of stable COPD with ICS in addition to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers against combination LABA/LAMA inhalers alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. The primary outcomes were acute exacerbations of COPD, respiratory health-related quality of life, pneumonia and other serious adverse events. The secondary outcomes were symptom scores, lung function, physical capacity, and mortality. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for studies that contributed data to our prespecified outcomes. MAIN RESULTS Four studies with a total of 15,412 participants met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of study participants ranged from 64.4 to 65.3 years; the proportion of female participants ranged from 28% to 40%. Most participants had symptomatic COPD (COPD Assessment Test Score ≥ 10) with severe to very severe airflow limitation (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) < 50% predicted) and one or more moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations in the last 12 months. Trial medications differed amongst studies. The duration of follow-up was 52 weeks in three studies and 24 weeks in one study. We assessed the risk of selection, performance, and detection bias to be low in the included studies; one study was at high risk of attrition bias, and one study was at high risk of reporting bias. Triple therapy may reduce rates of moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers (rate ratio (RR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 0.81; n = 15,397; low-certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis stratifying by blood eosinophil counts showed there may be a greater reduction in rate of moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations with triple therapy in participants with high-eosinophils (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.75) compared to low-eosinophils (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.93) (test for subgroup differences: P < 0.01) (high/low cut-offs: 150 eosinophils/µL in three studies; 200 eosinophils/µL in one study). However, moderate-to-substantial heterogeneity was observed in both high- and low-eosinophil subgroups. These subgroup analyses are observational by nature and thus results should be interpreted with caution. Triple therapy may be associated with reduced rates of severe COPD exacerbations (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.84; n = 14,131; low-certainty evidence). Triple therapy improved health-related quality of life assessed using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold (4-point decrease) (35.3% versus 42.4%, odds ratio (OR) 1.35, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.45; n = 14,070; high-certainty evidence). Triple therapy may result in fewer symptoms measured using the Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.57; n = 3044; moderate-certainty evidence) and improved lung function as measured by change in trough FEV1 (mean difference 38.68 mL, 95% CI 22.58 to 54.77; n = 11,352; low-certainty evidence). However, these benefits fell below MCID thresholds for TDI (1-unit decrease) and trough FEV1 (100 mL), respectively. Triple therapy is probably associated with a higher risk of pneumonia as a serious adverse event compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers (3.3% versus 1.9%, OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.18; n = 15,412; moderate-certainty evidence). In contrast, all-cause serious adverse events may be similar between groups (19.7% versus 19.7%, OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.03; n = 15,412; low-certainty evidence). All-cause mortality may be lower with triple therapy (1.4% versus 2.0%, OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.90; n = 15,397; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The available evidence suggests that triple therapy may reduce rates of COPD exacerbations (low-certainty evidence) and results in an improvement in health-related quality of life (high-certainty evidence) compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers, but probably confers an increased pneumonia risk as a serious adverse event (moderate-certainty evidence). Triple therapy probably improves respiratory symptoms and may improve lung function (moderate- and low-certainty evidence, respectively); however, these benefits do not appear to be clinically significant. Triple therapy may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers (low-certainty evidence). The certainty of the evidence was downgraded most frequently for inconsistency or indirectness. Across the four included studies, there were important differences in inclusion criteria, trial medications, and duration of follow-up. Investigation of heterogeneity was limited due to the small number of included studies. We found limited data on the effects of triple therapy compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers in patients with mild-moderate COPD and those without a recent exacerbation history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter H van Geffen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | - Daniel J Tan
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - E Haydn Walters
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence for Chronic Respiratory Disease, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Skloot GS, Guasconi A, Lavon BR, Georges G, De Backer W, Galkin D, Cortellini M, Panni I, Bates JHT. The effect of inhaled extrafine beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium bromide on distal and central airway indices, assessed using Functional Respiratory Imaging in COPD (DARWiIN). Respir Res 2023; 24:244. [PMID: 37803368 PMCID: PMC10559640 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-023-02549-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study, in patients with symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), explored switching therapy from non-extrafine high-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA; fluticasone propionate/salmeterol [FP/SLM]) to extrafine medium-dose beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate dihydrate/glycopyrronium (BDP/FF/G), both via dry-powder inhaler. Functional Respiratory Imaging, a quantitative computed tomography method with 3D reconstructions of pulmonary anatomy, was used to assess airway geometry and lung function. METHODS Patients receiving a stable ICS/LABA regimen for ≥ 8 weeks were switched to FP/SLM 500/50 µg, one inhalation twice-daily (high-dose ICS) for 6 weeks. After baseline assessments (Visit 2 [V2]), therapy was switched to BDP/FF/G 100/6/10 µg, two inhalations twice-daily (medium-dose ICS) for 6 weeks, followed by V3. The primary endpoints were percentage changes in specific image-based airway volume (siVaw) and resistance (siRaw) from baseline to predose at V3 (i.e., chronic effects), assessed at total lung capacity (TLC) in central and distal lung regions. Secondary endpoints included siVaw and siRaw changes from pre-dose to post-dose at V2, and from pre-dose to post-dose at V3 at TLC (i.e., acute effects), and chronic and acute changes in siVaw and siRaw at functional residual capacity (FRC). Pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) were also assessed. RESULTS There were no significant changes in pre-dose siVaw or siRaw at TLC from baseline to V3, although at FRC there was a significant decrease in mean siRaw in the distal airways (- 63.6%; p = 0.0261). In addition, in the distal airways there were significant acute effects at TLC on mean siVaw and siRaw (siVaw: 39.8% and 62.6%; siRaw: - 51.1% and - 57.2%, V2 and V3, respectively; all p < 0.001) and at FRC at V2 (siVaw: 77.9%; siRaw: - 67.0%; both p < 0.001). At V3, the mean change in pre-dose FEV1 was 62.2 mL (p = 0.0690), and in CAT total score was - 3.30 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with symptomatic COPD receiving high-dose ICS/LABA, adding a long-acting muscarinic antagonist while decreasing the ICS dose by switching to medium-dose extrafine BDP/FF/G was associated with improved airway indices, especially in the distal airways, together with improvements in respiratory health status. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04876677), first posted 6th May 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwen S. Skloot
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
- Chiesi USA, Inc., Cary, NC USA
| | | | | | - George Georges
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | - Wilfried De Backer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dmitry Galkin
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | - Mauro Cortellini
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | - Ilaria Panni
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy
| | - Jason H. T. Bates
- Departments of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dhar R, Talwar D, Salvi S, Muralimohan BV, Panchal S, Patil S, Bhagat S, Khatri N, Barkate H. Use of single-inhaler triple therapy in the management of obstructive airway disease: Indian medical experts' review. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8:00556-2021. [PMID: 35350278 PMCID: PMC8958219 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00556-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Obstructive airway disease (OAD), which includes COPD and asthma, is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in India. Long-acting bronchodilators (long-acting β2 agonists (LABAs) and/or long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs)) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have a vital role in the management of patients with OAD. While symptom burden and exacerbations are common amongst treated patients, poor adherence to inhaler therapy is a frequent challenge. Better treatment options that optimise symptom control, improve quality of life, reduce exacerbation risk and improve adherence are desired. Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) is recommended in the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2021 guidelines for symptomatic COPD patients on ICS/LABA or LABA/LAMA, and who are at increased risk for frequent or severe exacerbations. Similarly, add-on LAMA is recommended in uncontrolled asthma patients on medium- to high-dose ICS/LABA by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2021 guideline. In the real world, high-risk and overlapping phenotypes exist, which necessitate early initiation of triple therapy. We aim to provide an expert review on the use of single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) for OAD management in global and Indian settings, knowledge from which can be extrapolated for appropriate treatment of Indian patients. The OAD population in India may benefit from early optimisation to SITT characterised by a high burden of exacerbating OAD, nonsmoker COPD and asthma-COPD overlap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raja Dhar
- Dept of Pulmonology, The Calcutta Medical Research Institute, Kolkata, India
| | - Deepak Talwar
- Metro Respiratory Center, Pulmonology and Sleep Medicine, Metro Hospitals and Heart Institute, Noida, India
| | - Sundeep Salvi
- Pulmocare Research and Education (PURE) Foundation, Pune, India
| | - B V Muralimohan
- Dept of Internal Medicine and Pulmonology, Narayana Hrudayalaya - Mazumdar Shaw Medical Center, Bengaluru, India
| | - Sagar Panchal
- Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India
| | - Saiprasad Patil
- Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India
| | - Sagar Bhagat
- Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India
| | - Nishtha Khatri
- Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India
| | - Hanmant Barkate
- Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Peché R, Attar-Zadeh D, Scullion J, Kocks J. Matching the Inhaler to the Patient in COPD. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5683. [PMID: 34884385 PMCID: PMC8658339 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Selecting the most appropriate inhalation device from the wide range available is essential for the successful management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although choice is good for healthcare professionals, knowing which inhaler to prescribe is a complex consideration. Among the key factors to consider are quality of disease control, inhaler technique, inhaler resistance and inspiratory flow, inhaler design and mechanisms of drug delivery, insurance and reimbursement restrictions, and environmental impact. In this article, we offer a simple, practical tool that brings together all these factors and includes hyperlinks to other published resources from the United Kingdom, Belgium, and The Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudi Peché
- Department of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, 6042 Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Darush Attar-Zadeh
- North Central London Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), London N11 1GN, UK;
| | - Jane Scullion
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK;
| | - Janwillem Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, 9713 GH Groningen, The Netherlands;
- GRIAC Research Institute, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore 409051, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|