Review of Treatment Options for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation and Chronic Idiopathic Constipation

A real-world study of persistence and adherence to prescription medications in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation in the United States

BACKGROUND

At present, 4 prescription therapies have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) in adults.

OBJECTIVES

To compare persistence with and adherence to prucalopride vs 3 other prescription medications for CIC in a US population.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort study used data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental Databases (January 2015-June 2020). Inclusion criteria were patients (aged ≥18 years) with at least 1 prescription fill for prucalopride, lubiprostone, linaclotide, or plecanatide on or after April 2, 2019 (commercial availability of prucalopride), and at least 1 constipation-related diagnosis code. Persistence was assessed by time to discontinuation, and adherence was assessed by the proportion of days covered (PDC) and the proportion of patients who achieved PDC of at least 80%. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for discontinuation and odds ratios for adherence were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 14,700 patients (mean age = 48.3 years; female = 81.9%) were included (prucalopride, n = 675; lubiprostone, n = 1,591; linaclotide, n = 11,105; plecanatide, n = 1,329). After adjusting for confounding factors, the HRs for discontinuation were significantly higher for all comparator medications compared with prucalopride after 2 months (HR [95% CI]: lubiprostone, 1.70 [1.48-1.95]; linaclotide, 1.25 [1.10-1.41]; plecanatide, 1.31 [1.13-1.51], all P < 0.001). The unadjusted mean (SD) PDC was 0.53 (0.32) with prucalopride compared with 0.41 (0.31); P less than 0.001 with lubiprostone, 0.48 (0.31), P less than 0.05 with linaclotide, and 0.48 (0.29), P = 0.98 with plecanatide. The comparator medications were all associated with lower odds of achieving PDC of at least 80% relative to prucalopride (odds ratio [95% CI]: lubiprostone, 0.52 [0.40-0.69], P < 0.001; linaclotide, 0.73 [0.58-0.93], P = 0.009; plecanatide, 0.70 [0.53-0.93], P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study indicate that prucalopride has higher treatment persistence and adherence compared with other CIC prescription medications. This research represents the first instance of a real-world claims study showcasing such outcomes.

Review of the Patient Burden and Therapeutic Landscape of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation in the United States

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of the gut-brain axis. IBS with constipation (IBS-C) accounts for approximately one-third of IBS cases and is associated with substantial burden of illness and decreased quality of life. This narrative review provides an overview of the current and upcoming treatment options and disease management for IBS-C from a US perspective and discusses the importance of the relationship between patient and health care provider in diagnosis and treatment. A positive diagnostic strategy for IBS-C is recommended, based on clinical history, physical examination, and minimal laboratory tests. An effective communication strategy between patients and health care professionals is essential to ensure early diagnosis and reduce both health care costs and overall disease burden. Treatment typically begins with lifestyle interventions and nonpharmacologic options, such as dietary interventions, fiber supplements, and osmotic laxatives. In patients with inadequate response to these therapies, 4 currently available therapies (lubiprostone, linaclotide, plecanatide, and tenapanor) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration may relieve IBS-C symptoms. These agents are generally well tolerated and efficacious in improving IBS-C symptoms, including constipation and abdominal pain. In patients with persistent abdominal pain and/or psychological symptoms, brain-gut behavioral therapy or neuromodulator therapy may be beneficial.

An exploration of fibre intake and bowel function in a sample of adults at an Irish university campus

BACKGROUND

Bowel dysfunction can significantly impair quality of life. Adequate fibre intake is associated with good bowel health but intakes have been reported to be low in Ireland.

