In vitro activity of colistin in combination with various antimicrobials against Acinetobacter baumannii species, a report from South Iran

Colistin: Lights and Shadows of an Older Antibiotic

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance represents a serious threat to public health and for infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms, representing one of the most important causes of death worldwide. The renewal of old antimicrobials, such as colistin, has been proposed as a valuable therapeutic alternative to the emergence of the MDR microorganisms. Although colistin is well known to present several adverse toxic effects, its usage in clinical practice has been reconsidered due to its broad spectrum of activity against Gram-negative (GN) bacteria and its important role of "last resort" agent against MDR-GN. Despite the revolutionary perspective of treatment with this old antimicrobial molecule, many questions remain open regarding the emergence of novel phenotypic traits of resistance and the optimal usage of the colistin in clinical practice. In last years, several forward steps have been made in the understanding of the resistance determinants, clinical usage, and pharmacological dosage of this molecule; however, different points regarding the role of colistin in clinical practice and the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets are not yet well defined. In this review, we summarize the mode of action, the emerging resistance determinants, and its optimal administration in the treatment of infections that are difficult to treat due to MDR Gram-negative bacteria.

Rifampicin Enhanced Carbapenem Activity with Improved Antibacterial Effects and Eradicates Established Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilms

Biofilm-mediated infections are critical to public health and a leading cause of resistance among pathogens, amounting to a prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality rate in the intensive care unit. In this study, the antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of rifampicin or carbapenem monotherapies were compared with rifampicin and carbapenem combination therapies against rifampicin-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. Among 29 CRAB isolates, 24/29 (83%) were resistant to rifampicin, with MIC values between 2-256 µg/mL. Checkerboard assays disclosed that combination therapies at FICIs between 1/8 and 1/4 improved the activity of carbapenems at subinhibitory concentrations. Time-kill kinetics indicated a 2- to 4-log reduction at 1/2 MIC rifampicin + 1/4 MIC carbapenem and 1/4 MIC rifampicin + 1/4 MIC carbapenem against the isolates, with the MIC values ranging from 2-8 µg/mL. The MTT assay revealed a dose-dependent decrease of the cell viability of established bacterial biofilm at 4 MIC rifampicin + 2 MIC carbapenems, with a percentage reduction of 44-75%, compared with monotherapies at 16 MIC. Scanning electron microscopy further confirmed bacterial cell membrane disruption, suggesting a synergism between carbapenem and rifampicin against a representative isolate. The findings demonstrated that the combination of rifampicin with carbapenems could improve antibacterial activities and eradicate established Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm.

The clinical and paraclinical effectiveness of four-hour infusion vs. half-hour infusion of high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam in treatment of critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock: An assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to determine whether critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis and septic shock may benefit from extended infusion of ampicillin/sulbactam compared with those receiving intermittent infusion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This randomized assessor-blinded clinical trial was conducted in the ICUs of Nemazee and Shahid Rajaee hospital, Shiraz, Iran, from August 2019 to August 2021. The participants randomly received 9 g Ampicillin/Sulbactam every 8 h by either extended (infused over 4 h) or intermittent (infused over 30 min) intravenous infusion if their estimated glomerular filtration rate based on Cockrorft-Gault formula was higher than 60 ml/min.

RESULTS

Totally, 136 patients were enrolled and allocated to the intervention and control groups, each with 68 patients. Clinical cure was significantly higher in the extended group (P = 0.039), but ICU and hospital length of stay did not differ between the groups (P = 0.87 and 0.83, respectively). The ICU (P = 0.031) and hospital (P = 0.037) mortality rates in the extended infusion group were significantly lower than those in the intermittent infusion group.

CONCLUSION

These data should be replicated in larger clinical trials before providing any recommendation in favor of this method of administration in clinical practice.

The effectiveness of colistin/levofloxacin compared to colistin/meropenem in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Background and purpose

The treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is still a great challenge. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the colistin/levofloxacin regimen compared to the usual colistin/meropenem regimen in the treatment of patients with VAP caused by CRAB.

