A Cohort Study to Evaluate the Risk of Hospitalisation for Congestive Heart Failure Associated with the Use of Aclidinium and Other Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Medications in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink

The Impact of FEV1/FVC Ratio on the Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated with Dual Anti-Platelet Agents

Background

Few studies have investigated the clinical efficacy and pulmonary side effects of different P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of forced expiratory volume in 1 second over forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio on the clinical outcomes in ACS patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

ACS patients who underwent PCI, had documented pre-existing spirometry tests, and received aspirin with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel were enrolled for retrospective analysis.

Results

Of the enrolled ACS patients, 275 and 247 received ticagrelor and clopidogrel, respectively. The incidence of wheeze was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group compared to the clopidogrel group within 360 days (14.91% vs. 8.09%, p = 0.016). Multivariable analysis revealed that ticagrelor treatment, as compared to clopidogrel treatment, independently predicted 1-year hospitalization for acute exacerbation (AE) of obstructive airway disease (hazard ratio: 3.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.92 to 6.15; p < 0.01). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that an FEV1/FVC ratio of 63.85% had the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting the incidence of AE of obstructive airway disease within 1 year (p < 0.001). The 1-year hospitalization rate for AE of obstructive airway disease was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group when the FEV1/FVC ratio was < 63%.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated higher incidence of wheeze and hospitalization for AE of obstructive airway disease in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel. Furthermore, the FEV1/FVC ratio ≤ 63% in the ACS patients predicted hospitalization for AE of obstructive airway disease in 1 year.

Risk Assessment of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Stroke Associated with Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists, Alone or in Combination, versus Long-Acting beta2-Agonists

Background

The long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) aclidinium was approved in Europe in 2012 to relieve symptoms in adult patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A post-authorization safety study was initiated to assess potential cardiovascular risks associated with LAMAs versus long-acting beta2-agonists.

Purpose

To estimate incidence rates and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in new users of aclidinium, aclidinium/formoterol, tiotropium, other LAMA, long-acting beta-agonists/inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS), and LAMA/LABA compared with initiators of LABA.

Patients and Methods

This population-based cohort study included patients with COPD aged ≥40 years initiating COPD medications in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum database from 2012 to 2019. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the IRR for AMI, stroke, and MACE in users of COPD medications versus LABA, adjusting for clinically relevant covariables.

Results

The study included 11,121 new users of aclidinium, 4804 of aclidinium/formoterol, 56,198 of tiotropium, 23,856 of other LAMA, 17,450 of LAMA/LABA, 70,289 of LABA/ICS, and 13,716 of LABA. During periods of continuous medication use after initiation (current use), crude incidence rates per 1000 person-years for AMI ranged from 8.7 (aclidinium/formoterol) to 12.4 (LAMA/LABA), for stroke ranged from 4.8 (aclidinium/formoterol) to 7.2 (LAMA/LABA), and for MACE ranged from 13.5 (aclidinium/formoterol) to 19.3 (LAMA/LABA). Using LABA as reference, adjusted IRRs [95% confidence intervals] were close to 1 for all study drugs for AMI (lowest for aclidinium/formoterol, 0.95 [0.60–1.52], and highest for LAMA/LABA, 1.23 [0.91–1.67]), stroke (lowest for aclidinium/formoterol, 0.64 [0.39–1.06], and highest for tiotropium, 1.02 [0.81–1.27] for tiotropium) and for MACE (lowest for aclidinium, 0.93 [0.75–1.16], and highest for LAMA/LABA, 1.24 [0.97–1.59]).

Conclusion

Risks of AMI, stroke, and MACE in current users of aclidinium, aclidinium/formoterol, tiotropium, other LAMA, LAMA/LABA, or LABA/ICS were similar to the risks among current users of LABA.