Antiretroviral drug resistance mutations among patients failing first-line treatment in Hanoi, Vietnam

Low prevalence of doravirine-associated resistance mutations among polish human immunodeficiency-1 (HIV-1)–infected patients

Introduction

Doravirine (DOR) is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that retains activity against common NNRTI resistance mutations. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of DOR resistance mutations compared with that of resistance mutations for other NNRTIs among HIV-1-infected treatment‐experienced and -naïve patients from Poland.

Methods

Resistance to DOR and other NNRTIs was assessed in two datasets: 1760 antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 patients and 200 treatment‐experienced patients. All 1960 sequences were derived from the patients using bulk sequencing. For resistance analyses, Stanford HIV drug resistance database scores were used.

Results

Overall, DOR resistance was present in 32 patients (1.62%), of whom 13 (0.74%) were naïve and 19 (9.50%) were treatment-experienced. The most common DOR resistance mutations observed among the naïve patients were A98G and K101E (0.2% each), and those among cART-experienced patients were L100I (2.0%), K101E, V108I, H221Y, and P225H (1.5% each). Furthermore, among the naïve patients, less common resistance to DOR (0.7%) compared with that to nevirapine (NVP) (2.1%; p = 0.0013) and rilpivirine (5.40%; p < 0.0001) was observed. For sequences obtained from treatment-experienced patients, the frequency of resistance to DOR (9.5%) was lower than that for efavirenz (25.5%; p < 0.0001) and NVP (26.0%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The frequency of transmitted drug resistance to DOR is low, allowing for effective treatment of antiretroviral treatment-naïve patients and rapid treatment initiation. In cART-experienced patients, this agent remains an attractive NNRTI option with a higher genetic barrier to resistance.

Characteristics of drug resistance in HIV-1 CRF55_01B from ART-experienced patients in Guangdong, China

BACKGROUND

HIV-1 acquired drug resistance (ADR) has become a critical clinical and public health issue. Recently, HIV-1 CRF55_01B has been found more frequently in the MSM population.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the characteristics of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and the extent of changes in drug susceptibility among ART-experienced CRF55_01B-infected adults of Guangdong.

METHODS

ADR was tested for immediately in CRF55_01B-infected patients with virological failure. Demographic and epidemiological information was collected. DRMs and antiretroviral susceptibility were interpreted using the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database HIVdb program.

RESULTS

Overall, 162 (4.78%) CRF55_01B isolates were identified from 2013 to 2018. Among DRMs, M184V (43.83%) was the most frequent NRTI DRM, followed by K65R (23.46%), and V179E (98.77%) was the most frequent NNRTI DRM, followed by K103N (47.53%) and Y181C (14.81%). According to the HIVdb program, 79.01% of the CRF55_01B-infected patients carried mutations conferring low-level or higher drug resistance to any of the three classes of ART drugs. Among PI DRMs, only one mutation affording low-level resistance to nelfinavir was found (0.62%). Among NRTI DRMs, a high proportion of high-level resistance to lamivudine (58.64%) and emtricitabine (58.02%) was found. As regards NNRTIs, more than 75% of patients carried efavirenz and nevirapine DRMs. The percentages of high-level resistance were 70.99%, 63.58%, 22.22%, 17.90% and 4.32% for nevirapine, efavirenz, rilpivirine, doravirine and etravirine, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

High frequencies of DRMs and resistance were observed among CRF55_01B-infected patients failing ART in Guangdong, and interventions may be considered to minimize ecological contributions to ART.

Concordance of genotypic resistance interpretation algorithms in HIV-1 infected patients: An exploratory analysis in Greece

PURPOSE

Genotypic resistance-related mutations in HIV-1 disease are often difficult to interpret. Different algorithms have been developed to provide meaningful application into clinical context. We aimed to compare, for the first time in Greece, the results of genotypic resistance derived from three interpretation algorithms.

METHODS

The sequences of 120 HIV 1-infected patients were tested for genotypic resistance to 19 antiretroviral (ARV) drugs (n = 2280 sequences). The interpretation results of Rega, ANRS and ViroSeq algorithms were compared.

RESULTS

Complete concordance was found for 2/19 ARV drugs, namely lamivudine and emptricitabine. Concordance was high for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and low for protease inhibitors (PIs). In inter-algorithm pairs, agreement was high between Rega and ViroSeq (kappa = 0.701), especially by ARV class, namely NRTIs (k = 0.869) and NNRTIs (k = 0.562). The only exception was noted for rilpivirine, where agreement was higher between ANRS and Rega (k = 0.410) compared to other inter-algorithm pairs (k = 0.018-0.055). By contrast, for PIs all comparisons yielded concordance equivalent to chance (k = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Our exploratory analysis provided evidence of significant inter-algorithm discordances, especially for PIs and NNRTIs highlighting the importance of matching the results of different algorithms to achieve optimized risk stratification. Ongoing research could assist clinical physicians in interpreting complex genotypic resistance patterns.