Experimental approach

The patients with VAP were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 26) and control (n = 29) groups. The first group received IV colistin 4.5 MIU every 12 h + levofloxacin 750 mg IV daily, and the second group received IV colistin with the same dose + meropenem 1 g IV every 8 h for 10 days. The clinical (complete response, partial response, or treatment failure) and microbiological responses at the end of the intervention were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Findings/Results

The complete response rate was higher (n = 7; 35%) and the failure rate was lower (n = 4; 20%) in the experimental group than in the control group (n = 2; 8%, and n = 11; 44%, respectively), but the differences were not statistically significant. Even though the microbiological response rate was higher in the experimental group (n = 14; 70%) than in the control group (n = 12; 48%), the difference was not statistically significant. The mortality rate was 6 (23.10%) and 4 patients (13.8%) in the experimental and control groups, respectively (P = 0.490).

Conclusion and implication

The levofloxacin/colistin combination can be considered an alternative regimen to meropenem/colistin in the treatment of VAP caused by CRAB.

Synergism versus Additivity: Defining the Interactions between Common Disinfectants

Many of the most common disinfectant and sanitizer products are formulations of multiple antimicrobial compounds. Products claiming to contain synergistic formulations are common, although there is often little supporting evidence. The antimicrobial interactions of all pairwise combinations of common disinfectants (benzalkonium chloride, didecyldimethylammonium chloride, polyhexamethylene biguanide, chlorocresol, and bronopol) were classified via checkerboard assay and validated by time-kill analyses. Combinations were tested against Acinetobacter baumannii NCTC 12156, Enterococcus faecalis NCTC 13379, Klebsiella pneumoniae NCTC 13443, and Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 13143. Synergistic interactions were identified only for the combinations of chlorocresol with benzalkonium chloride and chlorocresol with polyhexamethylene biguanide. Synergism was not ubiquitously demonstrated against all species tested and was on the borderline of the synergism threshold. These data demonstrate that synergism between disinfectants is uncommon and circumstantial. Most of the antimicrobial interactions tested were characterized as additive. We suggest that this is due to the broad, nonspecific mechanisms associated with disinfectants not providing an opportunity for the combined activities of these compounds to exceed the sum of their parts.

Evaluation of the Synergistic Antibacterial Effects of Fosfomycin in Combination with Selected Antibiotics against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

The spread of multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens and the lagging pace in the development of novel chemotherapeutic agents warrant the use of combination therapy as a reliable, cost-effective interim option. In this study, the synergistic effects of fosfomycin in combination with other antibiotics were assessed. Of the 193 isolates, 90.6% were non-susceptible to fosfomycin, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ≥128 µg/mL. Antibacterial evaluation of fosfomycin-resistant isolates indicated multi-drug resistance to various antibiotic classes. Combinations of fosfomycin with 12 commonly used antibiotics synergistically inhibited most fosfomycin-resistant isolates. The fractional inhibitory concentration index indicated that combining fosfomycin with either aminoglycosides, glycylcyclines, fluoroquinolones, or colistin resulted in 2- to 16-fold reduction in the MIC of fosfomycin. Time-kill kinetics further confirmed the synergistic bactericidal effects of fosfomycin in combination with either amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, minocycline, tigecycline, or colistin, with more than 99.9% reduction in bacterial cells. Fosfomycin-based combination therapy might serve as an alternative option for the treatment of MDR A. baumannii. Further steps including in vivo efficacy and toxicity in experimental models of infection are required prior to clinical applications.

