1
|
Chen S, Hua L, Feng C, Mo Q, Wei M, Shen Y, Lin Z, Li G, Xu J, Guo C, Huang H. Correlation between UGT1A1 gene polymorphism and irinotecan chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a study from Guangxi Zhuang. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:96. [PMID: 32264830 PMCID: PMC7137309 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01227-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are obviously ethnic differences between the UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms. Due to the difference of genetic background and environment, the treatment with colorectal cancer patients of Guangxi Zhuang should not completely follow the Euramerican or Chinese han patients. The study aimed to explore the correlation of UGT1A1 gene polymorphism of Guangxi Zhuang metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with irinotecan -based chemotherapy, in order to develop an individualized irinotecan regimen for mCRC patients of Guangxi Zhuang. Methods From June 2013 and June 2015, a total of 406 patients of Guangxi who were histologically diagnosed as metastatic colorectal cancer with 102 patients of this cohort with three generations of Zhuang, and 86 patients that conformed to inclusion and exclusion criteria were competitively enrolled. The distribution of UGT1A1 gene polymorphism was analyzed-retrospectively in all patients. Pyrosequencing method was used to detect the UGT1A1*28 and*6 gene polymorphism in the 86 Guangxi Zhuang mCRC patients. After first-line chemotherapy with FOLFIRI regimen, the relationship between gene polymorphism of UGT1A1 and adverse reactions, and efficacy of Irinotecan were analyzed with χ2 test and Kaplan-Meier method. Results UGT1A1*28 wild-type (TA6/6), heterozygous mutant (TA6/7) and homozygous mutant (TA7/7) accounted for 69.8, 30.2 and 0%, respectively. UGT1A1*6 wild type (G/G), heterozygous mutation type (G/A) and homozygous mutant (A/A) accounted for 76.7%, 20.9 and 2.3%, respectively. UGT1A1*28 TA6/7 type could increase the risk of grade 3~4 diarrhea (p = 0.027), which did not increase the risk of grade 3~4 neutropenia (p = 0.092). UGT1A1*6G/A and A/A type could increase the risk of grade 3~4 diarrhea and neutropenia (p = 0.001; p = 0.017). After chemotherapy with FOLFIRI, there was no significant difference in response rate (RR) (p = 0.729; p = 0.745) or in median progression-free survival (mPFS) between the wild-type, mutant treatment of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 (7.0 m vs 7.4 m, p = 0.427; 6.9 m vs 7.0 m p = 0.408). Conclusions The distribution of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 gene polymorphism in Guangxi Zhuang patients were differed from the existing reported of European people and Chinese Han population. The UGT1A1 gene polymorphism with irinotecan chemotherapy-associated diarrhea and neutropenia were closely related. There was no significant association between UGT1A1 gene polymorphism and therapeutic efficacy of irinotecan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaojun Chen
- Department of Oncology, the Forth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No.1 liushi Road, Liuzhou, 545005, Guangxi, China
| | - Li Hua
- Department of Oncology, the Forth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No.1 liushi Road, Liuzhou, 545005, Guangxi, China
| | - Chengjun Feng
- Department of Oncology, the Forth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No.1 liushi Road, Liuzhou, 545005, Guangxi, China
| | - Qia Mo
- Department of Chemotherapy, Liuzhou Cancer Hospital, Liuzhou, 545006, Guangxi, China
| | - Mengzhuan Wei
- Department of Oncology, the Forth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No.1 liushi Road, Liuzhou, 545005, Guangxi, China
| | - Yongqi Shen
- Department of Oncology, The Liuzhou Railway Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, 545007, Guangxi, China
| | - Zhan Lin
- Department of Oncology, The Yulin First People's Hospital, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi, China
| | - Guisheng Li
- Department of Oncology, the Forth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No.1 liushi Road, Liuzhou, 545005, Guangxi, China
| | - Junyi Xu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, 545005, Guangxi, China.
