Gene Mutation Analysis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Using a Multi-Gene Panel in China

Real-life utility of five-gene panel test in preoperative thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a large cohort of 740 patients study

PURPOSE

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is an effective method to discriminate malignant thyroid nodules but reaches indeterminate results in approximately 30% of cases. Molecular testing can improve the diagnostic accuracy of FNA. This study aimed to investigate the real-life utility of the five-gene panel testing in thyroid FNAs.

METHODS

759 thyroid nodules from 740 patients under FNAs were retrospectively enrolled. Gene mutation information and clinical parameters, including age, gender, tumor size, and lymph node metastasis, were respectively recorded. Cytological results were classified based on The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). We analyzed mutational hotspots in BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, and TERT genes from FNA specimens. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated to assess diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

We identified 549 five-gene mutations in 759 nodules (72.3%), and the mutation frequency increased from the lower TBSRTC category to the upper category. BRAF.p.V600E showed the highest mutation incidence (71.3%) in the five-gene panel, correlated with the small to medium diameter (p = 0.008, p = 0.012) and high cytological categories (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the combination of FNA cytology and five-gene detection were 96.83%, 100%, 100%, 42.86%, and 96.90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The mutation frequency of the five-gene panel is 72.3% in thyroid FNAs. BRAF.p.V600E has the highest alteration rate, which is closely associated with tumor size and cytological results. The five-gene panel can improve the sensitivity and accuracy of FNA cytology, which may represent a valid adjunct technique in distinguishing thyroid nodules.

Spectrum of BRAF Aberrations and Its Potential Clinical Implications: Insights From Integrative Pan-Cancer Analysis

B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (BRAF) is frequently altered in multiple cancer types, and BRAF V600 mutations act as a prime target for precision therapy. Although emerging evidence has investigated the role of BRAF, the comprehensive profiling of BRAF expression, alteration and clinical implications across various cancer types has not been reported. In this study, we used the TCGA dataset, covering 10,967 tumor samples across 32 cancer types, to analyze BRAF abnormal expression, DNA methylation, alterations (mutations and amplification/deletion), and their associations with patient survival. The results showed that BRAF expression, alteration frequency, mutation site distribution, and DNA methylation patterns varied tremendously among different cancer types. The expression of BRAF was found higher in PCPG and CHOL, and lower in TGCT and UCS compared to normal tissues. In terms of pathological stages, BRAF expression was significantly differentially expressed in COAD, KIRC, LUSC, and OV. The methylation levels of BRAF were significantly lower in LUSC, HNSC, and UCEC compared to normal tissue. The expression of BRAF and downstream gene (ETS2) was negatively correlated with methylation levels in various cancers. The overall somatic mutation frequency of BRAF was 7.7% for all cancer samples. Most fusion transcripts were found in THCA and SKCM with distinct fusion patterns. The majority of BRAF mutations were oncogenic and mainly distributed in the Pkinase_Tyr domain of THCA, SKCM, COADREAD, and LUAD. The BRAF mutations were divided into five levels according to the clinical targeted therapy implication. The results showed level 1 was mainly distributed in SKCM, COADREAD, and LUAD, while level 3B in THCA. The overall BRAF CNV frequency was about 42.7%, most of which was gain (75.9%), common in GBM, TGCT, and KIRP. In addition, the forest plot showed that increased BRAF expression was associated with poor patient overall survival in LIHC, OV, and UCEC. Taken together, this study provided a novel insight into the full alteration spectrum of BRAF and its implications for treatment and prognosis.