Synergistic antibacterial effects of colistin in combination with aminoglycoside, carbapenems, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, fosfomycin, and piperacillin on multidrug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

Multidrug resistant Enterobacterales have become a serious global health problem, with extended hospital stay and increased mortality. Antibiotic monotherapy has been reported ineffective against most drug resistant bacteria including Klebsiella pneumoniae, thus encouraging the use of multidrug therapies as an alternative antibacterial strategy. The present works assessed the antibacterial activity of colistin against K. pneumoniae isolates. Resistant isolates were tested against 16 conventional antibiotics alone and in combination with colistin. The results revealed that all colistin resistant isolates demonstrated multidrug resistance against the tested antibiotics except amikacin. At sub-inhibitory concentrations, combinations of colistin with amikacin, or fosfomycin showed synergism against 72.72% (8 of 11 isolates). Colistin with either of gentamicin, meropenem, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, moxifloxacin, minocycline, or piperacillin exhibited synergism against 81.82% (9 of 11 isolates). Combinations of colistin with either of tobramycin or ciprofloxacin showed synergism against 45.45% (5 in 11 isolates), while combinations of colistin with imipenem or ceftolozane and tazobactam displayed 36.36% (4 of 11 isolates) and 63.64% (7 of 11 isolates) synergism. In addition, combinations of colistin with levofloxacin was synergistic against 90.91% (10 of 11 isolates). The results revealed that combinations of colistin with other antibiotics could effectively inhibit colistin resistant isolates of K. pneumoniae, and thus could be further explore for the treatment of multidrug resistant pathogens.

Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapy with high-dose sulbactam or colistin with additional antibacterial agents for multiple drug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with high-dose sulbactam or colistin with additional antibacterial agents for treating multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB or XDR-AB) infections.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science (through March 30, 2020) for studies that examined high-dose sulbactam or colistin with additional antibacterial agents as therapy for patients with infections with MDR-AB and XDR-AB. Through a network meta-analysis (NMA), using both direct and indirect evidence, we determined risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Primary outcomes included clinical improvement, clinical cure, microbiological eradication, and mortality from any cause. Secondary outcomes included nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

The NMA included 18 studies and 1835 patients. We found that high-dose sulbactam (≥6 g per day), combined with another single antibacterial agent (levofloxacin or tigecycline), which were the highest ranking in clinical improvement and clinical cure. Still colistin-based combination in drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii therapy occupied the main position (the number of studies and patients) in most studies. Colistin combined with additional antibacterial agents was associated with a higher risk of nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic regimens including high-dose sulbactam in combination with additional antibacterial agents (including colistin) might be one of the promising options for the treatment of MDR-AB or XDR-AB infections and high-quality study will be needed to confirm clinical efficacy.

In Vitro Activities of Colistin and Sitafloxacin Combinations against Multidrug-, Carbapenem-, and Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Using the Broth Microdilution Checkerboard and Time-Kill Methods

Drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) infections are a critical global problem, with limited treatment choices. This study aims to determine the in vitro activities of colistin–sitafloxacin combinations against multidrug-, carbapenem- and colistin-resistant A. baumannii (MDR-AB, CRAB, CoR-AB, respectively) clinical isolates from tertiary care hospitals. We used the broth microdilution checkerboard and time-kill methods in this study. Synergy was found using both methods. The colistin–sitafloxacin combination showed synergy in MDR-AB, CRAB, and CoR-AB isolates (3.4%, 3.1%, and 20.9%, respectively). No antagonism was found in any type of drug-resistant isolate. The majority of CoR-AB isolates became susceptible to colistin (95.4%). The time-kill method also showed that this combination could suppress regrowth back to the initial inocula of all representative isolates. Our results demonstrated that the colistin–sitafloxacin combination might be an interesting option for the treatment of drug-resistant A. baumannii. However, further in vivo and clinical studies are required.