AIM

This study aimed to gather data on fibre intake and bowel habits in a cohort of adults at a university campus in Dublin, Ireland.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was developed by adapting validated tools to assess habitual fibre intake and bowel function. The questionnaire was circulated through mailing lists and advertised via QR codes on campus in February/March 2023. Data was analysed using SPSS, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In total, 275 valid responses were received. Low fibre intakes (< 19 g/day) were found in 50.5% of participants. A significantly higher proportion of males had low fibre intake compared to females (62.2% vs 44.8%, p = 0.039). Nearly a third (30.2%) of respondents experienced mild symptoms of bowel dysfunction, and 13.1% experienced moderate to severe symptoms. An inverse relationship was observed between fibre intake (g/day) and bowel dysfunction (p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, low fibre intakes and some degree of bowel dysfunction were prevalent. Public health campaigns to increase fibre intake could prove to be a cost-effective way to improve bowel function and health amongst adults in Ireland.

Efficacy and safety of linaclotide in treating functional constipation in paediatric patients: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Linaclotide, a guanylate cyclase C agonist, has been approved in the USA for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation in adults. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of linaclotide in paediatric patients aged 6-17 years with functional constipation.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study was done at 64 clinic or hospital sites in seven countries (USA, Canada, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Ukraine, and Estonia). Patients aged 6-17 years who met modified Rome III criteria for functional constipation were randomly assigned (1:1), with a block size of four and stratified by age (6-11 years and 12-17 years), to receive either oral linaclotide 72 μg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Participants, investigators, and data assessors were masked to assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in the 12-week frequency rate of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs; occurring in the absence of rescue medication on the calendar day of or before the bowel movement) per week and the secondary efficacy endpoint was CFB in stool consistency over the 12-week treatment period; efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients in the randomised population who received at least one dose of study intervention (modified intention-to-treat population and safety population, respectively). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04026113, and the functional constipation part of the study is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 1, 2019, and March 21, 2022, 330 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to linaclotide (n=166) or placebo (n=164). Two patients in the linaclotide group did not receive any treatment; thus, efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed in 328 patients (164 patients in each group). 293 (89%) patients completed the 12-week treatment period (148 in the linaclotide group and 145 in the placebo group). 181 (55%) of 328 patients were female and 147 (45%) were male. At baseline, the mean frequency rate for SBMs was 1·28 SBMs per week (SD 0·87) for placebo and 1·16 SBMs per week (0·83) for linaclotide, increasing to 2·29 SBMs per week (1·99) for placebo and 3·41 SBMs per week (2·76) for linaclotide during intervention. Compared with placebo (least-squares mean [LSM] CFB 1·05 SBMs per week [SE 0·19]), patients treated with linaclotide showed significant improvement in SBM frequency (LSM CFB 2·22 SBMs per week [0·19]; LSM CFB difference 1·17 SBMs per week [95% CI 0·65-1·69]; p<0·0001). Linaclotide also significantly improved stool consistency over placebo (LSM CFB 1·11 [SE 0·08] vs 0·69 [0·08]; LSM CFB difference 0·42 [95% CI 0·21-0·64]; p=0·0001). The most reported treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) by patients treated with linaclotide was diarrhoea (seven [4%] of 164 vs three [2%] of 164 patients in the placebo group) and by patients treated with placebo was COVID-19 (five [3%] vs four [2%] in the linaclotide group). The most frequent treatment-related TEAE was diarrhoea (linaclotide: six [4%] patients; placebo: two [1%] patients). One serious adverse event of special interest (treatment-related severe diarrhoea resulting in dehydration and hospitalisation) occurred in a female patient aged 17 years in the linaclotide group; this case resolved without sequelae after administration of intravenous fluids. No deaths occurred during the study.

INTERPRETATION

Linaclotide is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment for functional constipation in paediatric patients and has subsequently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication.

FUNDING

AbbVie and Ironwood Pharmaceuticals.

