Comparison of Metaraminol, Phenylephrine, and Norepinephrine Infusion for Prevention of Hypotension During Combined Spinal-Epidural Anaesthesia for Elective Caesarean Section: A Three-Arm, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial

Perioperative hypotension and use of vasoactive agents in non-cardiac surgery: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Perioperative hypotension is common and associated with adverse patient outcomes. Vasoactive agents are often used to manage hypotension, but the ideal drug, dose and duration of treatment has not been established. With this scoping review, we aim to provide an overview of the current body of evidence regarding the vasoactive agents used to treat perioperative hypotension in non-cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We included all studies describing the use of vasoactive agents for the treatment of perioperative hypotension in non-cardiac surgery. We excluded literature reviews, case studies, and studies on animals and healthy subjects. We posed the following research questions: (1) in which surgical populations have vasoactive agents been studied? (2) which agents have been studied? (3) what doses have been assessed? (4) what is the duration of treatment? and (5) which desirable and undesirable outcomes have been assessed?

RESULTS

We included 124 studies representing 10 surgical specialties. Eighteen different agents were evaluated, predominantly phenylephrine, ephedrine, and noradrenaline. The agents were administered through six different routes, and numerous comparisons between agents, dosages and routes were included. Then, 88 distinct outcome measures were assessed, of which 54 were judged to be non-patient-centred.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that studies concerning vasoactive agents for the treatment of perioperative hypotension varied considerably in all aspects. Populations were heterogeneous, interventions and exposures included multiple agents compared against themselves, each other, fluids or placebo, and studies reported primarily non-patient-centred outcomes.

Predictive Efficacy of the Perfusion Index for Hypotension following Spinal Anesthesia in Parturient Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis assessed the predictive efficacy of perfusion index for hypotension following spinal anesthesia (SA) in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section (CS). Electronic databases, including Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE, were searched from inception to June 2023. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the perfusion index in predicting the probability of perioperative hypotension following SA. The review included 12 studies involving 2009 patients, published between 2017 and 2023. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.72-0.87) and 0.75 (95% CI = 0.67-0.82), respectively. Additionally, the pooled area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as 0.84 (95% CI = 0.81-0.87), suggesting a moderate to good accuracy of the diagnostic test. Using Fagan's nomogram plot, the positive likelihood ratio (LR) and negative LR were found to be 3 and 0.26, respectively. The results demonstrated that the perfusion index exhibited an acceptable level of accuracy in predicting perioperative hypotension after spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing elective CS. These findings highlight the potential value of incorporating a perfusion index as a useful tool for clinicians to integrate into routine clinical practice, which necessitates further large-scale studies for verification.

Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Background: Phenylephrine is the first-line drug used to maintain blood pressure in cesarean delivery. However, it poses a high risk of bradycardia and depression of cardiac activity in pregnant women. Consequently, norepinephrine has gained popularity over the recent years, as an alternative to Phenylephrine because it is thought that prophylactic use of vasopressors may reduce the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia. This systematic review compared the efficacy of both treatments.

Methods: We searched the following databases; CNKI, PubMed, Embase, Web of science, clinicaltrials.gov, Medline and Cochrane Library, for randomized controlled trials comparing the prophylactic efficacy of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The search period was from inception to July 2022, and the primary outcome indicator was incidence of bradycardia. Statistical analysis was conducted on Rev manager 5.4, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to evaluate the quality of evidence from each main finding.

Results: A total of 12 papers were included in the analysis. The incidence of bradycardia (RR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.49, p < 0.00001) and reactive hypertension (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83, p = 0.003) was significantly lower in the norepinephrine (NE) group compared with the phenylephrine (PE) category. In contrast, there were no statistical differences in the umbilical cord blood gas analysis pH values between the groups (arterial: MD = 0.00, 95% CI −0.00 to 0.01, p = 0.22, vein: MD = 0.01, 95% CI −0.00 to 0.02, p = 0.06). The incidence of hypotension, nausea, and vomiting did not differ significantly between the NE and PE groups (hypotension: 23% vs. 18%; nausea: 14% vs. 18%; vomiting: 5% vs. 7%, respectively).

Conclusion: Prophylactic use of norepinephrine is safe and effective in maintaining maternal hemodynamics without causing adverse events to either the pregnant woman or fetus.

Systematic Review Registration: website https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022347095

Dural puncture epidural technique provides better anesthesia quality in repeat cesarean delivery than epidural technique: Randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Repeat cesarean deliverys involve a longer surgery and more severe visceral traction than primary cesarean deliverys. The dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique provides faster and more effective analgesia for labor, but there is no sufficient evidence to indicate whether it is suitable for parturients undergoing repeat cesarean delivery.

AIM

To determine the efficacy and safety of the DPE anesthesia technique in patients undergoing repeat cesarean delivery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing repeat cesarean delivery were randomly divided into the DPE and epidural anesthesia (EA) groups. A 25-G spinal needle was used for dural puncture via a 19-G epidural needle. The patients in the two groups were injected with 5 mL of 2% lidocaine followed by 15 mL of a mixture of 1% lidocaine + 0.5% ropivacaine as the epidural dosage. The primary outcome was the onset time of sensory block to the T6 dermatome level and the sensory and motor block degree.

RESULTS

A total of 115 women were included (EA: 57, DPE: 58). The mean time to sensory block to the T6 Level was significantly shorter in the DPE group than in the EA group (14.7 min vs 16.6 min; 95% confidence interval, 13.9 to 15.4 vs 15.8 to 17.4; P = 0.001). The cranial sensory block level was significantly higher at 5, 10, and 15 min after the initial dose in the DPE group than in the EA group (P < 0.05). The sacral sensory block level was significantly higher and the modified bromage score was significantly lower in the DPE group at each time point (P < 0.05). Adverse effects and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The DPE technique provided higher-quality anesthesia than the EA technique, with a rapid onset of surgical anesthesia, better cranial and sacral sensory block spread and a higher motor block degree, without increasing the incidence of maternal or fetal side effects in patients undergoing repeat cesarean delivery.