Development, clinical utility, and place in therapy of posaconazole for prevention and treatment of invasive fungal infections

Heterologous Expression of Full-Length Lanosterol 14α-Demethylases of Prominent Fungal Pathogens Candida albicans and Candida glabrata Provides Tools for Antifungal Discovery

Targeting lanosterol 14α-demethylase (LDM) with azole drugs provides prophylaxis and treatments for superficial and disseminated fungal infections, but cure rates are modest for immunocompromised patients and individuals with comorbidities. The efficacy of azole drugs has also been reduced due to the emergence of drug-resistant fungal pathogens. We have addressed these problems by expressing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae functional, hexahistidine-tagged, full-length Candida albicans LDM (CaLDM6×His) and Candida glabrata LDM (CgLDM6×His) for drug discovery purposes and determining their X-ray crystal structures. Compared with S. cerevisiae overexpressing LDM6×His (ScLDM6×His), the reduced susceptibility of CgLDM6×His to all azole drugs tested correlated with its level of overexpression. In contrast, the reduced susceptibility to short-tailed (fluconazole and voriconazole) but not medium-tailed (VT-1161) or long-tailed azoles (itraconazole and posaconazole) indicates CaLDM6×His works best when coexpressed with its cognate NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase (CaNcp1A) rather than the host reductase (ScNcp1). Overexpression of LDM or Ncp1 modified the ergosterol content of yeast and affected growth inhibition by the polyene antibiotic amphotericin B. Affinity-purified recombinant Candida LDMs bind carbon monoxide and show tight type II binding of a range of azole drugs, including itraconazole, posaconazole, fluconazole, and voriconazole. This study provides a practical basis for the phenotype-, biochemistry-, and structure-directed discovery of novel antifungals that target LDMs of fungal pathogens.

Case report: Non-invasive management of Madura foot with oral posaconazole and ciprofloxacin

Madura foot is a chronic infection caused by fungus and/or bacteria. Traditionally, treatment has been surgical debridement or amputation. Non-invasive management with long-term antimicrobials alone has been reported as successful. We report a case of Madura foot in a Somali refugee successfully managed with oral posaconazole and ciprofloxacin.

Posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric patients and young adults with cancer

BACKGROUND

Limited information exists regarding the use of posaconazole for treating systemic fungal infections in children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer. At St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, the recommended posaconazole dose in patients weighing less than 34 kg is 18-24 mg/kg daily, given in 4 divided doses. For patients aged 13 years or older or those weighing 34 kg or more, the recommended dose is 800 mg daily, given orally in 4 divided doses.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the current posaconazole dosing guidelines achieve target posaconazole plasma concentrations of 0.7 μg/mL or greater.

METHODS

This retrospective clinical study examined data from patients who received treatment-dose posaconazole and had at least 1 posaconazole plasma concentration measurement.

RESULTS

Data from 33 patients who received posaconazole for the treatment of fungal infections were analyzed. The median age of patients was 11.5 years (range 0.5-23.2). Twenty-one of 33 patients (63.6%) had posaconazole concentrations of 0.7 μg/mL or greater (median 1.4; range 0.7-2.98) at the first measurement. The median posaconazole dosage referenced to total body weight in these patients was 20 mg/kg/day. Patients with concentrations less than 0.7 μg/mL (median 0.4; range 0.025-0.69) received lower posaconazole dosages when referenced to body weight (median 12.9 mg/kg/day; p = 0.02). Of the 12 patients with concentrations less than 0.7 μg/mL, 7 (58.3%) were aged 13 years or older.

CONCLUSIONS

The current dosing approach for posaconazole yielded therapeutic plasma concentrations more frequently in patients younger than 13 years than in those 13 years or older. This difference may be related to the practice of capping adolescent and young adult doses at the suggested maximum adult daily dose. Therefore, we recommend weight-based dosing in all pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with cancer, with routine therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure adequate concentrations.