| | - Chengxian Guo
- Clinical Pharmacology Center, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
| | - Haixin Huang
- Department of Oncology, the Forth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No.1 liushi Road, Liuzhou, 545005, Guangxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yuan Y, Wang X, Chen G, Wang Y, Sheng W, Li X, Zhou A, Zhang Z, Li G, Cai S, Xu R, Li J, Zhang S. Updates in version 2019 of CSCO guidelines for colorectal cancer from version 2018. Chin J Cancer Res 2019; 31:423-425. [PMID: 31354210 PMCID: PMC6613509 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2019.03.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
| | - Xicheng Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Gong Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Weiqi Sheng
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xinxiang Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Aiping Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Guichao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Sanjun Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Ruihua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Jin Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200123, China
| | - Suzhan Zhang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Multicenter phase II study of biweekly CAPIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (JSWOG-C3 study). Int J Clin Oncol 2019; 24:1223-1230. [PMID: 31144145 PMCID: PMC6736909 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01473-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Triweekly capecitabine plus irinotecan (CAPIRI) was not a replacement for fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) because of the potential for greater toxicity. Recently, it has reported that mCAPIRI is well tolerated and non-inferior to FOLFIRI. In this study, we conducted a multicenter phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of biweekly CAPIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC with reduced toxicity and preserved efficacy. Methods Patients with mCRC who had received prior chemotherapy, including oxaliplatin-based regimens, were eligible for this study. The treatment protocol administered capecitabine at 1000 mg/m2 twice daily from the evening of day 1 to the morning of day 8, intravenous irinotecan at 150 mg/m2 on day 1, and bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg on day 1 every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints for this study were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, response rate (RR), and disease control rate (DCR). Results Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study. Median PFS was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.23–7.40 months], and median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI 11.57–20.23 months). The RR was 14.6% (95% CI 6.5–28.4%), and the DCR was 66.7% (95% CI 51.5–79.2%). Hypertension was the most common Grade 3 adverse event (27.5%), followed by neutropenia (17.6%). Only two patients suffered from grade 3 hand–foot syndrome. Conclusions In mCRC patients, biweekly CAPIRI + bevacizumab appears effective and feasible as a second-line chemotherapy with relatively low toxicities, and has potential as a useful substitute for FOLFIRI + bevacizumab.
Collapse
|
4
|
Yoshino T, Arnold D, Taniguchi H, Pentheroudakis G, Yamazaki K, Xu RH, Kim TW, Ismail F, Tan IB, Yeh KH, Grothey A, Zhang S, Ahn JB, Mastura MY, Chong D, Chen LT, Kopetz S, Eguchi-Nakajima T, Ebi H, Ohtsu A, Cervantes A, Muro K, Tabernero J, Minami H, Ciardiello F, Douillard JY. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:44-70. [PMID: 29155929 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 379] [Impact Index Per Article: 75.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus guidelines for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was published in 2016, identifying both a more strategic approach to the administration of the available systemic therapy choices, and a greater emphasis on the use of ablative techniques, including surgery. At the 2016 ESMO Asia Meeting, in December 2016, it was decided by both ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) to convene a special guidelines meeting, endorsed by both ESMO and JSMO, immediately after the JSMO 2017 Annual Meeting. The aim was to adapt the ESMO consensus guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences relating to the toxicity as well as other aspects of certain systemic treatments in patients of Asian ethnicity. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with mCRC identified by the Presidents of the oncological societies of Japan (JSMO), China (Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology), Korea (Korean Association for Clinical Oncology), Malaysia (Malaysian Oncological Society), Singapore (Singapore Society of Oncology) and Taiwan (Taiwan Oncology Society). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the individual participating Asian countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - D Arnold
- CUF Hospitals Cancer Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - H Taniguchi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - K Yamazaki
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - R-H Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University (SYSU) Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - T W Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - F Ismail
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - I B Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - K-H Yeh
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, and Cancer Research Center, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - A Grothey
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, USA
| | - S Zhang
- Cancer Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - J B Ahn
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - M Y Mastura
- Pantai Cancer Institute, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - D Chong
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - L-T Chen
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - S Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, USA
| | - T Eguchi-Nakajima
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, St. Marianna University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - H Ebi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - A Ohtsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - A Cervantes
- CIBERONC, Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Health Research, INCLIVIA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - K Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - J Tabernero
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (V.H.I.O.), Barcelona, Spain
| | - H Minami
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - F Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seconda Università di Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Drug delivery system based on nanobiotechnology can improve the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic index of chemotherapeutic agents, which has revolutionized tumor therapy. Onivyde, also known as MM-398 or PEP02, is a nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan which has demonstrated encouraging anticancer activity across a broad range of malignancies, including pancreatic cancer, esophago-gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer. This up-to-date review not only focuses on the structure, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacogenetics of Onivyde but also summarizes clinical trials and recommends Onivyde for patients with advanced solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haijun Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy for patients with oxaliplatin-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II study in Japan (KSCC1102). Int J Clin Oncol 2016; 21:705-712. [DOI: 10.1007/s10147-015-0943-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Accepted: 12/19/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|