Clinical Outcomes Of Colistin In Combination With Either 6-G Sulbactam Or Carbapenems For The Treatment Of Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Pneumonia With High MIC To Sulbactam, A Prospective Cohort Study

Current Therapeutic Approaches for Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections

The treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections remains a challenge for physicians worldwide in the 21st century. The bacterium possesses a multitude of mechanisms to escape the human immune system. The consequences of A. baumannii infections on morbidity and mortality, as well on financial resources, remain dire. Furthermore, A. baumannii superinfections have also occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. While prevention is important, the antibiotic armamentarium remains the most essential factor for the treatment of these infections. The main problem is the notorious resistance profile (including resistance to carbapenems and colistin) that this bacterium exhibits. While newer beta lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors have entered clinical practice, with excellent results against various infections due to Enterobacteriaceae, their contribution against A. baumannii infections is almost absent. Hence, we have to resort to at least one of the following, sulbactam, polymyxins E or B, tigecycline or aminoglycosides, against multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) A. baumannii infections. Furthermore, the notable addition of cefiderocol in the fight against A. baumannii infections represents a useful addition. We present herein the existing information from the last decade regarding therapeutic advances against MDR/XDR A. baumannii infections.

Efficacy of combination therapy with standard-dose carbapenem for treating nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in intensive care units: A multicentre retrospective propensity score-matched study

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infection is common worldwide. Despite carbapenem resistance, standard-dose carbapenems are still used in clinical practice. Hence in this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and outcomes of a regimen containing standard-dose carbapenems with those of a regimen lacking carbapenems during the treatment of critically ill patients with CRAB nosocomial pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU). Initially, 735 patients were recruited for this multicentre retrospective cohort study. After exclusion, time-window bias adjustment, and propensity score matching, multiple clinical outcomes were compared between the carbapenem-containing (CC) (n = 166) and no carbapenem-containing (NCC) (n = 166) groups. The CC group showed a higher risk of clinical failure on day 7 than the NCC group (44.6% vs. 33.1%, P = 0.043). The lengths of ICU stay (21 and 16 days, P = 0.024) and hospital stay (61 and 44 days, P = 0.003) were longer in the CC group than in the NCC group. Multivariate analysis showed that the CC regimen was associated with higher clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.05-2.56, P = 0.031) and lower microbiological eradication (aOR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.23-1.00, P = 0.049) at day 7 than the NCC group. Thus, a regimen containing a standard dose of carbapenem should be prescribed with caution for treating CRAB nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU.

Prescription Pattern of Intravenous Fosfomycin in a Provincial Hospital in Thailand

BACKGROUND

In Thailand, active antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria are limited. The re-emergence of intravenous (IV) fosfomycin is an alternative. IV fosfomycin has broad-spectrum activity, relative safety, and availability. The limitations of the clinical use of IV fosfomycin include the lack of susceptibility reports and unclear dosing. Therefore, this study was designed to examine the prescription pattern of IV fosfomycin in Chonburi Hospital, a provincial hospital in Thailand.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective descriptive study involving in-patients aged ≥18 years who received IV fosfomycin between February 2019 and January 2020. Data were collected from the electronic patient records.

RESULTS

Of 265 patients, 254 (95.8%) and 11 (4.2%) received IV fosfomycin for treatment and prophylaxis, respectively. IV fosfomycin was prescribed for empirical and definitive treatment. All 166 organisms were Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including Enterobacterales (47.0%), Acinetobacter baumannii (44.0%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.0%). Moreover, 141 (87.6%) isolates were carbapenem-resistant GNB (CR-GNB). The most commonly used IV fosfomycin regimen contained colistin or aminoglycosides. Furthermore, 35.3% of the combination regimens contained one active antibiotic. The appropriate dosage of IV fosfomycin for treating urinary tract infection was 71.8%. The 14-day all-cause mortality rate in CR-GNB was 45.0%.

