Effective Tacrolimus Treatment for Patients with Non-Severe Aplastic Anemia That is Refractory/Intolerant to Cyclosporine A: A Retrospective Study

Eltrombopag with or without Tacrolimus for relapsed/refractory acquired aplastic anaemia: a prospective randomized trial

This trial compared eltrombopag (EPAG)+tacrolimus and EPAG monotherapy in patients with refractory/relapsed acquired aplastic anaemia (AA). Patients with refractory/relapsed AA were randomly assigned to receive either EPAG+tacrolimus or EPAG monotherapy at a ratio of 2:1. Patient response, safety, clonal evolution and survival were compared. In total, 114 patients were included in the analysis, with 76 patients receiving EPAG+tacrolimus and 38 receiving EPAG only. With a median follow-up of 18 (6-24) months, the overall response rate (ORR) for patients treated with EPAG+tacrolimus and EPAG alone was 38.2% vs. 31.6% (P = 0.490) at the 3rd month, 61.8% vs. 39.5% (P = 0.024) at the 6th month, 64.5% vs. 47.1% (P = 0.097) at the 12th month, and 60.5% vs. 34.2% (P = 0.008) at the last follow-up. The rate of each adverse event, overall survival curves (P = 0.635) and clonal evolution rate (P = 1.000) were comparable between the groups. A post hoc subgroup analysis showed that EPAG+tacrolimus could have advantage over EPAG monotherapy in terms of the ORR at the 6th month (P = 0.030)/last follow-up (P = 0.013) and the cumulative relapse-free survival (RFS) curves (P = 0.048) in patients <60 years old.

Efficacy and steroid-sparing effect of tacrolimus in patients with autoimmune cytopenia

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and steroid-sparing effect of tacrolimus in patients with autoimmune cytopenia, including immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), and Evans syndrome (ES). Patients in the tacrolimus group were treated with tacrolimus in combination with steroids, and the control group received only steroids. Of the 318 patients finally enrolled, 87 (27.4%) were males, with a median age of 45 (14-90) years. The tacrolimus group comprised 144 patients, including 120 ITP, 19 AIHA, and 5 ES patients, and the control group comprised 174 patients, including 141 ITP, 25 AIHA, and 8 ES patients. The optimal ORR of the tacrolimus group was comparable to that of the control group, and the optimal CRR was higher (p < 0.05). Patients receiving tacrolimus had a decreased relapse rate and prolonged relapse-free survival (p < 0.05) compared with the controls for both the whole cohort and the ITP and AIHA subgroups. Compared with the control group, the tacrolimus group had a lower cumulative steroid dosage and earlier discontinuation of steroids (p < 0.05), which resulted in a decreased incidence of steroid-related adverse events (p < 0.05) although the total side effects were similar between the two groups. Similar drug expenses were observed between the tacrolimus and control groups at the 18-month follow-up. In conclusion, the early addition of tacrolimus had a similar ORR, better CRR, lower relapse rate, and prolonged relapse-free survival compared to steroids alone, with reduced steroid-related adverse events.

New Trends of Nontransplant therapy for Acquired Aplastic Anemia

Aplastic anemia (AA) is a hematological disease that is characterized by pancytopenia and hypofunctional bone marrow hematopoiesis. Patients with AA are treated with either immunosuppressive therapy (IST) using anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and Cyclosporine (CsA) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), if a matched donor is available. The standard IST regimen for AA patients which results in response rates up to 70%, and even higher overall survival. However, primary and secondary failures after IST remain frequent, and to date all attempts aiming to overcome this problem have been unfruitful. The nontransplant therapeutic options for AA have significantly expanded during the last few years. Here, we review the new trends of nontransplant therapy for AA and summarize the current therapeutic effect of AA.