In vitro activity of colistin against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates harboring blaOXA-23-like and blaOXA-24-like genes: A multicenter based study

This study was aimed to evaluate occurrence of antibiotic resistance and the presence of resistance determinants among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. This cross-sectional study from January to September 2018 was performed on 59 A. baumannii strains isolated from clinical samples in the north of Iran. Isolates were identified by standard microbiologic tests and molecular method. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out by disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods. The presence of carbapenem resistance genes was detected by PCR method. All isolates were resistant to cefepime, meropenem, imipenem and ceftazidime. The lowest resistance rate was observed against doxycycline with 33.9%. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results showed that all carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) isolates were susceptible to colistin with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 1/2 µg/mL. Among 59 CRAB, blaOXA-23-like was the most prevalent gene (86.4%) followed by blaOXA-24-like (69.5%). Meanwhile, none of the clinical isolates harbored blaOXA-58-like gene. We found a high prevalence of CRAB strains harboring OXA-type carbapenemases in the north of Iran. Our results suggests that the presence of OXA-type genes was not directly correlated with the increase of imipenem MIC level, but can be clinically important as they contribute to the selection of CRAB strains.

Heteroresistance to colistin in oxacillinase-producing carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates from Gorgan, Northern Iran

OBJECTIVES

Colistin resistance rates are rising globally among multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, including Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii). A new type of resistance - heteroresistance - has also been reported to colistin in clinical A. baumannii isolates. This study investigated the presence of colistin heteroresistance in carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates.

METHODS

Different clinical specimens from hospitalised patients were investigated for A. baumannii. The MICs to imipenem, meropenem and colistin were determined by broth microdilution. PCR was performed to detect OXA-type carbapenemase genes (bla_OXA-23-like, bla_OXA-24/40-like, bla_OXA-51-like, bla_OXA-58-like, and bla_OXA-143-like). Heteroresistance to colistin was examined using the population analysis profiles method. Genotypic relatedness of the isolates was analysed by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-PCR (ERIC-PCR).

RESULTS

Overall, 71 A. baumannii isolates were recovered from clinical specimens. Of these, 27 (38.03%) and 44 (61.97%) isolates were carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant, respectively. In addition, 67 (94.36%) isolates were susceptible to colistin, with MICs between 0.25-2 μg/mL. Among the 44 selected carbapenem-resistant colistin-susceptible isolates, the frequency of bla_OXA-51-like, bla_OXA-23-like and bla_OXA-24/40-like genes was 100%, 77.27% and 43.18%, respectively. Nine of 44 (20.45%) isolates were characterised as colistin-heteroresistant with subpopulations growing at 6-8 μg/mL, whereas two of 44 (4.54%) presented heterogeneous subpopulations growing at up to 1 μg/mL of colistin. ERIC‑PCR typing clustered A. baumannii isolates to 10 common types (CT1-CT10) containing isolates from different hospitals and 12 single types (ST1-ST12).

CONCLUSIONS

A. baumannii with a colistin heteroresistance phenotype was common. This could be of great concern since colistin is often used as a last-resort drug for treating A. baumannii infections, highlighting that care is necessary with colistin monotherapy. In addition, more effective strategies and surveillance are required to confine and prevent the inter-hospital and/or intra-hospital dissemination of A. baumannii between therapeutic centres.

In vitro activities of colistin, imipenem and ceftazidime against drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in the south of Iran

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to determine in vitro activity of colistin and other agents against drug-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii.

RESULTS

This in vitro study performed on a collection of non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFB) consist of 18 A. baumannii and 21 P. aeruginosa isolates. Non-duplicated isolates (one per patient) were isolated from blood, endotracheal tube and sputum samples of hospitalized patients in the south of Iran. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of each isolate was determined using Epsilometer (E)-test strips containing colistin, imipenem, and ceftazidime. In overall, all A. baumannii isolates were non-susceptible to imipenem and ceftazidime. In contrast, all isolates were susceptible to colistin with MIC50 and MIC90 of 0.75/1.5 µg/mL, respectively. Antibiotic susceptibility results showed that 81% and 23.8% of P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime and imipenem, respectively. While, all of the P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to colistin with MIC50 and MIC90 of 0.5/1 µg/mL, respectively. In summary, colistin showed the promising in vitro activity against drug-resistant strains of two clinically important NFB in our region. However, investigation on a larger collection of drug-resistant strains demands to support these observations in the near future.