CONCLUSION

IV fosfomycin is reserved for secondary use in treating nosocomial infection with resistant GNB. It is used synergistically with other antibiotics. At least one active antibiotic and the optimal fosfomycin dosage should be considered. An antimicrobial stewardship program should be implemented for the optimal use of fosfomycin.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Colistin Combined with Sulbactam: 9 g per Day versus 12 g per Day in the Treatment of Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia: An Interim Analysis

Extensively drug-resistant A. baumannii (XDRAB) pneumonia has a high mortality rate in hospitalized patients. One of the recommended treatments is colistin combined with sulbactam; however, the optimal dosage of sulbactam is unclear. In an open-label, superiority, randomized controlled trial, patients diagnosed with XDRAB pneumonia were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive colistin in combination with sulbactam at either 9 g/day or 12 g/day. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate in the intention-to-treat population. A total of 88 patients received colistin in combination with sulbactam at a dosage of either 12 g/day (n = 45) or 9 g/day (n = 43). Trends toward a lower mortality rate were observed in the 12 g/day group at 7 days (11.1% vs. 23.3%), 14 days (33.3% vs. 41.9%), and 28 days (46.7% vs. 58.1%). The microbiological cure rate at day 7 was significantly higher in the 12 g/day group (90.5% vs. 58.1%; p = 0.02). Factors associated with mortality at 28 days were asthma, cirrhosis, APACHEII score ≥ 28, and a dosage of sulbactam of 9 g/day for mortality at any timepoint. Treatment with colistin combined with sulbactam at 12 g/day was not superior to the combination treatment with sulbactam at 9 g/day. However, due to being an interim analysis, this trial was underpowered to detect mortality differences.

Diagnosis and management of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria: guideline endorsed by the Italian Society of Infection and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT), the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI) and the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM)

Management of patients with infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach to achieve successful clinical outcomes. The aim of this paper is to provide recommendations for the diagnosis and optimal management of these infections, with a focus on targeted antibiotic therapy. The document was produced by a panel of experts nominated by the five endorsing Italian societies, namely the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM), the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT) and the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA). Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) questions about microbiological diagnosis, pharmacological strategies and targeted antibiotic therapy were addressed for the following pathogens: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. A systematic review of the literature published from January 2011 to November 2020 was guided by the PICO strategy. As data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were expected to be limited, observational studies were also reviewed. The certainty of evidence was classified using the GRADE approach. Recommendations were classified as strong or conditional. Detailed recommendations were formulated for each pathogen. The majority of available RCTs have serious risk of bias, and many observational studies have several limitations, including small sample size, retrospective design and presence of confounders. Thus, some recommendations are based on low or very-low certainty of evidence. Importantly, these recommendations should be continually updated to reflect emerging evidence from clinical studies and real-world experience.

Treatment of patients with serious infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: How viable are the current options?

This review critically appraises the published microbiologic and clinical data on the treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Despite being recognized as an urgent threat pathogen by the CDC and WHO, optimal treatment of patients with serious CRAB infections remains ill-defined. Few commercially available agents exhibit reliable in vitro activity against CRAB. Historically, polymyxins have been the most active agents in vitro, though interpretations of susceptibility data are difficult given issues surrounding MIC testing methodologies and lack of correlation between MICs and clinical outcomes. Most available preclinical and clinical data involve use of polymyxins, tetracyclines, and sulbactam, alone and in combination. As the number of viable treatment options is limited, combination therapy with a polymyxin is often used for patients with CRAB infections, despite the significant risk of nephrotoxicity. However, no treatment regimen has been found to reduce mortality, which exceeds 40% across most studies, or substantially improve clinical response. While some newer agents, such as eravacycline and cefiderocol, have demonstrated in vitro activity, clinical efficacy has not been fully established. New agents with clinically relevant activity against CRAB isolates and favorable toxicity profiles are sorely needed.

Systematic review on estimated rates of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity in patients treated with polymyxins

BACKGROUND

Nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity are commonly associated with polymyxin treatment; however, the emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with limited therapeutic options has resulted in increased use of polymyxins.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rates of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity during polymyxin treatment and whether any factors influence these.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched on 2 January 2020.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting nephrotoxicity and/or neurotoxicity rates in patients with infections treated with polymyxins were included. Reviews, meta-analyses and reports not in English were excluded.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients hospitalized with infections treated with systemic or inhaled polymyxins were included. For comparative analyses, patients treated with non-polymyxin-based regimens were also included.

