Clinical Audit on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Management in Primary Care: A Quality Improvement Project from Hong Kong

Clinical characteristics and healthcare resource utilization in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Hong Kong

OBJECTIVES

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant cause of mortality, with its prevalence projected to rise in Asia. The primary objective of this study was to describe clinical characteristics, maintenance treatment, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with COPD in Hong Kong. Secondary objectives were to assess patient demographics and clinical characteristics by eosinophil (EOS) levels, and compare the demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of patients on multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT).

METHODS

This study analyzed a cohort of patients with COPD who had entered a previously initiated prospective cohort study involving patients with COPD and/or asthma at the Prince of Wales Hospital between 2017 and 2019.

RESULTS

Patients with COPD were enrolled (N = 220, mean age 74.3 years, 97 % male). Twelve months prior to baseline assessment, 66 % of patients were on MITT, 17 % on long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs)/long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), and 7 % on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/LABA. Compared with ICS/LABA or LAMA/LABA, more patients on MITT experienced ≥1 exacerbation (26.7 %, 10.5 %, 39.7 %, respectively). Patients on MITT also had a higher mean (SD) COPD Assessment Test score (9.4 [5.9]) and modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale score (1.7 [0.7]) and incurred the most COPD-related and total HCRU costs. Compared with patients with EOS ≤300 cells/μL, those with EOS >300 cells/μL had a higher number of exacerbations.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with COPD in Hong Kong treated with MITT presented more severe disease profiles and incurred higher costs. These data can be used for decision making in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD in Hong Kong.

Factors influencing acceptance of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), often complicated by influenza or pneumococcus, is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Vaccinations against influenza and pneumococcus are, but vaccination coverage in Thailand has not been ascertained. This study aimed to determine the determinants of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination acceptance in COPD patients. A cross-sectional study of 210 COPD patients was conducted. Demographics, vaccinations, clinical outcomes (exacerbations and hospitalizations), and pulmonary functions were collected. A total of 134 COPD patients (91.0%male) were eligible for final analysis. Of these, 102 (76.1%) and 59 (44.0%) were vaccinated against influenza and pneumococcus, respectively. The influenza-vaccinated group had a higher rate of pneumococcal vaccination than the influenza-unvaccinated group (57.8% vs 0%, P < .001). Rates of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were higher in the pulmonologist group than in the non-pulmonologist group (71.6% vs 31.3%, P < .001 and 91.5% vs 38.7%, P < .001, respectively). By multivariable logistic regression analysis, influenza vaccination coverage was significantly higher among patients with bronchodilator response on pulmonary function testing. Pneumococcal vaccination coverage was significantly higher among patients who were seeing pulmonologists. Reasons for not getting influenza vaccination or pneumococcal vaccination were lack of recommendation, lack of knowledge, and misunderstanding, and in the case of pneumococcal vaccine, the expense. In conclusion, the influenza vaccination coverage in our COPD patients was considered high while the pneumococcal vaccination coverage was considered low. Physicians are advised to recommend and promote pneumococcal vaccination.

Developments in smoking cessation interventions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the past 5 years: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Smoking cessation is the most effective strategy for slowing the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, COPD patients find it difficult to quit smoking with standard cessation interventions.

AREAS COVERED

A scoping review of smoking cessation for COPD patients was conducted by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for all studies published between 1 January 2016 and 22 September 2021. Four themes were set up and 47 studies were included eventually. The majority of the included studies (61.7%, 29/47) investigated efficacy and effectiveness, including new strategies for extended treatment and mobile health (mHealth) delivery approach. Studies examining accessibility and utilization (31.9%, 15/47), safety (10.6%, 5/47), and health economics (6.4%, 3/47) were also reviewed. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials was also evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacotherapy combined with behavioral interventions delivered via mHealth may be a promising strategy to help COPD smokers quit. However, the overall quality of the current studies is poor, making it challenging for clinicians to make informed decisions. Future high-quality studies are needed to provide conclusive evidence on the optimal pharmacotherapies and the most cost-effective comprehensive smoking cessation interventions, particularly those integrated into disease management for smokers with COPD.