Application of Droplet Digital PCR to Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae Infections: A Narrative Review

Applying improved ddPCR to reliable quantification of MPXV in clinical settings

Monkeypox virus (MPXV) poses a global health threat. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) holds potential as an accurate diagnostic tool for clinical microbiology. However, there is limited literature on the applicability of ddPCR in clinical settings. In this study, the clinical features of patients with MPXV during the initial outbreak in China in June 2023 were reviewed, and an optimized ddPCR method with dilution and/or inhibitor removal was developed to enhance MPXV detection efficiency. Eighty-two MPXV samples were tested from nine different clinical specimen types, including feces, urine, pharyngeal swabs, anal swabs, saliva, herpes fluid, crust, and semen, and the viral load of each specimen was quantified. A comparative analysis was performed with qPCR to assess sensitivity and specificity and to investigate the characteristics of MPXV infection by analyzing viral loads in different clinical specimens. Consequently, common pharyngeal and gastrointestinal symptoms were observed in patients with MPXV. The optimized ddPCR method demonstrated relatively high sensitivity for MPXV quantification in the clinical materials, with a limit of detection of 0.1 copies/μL. This was particularly evident in low-concentration samples like whole blood, semen, and urine. The optimized ddPCR demonstrated greater detection accuracy compared with normal ddPCR and qPCR, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.939. Except for crust samples, viral loads in the specimens gradually decreased as the disease progressed. Virus levels in feces and anal swabs kept a high detection rate at each stage of post-symptom onset, and feces and anal swabs samples may be suitable for clinical diagnosis and continuous monitoring of MPXV.

IMPORTANCE

The ddPCR technique proved to be a sensitive and valuable tool for accurately quantifying MPXV viral loads in various clinical specimen types. The findings provided valuable insights into the necessary pre-treatment protocols for MPXV diagnosis in ddPCR detection and the potentially suitable sample types for collection. Therefore, such results can aid in comprehending the potential characteristics of MPXV infection and the usage of ddPCR in clinical settings.

Droplet digital PCR vs. quantitative real time-PCR for diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Tuberculosis is a rising global public health emergency. Then, it is a priority to undertake innovations in preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic methods. Improved diagnostic methods for tuberculosis are urgently needed to address this global epidemic. These methods should be rapid, accurate, affordable, and able to detect drug-resistant tuberculosis. The benefits of these new diagnostic technics include earlier diagnosis and treatment, improved patient outcomes, and reduced economic burden. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the diagnostic performance of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-a third-generation PCR-compared with quantitative Real Time-PCR (qPCR) for diagnosing pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. We included 14 diagnostic accuracy test studies performed in Asia, Europe, and Latin America, 1,672 participants or biological samples, and 975 events (pulmonary or extrapulmonary tuberculosis). Most of the included studies had a low risk of bias (QUADAS-C tool). Sensitivity and specificity were lower for ddPCR [0.56 (95% CI 0.53-0.58) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.98), respectively] than for qPCR [0.66 (95% CI 0.60-0.71) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99), respectively]. However, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was higher for ddPCR than for qPCR (0.97 and 0.94, respectively). Comparing both AUCs using the Hanley & McNeil method, we found statistically significant differences (AUC difference of 4.40%, p = 0.0020). In the heterogeneity analysis, we found significant differences between both techniques according to the continent of origin of the study and the location of tuberculosis (pulmonary or extrapulmonary disease). The AUCs of both methods were similar in pulmonary tuberculosis. However, for extrapulmonary tuberculosis, the AUC was higher for ddPCR. We found some limitations: (1) significant heterogeneity of the studies, and (2) we could not perform subgroup analyses according to other relevant variables, such as the age and sex of the participants. Nonetheless, this study is the first meta-analysis that shows that ddPCR has a comparable diagnostic performance than qPCR for pulmonary tuberculosis. However, for extrapulmonary tuberculosis, ddPCR has a better discriminant capacity to differentiate between patients with and without extrapulmonary tuberculosis. We conclude that ddPCR is likely the best diagnostic technic for tuberculosis diagnosis, especially for extrapulmonary tuberculosis. More studies are still needed yet.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022382768, CRD42022382768.

Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Sputum Samples Using Droplet Digital PCR Targeting mpt64

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the top 10 causes of death worldwide. It is challenging to find methods of diagnosis of active pulmonary TB that are sensitive enough to detect cases for proper treatment before unintentional transmission. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a highly sensitive method to detect genetic material of pathogens, but it has rarely been used for diagnosis of TB. This study compared the sensitivity of ddPCR with that of GeneXpert and AFB smear microscopy in 180 leftover sputum samples from patients suspected of having TB on the basis of clinical symptoms and radiography. Absolute quantification of copy numbers of MTB-specific genes was possible using ddPCR targeting the mpt64 gene. Among the 180 samples, 41.1% were diagnosed as having TB using ddPCR. The sensitivities of AFB smear microscopy, GeneXpert and ddPCR were 41.9%, 82.4% and 100%, respectively. AFB smear microscopy and GeneXpert both had a specificity of 100%, and the specificity of ddPCR was 95.3%. The accuracy of ddPCR (97.2%) is higher than that of GeneXpert (92.7%). This robust ddPCR system could potentially be used as a method for early diagnosis of TB.

Highly Sensitive Detection of Isoniazid Heteroresistance in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis by Droplet Digital PCR

Purpose

The drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis constitutes a major public health threat. Existing approaches make it challenging to detect low levels of drug-resistant TB, also known as heteroresistance (HR), in a population. The recently found droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a sensitive method for determining the precise amount of nucleic acid in a sample. We used ddPCR to test the Mycobacterium tuberculosis heteroresistance because it delivers more exact quantitative data without the need for a reference curve.

Patients and Methods

A TaqMan-MGB probe mutation detection assay was developed in order to determine the mutant and wild-type sequences of the isoniazid resistance katG (315) gene. We produced heteroresistant MTB combinations, which were subsequently identified by ddPCR, qPCR, and MeltPro/INH. In addition, 21 clinical sputum samples with positive smears were used to validate each method’s capacity to determine HR in sputum.

Results

We discovered that ddPCR can detect mutant sequences in as few as 0.01% of a combination. DeepMelt TB/INH, which is less sensitive in comparison, cannot detect HR with high resolution and requires a mutation rate of 50% to identify. qPCR likewise has a high resolution of 0.02%, but unlike ddPCR, it cannot determine the exact number of mutations. Our assay is applicable to sputum as well. ddPCR found a katG 315 substitution in two sputums with extremely low values of HR (0.26% and 0.14%). In 21 samples of clinical sputum, the HR prevalence of INH was 9.5%.

Conclusion

This work demonstrates that a well-designed ddPCR HR detection test can detect low levels of HR with high accuracy and consistency and gives new information for the clinical diagnosis of drug resistance.