METHODS

Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model; subgroup meta-analyses were conducted where data permitted using a mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, 237 reports of randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies were eligible for inclusion; most were single-arm observational studies. Nephrotoxic events in 35,569 patients receiving polymyxins were analysed. Overall nephrotoxicity rate was 0.282 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.259-0.307). When excluding studies where >50% of patients received inhaled-only polymyxin treatment or nephrotoxicity assessment was by methods other than internationally recognized criteria (RIFLE, KDIGO or AKIN), the nephrotoxicity rate was 0.391 (95% CI 0.364-0.419). The odds of nephrotoxicity were greater with polymyxin therapies compared to non-polymyxin-based regimens (odds ratio 2.23 (95% CI 1.58-3.15); p < 0.001). Meta-analyses showed a significant effect of polymyxin type, dose, patient age, number of concomitant nephrotoxins and use of diuretics, glycopeptides or vasopressors on the rate of nephrotoxicity. Polymyxin therapies were not associated with a significantly different rate of neurotoxicity than non-polymyxin-based regimens (p 0.051). The overall rate of neurotoxicity during polymyxin therapy was 0.030 (95% CI 0.020-0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Polymyxins are associated with a higher risk of nephrotoxicity than non-polymyxin-based regimens.

Enhanced bacterial killing with colistin/sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

AIMS

Polymyxin-based combination therapy is often used to treat carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) infections. Although sulbactam is intrinsically active against A. baumannii, few studies have investigated colistin/sulbactam combinations against carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii.

METHODS

Whole genome sequencing was undertaken on eight carbapenem-resistant (colistin-susceptible) isolates of A. baumannii from Chinese patients. Bacterial killing of colistin and sulbactam, alone and in combination, was examined with checkerboard (all isolates) and static and dynamic time-kill studies (three isolates). In the dynamic studies, antibiotics were administered in various clinically-relevant dosing regimens that mimicked patient pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

The eight isolates consisted of ST195, ST191 and ST208 belonging to clonal complex 208, which is the most epidemic clonal type of A. baumannii globally. All isolates possessed Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporinase (ADC-61 or ADC-78) and seven of eight isolates contained the carbapenem-resistance gene bla_OXA-23. The colistin/sulbactam combination was synergistic against two of eight isolates in checkerboard studies. In time-kill studies, rapid bacterial killing of ca. 3-6 log₁₀ CFU/mL was observed with colistin monotherapy, followed by steady regrowth. Sulbactam monotherapy was generally ineffective. Substantially enhanced bacterial killing was observed with colistin/sulbactam combinations in both static and dynamic models, especially with the higher sulbactam concentration (2 g) and/or longer sulbactam infusion time (2 hours) in the dynamic model.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was the first to use a pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics model to investigate synergistic activity of colistin/sulbactam combinations against A. baumannii. It showed that clinically-relevant dosing regimens of colistin combined with sulbactam may substantially improve bacterial killing of multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii.

Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapy with high-dose sulbactam or colistin with additional antibacterial agents for multiple drug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with high-dose sulbactam or colistin with additional antibacterial agents for treating multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB or XDR-AB) infections.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science (through March 30, 2020) for studies that examined high-dose sulbactam or colistin with additional antibacterial agents as therapy for patients with infections with MDR-AB and XDR-AB. Through a network meta-analysis (NMA), using both direct and indirect evidence, we determined risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Primary outcomes included clinical improvement, clinical cure, microbiological eradication, and mortality from any cause. Secondary outcomes included nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

The NMA included 18 studies and 1835 patients. We found that high-dose sulbactam (≥6 g per day), combined with another single antibacterial agent (levofloxacin or tigecycline), which were the highest ranking in clinical improvement and clinical cure. Still colistin-based combination in drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii therapy occupied the main position (the number of studies and patients) in most studies. Colistin combined with additional antibacterial agents was associated with a higher risk of nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic regimens including high-dose sulbactam in combination with additional antibacterial agents (including colistin) might be one of the promising options for the treatment of MDR-AB or XDR-AB infections and high-quality study will be needed to confirm clinical efficacy.

Acquired Genetic Elements that Contribute to Antimicrobial Resistance in Frequent Gram-Negative Causative Agents of Healthcare-Associated Infections

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a worldwide public health problem that reduces therapeutic options and increases the risk of death. The causative agents of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are drug-resistant microorganisms of the nosocomial environment, which have developed different mechanisms of AMR. The hospital-associated microbiota has been proposed to be a reservoir of genes associated with AMR and an environment where the transfer of genetic material among organisms may occur. The ESKAPE group (Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter aerogenes and Escherichia coli) is a frequent causative agents of HAIs. In this review, we address the issue of acquired genetic elements that contribute to AMR in the most frequent Gram-negative of ESKAPE, with a focus on last resort antimicrobial agents and the role of transference of genetic elements for the development of AMR.