Beneficial Effects of Limosilactobacillus fermentum in the DCA Experimental Model of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Rats

Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716, a probiotic strain isolated from human milk, has reported beneficial effects on different gastrointestinal disorders. Moreover, it has shown its ability to restore altered immune responses, in association with microbiome modulation in different pathological conditions. Therefore, our aim was to assess the effects of a Limosilacbacillus fermentum CECT5716 in a rat experimental model of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) that resembles human IBS. The experimental IBS was induced by deoxycholic acid (DCA) in rats and then, Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 (109 CFU/day/rat) was administered. Behavioral studies, hyperalgesia and intestinal hypersensitivity determinations were performed and the impact of the probiotic on the inflammatory and intestinal barrier integrity was evaluated. Additionally, the gut microbiota composition was analyzed. Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 attenuated the anxiety-like behavior as well as the visceral hypersensitivity and referred pain. Moreover, this probiotic ameliorated the gut inflammatory status, re-establishing the altered intestinal permeability, reducing the mast cell degranulation and re-establishing the gut dysbiosis in experimental IBS. Therefore, our results suggest a potential use of Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 in clinical practice for the management of IBS patients.

Intestinal anti-inflammatory and visceral analgesic effects of a Serpylli herba extract in an experimental model of irritable bowel syndrome in rats

Ethnopharmacological relevance:Serpylli herba extract (SHE), composed of the aerial parts of wild thyme (Thymus serpyllum L.) (Lamiaceae family), is traditionally used in Europe and North Africa to treat diarrhea, gastric ulcers, intestinal parasites and upper respiratory tract infections. Recently, SHE has generated a great interest for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) management, probably due to its intestinal anti-inflammatory properties shown in experimental colitis and the fact that its active components could preserve the intestinal barrier integrity, which is altered in patients with IBS.

Aim of study: We aimed to test the effects of a SHE in a rat experimental model resembling human IBS.

Materials and methods: IBS was provoked by deoxycholic acid (DCA). Rats were then treated with SHE (100 mg/kg) or gabapentin (70 mg/kg) and different inflammatory and gut barrier integrity markers were evaluated. Moreover, several gut hypersensitivity and hyperalgesia determinations were performed.

Results: SHE improved referred pain and visceral hypersensitivity. Additionally, SHE enhanced immune status by downregulating of the expression of the pro-inflammatory mediators Il-1β, Il-6, Ifn-γ, Tlr-4, and the inducible enzyme Cox-2, thus inducing visceral analgesia, and promoting the restore of the gut barrier function by upregulating the mucins Muc-2 and Muc-3. These anti-inflammatory effects could be related to its action on mast cells since it significantly inhibited the β-Hexosaminidase production in RBL-2H3 cells. Lastly, SHE also seems to modulate the serotonin pathway by restoring the altered expression of the 5-HT receptors Htr-3 and Htr-4.

Conclusion: SHE could be considered a potential new treatment for IBS, since it ameliorates hypersensitivity, visceral hyperalgesia, and inflammation. These beneficial effects may be due to the inhibition of mast cells degranulation and serotonin pathway.

Vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a prevalent and complex gastrointestinal disorder characterized by chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. Observational studies have suggested a relationship between serum vitamin D levels and IBS symptoms. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the clinical effects of vitamin D supplementation on IBS symptom severity and quality of life (QoL) measures.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Data abstraction and quality assessment were conducted by four authors independently, and discrepancies were resolved through consensus from the senior author. Continuous data were pooled with standardized mean difference (SMD) using the DerSimonian and Laird's random-effects model. Sensitivity analysis by risk of bias and potentially "predatory" publication were performed as well.

RESULTS

A total of 685 patients across eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Vitamin D supplementation significantly improved IBS symptom severity scale scores, with a SMD of -0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.47 to -0.07, P = 0.04, I²  = 91%). Improvements in IBS-QoL scores were also observed, albeit not statistically significant (SMD 0.54; 95% CI -0.34 to 1.41, P = 0.15, I²  = 87%). However, small sample sizes, a relatively young study population, limited ethnicities, and varied vitamin D dosing strategies across the studies were notable limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin D supplementation could be part of our clinical armamentarium when managing IBS patients due to the potential efficacy and good safety profile. Further randomized, controlled trials are required to confirm the therapeutic effects.