Future Research in General Medicine Has Diverse Topics and is Highly Promising: Opinions Based on a Questionnaire Survey

A Questionnaire Study of Leadership in General Medicine: General Physicians in Japan are Facing Challenges in Education and Research

Purpose

General physicians are required to demonstrate diverse leadership skills depending on their environment. It is essential for them to understand the characteristics of the medical institutions to which they belong and put this understanding into practice. Leadership skills are acquired through experience and training, and their acquisition is a goal in various medical training programs. However, these leadership skills are difficult to acquire because the specific leadership skills required in clinical practice, education, and research are not well defined. For example, in clinical practice, general physicians need to lead initiatives to improve patient outcomes, resource utilization, and the quality of medical care. However, the specific leadership skills required for these tasks are not explicitly defined. Based on the survey results on the leadership types that general physicians value in clinical practice, research, and education, in addition to expert opinions and a literature survey, we aimed to establish the leadership type necessary in general medicine.

Patients and Methods

A cross-sectional anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted from February 2 to 29, 2024, using Google Forms sent through email, targeting members of the Japan Society of Hospital General Medicine. The survey comprised multiple-choice and descriptive questions.

Results

Notably, 286 physicians responded to the survey (response rate: 12.5%); 82.9% were males. Of these, 56.3% said they could explain what leadership constitutes, and 57.0% wanted to attend leadership training. When asked about the most-demanded leadership types in each scenario, democratic and transformational leadership were the most selected in clinical practice (52.4%) and in education and research (26.6% and 31.8%, respectively), respectively.

Conclusion

Transformational leadership was the most important leadership type in education and research, indicating that many general physicians face challenges in these areas. Therefore, developing strategies to improve leadership skills in education and research within general medicine is crucial.

How Do We Establish the Utility and Evidence of General Medicine in Japan?

Hospital Medicine in the United States has achieved significant progress in the accumulation of evidence. This development has influenced the increasing societal demand for General Medicine in Japan. Generalists in Japan actively engage in a wide range of interdisciplinary clinical practices, education, and management. Furthermore, Generalists have also contributed to advances in research. However, there is limited evidence regarding the benefits of General Medicine in Japan in all these areas, with most of the evidence derived from single-center studies. In Japan, the roles of Generalists are diverse, and the comprehensive definition of General Medicine makes it difficult to clearly delineate its scope. This results in an inadequate accumulation of evidence regarding the benefits of General Medicine, potentially making it less attractive to the public and younger physicians. Therefore, it is necessary to categorize General Medicine and collect clear evidence regarding its benefits.

The Milestones of Clinical Research for Young Generalist Physicians: Conducting and Publishing Studies

Clinical physicians have the potential to contribute to the progress of medicine and healthcare through research based on their diagnostic and treatment practices and supported by their educational background. However, in the field of general medicine in Japan, publication of such research in international journals may be limited by challenges in English proficiency and the lack of opportunities to focus on specific research themes amidst the diverse range of diseases treated in clinical practice. Furthermore, novice researchers without prior research experience may lack a comprehensive understanding of the overall research process, including study design and article publication. To address these challenges, we developed a set of 22 milestones that highlight the necessary skills required to conduct and successfully publish clinical research. This guideline will enable novice researchers to identify and address individual barriers to undertaking a research project. These milestones are categorized into five parts: 1) preparing to undertake research; 2) conducting clinical research; 3) writing the article; 4) submitting and achieving acceptance for publication; and 5) advanced skills. For each part, we provide detailed recommendations on the specific steps and methods involved. By working through these 22 milestones, novice researchers can objectively assess their own level of achievement as researchers and continuously clarify the next step of each round of research. Through this set of milestones, we aim to increase the quality and quantity of research publications in general medicine in academic journals, ideally enhancing the overall research process and advancing the field of medicine and healthcare overall.

Five strategies on writing research papers for beginners and young general medicine doctors

We propose five important strategies for young generalists to write original research and papers. We hope that even beginners will understand and practice these five strategies, and help young generalist to write research papers based on clinical questions that arise in their daily practice.

Comparing Japanese University Hospitals' and Community Healthcare Facilities' Research Contributions on PubMed

Purpose

Although research in general medicine is important, the contributions and characteristics of general medicine physicians (GMPs) in university hospitals (UH) and community healthcare facilities (CHF) remains unclear. Therefore, this study examines the popularity of research by affiliation, characteristics of journal publication, annual trends, and differences in impact factors (IFs) of journal publications.

Methods

This study is a secondary bibliometric analysis of articles in international journals published in PubMed over the past six years (2015-2020). The analysis compared English articles published by either UH- or CHF-affiliated GMPs in Japan in terms of, among other things, article type, research field, and IF.

Results

Of the 2372 articles analyzed, 1688 (71.2%) were published by physicians affiliated with UHs, 62.6% of which were original. Basic research, international collaboration, and ratio of IFs were significantly higher for such papers. In contrast, the number of CHF articles were significantly higher in the areas of clinical research and practice, with a greater proportion of case reports. There was no significant difference in IF between the disciplines within each affiliation, but the IF was the highest in experimental basic research and the lowest in medical and clinical education. In the six-year time series, the number of original papers by UHs and CHFs increased roughly twofold between 2015 and 2020, but the number of articles in the areas of medical education and healthcare quality and safety remained mostly unchanged.

Conclusion

The number of international papers published by Japanese GMPs has increased since 2015, particularly in terms of original papers and clinical research from UHs. However, there was no significant difference in the IF between UH and CHF publications. Our findings can guide the development of indicators, research, and education strategies regarding Japanese GMPs' research performance.